It shouldn't happen tbh. The only real good thing about the vMA and vDSA 2h weapons is the 1pc weapon damage bonus you get with it. Being able to wear 2 5pc sets AND an undaunted set will make them pretty much useless. Personally I'd stop farming the arenas and just use another 5pc set if it ever happened.
It shouldn't happen tbh. The only real good thing about the vMA and vDSA 2h weapons is the 1pc weapon damage bonus you get with it. Being able to wear 2 5pc sets AND an undaunted set will make them pretty much useless. Personally I'd stop farming the arenas and just use another 5pc set if it ever happened.
Why am I FORCED to D/W to be able to run 2 fullsets with a monster set?
Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »
leepalmer95 wrote: »It shouldn't happen tbh. The only real good thing about the vMA and vDSA 2h weapons is the 1pc weapon damage bonus you get with it. Being able to wear 2 5pc sets AND an undaunted set will make them pretty much useless. Personally I'd stop farming the arenas and just use another 5pc set if it ever happened.
Why am I FORCED to D/W to be able to run 2 fullsets with a monster set?
Not not really, you have have a proc set on your back bar.
It shouldn't happen tbh. The only real good thing about the vMA and vDSA 2h weapons is the 1pc weapon damage bonus you get with it. Being able to wear 2 5pc sets AND an undaunted set will make them pretty much useless. Personally I'd stop farming the arenas and just use another 5pc set if it ever happened.
GreenSoup2HoT wrote: »There are a couple sets you can use that will allow you to use 2 5 piece sets and a monster set even with a 2 handed weapon. Clever Alchemist or Armour Master back buff bar.
This idea is just a cry for what you dont have when you can work around it. Having this extra set bonus is what makes duel wield and s+b unique, take that away and you make the game even more linear and boring.
I completely disagree with this idea and i have every time its been posted.
leepalmer95 wrote: »It shouldn't happen tbh. The only real good thing about the vMA and vDSA 2h weapons is the 1pc weapon damage bonus you get with it. Being able to wear 2 5pc sets AND an undaunted set will make them pretty much useless. Personally I'd stop farming the arenas and just use another 5pc set if it ever happened.
Why am I FORCED to D/W to be able to run 2 fullsets with a monster set?
Not not really, you have have a proc set on your back bar.
Can't do that with all builds.
GreenSoup2HoT wrote: »There are a couple sets you can use that will allow you to use 2 5 piece sets and a monster set even with a 2 handed weapon. Clever Alchemist or Armour Master back buff bar.
This idea is just a cry for what you dont have when you can work around it. Having this extra set bonus is what makes duel wield and s+b unique, take that away and you make the game even more linear and boring.
I completely disagree with this idea and i have every time its been posted.
This change would add to build diversity - and allow players to combine and use more and different sets then would otherwise be the case.
So if anything - this would make the game less linear and less boring. It would certainly give my character more options - and make him more interesting to play.
Why am I FORCED to D/W to be able to run 2 fullsets with a monster set?
GreenSoup2HoT wrote: »GreenSoup2HoT wrote: »There are a couple sets you can use that will allow you to use 2 5 piece sets and a monster set even with a 2 handed weapon. Clever Alchemist or Armour Master back buff bar.
This idea is just a cry for what you dont have when you can work around it. Having this extra set bonus is what makes duel wield and s+b unique, take that away and you make the game even more linear and boring.
I completely disagree with this idea and i have every time its been posted.
This change would add to build diversity - and allow players to combine and use more and different sets then would otherwise be the case.
So if anything - this would make the game less linear and less boring. It would certainly give my character more options - and make him more interesting to play.
This does not create diversity. It steals it from Dw and S+B because 2h/bow setups cant have it while only classed as a 1 set bonus. All this would do is make DW and S+B even less appealing.
2H and Bow have monster maelstrom enchants for pvp. You cant complain about those, they are basically 5 piece bonuses themselfs.
Also 2h bow has the best passives and most well rounded snergy when in pvp. It has 2 executes, speed, melee, range, burst and sustained damage.
When you DW or S+B you sacrifice range for that set bonus. You also sacrifice either Rally or Poison Inj to run either (depending if you slot a 2h or bow with it). Theres a lot that 2h/bow gets that you sacrifice to run either dw or s+b.
Giving 2h/bow the extra item slot would increase build diversity for that particular setup yes but it would also homogenize all players to use 2h/bow over dw or s+b.
2h/bow is already very good and giving them this kind of diversity would only harm the balance of the other weapon skill lines.
You already have the ability to slot armour master or clever alchemist which are very good in pvp. Sure its not 100% customization but its good enough considering how powerful 2h/bow already is.
From a magicka point of view, there would be no point duel wielding anymore. Which means all magicka users will use staffs instead. Only S+B would be used for the block reduction. (If you give staffs the same treatment).
2h/bow is already in a fantastic spot, we dont need to push them over the edge. Thats what im getting at.
From a pve point of view i understand. It would be nice if 2h could compete with dw... however for pvp it would ruin the only balanced aspect of the game we have. There are drawbacks for picking up dw/s+b, that extra set bonus makes up for them.
It shouldn't happen tbh. The only real good thing about the vMA and vDSA 2h weapons is the 1pc weapon damage bonus you get with it. Being able to wear 2 5pc sets AND an undaunted set will make them pretty much useless. Personally I'd stop farming the arenas and just use another 5pc set if it ever happened.
That's a good thing - because then there would be less of an incentive for players to torture themselves doing VMA - which is the most miserable content in this game.
If two-handed builds offered some kind of an innate advantage over one-handed builds I could see why this might be necessary. But as far as I can tell, there really isn't any.
Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »
I'm talking about the bonus