Since "Both" isn't an option, I chose "other".
I rolled a Stam Warden and friend rolled a Mag Warden. We're easily duoing most content...including some world bosses.
Running 5pc Hunding's Rage and 5pc Defiler. I'm doing about 12-18k sloppy DPS at level 20.
Wardens have really good "burst" dps.


Since "Both" isn't an option, I chose "other".
I rolled a Stam Warden and friend rolled a Mag Warden. We're easily duoing most content...including some world bosses.
Running 5pc Hunding's Rage and 5pc Defiler. I'm doing about 12-18k sloppy DPS at level 20.
Wardens have really good "burst" dps.
Nemesis7884 wrote: »why are the colors switched in the poll and below? its really confusing
stileanima wrote: »Magicka Warden isn't as weak as everyone is touting. Can do 34-35k DPS sustained with good group synergy and a little bit of self awareness.
But yeah, certainly isn't the strongest when it comes to PvE DPS in trials. Hopefully the class will receive a little bit of TLC.
stileanima wrote: »Magicka Warden isn't as weak as everyone is touting. Can do 34-35k DPS sustained with good group synergy and a little bit of self awareness.
But yeah, certainly isn't the strongest when it comes to PvE DPS in trials. Hopefully the class will receive a little bit of TLC.
No matter how many times we keep saying this, some people can't seem to figure Warden out. They continue to claim it's weak, but is it actually weak or is it a L2P issue for them? I know I can certainly deal a lot of damage, but I also see people using some of Warden's weakest skills and then complaining about lack of damage. Go figure.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »stileanima wrote: »Magicka Warden isn't as weak as everyone is touting. Can do 34-35k DPS sustained with good group synergy and a little bit of self awareness.
But yeah, certainly isn't the strongest when it comes to PvE DPS in trials. Hopefully the class will receive a little bit of TLC.
No matter how many times we keep saying this, some people can't seem to figure Warden out. They continue to claim it's weak, but is it actually weak or is it a L2P issue for them? I know I can certainly deal a lot of damage, but I also see people using some of Warden's weakest skills and then complaining about lack of damage. Go figure.
35k is not good DPS... It's 5-6k behind the other classes.
Once again, you contribute nothing to the discussion with your comments. You said it yourself in the other thread: you don't do endgame content. These posts are very specifically discussing endgame DPS.
Anything and everything is viable for overland questing.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »stileanima wrote: »Magicka Warden isn't as weak as everyone is touting. Can do 34-35k DPS sustained with good group synergy and a little bit of self awareness.
But yeah, certainly isn't the strongest when it comes to PvE DPS in trials. Hopefully the class will receive a little bit of TLC.
No matter how many times we keep saying this, some people can't seem to figure Warden out. They continue to claim it's weak, but is it actually weak or is it a L2P issue for them? I know I can certainly deal a lot of damage, but I also see people using some of Warden's weakest skills and then complaining about lack of damage. Go figure.
35k is not good DPS... It's 5-6k behind the other classes.
Once again, you contribute nothing to the discussion with your comments. You said it yourself in the other thread: you don't do endgame content. These posts are very specifically discussing endgame DPS.
Anything and everything is viable for overland questing.
I wouldn't say 35k dps is bad though, sure magsorc, magdk can outperform that, but 35k is more than enough to clear Trials HM with, heck you can even clear them with all dps only having 20k dps, as long as you keep everyone up. At 35k you'll just be dps'ing at the speed that you avoid mechanics rather than complete them while doing the trial (as intended).
That is to say, having high dps will ofcourse make it a lot easier since you spend less time dealing with things, thus your survivability goes up, so it's ofcourse preferred to have high dps. Although ZoS has been on a steady streak of trying to keep dps in check so we'd actually have to deal with mechanics in a trial rather than out-dps them, especially with this patch aimed at sustain, but that is a whole other issue.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »35k is not good DPS... It's 5-6k behind the other classes.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »35k doesn't leave you any wiggle room though. Someone without BiS or a mediocre rotation will be hitting <30k. Whereas a sorc or DK without BiS gear and a crappy rotation would still be at 35k (since they'd be dropping off from a much higher point).
stileanima wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »35k is not good DPS... It's 5-6k behind the other classes.MLGProPlayer wrote: »35k doesn't leave you any wiggle room though. Someone without BiS or a mediocre rotation will be hitting <30k. Whereas a sorc or DK without BiS gear and a crappy rotation would still be at 35k (since they'd be dropping off from a much higher point).
I agree with you entirely on these points. In my screenshots above, I had relatively high uptimes of the Shadow Blessing (100% in one of them, and when is that ever going to realistically happen in any trial scenario?), could reliably pop all synergies when needed, and of course, was standing at a stationary target. So even though my overall DPS would be increased in trials by raid buffs, and even though I can maybe squeeze 1-2k more out of this class beating on a skeleton with a bit more practice (and perhaps luck), yeah... pretty far behind what you would get out of any other class. Not to mention those tests were done using the Eternal Guardian ultimate, which would be the inferior ultimate choice in a good amount of situations (i.e., anything with more than one or two targets). Considering the Eternal Guardian has accounted for an astonishing 17-18% of my total DPS for most parses, removing it would only serve to hurt the class's performance in spite of replacing it with the Destro Ult or Meteor.
Apparently Magicka Warden buffs are incoming, so we will just have to hold out until then before passing any sort of "final" judgement.
stileanima wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »35k is not good DPS... It's 5-6k behind the other classes.MLGProPlayer wrote: »35k doesn't leave you any wiggle room though. Someone without BiS or a mediocre rotation will be hitting <30k. Whereas a sorc or DK without BiS gear and a crappy rotation would still be at 35k (since they'd be dropping off from a much higher point).
I agree with you entirely on these points. In my screenshots above, I had relatively high uptimes of the Shadow Blessing (100% in one of them, and when is that ever going to realistically happen in any trial scenario?), could reliably pop all synergies when needed, and of course, was standing at a stationary target. So even though my overall DPS would be increased in trials by raid buffs, and even though I can maybe squeeze 1-2k more out of this class beating on a skeleton with a bit more practice (and perhaps luck), yeah... pretty far behind what you would get out of any other class. Not to mention those tests were done using the Eternal Guardian ultimate, which would be the inferior ultimate choice in a good amount of situations (i.e., anything with more than one or two targets). Considering the Eternal Guardian has accounted for an astonishing 17-18% of my total DPS for most parses, removing it would only serve to hurt the class's performance in spite of replacing it with the Destro Ult or Meteor.
Apparently Magicka Warden buffs are incoming, so we will just have to hold out until then before passing any sort of "final" judgement.
So your screenshots show a DPS test with a fellow player providing synergies and what else? Elemental Drain? Anything else? I just like to quantify numbers I see, since many people post DPS numbers totally solo, and others post them with buffs/debuffs/synergies provided by a teammate.