Lava_Croft wrote: »@Wrobel has not even the faintest clue about the effects of introducing such a perverse meta. Not just on the gameplay, but also on how players feel. It's simply bad design all around and an example that should be used in schools to show upcoming game designers how not to do things.
Lava_Croft wrote: »@Wrobel has not even the faintest clue about the effects of introducing such a perverse meta. Not just on the gameplay, but also on how players feel. It's simply bad design all around and an example that should be used in schools to show upcoming game designers how not to do things.
When they make a bad design choice in school they can say things like "You just completely wrobeled", "Think what Wrobel would do, then do the exact opposite".
I mean no offence @Wrobel, but like, please stop crapping on the game.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »magicka damage is still right now more powerfull and does more damage then stamina damage and skills.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »magicka damage is still right now more powerfull and does more damage then stamina damage and skills.
Robes of Anti-Procs
2pc bonus: Adds Max Magicka
3pc bonus: Adds Spell Damage
4pc bonus: Adds Magicka Regen
5pc bonus: Adds Spell Damage + Become immune to the effects of proc sets
Coming soon, from ZOS
Robes of Anti-Procs
2pc bonus: Adds Max Magicka
3pc bonus: Adds Spell Damage
4pc bonus: Adds Magicka Regen
5pc bonus: Adds Spell Damage + Become immune to the effects of proc sets
Coming soon, from ZOS
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »magicka damage is still right now more powerfull and does more damage then stamina damage and skills.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »magicka damage is still right now more powerfull and does more damage then stamina damage and skills.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »magicka damage is still right now more powerfull and does more damage then stamina damage and skills.
ZOS is aware of the problem. Let's see what they do about it..