KaleidoscopeEyz wrote: »As a console player, I never subbed. It seems as unnatural to me as square pizza.
I buy square Pizza often.At Pizza Hut.It is thick crust and comes with bread sticks!
(oh,and I sub)
Square pizza ftw
KaleidoscopeEyz wrote: »As a console player, I never subbed. It seems as unnatural to me as square pizza.
I buy square Pizza often.At Pizza Hut.It is thick crust and comes with bread sticks!
(oh,and I sub)
Square pizza ftw
F the World?
Why? Because there is yummy long 8 people Pizza with bread sticks in the world?
You be limited.I love having my pals over for Pizza,and this one works!
... FTW = For the Win...KaleidoscopeEyz wrote: »As a console player, I never subbed. It seems as unnatural to me as square pizza.
I buy square Pizza often.At Pizza Hut.It is thick crust and comes with bread sticks!
(oh,and I sub)
Square pizza ftw
F the World?
Why? Because there is yummy long 8 people Pizza with bread sticks in the world?
You be limited.I love having my pals over for Pizza,and this one works!
KaleidoscopeEyz wrote: »As a console player, I never subbed. It seems as unnatural to me as square pizza.
I buy square Pizza often.At Pizza Hut.It is thick crust and comes with bread sticks!
(oh,and I sub)
Square pizza ftw
F the World?
Why? Because there is yummy long 8 people Pizza with bread sticks in the world?
You be limited.I love having my pals over for Pizza,and this one works!
Intended to be 'for the win', but 'square pizza f the world' made me lol, so have a free awesome sir
In order from highest to lowest.
1. Zenimax's inability to fix bugs.
2. Zenimax's inability to handle cheaters.
3. Zenimax's inability to fix server performance in pvp
4. Zenimax's inability to communicate to their customer base truthfully.
Edit: 5.Zenimax's class balance patches....
Oh and actively deleting threads seems to be a thing now.
DocFrost72 wrote: »So, I have to ask (and I know it is off topic, but rather than start a new thread...) When you cancel your sub, does your remaining time of ESO plus still apply?
SwaminoNowlino wrote: »In order from highest to lowest.
1. Zenimax's inability to fix bugs.
2. Zenimax's inability to handle cheaters.
3. Zenimax's inability to fix server performance in pvp
4. Zenimax's inability to communicate to their customer base truthfully.
Edit: 5.Zenimax's class balance patches....
Oh and actively deleting threads seems to be a thing now.
HOLY BLEEP THEY DID ACTUALLY DELETE THAT THREAD COMPLETELY!!
SwaminoNowlino wrote: »In order from highest to lowest.
1. Zenimax's inability to fix bugs.
2. Zenimax's inability to handle cheaters.
3. Zenimax's inability to fix server performance in pvp
4. Zenimax's inability to communicate to their customer base truthfully.
Edit: 5.Zenimax's class balance patches....
Oh and actively deleting threads seems to be a thing now.
HOLY BLEEP THEY DID ACTUALLY DELETE THAT THREAD COMPLETELY!!

My top 3 reasons:
1. Once it became clear they're unaware of how to optimize their game. You can't blame end user hardware forever.
2. Turn around time on issues. There are an infinite amount of examples for this.
3. Lack of support for PvP as a whole. We need serious fixes, not 1-3 incremental non-noted back-end we'll never see the difference in performance changes per quarter.
One of the biggest things that I think about constantly is the potential this game has and how much of it is wasted due to poor development/management. This could be such an amazing game, I just don't have a decade to wait for them to figure out things that should have been figured out by launch.
My top 3 reasons:
1. Once it became clear they're unaware of how to optimize their game. You can't blame end user hardware forever.
2. Turn around time on issues. There are an infinite amount of examples for this.
3. Lack of support for PvP as a whole. We need serious fixes, not 1-3 incremental non-noted back-end we'll never see the difference in performance changes per quarter.
One of the biggest things that I think about constantly is the potential this game has and how much of it is wasted due to poor development/management. This could be such an amazing game, I just don't have a decade to wait for them to figure out things that should have been figured out by launch.
Why does everyone want ZOS to turn ESO into what it never was supposed to be? A PvP game.
People also talk about how they should take a lesson from this game or that,for ESO to be more like those games.
Personally,if I wanted a PvP game,there are many to choose from.And,if I wanted to play the games that often get mentioned in the forums,I would justy go play them.
But,I dont because I like ESO as it is.And MMORPG with PvP elements.
My top 3 reasons:
1. Once it became clear they're unaware of how to optimize their game. You can't blame end user hardware forever.
2. Turn around time on issues. There are an infinite amount of examples for this.
3. Lack of support for PvP as a whole. We need serious fixes, not 1-3 incremental non-noted back-end we'll never see the difference in performance changes per quarter.
One of the biggest things that I think about constantly is the potential this game has and how much of it is wasted due to poor development/management. This could be such an amazing game, I just don't have a decade to wait for them to figure out things that should have been figured out by launch.
Why does everyone want ZOS to turn ESO into what it never was supposed to be? A PvP game.
People also talk about how they should take a lesson from this game or that,for ESO to be more like those games.
Personally,if I wanted a PvP game,there are many to choose from.And,if I wanted to play the games that often get mentioned in the forums,I would justy go play them.
But,I dont because I like ESO as it is.And MMORPG with PvP elements.
My top 3 reasons:
1. Once it became clear they're unaware of how to optimize their game. You can't blame end user hardware forever.
2. Turn around time on issues. There are an infinite amount of examples for this.
3. Lack of support for PvP as a whole. We need serious fixes, not 1-3 incremental non-noted back-end we'll never see the difference in performance changes per quarter.
One of the biggest things that I think about constantly is the potential this game has and how much of it is wasted due to poor development/management. This could be such an amazing game, I just don't have a decade to wait for them to figure out things that should have been figured out by launch.
Why does everyone want ZOS to turn ESO into what it never was supposed to be? A PvP game.
People also talk about how they should take a lesson from this game or that,for ESO to be more like those games.
Personally,if I wanted a PvP game,there are many to choose from.And,if I wanted to play the games that often get mentioned in the forums,I would justy go play them.
But,I dont because I like ESO as it is.And MMORPG with PvP elements.
My top 3 reasons:
1. Once it became clear they're unaware of how to optimize their game. You can't blame end user hardware forever.
2. Turn around time on issues. There are an infinite amount of examples for this.
3. Lack of support for PvP as a whole. We need serious fixes, not 1-3 incremental non-noted back-end we'll never see the difference in performance changes per quarter.
One of the biggest things that I think about constantly is the potential this game has and how much of it is wasted due to poor development/management. This could be such an amazing game, I just don't have a decade to wait for them to figure out things that should have been figured out by launch.
Why does everyone want ZOS to turn ESO into what it never was supposed to be? A PvP game.
People also talk about how they should take a lesson from this game or that,for ESO to be more like those games.
Personally,if I wanted a PvP game,there are many to choose from.And,if I wanted to play the games that often get mentioned in the forums,I would justy go play them.
But,I dont because I like ESO as it is.And MMORPG with PvP elements.
Where did I once say I wanted ZOS to turn ESO into PvP only? I want proper support for PvP. If you're looking to white knight for ZOS right now it's not the right thread and you actually need to read my comment next time.
lolo_01b16_ESO wrote: »It's just too much for me. We have
- devs / mods lying to us (or changing their mind quite frequently)
- how exploits / cheaters are dealt with
- dumbed down content
- lag / bad game performance
and now Matt Firor tells us that he can't see people playing this game for 6 months, so if I've been invisable for the last 2 years, why should I continue to support the game. But at least this explains why there was no reaction to many of my bug reports.
My top 3 reasons:
1. Once it became clear they're unaware of how to optimize their game. You can't blame end user hardware forever.
2. Turn around time on issues. There are an infinite amount of examples for this.
3. Lack of support for PvP as a whole. We need serious fixes, not 1-3 incremental non-noted back-end we'll never see the difference in performance changes per quarter.
One of the biggest things that I think about constantly is the potential this game has and how much of it is wasted due to poor development/management. This could be such an amazing game, I just don't have a decade to wait for them to figure out things that should have been figured out by launch.
Why does everyone want ZOS to turn ESO into what it never was supposed to be? A PvP game.
People also talk about how they should take a lesson from this game or that,for ESO to be more like those games.
Personally,if I wanted a PvP game,there are many to choose from.And,if I wanted to play the games that often get mentioned in the forums,I would justy go play them.
But,I dont because I like ESO as it is.And MMORPG with PvP elements.
Where did I once say I wanted ZOS to turn ESO into PvP only? I want proper support for PvP. If you're looking to white knight for ZOS right now it's not the right thread and you actually need to read my comment next time.
Oh,please forgive me,..really! I didnt mean you.I swear it.I started out just to say one thing,and your words just reminded me of that small rant.I promise you arent in the wrong.I really should have stipulated that.
I started to add at the bottom of my post that I wasnt meaning you,but didnt,thinking you wouldnt need it.
I was wrong.
To those who saw my comment:
(I didnt mean the person I was commenting to)
(And here's my "safety Smiley".)
SwaminoNowlino wrote: »Title of the thread states that if you stopped subbing, please say why. If you didn't stop, then good for you, but no point in saying that in this thread.