Crispen_Longbow wrote: »So it looks like Had reset their campaign last night and AD is in the lead currently. Looks like AD came and morning capped the map as they crowned emp (OMF pwned) about 4 1/2 hours ago. Currently all pops are low with 1 bar each. So I assumed they Pvdoored the map.
I plan I checking the map every hour to see how the population balance is throughout the day and night for as long as I can stay awake on TF and Had.
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
You need some skyshards .
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
You need some skyshards .
Let me introduce you to Crispen <---- (Hates PVE) currently playing my baby AD with the bare minimum skill points to PVP.
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
You need some skyshards .
Let me introduce you to Crispen <---- (Hates PVE) currently playing my baby AD with the bare minimum skill points to PVP. Skyshards are too far away from the battle. If a skyshard is close to where I have been pvping I will grab it. Notice I haven't even gone to the AD home keeps to get them
rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
You need some skyshards .
Let me introduce you to Crispen <---- (Hates PVE) currently playing my baby AD with the bare minimum skill points to PVP.
Maybe you can find some of those AD zerg guilds you were fishing for in your guilds of haderus thread that couldn't find more than 1 or 2 guilds on the AD side compared to dozen+ on DC and EP?
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
You need some skyshards .
Let me introduce you to Crispen <---- (Hates PVE) currently playing my baby AD with the bare minimum skill points to PVP.
Maybe you can find some of those AD zerg guilds you were fishing for in your guilds of haderus thread that couldn't find more than 1 or 2 guilds on the AD side compared to dozen+ on DC and EP?
They sent me private messages asking me not to include them. They said the reason for having me not include them was they didn't want their members trolled.
It's hard for me to know the dynamics of had as I play on TF (Primetime)
rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
You need some skyshards .
Let me introduce you to Crispen <---- (Hates PVE) currently playing my baby AD with the bare minimum skill points to PVP.
Maybe you can find some of those AD zerg guilds you were fishing for in your guilds of haderus thread that couldn't find more than 1 or 2 guilds on the AD side compared to dozen+ on DC and EP?
They sent me private messages asking me not to include them. They said the reason for having me not include them was they didn't want their members trolled.
It's hard for me to know the dynamics of had as I play on TF (Primetime)
That makes very little sense.
The actual answer was there never was any organized presence on Had.
I challenge anyone to name 3 org groups on the AD side that were on Haderus.
Groups that recruit from zone don't count...
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
You need some skyshards .
Let me introduce you to Crispen <---- (Hates PVE) currently playing my baby AD with the bare minimum skill points to PVP.
Maybe you can find some of those AD zerg guilds you were fishing for in your guilds of haderus thread that couldn't find more than 1 or 2 guilds on the AD side compared to dozen+ on DC and EP?
They sent me private messages asking me not to include them. They said the reason for having me not include them was they didn't want their members trolled.
It's hard for me to know the dynamics of had as I play on TF (Primetime)
That makes very little sense.
The actual answer was there never was any organized presence on Had.
I challenge anyone to name 3 org groups on the AD side that were on Haderus.
Groups that recruit from zone don't count...
Archane Councel, Fantasia, and COH where all on Had until they moved over to TF. There are 3.
rfennell_ESO wrote: »And Crispen, I'm not trolling you. I play on Haderus as AD and I haven't the vaguest idea who the org groups are.
Most of the "zerg" complaints were about Nk (whoever that is) and their zone recruitment groups.
rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
You need some skyshards .
Let me introduce you to Crispen <---- (Hates PVE) currently playing my baby AD with the bare minimum skill points to PVP.
Maybe you can find some of those AD zerg guilds you were fishing for in your guilds of haderus thread that couldn't find more than 1 or 2 guilds on the AD side compared to dozen+ on DC and EP?
They sent me private messages asking me not to include them. They said the reason for having me not include them was they didn't want their members trolled.
It's hard for me to know the dynamics of had as I play on TF (Primetime)
That makes very little sense.
The actual answer was there never was any organized presence on Had.
I challenge anyone to name 3 org groups on the AD side that were on Haderus.
Groups that recruit from zone don't count...
Archane Councel, Fantasia, and COH where all on Had until they moved over to TF. There are 3.
Who?
ok Arcane Council I heard of.
Fantasia wasn't Had based and they don't do anything but farm AP anyways.
Telel wasn't based on Haderus, just because he came over for a bit doesn't mean much.
I play mostly on DC these days and honestly, DC is pretty zergy on haderus as of late. It's just the truth. I find myself not wanting to play on my blue bc blue owns all the emp keeps (at least) and is blobbing around the map.
There's no need to deny it, let's just admit it and cut the crap so the server can go back to the only shot at fun pvp we've got.
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
You need some skyshards .
Let me introduce you to Crispen <---- (Hates PVE) currently playing my baby AD with the bare minimum skill points to PVP.
Maybe you can find some of those AD zerg guilds you were fishing for in your guilds of haderus thread that couldn't find more than 1 or 2 guilds on the AD side compared to dozen+ on DC and EP?
They sent me private messages asking me not to include them. They said the reason for having me not include them was they didn't want their members trolled.
It's hard for me to know the dynamics of had as I play on TF (Primetime)
That makes very little sense.
The actual answer was there never was any organized presence on Had.
I challenge anyone to name 3 org groups on the AD side that were on Haderus.
Groups that recruit from zone don't count...
Archane Councel, Fantasia, and COH where all on Had until they moved over to TF. There are 3.
Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »SO what everyone is saying is that Telel and their pack should ponder coming back to Haderus after the current cycle of True Flame ends?
Or is this just another nerf cloak thread disguised as a reminder of how silly the bloopers are?
Werewolf spam doesn't create lag . Feel free to stay in TF .
Send VE there .
Actually that's not a bad idea. But then TF might lose the AD push. They would have to decide internally as a faction.
Maybe . But K-Hole and VE are considered by many to be equal fire power and VE is looking for server balance ... So ... Opportunities N stuff .
That's why I said it doesn't feel like a bad idea for VE to shift.
The trouble is, of late when I'm not raiding AD gets pushed pretty hard. I've considered going Had multiple times, and then Saramis hits Black Boot and Roe, EP pushes Alessia, and I'm not eager to leave at that point.
I feel like I should bring up some old quotes from some old threads when reading this.
Don't be a ***, put up or shut up Huntler
idk, why don't the other guilds on TF help out at that point. There's so many of them.
There aren't that many other AD guilds on TF if that's what you are talking about. Very few seem to run consistently or are small man. I think if VE left for Had it would throw off what seems to be a balanced campaign.
rfennell_ESO wrote: »So for the most part mighty Fengrush and co and the Rylana super zerg were fighting who?
Pugs?
rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
You need some skyshards .
Let me introduce you to Crispen <---- (Hates PVE) currently playing my baby AD with the bare minimum skill points to PVP.
Maybe you can find some of those AD zerg guilds you were fishing for in your guilds of haderus thread that couldn't find more than 1 or 2 guilds on the AD side compared to dozen+ on DC and EP?
They sent me private messages asking me not to include them. They said the reason for having me not include them was they didn't want their members trolled.
It's hard for me to know the dynamics of had as I play on TF (Primetime)
That makes very little sense.
The actual answer was there never was any organized presence on Had.
I challenge anyone to name 3 org groups on the AD side that were on Haderus.
Groups that recruit from zone don't count...
Archane Councel, Fantasia, and COH where all on Had until they moved over to TF. There are 3.
Who?
ok Arcane Council I heard of.
Fantasia wasn't Had based and they don't do anything but farm AP anyways.
Telel wasn't based on Haderus, just because he came over for a bit doesn't mean much.
rfennell_ESO wrote: »So for the most part mighty Fengrush and co and the Rylana super zerg were fighting who?
Pugs?
I think they might be fighting you. But who are you? You are just as anonymous as these groups you are talking about. And FYI, when youre trolling and being salty about everything while being anonymous, you lose pretty much all credibility
But as a DC I'm actually familiar with two groups running on Had that I know of. Tarans group and Megaburns. They usually have anything from 12-20+ as far as I know. And these are organised, just pugs
forzajuve212 wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
You need some skyshards .
Let me introduce you to Crispen <---- (Hates PVE) currently playing my baby AD with the bare minimum skill points to PVP.
Maybe you can find some of those AD zerg guilds you were fishing for in your guilds of haderus thread that couldn't find more than 1 or 2 guilds on the AD side compared to dozen+ on DC and EP?
They sent me private messages asking me not to include them. They said the reason for having me not include them was they didn't want their members trolled.
It's hard for me to know the dynamics of had as I play on TF (Primetime)
That makes very little sense.
The actual answer was there never was any organized presence on Had.
I challenge anyone to name 3 org groups on the AD side that were on Haderus.
Groups that recruit from zone don't count...
Archane Councel, Fantasia, and COH where all on Had until they moved over to TF. There are 3.
Yea we were on Haderus from Dec. 2015 till around April 2016 when it got too AD dominated and too many AD everywhere, so we've effectively switched to TF and have only come back when the lag is terrible.
As of late tho, TF has become the new haven for AD (as evidenced by 60 man TF queue's, which were non-existent for months and occurred on Haderus instead). The AD still seem to have a lot of players on Had but they appear to not be very good or just mostly pugs.
Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »SO what everyone is saying is that Telel and their pack should ponder coming back to Haderus after the current cycle of True Flame ends?
Or is this just another nerf cloak thread disguised as a reminder of how silly the bloopers are?
Werewolf spam doesn't create lag . Feel free to stay in TF .
Send VE there .
Actually that's not a bad idea. But then TF might lose the AD push. They would have to decide internally as a faction.
Maybe . But K-Hole and VE are considered by many to be equal fire power and VE is looking for server balance ... So ... Opportunities N stuff .
That's why I said it doesn't feel like a bad idea for VE to shift.
The trouble is, of late when I'm not raiding AD gets pushed pretty hard. I've considered going Had multiple times, and then Saramis hits Black Boot and Roe, EP pushes Alessia, and I'm not eager to leave at that point.
I feel like I should bring up some old quotes from some old threads when reading this.
Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »SO what everyone is saying is that Telel and their pack should ponder coming back to Haderus after the current cycle of True Flame ends?
Or is this just another nerf cloak thread disguised as a reminder of how silly the bloopers are?
Werewolf spam doesn't create lag . Feel free to stay in TF .
Send VE there .
Actually that's not a bad idea. But then TF might lose the AD push. They would have to decide internally as a faction.
Maybe . But K-Hole and VE are considered by many to be equal fire power and VE is looking for server balance ... So ... Opportunities N stuff .
That's why I said it doesn't feel like a bad idea for VE to shift.
The trouble is, of late when I'm not raiding AD gets pushed pretty hard. I've considered going Had multiple times, and then Saramis hits Black Boot and Roe, EP pushes Alessia, and I'm not eager to leave at that point.
I feel like I should bring up some old quotes from some old threads when reading this.
Don't be a ***, put up or shut up Huntler
idk, why don't the other guilds on TF help out at that point. There's so many of them.
There aren't that many other AD guilds on TF if that's what you are talking about. Very few seem to run consistently or are small man. I think if VE left for Had it would throw off what seems to be a balanced campaign.Yeah, it would. I just remember pointing out more than a few months ago the lack of AD guilds only to be told I was wrong by VE members, and there were even less guilds on TF back then than there are now.
rfennell_ESO wrote: »So for the most part mighty Fengrush and co and the Rylana super zerg were fighting who?
Pugs?
I think they might be fighting you. But who are you? You are just as anonymous as these groups you are talking about. And FYI, when youre trolling and being salty about everything while being anonymous, you lose pretty much all credibility
But as a DC I'm actually familiar with two groups running on Had that I know of. Tarans group and Megaburns. They usually have anything from 12-20+ as far as I know. And these are organised, just pugs
He's always been a salty forum troll. Always coming up with some reason to complain about why he loses and that his alliance can do no wrong.
i guess it is only fair to start an AD thread for Had. It seems the DC have learned much in the last 6 months from the EP on ZERGing. Its time AD to pick a campaign they can work together on and push back the DC and EP.
Presently DC on HAD runs 48 deep with a K guild leading. The take EMP which EP gives them, then they take AD scrolls and farms AD at the gates while ignoring EP scrolls, and keeps. It's so much fun watching team Purple play on Had that every AD should make it a point to come farm the Grapes.
rfennell_ESO wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »So for the most part mighty Fengrush and co and the Rylana super zerg were fighting who?
Pugs?
I think they might be fighting you. But who are you? You are just as anonymous as these groups you are talking about. And FYI, when youre trolling and being salty about everything while being anonymous, you lose pretty much all credibility
But as a DC I'm actually familiar with two groups running on Had that I know of. Tarans group and Megaburns. They usually have anything from 12-20+ as far as I know. And these are organised, just pugs
He's always been a salty forum troll. Always coming up with some reason to complain about why he loses and that his alliance can do no wrong.
Considering the source and what that source uses... lolz.
My alliance can do no wrong? It's the least organized and full of pugs that don't know how to block anything. They are more a danger to me than the other alliances as they explode in vicious death explosions. AD is the alliance that literally can't siege a wall without 3 walls being hit.
I'm more referring to who Rylana ranted and raged about stopping though... I mean he was in zone as AD cursing and insulting for days. That was pretty much the precursor to the current DC zerg taking over Haderus.
I don't see a point in including my name because this forum is full of people that talk a lot of crap. Post videos of them 1vxing when they are nothing but cheats in game... talk about honor and good fights when they cross faction at every opportunity. For the longest time there was complete denial that any funny biz was going on, we now know otherwise...
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »
Really no one should be over on Had right now PVPdooring when good solid play is to be found on TF. Just my two cents
You need some skyshards .
Let me introduce you to Crispen <---- (Hates PVE) currently playing my baby AD with the bare minimum skill points to PVP. Skyshards are too far away from the battle. If a skyshard is close to where I have been pvping I will grab it. Notice I haven't even gone to the AD Temple gates to get them
rfennell_ESO wrote: »rfennell_ESO wrote: »So for the most part mighty Fengrush and co and the Rylana super zerg were fighting who?
Pugs?
I think they might be fighting you. But who are you? You are just as anonymous as these groups you are talking about. And FYI, when youre trolling and being salty about everything while being anonymous, you lose pretty much all credibility
But as a DC I'm actually familiar with two groups running on Had that I know of. Tarans group and Megaburns. They usually have anything from 12-20+ as far as I know. And these are organised, just pugs
He's always been a salty forum troll. Always coming up with some reason to complain about why he loses and that his alliance can do no wrong.
Considering the source and what that source uses... lolz.