BrightOblivion wrote: »Your "solution" and blatantly biased poll choices do absolutely nothing to contend with those guilds who use bots to pay for their spots, which is against the ToS from any angle.
If they're selling them for real money, report them. If they aren't, it's shady but not against the rules. Sigh, congratulate yourself on your integrity, and move on.
And for all those suggesting to lock the trader on guild disband, you're just going to have shadow guilds buying up spots and leaving them fallow to eliminate competition, limiting the number of actual guilds to buy from. I'll be honest. I'd rather have shady business practices than empty/blank guild traders who do nothing but waste time and space.
disintegr8 wrote: »Why not get rid of PVP - because I might only want to play PVE, or vice-versa, or get rid of vMA, because I have no interest in it so it shouldn't exist.puffytheslayer wrote: »just get rid of traders already - im sorry but if i wanted to play with money id play monopoly!
The game contains things you are and are not interested in, just ignore the traders and trading if you don't like them and leave others to use them if they choose.
Some people take trading way too seriously. It's a game for funsies FFS.
or another fix could be make a guild unable to be disbanded for 2 weeks after creation,not perfect but at least the planning would become tougher
FrancisCrawford wrote: »I fail to see what's so bad about this, to the extent that it is true.
They could also make it so that people can bid with a lower amount and make it so if the highest bidding guild disbands the second highest bidder would be the new highest (this would be like a scoreboard, if the top one goes away the second place will be the new top, and if that goes away it will be the one just below that and so on). If they make it this way it would be next to impossible to use shell guilds to secure a cheap trader since legit guilds could make their offer even if it is lower than the one from a fake guild.
hellcatlizzieb16_ESO wrote: »There's way too many ways for large syndicates and alliance guilds to monopolies traders.
I help with a smaller trade guild and we don't have the numbers/donations to always get a trader anymore due to the 'dummy' guilds. When we do, it's not a good trader. To get to the level where we can we would have to ally which we don't want to do. I think the whole trader system needs a full overhaul tbh.
DRXHarbinger wrote: »Once I hit 150M gold on PC EU, I am going to front for my guilds and actually block off Mournhold or Craglorn for 2-3 weeks so not a single one of these guilds will be able to trade there, nothing will be on sale in town when this happens. ETA about a month and I should be there, Don't care about the size of the outrageous bids that'll go down or how much I lose, I'll always make more. Feel the need to troll the trolls.
More simple solutions.. a Guild cannot bid on a trader within it's 1st month of creation.. that'll stamp it out instantly.
or another fix could be make a guild unable to be disbanded for 2 weeks after creation,not perfect but at least the planning would become tougher
They don't disband the guild, they drop their membership below the requirement for the store, and they lose the store, meanwhile the guild leader of their real guild is standing waiting for it to drop so he can snatch it up.FrancisCrawford wrote: »I fail to see what's so bad about this, to the extent that it is true.
It means that the lesser trade guilds get less of a chance to own a trader because the major trade guilds are holding onto multiple fake guilds and monopolizing the traders.
There's not enough traders available to provide one to every guild in the game as it is, the guilds doing this are making that number of available traders smaller and smaller.
They don't disband the guild, they drop their membership below the requirement for the store, and they lose the store, meanwhile the guild leader of their real guild is standing waiting for it to drop so he can snatch it up.
DRXHarbinger wrote: »Once I hit 150M gold on PC EU, I am going to front for my guilds and actually block off Mournhold or Craglorn for 2-3 weeks so not a single one of these guilds will be able to trade there, nothing will be on sale in town when this happens. ETA about a month and I should be there, Don't care about the size of the outrageous bids that'll go down or how much I lose, I'll always make more. Feel the need to troll the trolls.
why would u do that? i dont see a good reason?More simple solutions.. a Guild cannot bid on a trader within it's 1st month of creation.. that'll stamp it out instantly.
actually this is something i like.
DRXHarbinger wrote: »DRXHarbinger wrote: »Once I hit 150M gold on PC EU, I am going to front for my guilds and actually block off Mournhold or Craglorn for 2-3 weeks so not a single one of these guilds will be able to trade there, nothing will be on sale in town when this happens. ETA about a month and I should be there, Don't care about the size of the outrageous bids that'll go down or how much I lose, I'll always make more. Feel the need to troll the trolls.
why would u do that? i dont see a good reason?More simple solutions.. a Guild cannot bid on a trader within it's 1st month of creation.. that'll stamp it out instantly.
actually this is something i like.
Because it'll be communicated that the week after I intend to make bids of 10m per trader and it will happen. And then if they wish to continue to collude then it'll be too expensive to prove viable thus causing huge loses and maybe it'll die down. No trader makes anywhere near that kind of cheese.
Having the guild trader sit empty for a week is a terrible idea and will only create a new problem where the larger guilds deliberately lock out traders in order to restrict points of sale.
A partial solution would be to disable the disbanding of a guild that has an active trader.
Having the guild trader sit empty for a week is a terrible idea and will only create a new problem where the larger guilds deliberately lock out traders in order to restrict points of sale.
A partial solution would be to disable the disbanding of a guild that has an active trader.
I imagine that that first one would be a ban-able offence, but I agree that it could also introduce an entirely new set of problems. That second one though.. not being able to disband while holding a trader.. I think you're on to something!
@ZOS_GinaBruno @ZOS_JessicaFolsom