Crispen_Longbow wrote: »SubtleHate wrote: »Broken Boundaries
My small man PvP guild-- we haven't been as active of late, but when we run we run usually around groups between 6-12.
Trolling the crap out of zerglings and pugs.....
Thank you for the Guild information it is much appreciated.
If I might make one observation, I have noticed a common theme among many of the AD guilds on TF. It seems that they are more focused on harassment tactics then map control. If Adamant, Broken Boundaries and Faction hackers were to focus more on Map Control with Fantasia and CoH this could possible create a more balanced server. Only a humble observation nothing more, some food for thought.
Thank you again for the information.
Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow here is smart . He's obviously done is home work . He's solving a dozen problems with one stone . I didn't get it at first but after locating this thread I instantly got it . He's promoting a healthy stable server and bringing clarity to the lost and confused . Like any good General would do . Some people have been absent or on long hiatus . This information is essential . And it's about time we had this . Keep up the good work . No plans are being shared , no TS info has been handed out . I can only see positive things come from educating the players looking to be useful .
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »SubtleHate wrote: »Broken Boundaries
My small man PvP guild-- we haven't been as active of late, but when we run we run usually around groups between 6-12.
Trolling the crap out of zerglings and pugs.....
Thank you for the Guild information it is much appreciated.
If I might make one observation, I have noticed a common theme among many of the AD guilds on TF. It seems that they are more focused on harassment tactics then map control. If Adamant, Broken Boundaries and Faction hackers were to focus more on Map Control with Fantasia and CoH this could possible create a more balanced server. Only a humble observation nothing more, some food for thought.
Thank you again for the information.
It is a common misconception that we do not play map control. Considering our group size, we greatly contribute, but we have not consistently played for the last week and a half. For example we have secured 4 scroll this campaign, and we always help when we see a good opportunity.
Ramming 5-8 people into the entire EP pop is simply not smart, and will accomplish little to nothing. Harassment is generally our only option. We did play a few days ago, and there was some crazy stacking going on. So many EP were concentrated in Alessia/Aleswell that we were able to take SEJ, BRK and Arrius with 5 people. Arrius even had a Scroll in it, and the fight at Alessia did not stop till we were already moving it home.
Trust me we really do try to play the objectives, but eventually it becomes too much. I honestly can not stand asking people to play in some of the server performance on TF, and trying to lead a small group during lag is miserable. Furthermore, trying to push absolute map control is fruitless when you have 1-2 bars vs 3 Bars-locked pop. By this I mean I would never go to take Roe or Brindle when EP is dominating. All it would do is encourage AD pugs to push on DC, and this is not a good thing 90% of the time in TF. `
Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow here is smart . He's obviously done is home work . He's solving a dozen problems with one stone . I didn't get it at first but after locating this thread I instantly got it . He's promoting a healthy stable server and bringing clarity to the lost and confused . Like any good General would do . Some people have been absent or on long hiatus . This information is essential . And it's about time we had this . Keep up the good work . No plans are being shared , no TS info has been handed out . I can only see positive things come from educating the players looking to be useful .
No offense to you or OP, but this is all a little too high school for me. Who is who, who is in what clique? I'm too old for this guar dung.
Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow here is smart . He's obviously done is home work . He's solving a dozen problems with one stone . I didn't get it at first but after locating this thread I instantly got it . He's promoting a healthy stable server and bringing clarity to the lost and confused . Like any good General would do . Some people have been absent or on long hiatus . This information is essential . And it's about time we had this . Keep up the good work . No plans are being shared , no TS info has been handed out . I can only see positive things come from educating the players looking to be useful .
No offense to you or OP, but this is all a little too high school for me. Who is who, who is in what clique? I'm too old for this guar dung.
You're playing a social game. If that's too high school than MMOs might not be your thing.
Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow here is smart . He's obviously done is home work . He's solving a dozen problems with one stone . I didn't get it at first but after locating this thread I instantly got it . He's promoting a healthy stable server and bringing clarity to the lost and confused . Like any good General would do . Some people have been absent or on long hiatus . This information is essential . And it's about time we had this . Keep up the good work . No plans are being shared , no TS info has been handed out . I can only see positive things come from educating the players looking to be useful .
No offense to you or OP, but this is all a little too high school for me. Who is who, who is in what clique? I'm too old for this guar dung.
Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Roehamad_Ali wrote: »Crispen_Longbow here is smart . He's obviously done is home work . He's solving a dozen problems with one stone . I didn't get it at first but after locating this thread I instantly got it . He's promoting a healthy stable server and bringing clarity to the lost and confused . Like any good General would do . Some people have been absent or on long hiatus . This information is essential . And it's about time we had this . Keep up the good work . No plans are being shared , no TS info has been handed out . I can only see positive things come from educating the players looking to be useful .
No offense to you or OP, but this is all a little too high school for me. Who is who, who is in what clique? I'm too old for this guar dung.
No worries . I see it more like if you don't know your Allies , you have no army to work with . Just a bunch of loose warrior tribes . An this tool has been offered to all factions not just the OP's . I didn't take offence to your post . It's your opinion .
Publius_Scipio wrote: »I received an in-game mail from beyond the grave. It seems my post on page 2 caught the attention of the ghost of Grom Troll Stinky Fingers. The message was short and cryptic. Something about how a phoenix rises from the ashes. Seems like ESO is about to have its own Jon Snow moment.
What's important here is that I can now assure all of you that the spirit of Grom Troll is watching and listening. More specifically, to this very thread (see what good posts bring about). There are a few ways this can all shake out. Mr. Stinky Fingers return and take corporeal form and return to his old ways, coming after me and the COVENANT. Or, just maybe, he might reunite with his old friend Steve of VE and join the COVENANT, seeking to even the score with Haxus and Hektik for past transgressions. Or maybe neither, who knows?
Stay tuned folks.
Publius_Scipio wrote: »I received an in-game mail from beyond the grave. It seems my post on page 2 caught the attention of the ghost of Grom Troll Stinky Fingers. The message was short and cryptic. Something about how a phoenix rises from the ashes. Seems like ESO is about to have its own Jon Snow moment.
What's important here is that I can now assure all of you that the spirit of Grom Troll is watching and listening. More specifically, to this very thread (see what good posts bring about). There are a few ways this can all shake out. Mr. Stinky Fingers returns taking corporeal form and returns to his old ways, coming after me and the COVENANT. Or, just maybe, he might reunite with his old friend Steve of VE and join the COVENANT, seeking to even the score with Haxus and Hektik for past transgressions. Or maybe neither, who knows?
Stay tuned folks.
I used to play football and work in a corporate environment. you would never give away inforPublius_Scipio wrote: »I received an in-game mail from beyond the grave. It seems my post on page 2 caught the attention of the ghost of Grom Troll Stinky Fingers. The message was short and cryptic. Something about how a phoenix rises from the ashes. Seems like ESO is about to have its own Jon Snow moment.
What's important here is that I can now assure all of you that the spirit of Grom Troll is watching and listening. More specifically, to this very thread (see what good posts bring about). There are a few ways this can all shake out. Mr. Stinky Fingers returns taking corporeal form and returns to his old ways, coming after me and the COVENANT. Or, just maybe, he might reunite with his old friend Steve of VE and join the COVENANT, seeking to even the score with Haxus and Hektik for past transgressions. Or maybe neither, who knows?
Stay tuned folks.
Ok you win
Publius_Scipio wrote: »I used to play football and work in a corporate environment. you would never give away inforPublius_Scipio wrote: »I received an in-game mail from beyond the grave. It seems my post on page 2 caught the attention of the ghost of Grom Troll Stinky Fingers. The message was short and cryptic. Something about how a phoenix rises from the ashes. Seems like ESO is about to have its own Jon Snow moment.
What's important here is that I can now assure all of you that the spirit of Grom Troll is watching and listening. More specifically, to this very thread (see what good posts bring about). There are a few ways this can all shake out. Mr. Stinky Fingers returns taking corporeal form and returns to his old ways, coming after me and the COVENANT. Or, just maybe, he might reunite with his old friend Steve of VE and join the COVENANT, seeking to even the score with Haxus and Hektik for past transgressions. Or maybe neither, who knows?
Stay tuned folks.
Ok you win
abomination
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »SubtleHate wrote: »Broken Boundaries
My small man PvP guild-- we haven't been as active of late, but when we run we run usually around groups between 6-12.
Trolling the crap out of zerglings and pugs.....
Thank you for the Guild information it is much appreciated.
If I might make one observation, I have noticed a common theme among many of the AD guilds on TF. It seems that they are more focused on harassment tactics then map control. If Adamant, Broken Boundaries and Faction hackers were to focus more on Map Control with Fantasia and CoH this could possible create a more balanced server. Only a humble observation nothing more, some food for thought.
Thank you again for the information.
It is a common misconception that we do not play map control. Considering our group size, we greatly contribute, but we have not consistently played for the last week and a half. For example we have secured 4 scroll this campaign, and we always help when we see a good opportunity.
Ramming 5-8 people into the entire EP pop is simply not smart, and will accomplish little to nothing. Harassment is generally our only option. We did play a few days ago, and there was some crazy stacking going on. So many EP were concentrated in Alessia/Aleswell that we were able to take SEJ, BRK and Arrius with 5 people. Arrius even had a Scroll in it, and the fight at Alessia did not stop till we were already moving it home.
Trust me we really do try to play the objectives, but eventually it becomes too much. I honestly can not stand asking people to play in some of the server performance on TF, and trying to lead a small group during lag is miserable. Furthermore, trying to push absolute map control is fruitless when you have 1-2 bars vs 3 Bars-locked pop. By this I mean I would never go to take Roe or Brindle when EP is dominating. All it would do is encourage AD pugs to push on DC, and this is not a good thing 90% of the time in TF.
God_flakes wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »SubtleHate wrote: »Broken Boundaries
My small man PvP guild-- we haven't been as active of late, but when we run we run usually around groups between 6-12.
Trolling the crap out of zerglings and pugs.....
Thank you for the Guild information it is much appreciated.
If I might make one observation, I have noticed a common theme among many of the AD guilds on TF. It seems that they are more focused on harassment tactics then map control. If Adamant, Broken Boundaries and Faction hackers were to focus more on Map Control with Fantasia and CoH this could possible create a more balanced server. Only a humble observation nothing more, some food for thought.
Thank you again for the information.
It is a common misconception that we do not play map control. Considering our group size, we greatly contribute, but we have not consistently played for the last week and a half. For example we have secured 4 scroll this campaign, and we always help when we see a good opportunity.
Ramming 5-8 people into the entire EP pop is simply not smart, and will accomplish little to nothing. Harassment is generally our only option. We did play a few days ago, and there was some crazy stacking going on. So many EP were concentrated in Alessia/Aleswell that we were able to take SEJ, BRK and Arrius with 5 people. Arrius even had a Scroll in it, and the fight at Alessia did not stop till we were already moving it home.
Trust me we really do try to play the objectives, but eventually it becomes too much. I honestly can not stand asking people to play in some of the server performance on TF, and trying to lead a small group during lag is miserable. Furthermore, trying to push absolute map control is fruitless when you have 1-2 bars vs 3 Bars-locked pop. By this I mean I would never go to take Roe or Brindle when EP is dominating. All it would do is encourage AD pugs to push on DC, and this is not a good thing 90% of the time in TF.
Is that why you routinely come to Glade farm or Ales lumber when EP is assaulting Ales/Glade and help them by picking off DC defenders coming out the east posterns? Because you care so much about DC? <insert eyeroll>
God_flakes wrote: »Faction Hackers United Roster
Roaldy
Million Reasons to Dragonclaw
Theia le nudez
Yuki
KC
Ayrene
Ghostbae
Adhominid
Dread
Twiggy
Navi
Shado
Jessi
Nihilos
Duke of Mournhold
Huntz
Which one of these is Drako?
God_flakes wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »SubtleHate wrote: »Broken Boundaries
My small man PvP guild-- we haven't been as active of late, but when we run we run usually around groups between 6-12.
Trolling the crap out of zerglings and pugs.....
Thank you for the Guild information it is much appreciated.
If I might make one observation, I have noticed a common theme among many of the AD guilds on TF. It seems that they are more focused on harassment tactics then map control. If Adamant, Broken Boundaries and Faction hackers were to focus more on Map Control with Fantasia and CoH this could possible create a more balanced server. Only a humble observation nothing more, some food for thought.
Thank you again for the information.
It is a common misconception that we do not play map control. Considering our group size, we greatly contribute, but we have not consistently played for the last week and a half. For example we have secured 4 scroll this campaign, and we always help when we see a good opportunity.
Ramming 5-8 people into the entire EP pop is simply not smart, and will accomplish little to nothing. Harassment is generally our only option. We did play a few days ago, and there was some crazy stacking going on. So many EP were concentrated in Alessia/Aleswell that we were able to take SEJ, BRK and Arrius with 5 people. Arrius even had a Scroll in it, and the fight at Alessia did not stop till we were already moving it home.
Trust me we really do try to play the objectives, but eventually it becomes too much. I honestly can not stand asking people to play in some of the server performance on TF, and trying to lead a small group during lag is miserable. Furthermore, trying to push absolute map control is fruitless when you have 1-2 bars vs 3 Bars-locked pop. By this I mean I would never go to take Roe or Brindle when EP is dominating. All it would do is encourage AD pugs to push on DC, and this is not a good thing 90% of the time in TF.
Is that why you routinely come to Glade farm or Ales lumber when EP is assaulting Ales/Glade and help them by picking off DC defenders coming out the east posterns? Because you care so much about DC? <insert eyeroll>
Crispen_Longbow wrote: »SubtleHate wrote: »Broken Boundaries
My small man PvP guild-- we haven't been as active of late, but when we run we run usually around groups between 6-12.
Trolling the crap out of zerglings and pugs.....
Thank you for the Guild information it is much appreciated.
If I might make one observation, I have noticed a common theme among many of the AD guilds on TF. It seems that they are more focused on harassment tactics then map control. If Adamant, Broken Boundaries and Faction hackers were to focus more on Map Control with Fantasia and CoH this could possible create a more balanced server. Only a humble observation nothing more, some food for thought.
Thank you again for the information.
It is a common misconception that we do not play map control. Considering our group size, we greatly contribute, but we have not consistently played for the last week and a half. For example we have secured 4 scroll this campaign, and we always help when we see a good opportunity.
Ramming 5-8 people into the entire EP pop is simply not smart, and will accomplish little to nothing. Harassment is generally our only option. We did play a few days ago, and there was some crazy stacking going on. So many EP were concentrated in Alessia/Aleswell that we were able to take SEJ, BRK and Arrius with 5 people. Arrius even had a Scroll in it, and the fight at Alessia did not stop till we were already moving it home.
Trust me we really do try to play the objectives, but eventually it becomes too much. I honestly can not stand asking people to play in some of the server performance on TF, and trying to lead a small group during lag is miserable. Furthermore, trying to push absolute map control is fruitless when you have 1-2 bars vs 3 Bars-locked pop. By this I mean I would never go to take Roe or Brindle when EP is dominating. All it would do is encourage AD pugs to push on DC, and this is not a good thing 90% of the time in TF.
I am so offended that you forgot to put Mr. Miniskirt himself, Jacob Black on the FwF list, @Crispen_Longbow . I thought we were friends once, Crispy!
In all seriousness though, this is a fantastic list, I love it. Nice to see a bunch of names of people in guilds on all alliances, and people adding in other guilds as well.
Uh, no, I don't play on Bwb, haven't been in a long time. Jacob runs around vet PvP in the miniskirt costume (it makes his ass look great)
God_flakes wrote: »Crispen_Longbow wrote: »SubtleHate wrote: »Broken Boundaries
My small man PvP guild-- we haven't been as active of late, but when we run we run usually around groups between 6-12.
Trolling the crap out of zerglings and pugs.....
Thank you for the Guild information it is much appreciated.
If I might make one observation, I have noticed a common theme among many of the AD guilds on TF. It seems that they are more focused on harassment tactics then map control. If Adamant, Broken Boundaries and Faction hackers were to focus more on Map Control with Fantasia and CoH this could possible create a more balanced server. Only a humble observation nothing more, some food for thought.
Thank you again for the information.
It is a common misconception that we do not play map control. Considering our group size, we greatly contribute, but we have not consistently played for the last week and a half. For example we have secured 4 scroll this campaign, and we always help when we see a good opportunity.
Ramming 5-8 people into the entire EP pop is simply not smart, and will accomplish little to nothing. Harassment is generally our only option. We did play a few days ago, and there was some crazy stacking going on. So many EP were concentrated in Alessia/Aleswell that we were able to take SEJ, BRK and Arrius with 5 people. Arrius even had a Scroll in it, and the fight at Alessia did not stop till we were already moving it home.
Trust me we really do try to play the objectives, but eventually it becomes too much. I honestly can not stand asking people to play in some of the server performance on TF, and trying to lead a small group during lag is miserable. Furthermore, trying to push absolute map control is fruitless when you have 1-2 bars vs 3 Bars-locked pop. By this I mean I would never go to take Roe or Brindle when EP is dominating. All it would do is encourage AD pugs to push on DC, and this is not a good thing 90% of the time in TF.
Is that why you routinely come to Glade farm or Ales lumber when EP is assaulting Ales/Glade and help them by picking off DC defenders coming out the east posterns? Because you care so much about DC? <insert eyeroll>
What are you talking about? I can think of maybe 2 days I have fought on that side of the map. The only time we ever actually took keeps over there was the day DC had Emp. The second time we fought there was out of boredom with the red portion of the map. We had 3 people and all the the fighting was there.
I understand though. No matter what the map looks like there will be some random in zone complaining about getting double teamed. I imagine all factions have this, and you seem to be that person for your own.Experience has taught me that arguing with these players is fruitless, and I see this as no exception. Have a nice day.
DisgracefulMind wrote: »Uh, no, I don't play on Bwb, haven't been in a long time. Jacob runs around vet PvP in the miniskirt costume (it makes his ass look great)
Aw crap I meant to put you in Tara! Now I feel bad Dx
@Crispen_Longbow could you edit in Jacob Black into the FWF roster as well?
@Joy_Division May BwB forever remember Ren the permaemp