I feel that if you want the benefits of being a vampire, you should look like one. You're more or less a walking corpse, after all. I don't want an ESO filled with Twilight and Underworld vampires. This game is filled with barbies as it is.
So ESO is changing from all lore that describes how Vamps disguise themselves? A fully established lore section and they want to throw that part out of the window?
They aren't changing the lore, the only vampires that can fully pass as mortals are the ones from Cyrodiil and one strain of Bosmer vampires and both have limitations on that ability. The cyrodiilic strain must feed to maintain their mortal appearance and the Bosmer strain is revealed in candlelight (according to the "Immortal Blood" lorebook from Skyrim).
The vampires we play in ESO are unharmed by the sun, that is their special power.
Now, I do agree that stage 1 vampires could look a little less dead, but it's not really that big of an issue. Vampires in stage 2 or higher should never be able to hide their affliction (and they should be attacked by guards, but that's a different issue).
Possible solutions:
1) Feeding while in stage 1 could grant a "well-fed" buff, that allows players to hide their vampirism for a time.
2) ZOS could create a skill unlocked at vampire rank 10 that when slotted allows you to retain your mortal appearance at the cost of Magicka.
3) ZOS could make a new appearance for stage 1 that sets your skin tone to the first (lightest) skin tone for our chosen race and make the current stage 1 appearance actually stage 2.
Personally, I'd prefer option 1 or 3 since that would be the most lore-friendly.
Except Lamae Bal states that "Your kin hide among the mortals. They may be wearing rags or crowns. They may hide within or rise above the masses." So I don't think it's breaking lore at all for this strain of vampirism to be able to hide their appearance, that statement seems to imply that they can?
You see, I love vamp and all, the passives are great and it has some neat skills in certain situations... But when I make my characters I want them to look good and not like they have been covered in tippex and some 5 year old has splattered red sharpie all over them... Some people may not understand my feelings and thoughts but for me, a huge part of the game is making my character look aesthetically pleasing. I see no reason not to be a vamp really if you are on a magicka build and are like me who loves the Templar classes (the huge heals built into the class make up for the fire weakness completely imho), except for the horrible aesthetics.
Now, i'm probably going to get some people saying "oh well you know, you cant be a vampire and not look like one"... well clearly you can... just take a look at Count Verandis Ravenwatch who looks just like a normal human when hiding his vampirism.
So my question to you ZOS is why can the players not look like humans when afflicted with vampirism?
As i recall disguises tend to make you look normal - hiding vampirism, so if there are any disguises you like then they along with hide helmets will do a good part of the work. there are a ton of disguises so...
Except Lamae Bal states that "Your kin hide among the mortals. They may be wearing rags or crowns. They may hide within or rise above the masses." So I don't think it's breaking lore at all for this strain of vampirism to be able to hide their appearance, that statement seems to imply that they can?
"Hide among mortals" is a pretty vague statement. A stage 1 vampire can pass as mortal, albeit a pale one, and thus hide among them. But I don't believe for a second that extends to stage 2 and beyond.
Apparently not even the mighty Verandis can hide the higher stages and neither can Lamae Bal.
Tell that to Count Orlok!MLGProPlayer wrote: »Aren't vampires in fairy tales supposed to be attractive? You don't seduce your prey by looking like a syphillitic meth head.

Yeah. Exactly.There are other instances in the game where mortals used illusion magic or enchanted items to make themselves or someone else look completely different. Doing the same to make a character look like a mortal version of themselves shouldn't be a problem.
Stop using Verandis as an excuse for being able to hide our vampirism. He's apparently the only vampire NPC in ESO that can do it, which may well be a gift from Molag Bal.
Neither Gwendis nor Adusa-daro or the guys at Wittestadr seem to be able to do this, so why should we?
If we ever get such a feature, it has to be a toggle skill that only works in stage 1 and maybe stage 2.
I didn't use Verandis as an excuse, read my post again @Kendaric . I am speaking of illusion magic used by mortals, which can very well be what he uses to hide his vampirism too. It isn't necessarily something connected to his vampirism. So stop using him being an original vampire as a reason why we shouldn't be able to hide it and ignoring the other possibilities.
When a Thalmor mage makes Raz look like Ayrenn.
When Raz wears an enchanted earring to look like a male Altmer, and we wear it too on the same quest.
When we again wear the same earring to look like a colovian general.
When we use a gem to look like a goblin.
And that's why we should be able to hide our vampirism. Because illusion magic and enchanted items that alter your appearance are a thing.
Quickest way for this to get implemented is to suggest to ZOS a CS item... They can't resist that extra money
I want to be a spellcaster with the best passives for my class, but I don't want to be an altmer or dunmer so I should be able to get those racial benefits yet look like a redguard, or they could just let me pick the passive racial lines from whatever I feel has the best passives and add them to whatever race I choose based on looks / lore.
I mean its my character so I should be able to do what I want - also every excuse for how illusion magic exists and spells that do things like make a kajit look like an altmer should allow me to play a dunmer and look like an imperial.I want to be a spellcaster with the best passives for my class, but I don't want to be an altmer or dunmer so I should be able to get those racial benefits yet look like a redguard, or they could just let me pick the passive racial lines from whatever I feel has the best passives and add them to whatever race I choose based on looks / lore.
That's such a warped logic from what we are discussing here.
Is it?
Some in this and similar threads have clearly stated that what they want is to be able to obtain the vampire skill line and passives without actually being a vampire, well I want the dunmer passives for my templar without having to look like a dunmer.
Not to mention the OP of this thread posted a justification for allowing the appearance based on quests such as those involving Raz where the player (any race / gender) is given the appearance of a male altmer or when Raz (kajit) has the appearance of a male altmer or female altmer (the queen herself) - so those same in-game appearance changes also seem to work to mask a players actual gender and race.
So again - if one player can have the vampire skill line and not look like a vampire, then I and other players should be able to have a racial skill line and not look like the race.
Seriously, the whole reasoning so many are asking to have the vampire appearance hidden is tied to wanting to control their character's appearance while being able to access certain skills and passives - so letting players pick and choose their appearance for one set of skills and passives (vamp / ww) and not another (racial) is warped in my mind.
Race = Race (Bosmer = Bosmer | Orc = Orc etc)
Vampire = Race with vampirism. You will look like the race except with vampirism. And when in ES lore has a race been able to look like another race permanently and have all of that race's bonuses? Im not too good at explaining but your logic should really make it clear to you.
Quickest way for this to get implemented is to suggest to ZOS a CS item... They can't resist that extra money
MornaBaine wrote: »Quickest way for this to get implemented is to suggest to ZOS a CS item... They can't resist that extra money
Not necessarily true. I suggested it over 2 years ago and my question was even asked on a ESO Live segment. At that time they said they "might be able to do something with costumes" and that was long before there even was a crown shop. So you would have thought that might have been one of the first things they put out. But nope. All this time and countless requests later they still haven't done anything about it.
if you are stage 1 sure hide it, stage 4? hell no thats stupid and doesnt follow lore
DocFrost72 wrote: »Yay! Another one!
/popcorn
Awesome constructive post detailing your position, reasons, and concessions! "Yay!"
And yeah OP I feel you. Stage one vamps, by lore definition (Google "Immortal Blood", quite a good read) can fool even the most seasoned, trained hunters when fed. So, my solution?
Add another stage to vampirism identicle to stage 1, but with unchanged skin. "Stage 0", if you will.