cosmic_niklas_93b16_ESO wrote: »cosmic_niklas_93b16_ESO wrote: »willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
What are you trying to say? Are you trying to justify how strong templar are right now? Terrible logic. Just because a class used to be weak (assuming it's even true), doesn't justify it being too strong now - but that's not what I'm saying anyway. I'd rather sorcerer be improved than have a good class (templar) destroyed.
EDIT: I should add, this isn't only about PvP, but that's certainly an important area. Also, 1v1 isn't the only or most important aspect of PvP.
EDIT2: I see from your signature that your main character is a templar. Gee, I wonder if you have some sort of bias.
The guy said Templars have always been the "Win button" of ESO which is just untrue. I am not trying to justify anything with current balance now because Templars are fine. Some class builds still annihilatevus but now we have a fighting chance. Mag sorcs definately got more balanced and are now beatable, but I guess you like being OP. Stam sorcs got a bit of love which was very much needed.
I feel like the balance overall is better now than it was before.
1v1 isn't the only aspect but it is the best indicator of balance between classes and builds.
It's pretty hypocritical of you to point out my bias when your entire thread about your class is one big bias.
Sorcs are doing just fine and templars are not currently OP. If you feel otherwise you should probably reevaluate your experiences and seek out improvement.willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
No one is saying Templars are overpowered, they are in similar level to DKs and Nightblades in most areas and are the better healers, while Nightblades are the best for PvP and DKs are the best for tanking. What we are saying is that sorcerers are not the best at anything, they are the class with the least forgiving rotation in PvE, the class with least reliable self heals and the only class with terrible toggles (some of which that we are forced to use). It all contributes to the most boring class to play.
Also, it is laughable that you say you see lots of unkillable sorcerers in PvP as there has been some serious notes by every PvP guild that the number of sorcerers around Cyrodiil has diminished quite considerably since the release of DB.
That's exactly what the OP and the guy I responded to was saying; that templars are OP and easy to play.
Similar level to NBs? I still see stamblades excelling past what a Templar can achieve, albeit at a smaller degree than before.
I can only state what I see, laugh if you want. I didn't know that EVERY PvP guild agreed on this. If you're going to make such a claim then I will just counter it by saying that might be true but that there are still more sorcs around than templars and by your logic that must mean sorcs are better.
In truth I can't sympasize with you sorcs because your class is still good and nowhere near at the *** level templars were for one and a half year, where during that period mag sorcs were *** beasts. Other classes and builds just got brought up to the same level so the balance is better. That is a good thing.willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
I saw someone rich today.So there's definitely no poverty.
NA logic?
If sorcs are so OP, then why in a poll where a guy asked which class he should be was magicka sorc the only one without a single vote while magplars got the second most with stam DK first? xD
I didn't claim sorcs are OP now. I think they are fine. The only build I still think is overperforming in PvP are stamblades.
I don't know of that thread. Probably the same people who said stamplars were just fine the past one and a half year before they got buffed.
I tend to not follow the opinions of the masses on these forums because most times they are wrong.
And what about ingame where most sorcs have rerolled their class this patch because all other classes are easier to play for the same or better reward in terms of survivability, dps, utility etc? Are they all wrong too? xD
Please provide a link to the statistic supporting that claim.
Some classes do some things better than sorcs now sure.
They no longer have the survivability of a DK and Templar combined along with the burst of the NB.
The people rerolling their sorcs now are the people who are used to *** and now have to fight just as hard for it as many other builds, and those people will always aim for FotM (or should I say year?). You have to realize that many of the sorc players were rerollers from DKs and Templars back from before console launch because Sorc have been insanely strong since then along with stamblades. So they rerolled to Sorc back then because it was overperforming and now they will probably move to stamblade or something else. Those people do not stick with something if it requires effort to make it work and such they are not really a good demographic to base decisions on.
Let the pstch hit and let thing settle. Then in a month or two we will have a clearer view of where things are. But I do believe that sorcs are doing just fine, both stam and mag, this patch. Yes mag sorcs are comparatively performing worse this patch compared to last one but that was warranted since they were too strong. Only wondering why they didn't bring stamblades back in line too.
willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
What are you trying to say? Are you trying to justify how strong templar are right now? Terrible logic. Just because a class used to be weak (assuming it's even true), doesn't justify it being too strong now - but that's not what I'm saying anyway. I'd rather sorcerer be improved than have a good class (templar) destroyed.
EDIT: I should add, this isn't only about PvP, but that's certainly an important area. Also, 1v1 isn't the only or most important aspect of PvP.
EDIT2: I see from your signature that your main character is a templar. Gee, I wonder if you have some sort of bias.
The guy said Templars have always been the "Win button" of ESO which is just untrue. I am not trying to justify anything with current balance now because Templars are fine. Some class builds still annihilatevus but now we have a fighting chance. Mag sorcs definately got more balanced and are now beatable, but I guess you like being OP. Stam sorcs got a bit of love which was very much needed.
I feel like the balance overall is better now than it was before.
1v1 isn't the only aspect but it is the best indicator of balance between classes and builds.
It's pretty hypocritical of you to point out my bias when your entire thread about your class is one big bias.
Sorcs are doing just fine and templars are not currently OP. If you feel otherwise you should probably reevaluate your experiences and seek out improvement.willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
No one is saying Templars are overpowered, they are in similar level to DKs and Nightblades in most areas and are the better healers, while Nightblades are the best for PvP and DKs are the best for tanking. What we are saying is that sorcerers are not the best at anything, they are the class with the least forgiving rotation in PvE, the class with least reliable self heals and the only class with terrible toggles (some of which that we are forced to use). It all contributes to the most boring class to play.
Also, it is laughable that you say you see lots of unkillable sorcerers in PvP as there has been some serious notes by every PvP guild that the number of sorcerers around Cyrodiil has diminished quite considerably since the release of DB.
That's exactly what the OP and the guy I responded to was saying; that templars are OP and easy to play.
Similar level to NBs? I still see stamblades excelling past what a Templar can achieve, albeit at a smaller degree than before.
I can only state what I see, laugh if you want. I didn't know that EVERY PvP guild agreed on this. If you're going to make such a claim then I will just counter it by saying that might be true but that there are still more sorcs around than templars and by your logic that must mean sorcs are better.
In truth I can't sympasize with you sorcs because your class is still good and nowhere near at the *** level templars were for one and a half year, where during that period mag sorcs were *** beasts. Other classes and builds just got brought up to the same level so the balance is better. That is a good thing.willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
I saw someone rich today.So there's definitely no poverty.
NA logic?
cosmic_niklas_93b16_ESO wrote: »cosmic_niklas_93b16_ESO wrote: »willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
What are you trying to say? Are you trying to justify how strong templar are right now? Terrible logic. Just because a class used to be weak (assuming it's even true), doesn't justify it being too strong now - but that's not what I'm saying anyway. I'd rather sorcerer be improved than have a good class (templar) destroyed.
EDIT: I should add, this isn't only about PvP, but that's certainly an important area. Also, 1v1 isn't the only or most important aspect of PvP.
EDIT2: I see from your signature that your main character is a templar. Gee, I wonder if you have some sort of bias.
The guy said Templars have always been the "Win button" of ESO which is just untrue. I am not trying to justify anything with current balance now because Templars are fine. Some class builds still annihilatevus but now we have a fighting chance. Mag sorcs definately got more balanced and are now beatable, but I guess you like being OP. Stam sorcs got a bit of love which was very much needed.
I feel like the balance overall is better now than it was before.
1v1 isn't the only aspect but it is the best indicator of balance between classes and builds.
It's pretty hypocritical of you to point out my bias when your entire thread about your class is one big bias.
Sorcs are doing just fine and templars are not currently OP. If you feel otherwise you should probably reevaluate your experiences and seek out improvement.willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
No one is saying Templars are overpowered, they are in similar level to DKs and Nightblades in most areas and are the better healers, while Nightblades are the best for PvP and DKs are the best for tanking. What we are saying is that sorcerers are not the best at anything, they are the class with the least forgiving rotation in PvE, the class with least reliable self heals and the only class with terrible toggles (some of which that we are forced to use). It all contributes to the most boring class to play.
Also, it is laughable that you say you see lots of unkillable sorcerers in PvP as there has been some serious notes by every PvP guild that the number of sorcerers around Cyrodiil has diminished quite considerably since the release of DB.
That's exactly what the OP and the guy I responded to was saying; that templars are OP and easy to play.
Similar level to NBs? I still see stamblades excelling past what a Templar can achieve, albeit at a smaller degree than before.
I can only state what I see, laugh if you want. I didn't know that EVERY PvP guild agreed on this. If you're going to make such a claim then I will just counter it by saying that might be true but that there are still more sorcs around than templars and by your logic that must mean sorcs are better.
In truth I can't sympasize with you sorcs because your class is still good and nowhere near at the *** level templars were for one and a half year, where during that period mag sorcs were *** beasts. Other classes and builds just got brought up to the same level so the balance is better. That is a good thing.willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
I saw someone rich today.So there's definitely no poverty.
NA logic?
If sorcs are so OP, then why in a poll where a guy asked which class he should be was magicka sorc the only one without a single vote while magplars got the second most with stam DK first? xD
I didn't claim sorcs are OP now. I think they are fine. The only build I still think is overperforming in PvP are stamblades.
I don't know of that thread. Probably the same people who said stamplars were just fine the past one and a half year before they got buffed.
I tend to not follow the opinions of the masses on these forums because most times they are wrong.
And what about ingame where most sorcs have rerolled their class this patch because all other classes are easier to play for the same or better reward in terms of survivability, dps, utility etc? Are they all wrong too? xD
Please provide a link to the statistic supporting that claim.
Some classes do some things better than sorcs now sure.
They no longer have the survivability of a DK and Templar combined along with the burst of the NB.
The people rerolling their sorcs now are the people who are used to *** and now have to fight just as hard for it as many other builds, and those people will always aim for FotM (or should I say year?). You have to realize that many of the sorc players were rerollers from DKs and Templars back from before console launch because Sorc have been insanely strong since then along with stamblades. So they rerolled to Sorc back then because it was overperforming and now they will probably move to stamblade or something else. Those people do not stick with something if it requires effort to make it work and such they are not really a good demographic to base decisions on.
Let the pstch hit and let thing settle. Then in a month or two we will have a clearer view of where things are. But I do believe that sorcs are doing just fine, both stam and mag, this patch. Yes mag sorcs are comparatively performing worse this patch compared to last one but that was warranted since they were too strong. Only wondering why they didn't bring stamblades back in line too.
willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
What are you trying to say? Are you trying to justify how strong templar are right now? Terrible logic. Just because a class used to be weak (assuming it's even true), doesn't justify it being too strong now - but that's not what I'm saying anyway. I'd rather sorcerer be improved than have a good class (templar) destroyed.
EDIT: I should add, this isn't only about PvP, but that's certainly an important area. Also, 1v1 isn't the only or most important aspect of PvP.
EDIT2: I see from your signature that your main character is a templar. Gee, I wonder if you have some sort of bias.
The guy said Templars have always been the "Win button" of ESO which is just untrue. I am not trying to justify anything with current balance now because Templars are fine. Some class builds still annihilatevus but now we have a fighting chance. Mag sorcs definately got more balanced and are now beatable, but I guess you like being OP. Stam sorcs got a bit of love which was very much needed.
I feel like the balance overall is better now than it was before.
1v1 isn't the only aspect but it is the best indicator of balance between classes and builds.
It's pretty hypocritical of you to point out my bias when your entire thread about your class is one big bias.
Sorcs are doing just fine and templars are not currently OP. If you feel otherwise you should probably reevaluate your experiences and seek out improvement.willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
No one is saying Templars are overpowered, they are in similar level to DKs and Nightblades in most areas and are the better healers, while Nightblades are the best for PvP and DKs are the best for tanking. What we are saying is that sorcerers are not the best at anything, they are the class with the least forgiving rotation in PvE, the class with least reliable self heals and the only class with terrible toggles (some of which that we are forced to use). It all contributes to the most boring class to play.
Also, it is laughable that you say you see lots of unkillable sorcerers in PvP as there has been some serious notes by every PvP guild that the number of sorcerers around Cyrodiil has diminished quite considerably since the release of DB.
That's exactly what the OP and the guy I responded to was saying; that templars are OP and easy to play.
Similar level to NBs? I still see stamblades excelling past what a Templar can achieve, albeit at a smaller degree than before.
I can only state what I see, laugh if you want. I didn't know that EVERY PvP guild agreed on this. If you're going to make such a claim then I will just counter it by saying that might be true but that there are still more sorcs around than templars and by your logic that must mean sorcs are better.
In truth I can't sympasize with you sorcs because your class is still good and nowhere near at the *** level templars were for one and a half year, where during that period mag sorcs were *** beasts. Other classes and builds just got brought up to the same level so the balance is better. That is a good thing.willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
I saw someone rich today.So there's definitely no poverty.
NA logic?
I don't want to turn this into a Templar or Jesus beam whine thread, there are enough of those. Your class is fine and fun to play, it should stay that way.
All I ask is that they make sorcs just as fun and viable.cosmic_niklas_93b16_ESO wrote: »cosmic_niklas_93b16_ESO wrote: »willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
What are you trying to say? Are you trying to justify how strong templar are right now? Terrible logic. Just because a class used to be weak (assuming it's even true), doesn't justify it being too strong now - but that's not what I'm saying anyway. I'd rather sorcerer be improved than have a good class (templar) destroyed.
EDIT: I should add, this isn't only about PvP, but that's certainly an important area. Also, 1v1 isn't the only or most important aspect of PvP.
EDIT2: I see from your signature that your main character is a templar. Gee, I wonder if you have some sort of bias.
The guy said Templars have always been the "Win button" of ESO which is just untrue. I am not trying to justify anything with current balance now because Templars are fine. Some class builds still annihilatevus but now we have a fighting chance. Mag sorcs definately got more balanced and are now beatable, but I guess you like being OP. Stam sorcs got a bit of love which was very much needed.
I feel like the balance overall is better now than it was before.
1v1 isn't the only aspect but it is the best indicator of balance between classes and builds.
It's pretty hypocritical of you to point out my bias when your entire thread about your class is one big bias.
Sorcs are doing just fine and templars are not currently OP. If you feel otherwise you should probably reevaluate your experiences and seek out improvement.willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
No one is saying Templars are overpowered, they are in similar level to DKs and Nightblades in most areas and are the better healers, while Nightblades are the best for PvP and DKs are the best for tanking. What we are saying is that sorcerers are not the best at anything, they are the class with the least forgiving rotation in PvE, the class with least reliable self heals and the only class with terrible toggles (some of which that we are forced to use). It all contributes to the most boring class to play.
Also, it is laughable that you say you see lots of unkillable sorcerers in PvP as there has been some serious notes by every PvP guild that the number of sorcerers around Cyrodiil has diminished quite considerably since the release of DB.
That's exactly what the OP and the guy I responded to was saying; that templars are OP and easy to play.
Similar level to NBs? I still see stamblades excelling past what a Templar can achieve, albeit at a smaller degree than before.
I can only state what I see, laugh if you want. I didn't know that EVERY PvP guild agreed on this. If you're going to make such a claim then I will just counter it by saying that might be true but that there are still more sorcs around than templars and by your logic that must mean sorcs are better.
In truth I can't sympasize with you sorcs because your class is still good and nowhere near at the *** level templars were for one and a half year, where during that period mag sorcs were *** beasts. Other classes and builds just got brought up to the same level so the balance is better. That is a good thing.willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
Up until recently templar was the worst class for 1v1 in the game. Come back when you have more experience, knowledge and know what you are talking about.
To OP: I see lots of near unbeatable magic sorcs roaming around in Cyrodiil every day so there is definately nothing wrong with your class.
I saw someone rich today.So there's definitely no poverty.
NA logic?
If sorcs are so OP, then why in a poll where a guy asked which class he should be was magicka sorc the only one without a single vote while magplars got the second most with stam DK first? xD
I didn't claim sorcs are OP now. I think they are fine. The only build I still think is overperforming in PvP are stamblades.
I don't know of that thread. Probably the same people who said stamplars were just fine the past one and a half year before they got buffed.
I tend to not follow the opinions of the masses on these forums because most times they are wrong.
And what about ingame where most sorcs have rerolled their class this patch because all other classes are easier to play for the same or better reward in terms of survivability, dps, utility etc? Are they all wrong too? xD
Please provide a link to the statistic supporting that claim.
Some classes do some things better than sorcs now sure.
They no longer have the survivability of a DK and Templar combined along with the burst of the NB.
The people rerolling their sorcs now are the people who are used to *** and now have to fight just as hard for it as many other builds, and those people will always aim for FotM (or should I say year?). You have to realize that many of the sorc players were rerollers from DKs and Templars back from before console launch because Sorc have been insanely strong since then along with stamblades. So they rerolled to Sorc back then because it was overperforming and now they will probably move to stamblade or something else. Those people do not stick with something if it requires effort to make it work and such they are not really a good demographic to base decisions on.
Let the pstch hit and let thing settle. Then in a month or two we will have a clearer view of where things are. But I do believe that sorcs are doing just fine, both stam and mag, this patch. Yes mag sorcs are comparatively performing worse this patch compared to last one but that was warranted since they were too strong. Only wondering why they didn't bring stamblades back in line too.
Statistic? How about... It takes three to four times as long to complete a 'kill 20 sorcs' bounty because there are so few around? Try it.
This steaming pile of a patch has had weeks to 'settle' and it doesn't smell any better from where sorcs are.
I want the class to be fun and viable for everyone, not just for an elitist talented few or the last stubborn die-hards like me.
Waffennacht wrote: »That said, you're past templar issues do not warrent a complete disregard of what these people are posting.
Waffennacht wrote: »That said, you're past templar issues do not warrent a complete disregard of what these people are posting.
That is definately true, I just genuinely do not see the big problem with Sorcs specifically this patch.
Every class could be improved in some ways to make them more fun or fit their "archetype" better, but I don't think Sorcs specifically need to be buffed.
I meet Sorcs I steamroll and I meat Sorcs who outplay me, just like I do with Stamblades and DKs.
Yesterday I was dueling a stam sorc who I couldn't even get close to beating as a Stamplar because he most likely had better gear and build but also knew what he was doing, and I meet mag sorcs constantly who I cannot seem to put a scratch in before they catch me in a burst combination and ruin my life within two seconds.
Fair enough if you play Sorc and feel like your class should get buffed, you have every right to advocate that, I just disagree.
What triggered my response on this thread was that the "buff sorcs" message was accompanied by a "templars have always been the easy mode OP class in this game" message written by another user and endorsed by the OP.
It feels like we a have a lot of console players on these forums who are without class history when it comes to looking at this game objectively.
Also we cannot dismiss that class balance is a different story on console than on PC simply because the game plays differently depending on the platform and what a player can achieve on each.
I played as her templar some more and saw how easy the game was - big damage, big instant heals, god-like execute (I see why it's called Jesus Beam now) - basically easy-mode.
Playing templar felt like I was cheating.
Zinaroth - you're just lying now. I never endorsed "templars have always been the easy mode OP class in the game."
I played as her templar some more and saw how easy the game was - big damage, big instant heals, god-like execute (I see why it's called Jesus Beam now) - basically easy-mode.Playing templar felt like I was cheating.Zinaroth - you're just lying now. I never endorsed "templars have always been the easy mode OP class in the game."
Yeah sure dude...
I played as her templar some more and saw how easy the game was - big damage, big instant heals, god-like execute (I see why it's called Jesus Beam now) - basically easy-mode.Playing templar felt like I was cheating.Zinaroth - you're just lying now. I never endorsed "templars have always been the easy mode OP class in the game."
Yeah sure dude...
Are you having a brain problem? You claimed that I supported "templars have always been easy mode" - yet I've stated that my post was specifically about my experience this patch.
You're purposefully ignoring logic and facts (and apparently basic English) in order to save yourself forum embarrassment. I'm literally embarrassed for you now.
willklippsteinb14_ESO wrote: »LOL Templars have always been the "Win Button" Of ESO. So totally understand how itd feel like "easy mode" Sorcs have always required abit of skill to play....whether you shield stacked or not....
I played as her templar some more and saw how easy the game was - big damage, big instant heals, god-like execute (I see why it's called Jesus Beam now) - basically easy-mode.Playing templar felt like I was cheating.Zinaroth - you're just lying now. I never endorsed "templars have always been the easy mode OP class in the game."
Yeah sure dude...
Are you having a brain problem? You claimed that I supported "templars have always been easy mode" - yet I've stated that my post was specifically about my experience this patch.
You're purposefully ignoring logic and facts (and apparently basic English) in order to save yourself forum embarrassment. I'm literally embarrassed for you now.
You know it's time to end a discussion when the opposing part starts resulting to personal attacks. Don't think think anything constructive will come from this. Good luck with your "templars are OP easy mode so please buff sorcs" agenda.
DaveMoeDee wrote: »I can't relate to being so attached to a single class. Part of the fun of ESO classes is being able to try each class and learning to play their fundamentally different play styles. I really struggled playing Sorc and NB coming from my DK tank because it was so different. It took me a while to learn their skills, but it is entertaining to figure out how to better use different skills. Templar was a bit different as I just spammed sweeps in PvE and everything was really easy. In PvP, I just stand behind my group spamming heals and RD. Getting to v16 was so much easier (or more mindless) on Templar than DK.
I suppose I understand being attached to a character, and it isn't like we can change that character's class, especially if they are a sorc and don't switch well to being stam weapon focused. But I like having 4 v16 characters and I plan to get 4 more so that I have 2 of each class, 1 stam and 1 magicka.
I work and have various personal duties, so I can only realistically focus on one character. Having all my time in this game invested in one character, just to see my investment arbitrarily get diminished due to one guy's opinions...yeah, I'm not happy about it.
newtinmpls wrote: »I work and have various personal duties, so I can only realistically focus on one character. Having all my time in this game invested in one character, just to see my investment arbitrarily get diminished due to one guy's opinions...yeah, I'm not happy about it.
You have made a tradeoff.
You have chosen to spend what time you have on one character.
If you don't like the results, then do something different.
Yes sorcs are bad especially when people say that this is(was) the best class for vMA, if You do not know what this is google it. In PvE every class is fine when it comes to not vMA solo content. Templars are "one button to win" type of class. I have all types of characters stamina and magicka and with the same(almost) gear I can pull off similar dps on same enemies. L2P or git gud, choose.
Quick edit: Before DB dragonknights had 3 types of damage: magical, physical and fire/flame no matter if magicka or stamina based character, try to put CP points into character like that.