Maintenance for the week of May 11:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – May 11

Proposal: Emperor scaling

Derra
Derra
✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭
Make the reigning emperors stats increases scale with the number of enemies on the map:

1 bar for each opposing faction: 15% stat increase. 20% regen increase.
For every bar above one the reigning emp gains 15% extra stats and 20% regen increase (locked is equal to 3 bars).
Ult generation stays doubled.

IE:
EP emp. 1 bar DC. 3 bar AD. => Emp gets 45% increased stats. 60% increased reg.
EP emp. 2 bar DC. 1 bar AD. => Emp gets 30% increased stats. 40% increased reg.
EP emp. 3 bar DC. locked AD. => Emp gets 75% increased stats. 100% increased reg.
etc pp.

This would make fighting a reigning emp easier on off hours or empty campaigns. Also buffcampaign telvar farming as emp would get less attractive.
<Noricum>
I live. I die. I live again.

Derra - DC - Sorc - AvA 50
Derrah - EP - Sorc - AvA 50

  • Lieblingsjunge
    Lieblingsjunge
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Derra wrote: »
    This would make fighting a reigning emp easier on off hours or empty campaigns. Also buffcampaign telvar farming as emp would get less attractive.

    ^This.
    Ignorance is the greatest weapon of tyranny.
    PC - EU.
    Lieblingsjunge(AD) - Racechanged Argonian :< | AR 50 - No double AP or Bleakers involved |
    Sits-On-Cacti(DC) - Problem?
    Fail-With-Tail(AD) - Healing Springs-spammer :<
    Tiny Liebs(EP) - Very Tiny. Also heals.
    Lieblingsmädchen(DC) - Magplar is love.
    The Dominàtrix(AD) - Chains, whip, whip, whip.
    Fluffy Furball Kitten(DC) - Kittycat, meow.
    Your Face(EP) - People make bad jokes about my name =(
    Liebs-With-Trees(AD) - Male argo with a big tail :>

    Officer/Sandwitch of Zerg Squad
    My title: The Maneater, Destroyer of Maneuvers, Bane of Potatoes, she who devours them, The Black Hole, the humorless, first of her name.
  • KisoValley
    KisoValley
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like that.
  • Sanct16
    Sanct16
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    On a active campaign I don't really think this would serve any real purpose and balancing something around empty campaigns seems a bit weird. At this point I'd rather see ZOS remove all but 2 CP campaigns + Azura. This way we might find ourself with 2 active cp camps rather than 1 active and 3 inactive.
    Emperor stats shouldn't be an issue then either as hopefully there wouldn't be dead campaigns.
    - EU - Raid Leader of Banana Zerg Squad
    AD | AR 50 | Sanct Fir'eheal | ex Mana DK @31.10.2015
    EP | AR 50 | Sanctosaurus | Mana NB
    AD | AR 44 | rekt ya | Mana NB
    AD | AR 41 | Sanct Thunderstorm | Mana Sorc
    EP | AR 36 | S'na'ct | Mana NB {NA}
    AD | AR 29 | Captain Full Fist| Stam DK
    AD | AR 29 | Sanct The Dark Phoenix| Stam Sorc
    EP | AR 16 | Horny Sanct | Stam Warden
    EP | AR 16 | Sánct Bánáná Sláyér | Mana DK
    DC | AR 13 | ad worst faction eu | Stam Sorc
    DC | AR 13 | Lagendary Sanct | Mana NB

    >320.000.000 AP
  • Derra
    Derra
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sanct16 wrote: »
    On a active campaign I don't really think this would serve any real purpose and balancing something around empty campaigns seems a bit weird. At this point I'd rather see ZOS remove all but 2 CP campaigns + Azura. This way we might find ourself with 2 active cp camps rather than 1 active and 3 inactive.
    Emperor stats shouldn't be an issue then either as hopefully there wouldn't be dead campaigns.

    This is very much an issue on "active" campaigns when you have a grp with emperror defending a completely coloured map against 1 bar of each enemy faction.
    That´s whats happening every second day from 8 to 15 on trueflame EU.
    <Noricum>
    I live. I die. I live again.

    Derra - DC - Sorc - AvA 50
    Derrah - EP - Sorc - AvA 50

  • The-Baconator
    The-Baconator
    ✭✭✭✭
    I don't necessarily have a problem with an emp's strength being based off of population, but it should be the population of the emp's faction relative to the population of the other two factions. If the emp is sitting in their faction's buff server with locked pop against 2 low\medium they should certainly be less powerful, but I shouldn't be screwed at 6 am on our main campaign when my faction has one bar and DC is attempting to steam role the map with poplock just because the server isn't full.
    First PS4 NA Grand Overlord, Stormproof, and Flawless Conqueror.
    Potato Lord of Atrocity
  • Paneross
    Paneross
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No
  • Ankael07
    Ankael07
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Paneross wrote: »
    No

    No what? If you have nothing to contribute dont waste space at all.
    If you want me to reply to your comment type @Ankael07 in it.
  • Derra
    Derra
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't necessarily have a problem with an emp's strength being based off of population, but it should be the population of the emp's faction relative to the population of the other two factions. If the emp is sitting in their faction's buff server with locked pop against 2 low\medium they should certainly be less powerful, but I shouldn't be screwed at 6 am on our main campaign when my faction has one bar and DC is attempting to steam role the map with poplock just because the server isn't full.

    Which with my proposal would not happen as emps strengh would entirely be based on opposing faction player numbers.
    <Noricum>
    I live. I die. I live again.

    Derra - DC - Sorc - AvA 50
    Derrah - EP - Sorc - AvA 50

  • Bashev
    Bashev
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    I totally agree. Even if ZoS remove emperorship will be even better.
    Because I can!
Sign In or Register to comment.