So dont expect too much info until January.Absolutely! I try to do that every January. We will have tons of good stuff to talk about in 2017, but let's get through the One Tamriel launch first.
Expect to see that post sometime in the first week of January.
Also...those personal attacks against the marketing director...smh
ZOS_DaryaK wrote: »We've removed a couple of posts that contained some misinformation.
Mountain33r wrote: »ZOS CEO talking to Funcom (Failcom) CEO in an interview. ZOS asks what has made them successful and if he could explain it into detail.
Its a rare video that you may not have seen. ZOS is the guy with his head down, taking notes.
ZOS and Funcom
Its quite obvious the game is going f2p. All the signs are there. Dont matter to me anymore. Just enjoy the game until it hits the point where you're no longer having fun. ZOS has shown they don't give a *** about a healthy long term game. So if its a few more months or a year till it really goes down hill then so be it.
ZOS_DaryaK wrote: »We've removed a couple of posts that contained some misinformation.
ZOS_DaryaK wrote: »We've removed a couple of posts that contained some misinformation.
ZOS_DaryaK wrote: »We've removed a couple of posts that contained some misinformation.
Elijah_Crow wrote: »I'm a little suspicious of the contents of the removed posts.
If the post contained speculation of a free to play transition because an employee's linkedin says they specialize in this type of work, I think it's perfectly valid.
Heavy handed moderation for this kind of thing actually makes the situation worse.
As for a free to play transition, that would be the end of my spending money with ZOS. I don't care if the game costs $10 for ever, but there needs to be a barrier to entry. Just look at free to play communities without this barrier. They are toxic and riddled with hackers as there is no consequence to being banned. ZOS is challenged to police the game as is, allowing anyone in without an entry fee would ruin the existing game and community.
Also...those personal attacks against the marketing director...smh
Millennials have turned the marketing and advertising industry into a social media driven creative safe space where accountability doesn't matter.
For my second agency job, I had to write a memo to my supervisor every single night listing how my work that day made the clients I worked with better off than they were yesterday. Not just financially, but stronger brands overall. It didn't just make the brands stronger. It made me stronger.
It's not personal attacks. I've seen people walk out of job interviews in tears and that still not personal attacks. If you want a job dealing with the public in any way, you need a thick skin and resolve. And given how many people whine on Facebook about how their cashier jobs are so stressful and people are sooo mean, there's not a whole lot of thick skin anymore.
I'm not in the business of coddling people for mediocre results. They're all probably crappy cashiers, and we have a crappy marketing director who is more interested in her own self-interest ventures than the brand Bethesda is paying her to represent.
Mountain33r wrote: »ZOS CEO talking to Funcom (Failcom) CEO in an interview. ZOS asks what has made them successful and if he could explain it into detail.
Its a rare video that you may not have seen. ZOS is the guy with his head down, taking notes.
ZOS and Funcom
Mountain33r wrote: »ZOS CEO talking to Funcom (Failcom) CEO in an interview. ZOS asks what has made them successful and if he could explain it into detail.
Its a rare video that you may not have seen. ZOS is the guy with his head down, taking notes.
ZOS and Funcom
Also...those personal attacks against the marketing director...smh
Millennials have turned the marketing and advertising industry into a social media driven creative safe space where accountability doesn't matter.
For my second agency job, I had to write a memo to my supervisor every single night listing how my work that day made the clients I worked with better off than they were yesterday. Not just financially, but stronger brands overall. It didn't just make the brands stronger. It made me stronger.
It's not personal attacks. I've seen people walk out of job interviews in tears and that still not personal attacks. If you want a job dealing with the public in any way, you need a thick skin and resolve. And given how many people whine on Facebook about how their cashier jobs are so stressful and people are sooo mean, there's not a whole lot of thick skin anymore.
I'm not in the business of coddling people for mediocre results. They're all probably crappy cashiers, and we have a crappy marketing director who is more interested in her own self-interest ventures than the brand Bethesda is paying her to represent.
"That's an...olive branch. Is that what you call it?" -Tony Stark
Allow me to extend one of my own. Crates are here, and apparently they're here to stay. I was as vocal as any of the naysayers. However, since our concerns seemingly carry little weight with the powers that be, let's look to the future. Ideally, the money made from crates could be used to expand ESO in new and exciting ways, with fresh content, refined gameplay mechanics, and quality of life improvements. Unfortunately, several MMO's, once they have integrated a gambling crate system, have thinned out their dev team (and their playerbase) by only keeping enough devs on board to keep filling the crates and perhaps releasing half-hearted content updates from time to time. Those games don't die, but they don't continue to grow and flourish, either. They exist in a sort of purgatory. My understanding of this is that the publishers/bean counters/suits want to line their pockets as much as possible for as long as possible before moving onto the next hunting ground.
With all of that in mind, would it be possible to open up some line of communication between ourselves and ZOS? To make sure ESO still has a bright future? Potentially, this could affect ZOS staff as well, should the powers that be decide that they only need enough devs to keep the crown crates flowing. Are we going to receive any reassurances that these crates are for the good of the game in the long run? I certainly have my doubts, but many of us would be willing to listen if the devs would be willing to actually open up and have a conversation. At the end of the day, we are your customers, and communication with your customers is paramount.
Note: I created a new thread for this because I felt this was different enough from the other crate discussions to warrant it. With that in mind, let's not let this devolve into another discussion about the existence of the crates. Let's make it a discussion about looking toward the future of ESO.
Stopnaggin wrote: »Must have been the same person that specializes in microtransaction, hmmmm.
I made a post about heavy handed moderation but alas it was shut down. While it did involve crown crates it wasn't specifically about the crates themselves. But rather an effect that it may or may not have had.
What really scares me is the lack of communication on their end. It would at least calm some of the fears. I'm not even sure the mods are privlaged enough to have the information. Anyone remember when they did podcasts? Actually tried to answer questions?
This thread is my way of hoping that that is not the case. And I'm holding onto a tiny sliver of hope that the game won't go that path, as many others have before.
This thread is my way of hoping that that is not the case. And I'm holding onto a tiny sliver of hope that the game won't go that path, as many others have before.
Let that sliver go. Every future feature will be predicated on maximizing revenue through crate sales. ZOS will not risk reputational damage by introducing blatant p2w elements, but qol aspects like housing will be fair game. Expect to see unique housing items or furniture crafting styles that can only be acquired via crates. I think you're looking for reassurance, but you already know how this plays out. You simply need to accept it or move on.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »IIRC, the post in question was quite disrespectful of that person, and it also stated that community managers would do a better job than she does.
Assuming marketing and community management are interchangeable competences shows for ignorance and leads to obvious misinformation.
The confusion between being a customer and being a boss is quite frequent in here.
Just my 2 cents.