Ya'll are too nice.

I feel like it should be hardly anyone that votes they were innovative and exceeded expectations.
I feel like this generation is too nice to everyone, and that people cater to them by being PG, and that in some things, there really is no improvement at all.

Apple and Oranges all you want.
I feel like video game industry is like the WWE industry.
PG Era
Gotta be careful to not put too much violence, too much things that are offensive, to go above and beyond because of the person with opposite viewpoint will bring you down.

I'd like video games to be great again, GTA 3 era, Quake 1, heads flying across map when someone dies, mortal kombat type of brutality. Think of who plays ESO, is it really people under 17 years old and not mature enough to see hardcore mortal kombat blood and gore, or is it young professionals who are mature?

Just like WWE. Whose really watching it most of the time. Is it really necessary to cater to PG era?

Too many, I dont want to voice my opinion because people will attack me type of attitude people around here. This poll in my mind, based on what I seen from older games, what technology we have today. The polls should be that they did a terrible job when you compare its work to other games.

As with other games, little improvement happens after the initial launch too, everyone is always hopeful, but nothing really gets done till years later, and by that time, the game is considered old.

"ehh, i dont like how the OP worded these, its not PG enough for me, so I go lenient, I'm a PG type person, always say nice things even though i seen stuff better made 10 years ago, and thats half my lifetime, so this housing system... is bad because 10 year old stuff was better, I'm PG tho, so nice things and those bad ones are worded too harsh for me to pick it even though its true"

Those games to think about, in my personal opinion have a better housing system, and for you guys to bring up SWG which I never played and a few other games that has better system and is 10 years or older too. In a business point of view... If you make a new product that is pretty much worse than a similiar product 10 years ago... Is that a good thing? Is that bad? Or is that REALLY bad? 10 years is a long time ago. To me, thats very sad. 10 years ago, I think 2GB RAM was considered high quality, 512GB storage was considered a lot... We have so much better technology... Space. Yet this is what we get? I'm not going to be lenient on these guys. I'm not going to accept, games have been in a rut for a long time and consider this game good, because we been getting crap games for a long time and should be used to it.