Welcome to the future of gaming where producing videogames cost 5-10 times what they cost ten to fifteen years ago, yet players demand price per game ($60) and subscription fee ($15/month) remain at a rate it was ten to fifteen years ago. Then they're shocked that a company isn't making money, and outraged when they pursue other means at bringing in capital.
Any evidence that ZOS isn't making money with ESO? All recent publicity (over the past year) would suggest they are happy with the health of the game.
More pages, more posts of people arguing with each other rather than agreeing on who the real enemy is.
This is why every single PvP thread becomes worthless, the community would rather argue and blame each other than focus on the people making the choices and messing with the community.
Iskrasfemme wrote: »Why not? if u support the game, why not the part of this game? And, please, ZOS is a company, need money to pay workers.
Strange this topic.
catsgomeow wrote: »Iskrasfemme wrote: »Why not? if u support the game, why not the part of this game? And, please, ZOS is a company, need money to pay workers.
Strange this topic.
They have all the money they need to pay their workers already, this is about capitalizing on peoples impulses to gamble and take advantage of that, this is why casino's are so popular and lucrative, it's taking advantage of human nature.
I may be dumb but still don't get it how this whole thing is a scam or a pay-gate?
As ZOS is 100% clear about what a crown crate is, they are neither dishonest nor fraudulent.
Logicbomb00 wrote: »I will buy a ***-ton of crates if only they would do another Crown Sale. How long has it been since the last one? I honestly can't remember, but it was the last time I gave them any money for Crowns.
Gandrhulf_Harbard wrote: »Gandrhulf_Harbard wrote: »Perhaps if more people had coughed up and subbed in the beginning instead of screaming about it being a sub only game, it would now not be B2P.
Oh please.
Not this myth again.
The moment ZOS decided that ESO was going to be a multi-platform game was the moment that B2P was 100% inevitable and necessary.
All the bluster prior to Console Launch that ESO was always going to be a Sub game was smoke and mirrors.
There was no way on earth Console players would pay a monthly network Sub and an ESO Sub - so Console was always going to be B2P.
There was no way that once Console was B2P that ZOS could keep PC alive if PC were Sub and Console was B2P - so PC was always going to go B2P once Console was live.
And that means all the guff prior to Console going live about ESO always being a Sub based game was just half-truths to cover up an initial cash-grab.
All The Best
Final Fantasy XIV disagrees with you and would like to have a word with you
Final Fantasy XIV? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Fantasy_XIV
A game so bad it never made it to console (and so bears no valid comparison) and was shut down after 2 years?
I think you mean Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn - a very different game in so many ways.
But hey, one example, must mean my argument is so flawed, eh?
But hang on, I distinctly recall comments by ZOS at the time of Console Launch stating that it would be untenable to charge twice for console access, and that it would also be untenable to have Console as B2P and PC and P2P. Perhaps you weren't around then.
All The Best
Bigevilpeter wrote: »Seeing all this money wasted just makes me sad. The mounts do look epic, but putting them behind an rng wall that costs so much money with a very low chance is one of the biggest scams ever.
I didn't buy crown crates yet, but I saw some videos on youtube of openings and I see how many people were disappointing and just threw so much money away.
Even if you have too much money to spend, there are other more useful ways to spend it other than supporting this massive scam.
Even if there was 100% chance to get a mount every 15 boxes it would still be the equivalent of 40$ for a mount which is the price of many brand new games.
Supporting things like that only encourages them to scam you more.
catsgomeow wrote: »Iskrasfemme wrote: »Why not? if u support the game, why not the part of this game? And, please, ZOS is a company, need money to pay workers.
Strange this topic.
They have all the money they need to pay their workers already, this is about capitalizing on peoples impulses to gamble and take advantage of that, this is why casino's are so popular and lucrative, it's taking advantage of human nature.
notimetocare wrote: »PelinalWhitestrake wrote: »Welcome to the future of Gaming where everything is locked behind a pay gate.
Welcome to the future of gaming, where players cry about having to buy games at full price and pay subscription fees that force companies to have cash shops
notimetocare wrote: »PelinalWhitestrake wrote: »Welcome to the future of Gaming where everything is locked behind a pay gate.
Welcome to the future of gaming, where players cry about having to buy games at full price and pay subscription fees that force companies to have cash shops
Interesting statement as most against them have purchased the game at launch for full price and happily subscribed. Most even probably made occasional crown store purchases. We are against this greedy tactic becoming popular because it seems there are too many people with more money than sense. Which is fine, but harmful for the industry because developers are happy to exploit that stupidity. If your willing to just throw massive amounts of money at a system that is designed to exploit you with rng, that is where their focus will inevitably change to at the expense of everything else.
Bullying like that is the main reason I don't use the chat, or don't read the messages when people try to talk to me. It doesn't matter if you're using Crown Crate items or not ... there will always be pathetic little whiner bullies who bully you for ANY reason.One of my friends a few days ago received a tell saying she should kill herself because she was riding a apex mount.
I may be dumb but still don't get it how this whole thing is a scam or a pay-gate?
You don't get it because players are misleading you.
Scam - a dishonest scheme or fraud. As ZOS is 100% clear about what a crown crate is, they are neither dishonest nor fraudulent.
Paygate - a wall blocking off content, unless you pay for it. Technically these digital items are in fact behind a paywall. However, players are misleading you to believe paywalls are inherently a bad thing, when that is far form the case. Paywalls are neither inherently good or bad. They are neutral, and solely depend on the value they are "walling" off. The content in these crown crates is PURELY 100% optional and do not add/detract substantial value to the game. Thus, there is nothing wrong with this paygate as the content behind the gate is non-essential.
Yes, thank you!Yes the content is random, but you get a value for your purchase. On the top of that duplicate and unwanted items can be turned back to currency which can be used to purchase the exact item you wanted from the crates, bypassing RNG. Show me a casino where you get a guaranteed jackpot even after 10000 failed attempts.
Thank you for this post!BlackSparrow wrote: »So, if we assume that every single person at ZOS earns this extremely underestimated number, do you know how much they're paying a year in just personnel?
$10 million.
Hand_Bacon wrote: »Artemiisia wrote: »I use my money how I damn well pleases
Married? I talked like that once...those were good days.
I usually do not post on forums, but I would really like to do so this time. Because honestly? I find this topic a bit ridiculous and have a feeling that people have major issues with definitions.Yes, thank you!Yes the content is random, but you get a value for your purchase. On the top of that duplicate and unwanted items can be turned back to currency which can be used to purchase the exact item you wanted from the crates, bypassing RNG. Show me a casino where you get a guaranteed jackpot even after 10000 failed attempts.
Crates are not a gamble exactly because they have what some other aspects of the game thoroughly lack: token system (gems).
Allow me to throw an analogy.
vMA is a gamble. Undaunted chests are a gamble. And when you enter these gambles, you pay with the valute much more valuable than any money: time.
However if I started a topic "Please, don't run vMA, don't support this horrid policy, don't throw your precious time in gambling", I would get a perfectly adequate response... "Hey. Gtfo. My time - my business".
But suddenly the Crates - much more forgiving system - get a hell. People who ran vMA for weapons and got them are praised - people who either got lucky or bought enough Crates to get enough gems for apex mount may be ridiculed or scorned upon.
If you are against Crates, 'cause gambling, but you ran vMA hundreds times to get the weapon you wanted - congratulations, you are a hypocrite. And you have lost much more than people who bought Crates. Money can be made again. Time can't.
And yes, I know, that people hate vMA system and want it to be changed... into something with token system, something similar to Crates, ehehe. So what? If it would be changed, will we still call it a gamble? Will we ask people to not participate? No.
Because it's ridiculous.
P. S. Also:Thank you for this post!BlackSparrow wrote: »So, if we assume that every single person at ZOS earns this extremely underestimated number, do you know how much they're paying a year in just personnel?
$10 million.
I do wonder... All those people who say "ZoS makes enough without Crates, trust me"... Do they have proof? Do they have access to ZoS accounts? Somehow, I doubt.
Making and supporting MMO as huge as ESO demands great deal of resources. Do not assume that ZoS bathes in green and gold. (In fact, if you want to get philosophical, better to not assume. Ever, period XD ). The truth of the matter is: we do not know. And accusations without knowledge (i. e. cold hard numbers, i. e. proofs) are... frankly speaking, also ridiculous.
That's exactly it - you're drawing assumptions. Yes, the game now has much more people, the population is huge. Yet we do not know the ratio profit-from-all-these-sales/all-resources-that-were-used-so-people-would-come. Without the numbers - which we, of course, will never get and companies are entitled to such secrets, 'cause privacy matters - we can only assume. Throwing accusations based on assumptions never won anyone any points.First the financial aspect. At the beginning of last year Matt Firor released an article saying that ESO has been a major success. http://massivelyop.com/2016/04/04/matt-firor-says-elder-scrolls-onlines-population-is-huge-and-thriving/
This game I'm sure was doing well and this move was motivated by greed.
How, pray tell, is that different? XDSecondly, your response to rng is flawed. Running game content repeatedly, is not the same as running your credit card repeatedly. It's a system designed to tempt people to spend ridiculous amounts of money for something most would pay considerably less on average if they put in the store. They are ripping off their players and people are actually praising them.