The issues related to logging in to the European PC/Mac megaserver have been resolved at this time. If you continue to experience difficulties at login, please restart your client. Thank you for your patience!

ESO Plus Prioirity Queueing Suggestion

Combz
Combz
So just a quick suggestion about the load times of the more popular campaigns such as Haderus. Me and my buddy do not get to play all that often together due to our conflicting work schedules but when we do we like to dive into the PvP content. Thing is it's not just something you log in and enter, the queue time today was 150, 30 minutes in we are down to 98, i believe that ESO Plus members should get priority in all queues throughout the game.

TL:DR ESO Plus members should get priority in all queues throughout the game (PvP and PvE)
  • UltimaJoe777
    UltimaJoe777
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    We've said it before and we'll say it again: No.
    Guildmaster of Power With Numbers in PS4 NA Server's Aldmeri Dominion.
    Proud Founder of the Yaysay cult! DOWN WITH THE NAYSAY CULT!! #ToxicRemedy
  • imnotanother
    imnotanother
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Combz wrote: »
    So just a quick suggestion about the load times of the more popular campaigns such as Haderus. Me and my buddy do not get to play all that often together due to our conflicting work schedules but when we do we like to dive into the PvP content. Thing is it's not just something you log in and enter, the queue time today was 150, 30 minutes in we are down to 98, i believe that ESO Plus members should get priority in all queues throughout the game.

    TL:DR ESO Plus members should get priority in all queues throughout the game (PvP and PvE)

    Heads would roll.

    I can hear pitchforks being sharpened.
    PS4: NA - AD PSN: imnotanother (Artell Lyeselle)
    Stamina NightBlade 810+ CP - PvP/Trials/Dungeon Ready
  • Combz
    Combz
    Combz wrote: »
    So just a quick suggestion about the load times of the more popular campaigns such as Haderus. Me and my buddy do not get to play all that often together due to our conflicting work schedules but when we do we like to dive into the PvP content. Thing is it's not just something you log in and enter, the queue time today was 150, 30 minutes in we are down to 98, i believe that ESO Plus members should get priority in all queues throughout the game.

    TL:DR ESO Plus members should get priority in all queues throughout the game (PvP and PvE)

    Heads would roll.

    I can hear pitchforks being sharpened.

    Yeah, I could see the conflict, going to put the whole we put more money into the game then the F2Ps do.

    But, if this is a suggestion that has been mentioned numerous times before, what about splitting the queues for the Imperial City (Where the majority of players go now) and the battlefield. Because the queue time is calling for all player who want to enter Cyrodil in general not accounting the players who can't even get into the sewers.
  • Combz
    Combz
    Combz wrote: »
    Combz wrote: »
    So just a quick suggestion about the load times of the more popular campaigns such as Haderus. Me and my buddy do not get to play all that often together due to our conflicting work schedules but when we do we like to dive into the PvP content. Thing is it's not just something you log in and enter, the queue time today was 150, 30 minutes in we are down to 98, i believe that ESO Plus members should get priority in all queues throughout the game.

    TL:DR ESO Plus members should get priority in all queues throughout the game (PvP and PvE)

    Heads would roll.

    I can hear pitchforks being sharpened.

    Yeah, I could see the conflict, going to put the whole we put more money into the game then the F2Ps do.

    But, if this is a suggestion that has been mentioned numerous times before, what about splitting the queues for the Imperial City (Where the majority of players go now) and the battlefield. Because the queue time is calling for all player who want to enter Cyrodil in general not accounting the players who can't even get into the sewers.

    Not sure how to edit if that is even possible... but a simple fix would just to add a straight queue to the sewers and a queue for the battlefield.
  • anitajoneb17_ESO
    anitajoneb17_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Combz wrote: »

    Yeah, I could see the conflict, going to put the whole we put more money into the game then the F2Ps do.


    There's no such thing a "F2P" players. Everyone paid for the base game and DLC one way or the other.
    There's no proof that crown players contributed less to the game financially than ESO+ players. Sure, they pay less if they pay strictly for DLC, but they can also buy cosmetic stuff and end up paying more.
    You don't have the data to make such an assumption.

  • Combz
    Combz
    Combz wrote: »

    Yeah, I could see the conflict, going to put the whole we put more money into the game then the F2Ps do.


    There's no such thing a "F2P" players. Everyone paid for the base game and DLC one way or the other.
    There's no proof that crown players contributed less to the game financially than ESO+ players. Sure, they pay less if they pay strictly for DLC, but they can also buy cosmetic stuff and end up paying more.
    You don't have the data to make such an assumption.

    That is why I also suggested to split the queue times as well for players who are wanting to go into the Sewers or City, and those that just want to Siege.
  • anitajoneb17_ESO
    anitajoneb17_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Combz wrote: »

    That is why I also suggested to split the queue times as well for players who are wanting to go into the Sewers or City, and those that just want to Siege.

    This sounds simple but it is likely to not be that simple. It is related to game mechanics (IC and Cyro must remain interconnected) and server architecture... and it would "dilute" the population.
    It's like the suggestion to add more campaigns to reduce queuing times : the true issue is that everyone wants to enter a campaign with many players to fight against or to group up with, but nobody wants to wait to enter.


  • AlnilamE
    AlnilamE
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    As an ESO Plus subscriber: No.

    Also, if you are going to IC to PvE, shouldn't you be picking a less populated campaign?
    The Moot Councillor
  • DaveMoeDee
    DaveMoeDee
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    Absurd idea.
  • NewBlacksmurf
    NewBlacksmurf
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    This would be a terrible idea. Sorry, but no thanks
    -PC (PTS)/Xbox One: NewBlacksmurf
    ~<{[50]}>~ looks better than *501
  • Elsonso
    Elsonso
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Another ESO Plus subscriber says: No

    Too much elitism in that suggestion. Sorry.
    XBox EU/NA:@ElsonsoJannus
    PC NA/EU: @Elsonso
    PSN NA/EU: @ElsonsoJannus
    Total in-game hours: 11321
    X/Twitter: ElsonsoJannus
  • rootimus
    rootimus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm indifferent, but don't most MMOs do something like this? I know SWTOR does.
    Even on the internet, clear communication is important; it can be the difference between "helping your Uncle Jack off a horse" and "helping your uncle jack off a horse"; the difference between "knowing your s***" and "knowing you're s***".
    Greybeards & Gals - Civilised, laid-back, mature gamers. Beards optional. |
  • lDcoyl
    lDcoyl
    ✭✭
    Im an eso sub and Id say: No!

    Thats not fair to those who cant or dont want to pay monthly.
  • khele23eb17_ESO
    khele23eb17_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Id say sure - the queues dont work anyway. And if someone goes for ESO+ to get faster queue times I have a few bridges and other property around the country to sell them.
    P2P offered you 'hell yeah!' moments. F2P offers you 'thank god its over' moments.
Sign In or Register to comment.