There is an important factor many of you don't understand yet. Other than in games like Neverwinter Online which are F2P, people have bought their games. And it's a completely different thing to ban a paying customer.
So, let's assume there's a video of you botting. Possible answers:
- "I just like to farm in peace."
- "I don't speak English."
- "My chat is off."
- "I had to take a ***."
- "Doesn't matter. I AM NOT A BOT. That's my final statement. Were you next to me in front of my computer and saw the bot running? And took a video of THAT? No? Well, sucks to be you, ZOS. I am not a bot. I am a consumer and I paid for this game. I want to play it. Unban me, or else!"
Now, US is one thing. But don't underestimate the consumer support in the EU. If you're taking a promised service away from your customer, you have to refund him + pay for damages. Furthermore, if you're not closing your game completely, but actually banning single individuals, you don't wanna face the anti-discrimination laws.
Oh yeah, there's also chargeback. ZOS may not care too much about individual chargebacks per se, but if many people do that in the EU, ZOS might get banned from accepting EU payments. Of course they can try to see if they have a case on every single chargeback, but "customer is right" until you prove 100% that it was his fault. Not 99%. So unless you have a video of the customer in his home launching the bot, your chances are pretty bad.
The reason hackers got unbanned was not that ZOS is too friendly. The reason was that the hackers simply answered "I don't know anything about hacks, it was all legit!" and threatened with customer protection authorities.
When ESO was relatively new and management was unexperienced, they could just log on and manually ban every bot like in that video. But by now, they have already faced multiple incidents with authorities and, unless you're actively promoting mass murder in real life, nothing will ever happen. If you go too far (botting, cheating, etc.), they might ban you. But a "I paid for it, unban me, or else!" is enough as long as you're in the EU.
Banning one person might sound simple, but this is the exact definition of discrimination: providing to many while excluding one. And trust me, you don't wanna mess with people that are able to shut you down with one signature. And chances are ZOS already got at least one warning. As many online services.
#EUlife
If you wanna understand why botters aren't being banned (anymore), feel free to read my wall of text:There is an important factor many of you don't understand yet. Other than in games like Neverwinter Online which are F2P, people have bought their games. And it's a completely different thing to ban a paying customer.
So, let's assume there's a video of you botting. Possible answers:
- "I just like to farm in peace."
- "I don't speak English."
- "My chat is off."
- "I had to take a ***."
- "Doesn't matter. I AM NOT A BOT. That's my final statement. Were you next to me in front of my computer and saw the bot running? And took a video of THAT? No? Well, sucks to be you, ZOS. I am not a bot. I am a consumer and I paid for this game. I want to play it. Unban me, or else!"
Now, US is one thing. But don't underestimate the consumer support in the EU. If you're taking a promised service away from your customer, you have to refund him + pay for damages. Furthermore, if you're not closing your game completely, but actually banning single individuals, you don't wanna face the anti-discrimination laws.
Oh yeah, there's also chargeback. ZOS may not care too much about individual chargebacks per se, but if many people do that in the EU, ZOS might get banned from accepting EU payments. Of course they can try to see if they have a case on every single chargeback, but "customer is right" until you prove 100% that it was his fault. Not 99%. So unless you have a video of the customer in his home launching the bot, your chances are pretty bad.
The reason hackers got unbanned was not that ZOS is too friendly. The reason was that the hackers simply answered "I don't know anything about hacks, it was all legit!" and threatened with customer protection authorities.
When ESO was relatively new and management was unexperienced, they could just log on and manually ban every bot like in that video. But by now, they have already faced multiple incidents with authorities and, unless you're actively promoting mass murder in real life, nothing will ever happen. If you go too far (botting, cheating, etc.), they might ban you. But a "I paid for it, unban me, or else!" is enough as long as you're in the EU.
Banning one person might sound simple, but this is the exact definition of discrimination: providing to many while excluding one. And trust me, you don't wanna mess with people that are able to shut you down with one signature. And chances are ZOS already got at least one warning. As many online services.
#EUlife
Do people even still do this? Haven't seen rubberbanders since I started playing again.
You seem to be missing the term 'wrongful' in there.If you wanna understand why botters aren't being banned (anymore), feel free to read my wall of text:
Now, US is one thing. But don't underestimate the consumer support in the EU. If you're taking a promised service away from your customer, you have to refund him + pay for damages.
StackonClown wrote: »Zenny - Just... just fix it please...
It is annoying to say the least... I feel sorry for new players in the starter zones who would be confused and overwhelmed by all the bot spamming at Anchors.
It's a shame.. I remember when i first came across Dolmens and there were 2 or 3 other players.. It was chaotic but really fun to run the dolmen and complete it..
I reported two today for botting at Vulkhel Guard dolemen, but I don't know WHY WE, the players, have to report them since all a GM would have to do is visit there for themselves. It makes me wonder if ZOS is being disingenuous with their comments about taking it seriously, considering many people commenting about reporting players only to find them back doing the same botting again. I mean, really, it's EASY for a GM to see this for themselves, visit a dolemen by a major city, and they will see it for themselves and IF they are being 'serious' about getting rid of them... then BAM 'insta-ban'.