JamieAubrey wrote: »Yes............ with a 6 month ( or how ever long they need ) hiatus and fix all the bugs etc before adding new content
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »I don't know how you do it Champ . You attract more salty posts then anyone else . It's almost a super power at this point .
I voted yes, because literally 1/2 of the game is unplayable. Literally unplayable. That’s PvP by the way, for those who have no clue what I was referencing at. Plus, it would be an awesome gesture toward the community. It would show that ZOS is more than aware of this huge setback, and looks to make amends in some way.
Brutusmax1mus wrote: »I want them to communicate better as restitution. This has been handled by a bunch of kids.
who's responsible? What happened? What's been done? What's being done? What's the time frame? What's your plan to ensure it doesn't happen again? How do you plan on updating us with progress?
Brutusmax1mus wrote: »I want them to communicate better as restitution. This has been handled by a bunch of kids.
who's responsible? What happened? What's been done? What's being done? What's the time frame? What's your plan to ensure it doesn't happen again? How do you plan on updating us with progress?
They do though.
They say stuff like `Soon`, and `We are constantly working to improve the game` and special one liners like, `You know you dont need to be here, right?
@Rohamad_Ali Please do me a favor, and analyze every response that people have had to this poll regarding that players should not be compensated. Then, proceed with asking the following question after reading them: “Does this make sense in any logical way?”
If the answer(s) you come across are: “Yes.” Then take a note of it. If the answer(s) you come across are: “No.” Then take a note of that as well. Mind you, this is a favor of opinion. But, there is a hidden question in that 1 question that I’m asking you as well. You’re a highly intelligent person, and I have a very strong feeling you’ll grasp the true question that I’m asking you here. You don’t have to answer said question, either. Nor report back with said findings after making your analysis. It’s more of a thing of 1 buddy trying to help another see things for what they truly are.
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »@Rohamad_Ali Please do me a favor, and analyze every response that people have had to this poll regarding that players should not be compensated. Then, proceed with asking the following question after reading them: “Does this make sense in any logical way?”
If the answer(s) you come across are: “Yes.” Then take a note of it. If the answer(s) you come across are: “No.” Then take a note of that as well. Mind you, this is a favor of opinion. But, there is a hidden question in that 1 question that I’m asking you as well. You’re a highly intelligent person, and I have a very strong feeling you’ll grasp the true question that I’m asking you here. You don’t have to answer said question, either. Nor report back with said findings after making your analysis. It’s more of a thing of 1 buddy trying to help another see things for what they truly are.
I think anyone paying for a sub should get some compensation when things go on longer then a few days . An ZoS does too . You just have to contact them directly . I've been compensated a couple times . I don't care what the community really thinks when it comes to my money lol .
Brutusmax1mus wrote: »I want them to communicate better as restitution. This has been handled by a bunch of kids.
who's responsible? What happened? What's been done? What's being done? What's the time frame? What's your plan to ensure it doesn't happen again? How do you plan on updating us with progress?
Apache_Kid wrote: »Brutusmax1mus wrote: »I want them to communicate better as restitution. This has been handled by a bunch of kids.
who's responsible? What happened? What's been done? What's being done? What's the time frame? What's your plan to ensure it doesn't happen again? How do you plan on updating us with progress?
"Who's responsible" lmaoooo the man wants names. I'm dead
Agreed. I don’t know why the ESO community is so tolerant to mistreatment. It’s sad, really. I have never seen a collective group of people who are so submissive to a group of video game developers. The only exceptions are Blizzard fanboys, and Sonic fanboys. The Sonic fanboys only recently realized the error of their ways, but the damage has been done already. And the community has transformed into something both atrocious and disturbing. Blizzard fanboys on the other hand are slowly catching on to not supporting devs who mistreat their consumers (the Overwatch community in particular), but for the most part are still incredibly submissive.
But then again, I suppose it is their money and time afterall. You can’t really tell someone what to support, and what not to support. It’s their money and time to use however they see fit. If they want to defend a company who repeatedly breaks promises, and unapologetically continues dishing out poorly performing crap update after update? They are 100% entitled to do so.
The ratio of this poll is a huge eye opener, however. Very insightful stuff indeed. With the responses further solidifying bits of speculation that I had about a few things.
People always want something for nothing.
Whilst some players undoubtedly experience poor performance, it isn't always ZO$' fault. Equally well many others don't have any problems playing ESO.
Wouldn't ZO$ do better to spend their time and resources finding ways to improve matters where they can, rather than dishing out compensation to the whiners?
How are people who want compensation for paying for something (let alone a subscription) that doesn’t work for a prolonged period of time a bunch of whiners? Are you kidding me?
The amount of folks who will defend ZOS’ incompetence is absolutely astonishing. Incredible really. And I thought Apple fanboys and Blizzard fanboys were extremely loyal. Sheesh. The ESO community is starting to become almost as bad as the Sonic fan-base. And trust me. You all do NOT want the reputation of the Sonic community.