Because ZOS themselves(if I am correct) have stated that getting thru or on walls without sieging them is exploiting. either I am wrong about this, or ZOS refuses or is unable to enforce this rule.

It's not a big deal though, usually "keep jumpers"are easy targets for the group on the wall.

I think most people are less annoyed about the gap closing enemy players during a siege than they are gap closing NPCs and making it easy to create more situations where people use cross-alliance friends to get into keeps on the sly.

Although if you've seen someone gap close through an outpost grate, they basically go straight up like a rocket. Dks have wings, but anyone with a 2h can fly!

When it was just DKs blowing an ultimate in select locations, it wasn't that big of a deal.

mechsauc3 wrote: »

Cody wrote: »

Because ZOS themselves(if I am correct) have stated that getting thru or on walls without sieging them is exploiting. either I am wrong about this, or ZOS refuses or is unable to enforce this rule.

It's not a big deal though, usually "keep jumpers"are easy targets for the group on the wall.

from my past mmorpg experience, every "charge" or gap closer have this. its really news to me that people find this to be an "exploit" where as, its their fault for being in range of crit rush.

its not about the gap closer in of itself, its that ZOS said(supposedly anyway) that getting into a keep without sieging it down is exploiting.

I personally don't have that much of an issue with it. even if it is exploiting, the "exploiter" tends to die due to being swarmed by the group on the wall, pretty bad exploit I say, if it actually is in ZOS terms.