IcyDeadPeople wrote: »Isn't barrier better than magma armor?
brandonv516 wrote: »Currently running sorcerer healer and will continue to do so. Great burst, plenty of options for sets, great sustain (even without cp).
There's some positive talk about new classes of healers... I know it sucks templars, but it was for the better.
There's already discussion on how to make dk healers... got to say might be there time to shine as mentioned in patch notes they fixed the healing skill of their's, only class with major mending though admittedly if they get hit it's gone, but still ease access. With sustain issues dk healers will have ingenous weapons and dps could slot new potions combinations. ( merchants this is your chance to make gold) They have group shield switch between bone shield which cost less since there class shield returns stamina. (They get a buff in stamina return as they already have low stamina). Imagine a magma amour on dk healers... you might never have complete wipes again. Sets they might use are the group shield sets along with maybe lamina song. Don't forget by using ult you regain back.
The nightblade healer seems to be suffering from cost the most, but still can pull off dps and healing the best. It's doing well with class based breech, majority viality and other things might make them excellent members for trials, and healer and off healer.
Templar seems to be not fairing too bad. There's definitely some anger, but generally it's cooling down and people settle down and realize it's not much different. They still have more power burst healer than warden though less than sorrecer healer. They have very very important purtify and nova along with other skills. Seems like easiest class to use for healing
Warden not as OP as it seems on paper, there's already adjusting it's balance with major mending, zos does care. It's definetly a fun class, but it's definatly a jack all trades class. I say good for battlegrounds and off tank in trials. It's not a replacement for Templar healer. Sure maybe warden could go in trials as healer, but so could other four with equal cons and pros
Sorcerer healers... we really are amazing. I defiantly out powered the scrub warden healers, mind they still don't know what they are doing, yet I am rooting for them for best pet healer. They have better access to minor intellect. (10% regain in magicka), can give major beserk to allies, large healing aoe that stuns area, minor prophecy, three bars options, ... and you know dark exchange. As it should be sorcerer healer has best resource management. .
If I had to bet, best healing class might be dragon knight coming up
Where are these "partial lifts" coming from? Are you getting permission to say this? Or are you just saying that as an excuse to post.
IcyDeadPeople wrote: »
There's some positive talk about new classes of healers... I know it sucks templars, but it was for the better.
There's already discussion on how to make dk healers... got to say might be there time to shine as mentioned in patch notes they fixed the healing skill of their's, only class with major mending though admittedly if they get hit it's gone, but still ease access. With sustain issues dk healers will have ingenous weapons and dps could slot new potions combinations. ( merchants this is your chance to make gold) They have group shield switch between bone shield which cost less since there class shield returns stamina. (They get a buff in stamina return as they already have low stamina). Imagine a magma amour on dk healers... you might never have complete wipes again. Sets they might use are the group shield sets along with maybe lamina song. Don't forget by using ult you regain back.
The nightblade healer seems to be suffering from cost the most, but still can pull off dps and healing the best. It's doing well with class based breech, majority viality and other things might make them excellent members for trials, and healer and off healer.
Templar seems to be not fairing too bad. There's definitely some anger, but generally it's cooling down and people settle down and realize it's not much different. They still have more power burst healer than warden though less than sorrecer healer. They have very very important purtify and nova along with other skills. Seems like easiest class to use for healing
Warden not as OP as it seems on paper, there's already adjusting it's balance with major mending, zos does care. It's definetly a fun class, but it's definatly a jack all trades class. I say good for battlegrounds and off tank in trials. It's not a replacement for Templar healer. Sure maybe warden could go in trials as healer, but so could other four with equal cons and pros
Sorcerer healers... we really are amazing. I defiantly out powered the scrub warden healers, mind they still don't know what they are doing, yet I am rooting for them for best pet healer. They have better access to minor intellect. (10% regain in magicka), can give major beserk to allies, large healing aoe that stuns area, minor prophecy, three bars options, ... and you know dark exchange. As it should be sorcerer healer has best resource management. .
If I had to bet, best healing class might be dragon knight coming up
Poor Templars.
DKs healers might become stronger healers than templars. At least DKs can reliably keep their mending up by shield stacking - Harness magica + Igneous Shield and here you go you have your major mending for 6 seconds.
Major mending isn't that great and they will still need all those resources to keep shields up. I suppose if it gets so bad they will nerf... but for now how many dragon knights healers are in game? They still don't have a burst heal so there's weakness.
The sensible templar healers aren't noticing much difference, the heals are weaker and everyone is suffering for substain so we need to find a sweet spot, but not really the changes are for the better. More healers are going to be in queue! More diverse gameplay!
There's some positive talk about new classes of healers... I know it sucks templars, but it was for the better.
There's already discussion on how to make dk healers... got to say might be there time to shine as mentioned in patch notes they fixed the healing skill of their's, only class with major mending though admittedly if they get hit it's gone, but still ease access. With sustain issues dk healers will have ingenous weapons and dps could slot new potions combinations. ( merchants this is your chance to make gold) They have group shield switch between bone shield which cost less since there class shield returns stamina. (They get a buff in stamina return as they already have low stamina). Imagine a magma amour on dk healers... you might never have complete wipes again. Sets they might use are the group shield sets along with maybe lamina song. Don't forget by using ult you regain back.
The nightblade healer seems to be suffering from cost the most, but still can pull off dps and healing the best. It's doing well with class based breech, majority viality and other things might make them excellent members for trials, and healer and off healer.
Templar seems to be not fairing too bad. There's definitely some anger, but generally it's cooling down and people settle down and realize it's not much different. They still have more power burst healer than warden though less than sorrecer healer. They have very very important purtify and nova along with other skills. Seems like easiest class to use for healing
Sorcerer healers... we really are amazing. I defiantly out powered the scrub warden healers, mind they still don't know what they are doing, yet I am rooting for them for best pet healer. They have better access to minor intellect. (10% regain in magicka), can give major beserk to allies, large healing aoe that stuns area, minor prophecy, three bars options, ... and you know dark exchange. As it should be sorcerer healer has best resource management. .
If I had to bet, best healing class might be dragon knight coming up
Dk's healing...
ROFL I'm sorry, but I did NOT make my DK's for that purpose. One stam, one magicka, both are supposed to be DPS or tank. I'd rather leave the game then try to heal with them. If healing is your thing, then bless you! I appreciate it. I just don't see how DK's should in any world, be able to heal better than a Templar. Sorcs on the otherhand, that's a little different.I could see that well before DK's.
There's some positive talk about new classes of healers... I know it sucks templars, but it was for the better.
There's already discussion on how to make dk healers... got to say might be there time to shine as mentioned in patch notes they fixed the healing skill of their's, only class with major mending though admittedly if they get hit it's gone, but still ease access. With sustain issues dk healers will have ingenous weapons and dps could slot new potions combinations. ( merchants this is your chance to make gold) They have group shield switch between bone shield which cost less since there class shield returns stamina. (They get a buff in stamina return as they already have low stamina). Imagine a magma amour on dk healers... you might never have complete wipes again. Sets they might use are the group shield sets along with maybe lamina song. Don't forget by using ult you regain back.
The nightblade healer seems to be suffering from cost the most, but still can pull off dps and healing the best. It's doing well with class based breech, majority viality and other things might make them excellent members for trials, and healer and off healer.
Templar seems to be not fairing too bad. There's definitely some anger, but generally it's cooling down and people settle down and realize it's not much different. They still have more power burst healer than warden though less than sorrecer healer. They have very very important purtify and nova along with other skills. Seems like easiest class to use for healing
Sorcerer healers... we really are amazing. I defiantly out powered the scrub warden healers, mind they still don't know what they are doing, yet I am rooting for them for best pet healer. They have better access to minor intellect. (10% regain in magicka), can give major beserk to allies, large healing aoe that stuns area, minor prophecy, three bars options, ... and you know dark exchange. As it should be sorcerer healer has best resource management. .
If I had to bet, best healing class might be dragon knight coming up
Did you try all of this out or are you speculating?
jcasini222ub17_ESO wrote: »Do you have to aim your twilight heal?
jcasini222ub17_ESO wrote: »Do you have to aim your twilight heal?
is this "new meta" abt healing dungeons or healing vet trial?
i'm not too worried abt dungeons. i'm just unhappy that vMOL is becoming even more out of my league when i try hard to git gud enough to get a clear.
is this "new meta" abt healing dungeons or healing vet trial?
i'm not too worried abt dungeons. i'm just unhappy that vMOL is becoming even more out of my league when i try hard to git gud enough to get a clear.
There's some positive talk about new classes of healers... I know it sucks templars, but it was for the better.
There's already discussion on how to make dk healers... got to say might be there time to shine as mentioned in patch notes they fixed the healing skill of their's, only class with major mending though admittedly if they get hit it's gone, but still ease access. With sustain issues dk healers will have ingenous weapons and dps could slot new potions combinations. ( merchants this is your chance to make gold) They have group shield switch between bone shield which cost less since there class shield returns stamina. (They get a buff in stamina return as they already have low stamina). Imagine a magma amour on dk healers... you might never have complete wipes again. Sets they might use are the group shield sets along with maybe lamina song. Don't forget by using ult you regain back.
The nightblade healer seems to be suffering from cost the most, but still can pull off dps and healing the best. It's doing well with class based breech, majority viality and other things might make them excellent members for trials, and healer and off healer.
Templar seems to be not fairing too bad. There's definitely some anger, but generally it's cooling down and people settle down and realize it's not much different. They still have more power burst healer than warden though less than sorrecer healer. They have very very important purtify and nova along with other skills. Seems like easiest class to use for healing
Warden not as OP as it seems on paper, there's already adjusting it's balance with major mending, zos does care. It's definetly a fun class, but it's definatly a jack all trades class. I say good for battlegrounds and off tank in trials. It's not a replacement for Templar healer. Sure maybe warden could go in trials as healer, but so could other four with equal cons and pros
Sorcerer healers... we really are amazing. I defiantly out powered the scrub warden healers, mind they still don't know what they are doing, yet I am rooting for them for best pet healer. They have better access to minor intellect. (10% regain in magicka), can give major beserk to allies, large healing aoe that stuns area, minor prophecy, three bars options, ... and you know dark exchange. As it should be sorcerer healer has best resource management. .
If I had to bet, best healing class might be dragon knight coming up
Poor Templars.
DKs healers might become stronger healers than templars. At least DKs can reliably keep their mending up by shield stacking - Harness magica + Igneous Shield and here you go you have your major mending for 6 seconds.
Major mending isn't that great and they will still need all those resources to keep shields up. I suppose if it gets so bad they will nerf... but for now how many dragon knights healers are in game? They still don't have a burst heal so there's weakness.
The sensible templar healers aren't noticing much difference, the heals are weaker and everyone is suffering for substain so we need to find a sweet spot, but not really the changes are for the better. More healers are going to be in queue! More diverse gameplay!
leaderboard is out of my league, i am still progressing to try get a clear.
meta shift is one thing i don't mind.
but:
1. are the player characters (4 current classes) all weakened across the board?
2. will the difficulty of end game pve content (mob damage mob hp etc) be adjusted with the players new power level?
There's some positive talk about new classes of healers... I know it sucks templars, but it was for the better.
There's already discussion on how to make dk healers... got to say might be there time to shine as mentioned in patch notes they fixed the healing skill of their's, only class with major mending though admittedly if they get hit it's gone, but still ease access. With sustain issues dk healers will have ingenous weapons and dps could slot new potions combinations. ( merchants this is your chance to make gold) They have group shield switch between bone shield which cost less since there class shield returns stamina. (They get a buff in stamina return as they already have low stamina). Imagine a magma amour on dk healers... you might never have complete wipes again. Sets they might use are the group shield sets along with maybe lamina song. Don't forget by using ult you regain back.
The nightblade healer seems to be suffering from cost the most, but still can pull off dps and healing the best. It's doing well with class based breech, majority viality and other things might make them excellent members for trials, and healer and off healer.
Templar seems to be not fairing too bad. There's definitely some anger, but generally it's cooling down and people settle down and realize it's not much different. They still have more power burst healer than warden though less than sorrecer healer. They have very very important purtify and nova along with other skills. Seems like easiest class to use for healing
Warden not as OP as it seems on paper, there's already adjusting it's balance with major mending, zos does care. It's definetly a fun class, but it's definatly a jack all trades class. I say good for battlegrounds and off tank in trials. It's not a replacement for Templar healer. Sure maybe warden could go in trials as healer, but so could other four with equal cons and pros
Sorcerer healers... we really are amazing. I defiantly out powered the scrub warden healers, mind they still don't know what they are doing, yet I am rooting for them for best pet healer. They have better access to minor intellect. (10% regain in magicka), can give major beserk to allies, large healing aoe that stuns area, minor prophecy, three bars options, ... and you know dark exchange. As it should be sorcerer healer has best resource management. .
If I had to bet, best healing class might be dragon knight coming up
Poor Templars.
DKs healers might become stronger healers than templars. At least DKs can reliably keep their mending up by shield stacking - Harness magica + Igneous Shield and here you go you have your major mending for 6 seconds.
Major mending isn't that great and they will still need all those resources to keep shields up. I suppose if it gets so bad they will nerf... but for now how many dragon knights healers are in game? They still don't have a burst heal so there's weakness.
The sensible templar healers aren't noticing much difference, the heals are weaker and everyone is suffering for substain so we need to find a sweet spot, but not really the changes are for the better. More healers are going to be in queue! More diverse gameplay!
more heals less tanks, stamina sustain was hit the hardest along with the dk nerfs = less tanks.
There's some positive talk about new classes of healers... I know it sucks templars, but it was for the better...
Templar seems to be not fairing too bad. There's definitely some anger, but generally it's cooling down and people settle down and realize it's not much different. They still have more power burst healer than warden though less than sorrecer healer. They have very very important purtify and nova along with other skills. Seems like easiest class to use for healing
Sorcerer healers... we really are amazing. I defiantly out powered the scrub warden healers, mind they still don't know what they are doing, yet I am rooting for them for best pet healer. They have better access to minor intellect. (10% regain in magicka), can give major beserk to allies, large healing aoe that stuns area, minor prophecy, three bars options, ... and you know dark exchange. As it should be sorcerer healer has best resource management. .
There's some positive talk about new classes of healers... I know it sucks templars, but it was for the better...
Templar seems to be not fairing too bad. There's definitely some anger, but generally it's cooling down and people settle down and realize it's not much different. They still have more power burst healer than warden though less than sorrecer healer. They have very very important purtify and nova along with other skills. Seems like easiest class to use for healing
Sorcerer healers... we really are amazing. I defiantly out powered the scrub warden healers, mind they still don't know what they are doing, yet I am rooting for them for best pet healer. They have better access to minor intellect. (10% regain in magicka), can give major beserk to allies, large healing aoe that stuns area, minor prophecy, three bars options, ... and you know dark exchange. As it should be sorcerer healer has best resource management. .
So why play a Templar? I mean if Sorc healers are so amazing. And they have the best resource management.