God_flakes wrote: »@BFT88 if they move to Haderus will you come back to TF? Pwease?
God_flakes wrote: »Look, I'm not really complaining. Their zerg is juicy and fun to fight most nights. But TF has become nothing but zerg v zerg and it's mostly because of them. Any time you face off with them you are forced to bring at least half their size Zerg. My only point was now maybe TF can enjoy some smaller engagements and battles.
God_flakes wrote: »Lord_Draevan wrote: »IMO this won't solve anything, EP. Either we end up alone on Haderus with no PvP fights, or AD and DC pvpers will switch over and it'll be the same situation that's currently on Trueflame.
But like them or not, we owe a lot of our success to Pact Militia, so anyone who stays of Trueflame is going to have a much harder time without them.
Either way I'm not going be playing very much for the next few months, so either choice is fine by me.
No. The players who have been dependent and reliant on their zergs will have to learn to become better individual players. Trust me, this will be good for the Ep who remain on TF.
Lord_Draevan wrote: »God_flakes wrote: »Lord_Draevan wrote: »IMO this won't solve anything, EP. Either we end up alone on Haderus with no PvP fights, or AD and DC pvpers will switch over and it'll be the same situation that's currently on Trueflame.
But like them or not, we owe a lot of our success to Pact Militia, so anyone who stays of Trueflame is going to have a much harder time without them.
Either way I'm not going be playing very much for the next few months, so either choice is fine by me.
No. The players who have been dependent and reliant on their zergs will have to learn to become better individual players. Trust me, this will be good for the Ep who remain on TF.
The people who need to improve are far more likely to log in, see that EP's being Gate camped with no Scrolls, then go PvE or switch campaigns, and won't improve.

God_flakes wrote: »Look, I'm not really complaining. Their zerg is juicy and fun to fight most nights. But TF has become nothing but zerg v zerg and it's mostly because of them. Any time you face off with them you are forced to bring at least half their size Zerg. My only point was now maybe TF can enjoy some smaller engagements and battles.
I guess my point is that zerging is just the nature of any PvP like this. Hell any war in general. Usually the side with the bigger number of soldiers wins.
God_flakes wrote: »@BFT88 if they move to Haderus will you come back to TF? Pwease?
@God_flakes Honestly at this point, if Haderus becomes PM's new stomping ground, I probably won't have any choice other than returning to TF.
Publius_Scipio wrote: »As the tide rises and the waves of Pact Militia come crashing on shore, the COVENANT will be the seawall that breaks the waves. The flood pumps will be manned by COVENANT hands! The innocent will take shelter in COVENANT controlled forts. And when the storm subsides and the rays of the sun pierce the dark veil of clouds.... All that will be left will be a few shallow puddles.... A few shallow puddles calling for some passing guar to p*ss in.
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Lord_Draevan wrote: »God_flakes wrote: »Lord_Draevan wrote: »IMO this won't solve anything, EP. Either we end up alone on Haderus with no PvP fights, or AD and DC pvpers will switch over and it'll be the same situation that's currently on Trueflame.
But like them or not, we owe a lot of our success to Pact Militia, so anyone who stays of Trueflame is going to have a much harder time without them.
Either way I'm not going be playing very much for the next few months, so either choice is fine by me.
No. The players who have been dependent and reliant on their zergs will have to learn to become better individual players. Trust me, this will be good for the Ep who remain on TF.
The people who need to improve are far more likely to log in, see that EP's being Gate camped with no Scrolls, then go PvE or switch campaigns, and won't improve.
That's why no faction should gate camp!!! So what your saying is that most of the EP left on TF are going to be CHAOTIC NEUTRAL from the image below...
General Question to all, what type of Gamer are you? I like to think of myself as Chaotic Good unless the right person comes along.
Publius_Scipio wrote: »As the tide rises and the waves of Pact Militia come crashing on shore, the COVENANT will be the seawall that breaks the waves. The flood pumps will be manned by COVENANT hands!
God_flakes wrote: »God_flakes wrote: »Look, I'm not really complaining. Their zerg is juicy and fun to fight most nights. But TF has become nothing but zerg v zerg and it's mostly because of them. Any time you face off with them you are forced to bring at least half their size Zerg. My only point was now maybe TF can enjoy some smaller engagements and battles.
I guess my point is that zerging is just the nature of any PvP like this. Hell any war in general. Usually the side with the bigger number of soldiers wins.
I don't think you understand what zerging is. It's been defined again and again. A Zerg is not merely a "large group". It is an obscenely and inappropriately large wave of players showing up to a fight against 1/10th the enemies they're facing. I think what PM needs to learn, and still has yet to learn, is it is OK to run large raids and double raids...heck I have done it....but you absolutely don't need to stack them all on one objective. Break them up. Send them two different locations. 100 don't need to show up to assault bleakers when it's obvious there are 10-12 DC inside.
God_flakes wrote: »God_flakes wrote: »Look, I'm not really complaining. Their zerg is juicy and fun to fight most nights. But TF has become nothing but zerg v zerg and it's mostly because of them. Any time you face off with them you are forced to bring at least half their size Zerg. My only point was now maybe TF can enjoy some smaller engagements and battles.
I guess my point is that zerging is just the nature of any PvP like this. Hell any war in general. Usually the side with the bigger number of soldiers wins.
I don't think you understand what zerging is. It's been defined again and again. A Zerg is not merely a "large group". It is an obscenely and inappropriately large wave of players showing up to a fight against 1/10th the enemies they're facing. I think what PM needs to learn, and still has yet to learn, is it is OK to run large raids and double raids...heck I have done it....but you absolutely don't need to stack them all on one objective. Break them up. Send them two different locations. 100 don't need to show up to assault bleakers when it's obvious there are 10-12 DC inside.
Well yeah I can agree with that, but there's always those random players that aren't in the group, but just tag along. Doesn't mean a guild or an entire faction zerg by your definition. If I'm by myself and not in a group, I'm not going to go off on my own somewhere. I'm going to go where the action is. Every faction has players that do that, and every faction gets blamed for zerging.
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Lord_Draevan wrote: »God_flakes wrote: »Lord_Draevan wrote: »IMO this won't solve anything, EP. Either we end up alone on Haderus with no PvP fights, or AD and DC pvpers will switch over and it'll be the same situation that's currently on Trueflame.
But like them or not, we owe a lot of our success to Pact Militia, so anyone who stays of Trueflame is going to have a much harder time without them.
Either way I'm not going be playing very much for the next few months, so either choice is fine by me.
No. The players who have been dependent and reliant on their zergs will have to learn to become better individual players. Trust me, this will be good for the Ep who remain on TF.
The people who need to improve are far more likely to log in, see that EP's being Gate camped with no Scrolls, then go PvE or switch campaigns, and won't improve.
That's why no faction should gate camp!!! So what your saying is that most of the EP left on TF are going to be CHAOTIC NEUTRAL from the image below...
General Question to all, what type of Gamer are you? I like to think of myself as Chaotic Good unless the right person comes along.
God_flakes wrote: »General Question to all, what type of Gamer are you? I like to think of myself as Chaotic Good unless the right person comes along.
I don't know about me... But I see Tex!

Publius_Scipio wrote: »As the tide rises and the waves of Pact Militia come crashing on shore, the COVENANT will be the seawall that breaks the waves. The flood pumps will be manned by COVENANT hands!
Count me in, Skippy!
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »God_flakes wrote: »General Question to all, what type of Gamer are you? I like to think of myself as Chaotic Good unless the right person comes along.
I don't know about me... But I see Tex!
I updated the last 3. I think we all know which one is Tex.
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »God_flakes wrote: »General Question to all, what type of Gamer are you? I like to think of myself as Chaotic Good unless the right person comes along.
I don't know about me... But I see Tex!
I updated the last 3. I think we all know which one is Tex.
@Crispen_Longbow wins the thread!
Lord_Draevan wrote: »God_flakes wrote: »Lord_Draevan wrote: »IMO this won't solve anything, EP. Either we end up alone on Haderus with no PvP fights, or AD and DC pvpers will switch over and it'll be the same situation that's currently on Trueflame.
But like them or not, we owe a lot of our success to Pact Militia, so anyone who stays of Trueflame is going to have a much harder time without them.
Either way I'm not going be playing very much for the next few months, so either choice is fine by me.
No. The players who have been dependent and reliant on their zergs will have to learn to become better individual players. Trust me, this will be good for the Ep who remain on TF.
The people who need to improve are far more likely to log in, see that EP's being Gate camped with no Scrolls, then go PvE or switch campaigns, and won't improve.
Yeah I would move too if i kept getting beaten as well. Good thing I am AD. We will never have the numbers to compete with EP. So it might balance out the pop. the more numbers they bring it just makes me want to take everything from them and then do scrolmens to rub it in. It might be nice to see a keep flag on the map and horse ride to it not see every postern guarded or get up on the outside wall to see three full raid groups to take one keep. But i am not going to let my faction mates get zerged down when they are outnumbered three to one or four to one.
Celas_Dranacea wrote: »It's been an awesome few months of AD winning TF but this server shakeup is good, should be interesting.