bloodthirstyvampire wrote: »Problem is elitist sensei might be a horrible teacher
DeadlyPhoenix wrote: »ve or negative survey as to how helpful said mentor was.
This way you can see who is truly helping and those that just want the rewards.
ZOS should look at the Dota 2 new user experience. Mentoring and advanced tutorials are desperately needed because this game seems to have a very high percentage of players who are new to MMOs and online gaming in general.
First just to clear it up, the forums star system isn't a path to community ambassador, as not all the new ambassadors were high ranked forums posters and there were a number of people who outranked me when I was offered the position.Nordicly_Responsible wrote: »I see your point, and my thinking is not just a reward system, but perhaps a rating based reward system. Instead of anyone can queue up for these rewards, it'd be something more like uber (or the star system that got your community ambassador title). Meaning, the person you mentored could rate you. If you were legitimately helpful, then there'd be a little reward. It could be as simple as a non-combat pet. If you were $#!+ then there'd be nothing. And you don't just get a reward for helping people, it'd have to almost be a following, or an achievement type deal where x players rated you a 5* kinda thing. That way, it'd reduce the troll's ability just to "grind newbies" but also incentivise people to be kinder to newer players.
I'm not suggesting this because I care about the rewards. But we were all new once, and while.
IcyDeadPeople wrote: »DOTA2 has a really good program for this. No idea what the incentives are, but it is a rather complicated game, and the first time I tried it I was completely lost until I was paired with mentor. This person did a really good job teaching me how to play.