Bonzodog01 wrote: »They know the cause of the problems with the NA servers, and have asked the people concerned (AT&T) to fix it for them. Those people have shrugged their shoulders and admitted that the routing hardware isn't up to the task, but, well, it would be too much like actually spending money to do something about it. In the meantime, ZOS's NA hosting provider can go swing.The problem in NA has been acutely identified in the hop just before the hosting site. ZOS are more or less powerless (apart from phonecalls pleading and begging and asking for router reboots) to do much more than they have about it.
I have a sneaking suspicion that its going to get very legal, and if we all know AT&T, thats a couple of years of paperwork before anything gets actioned.
In short, those on NA are up the creek without a paddle right now.
Funny, after half a dozen attempts I can log in, then there aren't any further issues till the next time I log in.
Sure doesn't sound like at&t to me. Cool story though.
Can't log in, your na server got issues ZOS!
Bonzodog01 wrote: »They know the cause of the problems with the NA servers, and have asked the people concerned (AT&T) to fix it for them. Those people have shrugged their shoulders and admitted that the routing hardware isn't up to the task, but, well, it would be too much like actually spending money to do something about it. In the meantime, ZOS's NA hosting provider can go swing.The problem in NA has been acutely identified in the hop just before the hosting site. ZOS are more or less powerless (apart from phonecalls pleading and begging and asking for router reboots) to do much more than they have about it.
I have a sneaking suspicion that its going to get very legal, and if we all know AT&T, thats a couple of years of paperwork before anything gets actioned.
In short, those on NA are up the creek without a paddle right now.
Can't log in, your na server got issues ZOS!
Seems a little funny that ZOS wouldn't just say that in the forum threads, or at least put a link to it somewhere so that the players who are spending good money on subs would at least know.
I mean - we send them our money thinking that they'll look out for us as part of the deal, and they hide stuff that would let us make informed decisions?
Thats just tacky at the very least, and something else at a higher level.
TheAngelofDeath99 wrote: »Bonzodog01 wrote: »They know the cause of the problems with the NA servers, and have asked the people concerned (AT&T) to fix it for them. Those people have shrugged their shoulders and admitted that the routing hardware isn't up to the task, but, well, it would be too much like actually spending money to do something about it. In the meantime, ZOS's NA hosting provider can go swing.The problem in NA has been acutely identified in the hop just before the hosting site. ZOS are more or less powerless (apart from phonecalls pleading and begging and asking for router reboots) to do much more than they have about it.
I have a sneaking suspicion that its going to get very legal, and if we all know AT&T, thats a couple of years of paperwork before anything gets actioned.
In short, those on NA are up the creek without a paddle right now.
Well ***.
Sorry about ranting at you ZOS. Hopefully AT&T will quit being a**holes and do something.