Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »Tbh the only thing I was expecting is a discussion but I know that can be asking too much of some forum users.
But it would be a discussion about nothing since it's pure speculation.
So discussion, ESO will ensure the game works on the new console. Beyond that there is no reason for them to make changes. Zos has no vested interest in the sales of a new console so no reason to spend $$$ upgrading to serve theIr purpose.
GreenhaloX wrote: »PS4 is quite good now.. side from the non-back compatibility function. I wonder what kind of upgrades the next PS console would have. If it does come out with a new console, it may be a couple years before I upgrade to it. Took me a couple years to upgrade to PS4 from PS3.
I'm not a PC gamer guy.. always been console and better to play on a big screen TV than on a 15-17 inch PC screen. Also using console controller is much easier for me. I believe I finally upgraded to PS4 in anticipation for ESO and the soon-to-be released Dues Ex: Mankind Divided, but also to be able to play AC: Unity.

If rumors are true console upgrade will be seamless from architecture and API perspective, so devs will need to update sdk and make different settings set, which shouldn't require a lot of work.Will ESO upgrade alongside them? And would you make the purchase?
If rumors are true then PS4 and Xbox One are getting slimmer (but more importantly) more powerful versions coming in 2017.
If this is true then can we expect ESO to make the purchase worthwhile? Because if ESO is the same I won't bother, I'll just wait till ESO does evolve with the hardware.
But remember these are just rumors ATM.
Will ESO upgrade alongside them? And would you make the purchase?
If rumors are true then PS4 and Xbox One are getting slimmer (but more importantly) more powerful versions coming in 2017.
If this is true then can we expect ESO to make the purchase worthwhile? Because if ESO is the same I won't bother, I'll just wait till ESO does evolve with the hardware.
But remember these are just rumors ATM.

KingYogi415 wrote: »Enjoy your mods, macro and bots. I will stick with a controller and a fair playing field in pvp.
Lets see how happy you are when ps4k forces ZOS to make it run in 4k before pc get it!
Cheers!
Sallington wrote: »Will ESO upgrade alongside them? And would you make the purchase?
If rumors are true then PS4 and Xbox One are getting slimmer (but more importantly) more powerful versions coming in 2017.
If this is true then can we expect ESO to make the purchase worthwhile? Because if ESO is the same I won't bother, I'll just wait till ESO does evolve with the hardware.
But remember these are just rumors ATM.
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »At least us PC players don't need to put disks into play and accidently risk scratching them.....FortheloveofKrist wrote: »
Is Elder Scrolls Online on console significantly different than on PC? I've never done a side-by-side comparison of them so I don't know.
What could be improved with more powerful consoles? The only three things I can think of are faster loading times, higher resolution textures, and a better frame rate.
I can see all those coming to pass.
FortheloveofKrist wrote: »
Well said : )
GreenhaloX wrote: »PS4 is quite good now.. side from the non-back compatibility function. I wonder what kind of upgrades the next PS console would have. If it does come out with a new console, it may be a couple years before I upgrade to it. Took me a couple years to upgrade to PS4 from PS3.
I'm not a PC gamer guy.. always been console and better to play on a big screen TV than on a 15-17 inch PC screen. Also using console controller is much easier for me. I believe I finally upgraded to PS4 in anticipation for ESO and the soon-to-be released Dues Ex: Mankind Divided, but also to be able to play AC: Unity.
/pats poor console playeron the head , of course it's "easier" for you
[snip]
[edited for flaming]
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »GreenhaloX wrote: »PS4 is quite good now.. side from the non-back compatibility function. I wonder what kind of upgrades the next PS console would have. If it does come out with a new console, it may be a couple years before I upgrade to it. Took me a couple years to upgrade to PS4 from PS3.
I'm not a PC gamer guy.. always been console and better to play on a big screen TV than on a 15-17 inch PC screen. Also using console controller is much easier for me. I believe I finally upgraded to PS4 in anticipation for ESO and the soon-to-be released Dues Ex: Mankind Divided, but also to be able to play AC: Unity.
/pats poor console playeron the head , of course it's "easier" for you
[snip]
[edited for flaming]
You do understand Console players get that view WITHOUT having to plug numerous screens together right?
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »GreenhaloX wrote: »PS4 is quite good now.. side from the non-back compatibility function. I wonder what kind of upgrades the next PS console would have. If it does come out with a new console, it may be a couple years before I upgrade to it. Took me a couple years to upgrade to PS4 from PS3.
I'm not a PC gamer guy.. always been console and better to play on a big screen TV than on a 15-17 inch PC screen. Also using console controller is much easier for me. I believe I finally upgraded to PS4 in anticipation for ESO and the soon-to-be released Dues Ex: Mankind Divided, but also to be able to play AC: Unity.
/pats poor console playeron the head , of course it's "easier" for you
[snip]
[edited for flaming]
You do understand Console players get that view WITHOUT having to plug numerous screens together right?
I think you might be surprised at the resolution in that picture. Hint: It's not 1080p, or even 1440p.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »GreenhaloX wrote: »PS4 is quite good now.. side from the non-back compatibility function. I wonder what kind of upgrades the next PS console would have. If it does come out with a new console, it may be a couple years before I upgrade to it. Took me a couple years to upgrade to PS4 from PS3.
I'm not a PC gamer guy.. always been console and better to play on a big screen TV than on a 15-17 inch PC screen. Also using console controller is much easier for me. I believe I finally upgraded to PS4 in anticipation for ESO and the soon-to-be released Dues Ex: Mankind Divided, but also to be able to play AC: Unity.
/pats poor console playeron the head , of course it's "easier" for you
[snip]
[edited for flaming]
You do understand Console players get that view WITHOUT having to plug numerous screens together right?
Guys, we understand that discussing any particular platform tends to lead to general platform discussion but please keep discussion civil. Most of the platform vs platform debate is already out of context with the subject of this topic, and arguments have already lead to a fair amount of posts being removed (or removed in relation).
We would like to keep this chat open so let's get this chat back on track.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »GreenhaloX wrote: »PS4 is quite good now.. side from the non-back compatibility function. I wonder what kind of upgrades the next PS console would have. If it does come out with a new console, it may be a couple years before I upgrade to it. Took me a couple years to upgrade to PS4 from PS3.
I'm not a PC gamer guy.. always been console and better to play on a big screen TV than on a 15-17 inch PC screen. Also using console controller is much easier for me. I believe I finally upgraded to PS4 in anticipation for ESO and the soon-to-be released Dues Ex: Mankind Divided, but also to be able to play AC: Unity.
/pats poor console playeron the head , of course it's "easier" for you
[snip]
[edited for flaming]
You do understand Console players get that view WITHOUT having to plug numerous screens together right?
I think you might be surprised at the resolution in that picture. Hint: It's not 1080p, or even 1440p.
Resolution beyond 1080 is mostly wasted anyway, ever watch game of thrones and think this needs to be higher resolution?. Even at 1080, PC does give better graphics. But beyond 1080, it's just a pointless p1551ng contest. It's like saying my car goes 180 miles an hour, that's great but how often is that in any way useful? That's right never and you pay through the nose for it.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »GreenhaloX wrote: »PS4 is quite good now.. side from the non-back compatibility function. I wonder what kind of upgrades the next PS console would have. If it does come out with a new console, it may be a couple years before I upgrade to it. Took me a couple years to upgrade to PS4 from PS3.
I'm not a PC gamer guy.. always been console and better to play on a big screen TV than on a 15-17 inch PC screen. Also using console controller is much easier for me. I believe I finally upgraded to PS4 in anticipation for ESO and the soon-to-be released Dues Ex: Mankind Divided, but also to be able to play AC: Unity.
/pats poor console playeron the head , of course it's "easier" for you
[snip]
[edited for flaming]
You do understand Console players get that view WITHOUT having to plug numerous screens together right?
I think you might be surprised at the resolution in that picture. Hint: It's not 1080p, or even 1440p.
Resolution beyond 1080 is mostly wasted anyway, ever watch game of thrones and think this needs to be higher resolution?. Even at 1080, PC does give better graphics. But beyond 1080, it's just a pointless p1551ng contest. It's like saying my car goes 180 miles an hour, that's great but how often is that in any way useful? That's right never and you pay through the nose for it.
Depends on your screen size. Does 2560x1440 really make sense on my Samsung Galaxy s6 5 inch screen? Not really, and I wish I could lower that to save battery power TBH.
But does 4k resolution look better than 1080p on a 60 inch screen? Absolutely it does. The bigger the screen the more lines of resolution you want. 1080p may look good on a 20 inch monitor, but take that same resolution and spread it out over 60 inches and it looks like mud.
For the record, I never thought there was any issue with my old tube TV back in the 90's watching TV at 640x320 4:3 ratio. "Who cares about HD?" I thought. Yah...just try to go back. I can barely stand looking at the standard definition channels included with my cable.
Ruze is a veteran of the PC Beta, lived through the year one drought, survived the buy-to-play conversion, and has stepped foot in the hells known as Craglorn. He mained a nightlbade when nightblades weren't good, and has never worn a robe. He converted from PC during the console betas, and hasn't regretted it a moment since.
He'd rank ESO:TU (in it's current state) a 4.8 out of 5, loving the game almost entirely.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »GreenhaloX wrote: »PS4 is quite good now.. side from the non-back compatibility function. I wonder what kind of upgrades the next PS console would have. If it does come out with a new console, it may be a couple years before I upgrade to it. Took me a couple years to upgrade to PS4 from PS3.
I'm not a PC gamer guy.. always been console and better to play on a big screen TV than on a 15-17 inch PC screen. Also using console controller is much easier for me. I believe I finally upgraded to PS4 in anticipation for ESO and the soon-to-be released Dues Ex: Mankind Divided, but also to be able to play AC: Unity.
/pats poor console playeron the head , of course it's "easier" for you
[snip]
[edited for flaming]
You do understand Console players get that view WITHOUT having to plug numerous screens together right?
I think you might be surprised at the resolution in that picture. Hint: It's not 1080p, or even 1440p.
Resolution beyond 1080 is mostly wasted anyway, ever watch game of thrones and think this needs to be higher resolution?. Even at 1080, PC does give better graphics. But beyond 1080, it's just a pointless p1551ng contest. It's like saying my car goes 180 miles an hour, that's great but how often is that in any way useful? That's right never and you pay through the nose for it.



FortheloveofKrist wrote: »
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »GreenhaloX wrote: »PS4 is quite good now.. side from the non-back compatibility function. I wonder what kind of upgrades the next PS console would have. If it does come out with a new console, it may be a couple years before I upgrade to it. Took me a couple years to upgrade to PS4 from PS3.
I'm not a PC gamer guy.. always been console and better to play on a big screen TV than on a 15-17 inch PC screen. Also using console controller is much easier for me. I believe I finally upgraded to PS4 in anticipation for ESO and the soon-to-be released Dues Ex: Mankind Divided, but also to be able to play AC: Unity.
/pats poor console playeron the head , of course it's "easier" for you
[snip]
[edited for flaming]
You do understand Console players get that view WITHOUT having to plug numerous screens together right?
I think you might be surprised at the resolution in that picture. Hint: It's not 1080p, or even 1440p.
Resolution beyond 1080 is mostly wasted anyway, ever watch game of thrones and think this needs to be higher resolution?. Even at 1080, PC does give better graphics. But beyond 1080, it's just a pointless p1551ng contest. It's like saying my car goes 180 miles an hour, that's great but how often is that in any way useful? That's right never and you pay through the nose for it.
Yes yes , I expect some to say that. Just as some said 30fps is "more cinematic".
Some people can't tell the difference between wine out of a box at 10 dollars vs a reasonable tasting 100 dollar bottle.
Others though , appreciate quality.
You can go something like this , with a 48" 4k main screen flanked by two 40" 4k screens ,
Or you can go 65" Oled like this.
Currently running two 32" 4k BenQ 3201's(one rig for each one) with a 48" Samsung 4k for side monitor and Blu-Ray , Bloodborne on Potato use. Works well enough for the moment , waiting for the next gen OLED 65" like the above (never buy the first revision).
I assure you , whether it's my 32" 4K or my 48" 4k , right now 60 fps solid (never dips with Titan X SLI ) at 4k is night and day difference than 1080p 30fps console ESO (and neither potato's hold 30 fps even , so dips into the low 20's frequently.)
Again , 1080p might be good enough for you and some , but others don't like box wine.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »GreenhaloX wrote: »PS4 is quite good now.. side from the non-back compatibility function. I wonder what kind of upgrades the next PS console would have. If it does come out with a new console, it may be a couple years before I upgrade to it. Took me a couple years to upgrade to PS4 from PS3.
I'm not a PC gamer guy.. always been console and better to play on a big screen TV than on a 15-17 inch PC screen. Also using console controller is much easier for me. I believe I finally upgraded to PS4 in anticipation for ESO and the soon-to-be released Dues Ex: Mankind Divided, but also to be able to play AC: Unity.
/pats poor console playeron the head , of course it's "easier" for you
[snip]
[edited for flaming]
You do understand Console players get that view WITHOUT having to plug numerous screens together right?
I think you might be surprised at the resolution in that picture. Hint: It's not 1080p, or even 1440p.
Resolution beyond 1080 is mostly wasted anyway, ever watch game of thrones and think this needs to be higher resolution?. Even at 1080, PC does give better graphics. But beyond 1080, it's just a pointless p1551ng contest. It's like saying my car goes 180 miles an hour, that's great but how often is that in any way useful? That's right never and you pay through the nose for it.
Yes yes , I expect some to say that. Just as some said 30fps is "more cinematic".
Some people can't tell the difference between wine out of a box at 10 dollars vs a reasonable tasting 100 dollar bottle.
Others though , appreciate quality.
You can go something like this , with a 48" 4k main screen flanked by two 40" 4k screens ,
Or you can go 65" Oled like this.
Currently running two 32" 4k BenQ 3201's(one rig for each one) with a 48" Samsung 4k for side monitor and Blu-Ray , Bloodborne on Potato use. Works well enough for the moment , waiting for the next gen OLED 65" like the above (never buy the first revision).
I assure you , whether it's my 32" 4K or my 48" 4k , right now 60 fps solid (never dips with Titan X SLI ) at 4k is night and day difference than 1080p 30fps console ESO (and neither potato's hold 30 fps even , so dips into the low 20's frequently.)
Again , 1080p might be good enough for you and some , but others don't like box wine.
Want to be a bit more patronising? Because I'm happy with 1080 does not mean I'd drink box wine. I spend hundreds on wine (well my work does) no boxes. I refuse to spend the crazy amount that the set ups you suggest would cost.
I have more important things in my life to spend that money on. You may not, that does not make my likes simple in the way you suggest!
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »GreenhaloX wrote: »PS4 is quite good now.. side from the non-back compatibility function. I wonder what kind of upgrades the next PS console would have. If it does come out with a new console, it may be a couple years before I upgrade to it. Took me a couple years to upgrade to PS4 from PS3.
I'm not a PC gamer guy.. always been console and better to play on a big screen TV than on a 15-17 inch PC screen. Also using console controller is much easier for me. I believe I finally upgraded to PS4 in anticipation for ESO and the soon-to-be released Dues Ex: Mankind Divided, but also to be able to play AC: Unity.
/pats poor console playeron the head , of course it's "easier" for you
[snip]
[edited for flaming]
You do understand Console players get that view WITHOUT having to plug numerous screens together right?
I think you might be surprised at the resolution in that picture. Hint: It's not 1080p, or even 1440p.
Resolution beyond 1080 is mostly wasted anyway, ever watch game of thrones and think this needs to be higher resolution?. Even at 1080, PC does give better graphics. But beyond 1080, it's just a pointless p1551ng contest. It's like saying my car goes 180 miles an hour, that's great but how often is that in any way useful? That's right never and you pay through the nose for it.
Yes yes , I expect some to say that. Just as some said 30fps is "more cinematic".
Some people can't tell the difference between wine out of a box at 10 dollars vs a reasonable tasting 100 dollar bottle.
Others though , appreciate quality.
You can go something like this , with a 48" 4k main screen flanked by two 40" 4k screens ,
Or you can go 65" Oled like this.
Currently running two 32" 4k BenQ 3201's(one rig for each one) with a 48" Samsung 4k for side monitor and Blu-Ray , Bloodborne on Potato use. Works well enough for the moment , waiting for the next gen OLED 65" like the above (never buy the first revision).
I assure you , whether it's my 32" 4K or my 48" 4k , right now 60 fps solid (never dips with Titan X SLI ) at 4k is night and day difference than 1080p 30fps console ESO (and neither potato's hold 30 fps even , so dips into the low 20's frequently.)
Again , 1080p might be good enough for you and some , but others don't like box wine.
Want to be a bit more patronising? Because I'm happy with 1080 does not mean I'd drink box wine. I spend hundreds on wine (well my work does) no boxes. I refuse to spend the crazy amount that the set ups you suggest would cost.
I have more important things in my life to spend that money on. You may not, that does not make my likes simple in the way you suggest!
You were the one that said there was no reason , pointless and so on to go beyond 1080p.
I was showing why I thought it was not pointless.
Theres's a huge difference between 1080p 30fps and 4k 60fps to me and others.
KingYogi415 wrote: »@Dahkoht
Now that the 1070 came out was it worth the thousands of extra you spent to be able to run 4k 1 year early?