GreenSoup2HoT wrote: »You despise the CC used against you?
You despise using the CC against other players?
Why don't you like the CC from this Ultimate ability?
Why would you prefer something else?
Your statement is kind of vague.

RedisSennegath wrote: »I honestly think the issue is more at your side rather than incaps.
The incap CC is a) Dodgeable b) Blockable.
It has a fairly long animation and a sound warning you that its coming.
A lot of times the enemy will counter it unless you CC him before you use incap. And then you miss anyway because of shuffle
ShedsHisTail wrote: »You can't call it "Incapacitating Strike" if it doesn't incapacitate.
Sorry, we're bound by semantics here. Has to stay.
SleepyTroll wrote: »So you don't want to cc other players? how do you kill people with all the self heals and roll doge going on?
Strider_Roshin wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »You can't call it "Incapacitating Strike" if it doesn't incapacitate.
Sorry, we're bound by semantics here. Has to stay.
Okay but you have to act surprised every time I hit you with Surprise Attack.
Brutusmax1mus wrote: »I like incapacitating strikes better than dbos. Cheaper, more immediate damage, healing debuff are what I'm looking for on my nb.
Brutusmax1mus wrote: »I like incapacitating strikes better than dbos. Cheaper, more immediate damage, healing debuff are what I'm looking for on my nb.
Better than an AoE with CC, DoT and wpn buff, that's undodgeable?
You can get the debuff with a decent glyph and talking about the cost, it is more expensive, but it's not a 200 ult, just 100, quite easy to get for a NB.
Brutusmax1mus wrote: »I like incapacitating strikes better than dbos. Cheaper, more immediate damage, healing debuff are what I'm looking for on my nb.
Better than an AoE with CC, DoT and wpn buff, that's undodgeable?
You can get the debuff with a decent glyph and talking about the cost, it is more expensive, but it's not a 200 ult, just 100, quite easy to get for a NB.
RedisSennegath wrote: »I honestly think the issue is more at your side rather than incaps.
The incap CC is a) Dodgeable b) Blockable.
It has a fairly long animation and a sound warning you that its coming.
A lot of times the enemy will counter it unless you CC him before you use incap. And then you miss anyway because of shuffle
I don't think the stun is a big issue since Incap is a nightblade skill, and nightblades have fear, which they should use before incap on CC-vulnerable enemies anyway, to prevent the incap from being blocked/rolled, making the stun kinda redundant.
Azor_Ahaii wrote: »Just wondering, can you empower DBoS with mage light?
Only one class has a In class purge and that's Templar.Other magic classes has to use the alliance war purge which is very expensive or deal with the DOT remember shields take DOT damage now.Only Stamplars have a class purge since they removed it from Dark cloak.So again the Dot will more then likely kill you not counting the upfront damage.Which you have to realized that DBOs still do more damage than Incap strike so it be easier to stealth gank people with with DBOS actually you can kill more people faster.Ultimately its personal opinion in this matter.Brutusmax1mus wrote: »Brutusmax1mus wrote: »I like incapacitating strikes better than dbos. Cheaper, more immediate damage, healing debuff are what I'm looking for on my nb.
Better than an AoE with CC, DoT and wpn buff, that's undodgeable?
You can get the debuff with a decent glyph and talking about the cost, it is more expensive, but it's not a 200 ult, just 100, quite easy to get for a NB.
Dot can be purged. Aoe is nice, but the way i nb is to make sure primary targets die, which up front damage works best for me. For aoe instances iv use tether which imo is better than dbod too. Night blades have great ultimates.
On my Templars and sorcs i use dbos.