Maintenance for the week of December 15:
· [COMPLETE] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)

No choice regarding one's character should be 100% permanent.

  • nordsavage
    nordsavage
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Changing appearance and names should be a given and seem lazy that it is not available already. I agree with race change on the grounds that racial passives have changed since release several times and min maxing is more prevalent than ever.

    I disagree with alliance changes as this could topple any type of symmetry that a three way alliance can possibly have. People would flip flop so hard on the band wagon it would hurt the already ailing PvP further.

    Class change might not be possible due to there being no real way to transfer abilities between classes because of variations in skill lines. As for agreeing it is a similar argument I have for race change. For disagreeing it is a similar argument I have for alliance change and balance/symmetry.
    Edited by nordsavage on May 14, 2016 8:33PM
    I didn't choose tank life, tank life chose me.
  • AOECAPS
    AOECAPS
    ✭✭✭✭
    Artis wrote: »

    "If people could change everything about their character, they'd only ever need one!"
    How is that a bad thing? A character is simply a player's avatar which he uses to explore the game world. I would like to play only one character and be able to try everything, just like in TES games.

    Agree with you OP. And I was with since beta-tests and wrote about it in feedback. Let's hope they finally listen to us :)
    Regarding race - they did remove softcaps and changed some passives, so our choice of race is already devalued. Pretty strange that they still didn't let us change the race for free or very cheap to make up for that.
    Kammakazi wrote: »
    I wish some choice in the real world wasn't permanent, but oh well, right?

    If only in game we didn't have to do all that and it was possible not to make choices permanent so players don't suffer choice anxiety and don't regret their choices later for like the rest of their character's life (I obviously wont' reroll, my character has 16k+ achievement points).....

    Oh wait, it is possible, because it's a computer game, not the real world.


    This is an MMO that has the elder scrolls license this isn't Skyrim 2
  • Artis
    Artis
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    AOECAPS wrote: »
    This is an MMO that has the elder scrolls license this isn't Skyrim 2

    Which I never say it was. But if someone's talking about lore-breaking stuff.. What's lore-breaking is that we are limited by rigid classes.

    Anyways, the point is - MMO = massive multiplayer online. The only thing it means is that many players play it online. So, I don't see how it says that you shouldn't be able to change your avatar every now and then. Because it doesn't say anything like that.
    Edited by Artis on May 14, 2016 8:41PM
  • dday3six
    dday3six
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Appearence and Race Change are coming down the road. Alliance change has been mentioned as a possibility. VR ranks are gone come DB. CP is account wide. It's much easier to level AvA skill lines. The last bastion is Undaunted, but that is mostly, doing dungeons for the first time on that character, buying drinks, then doing pledges every day for the rest. Class change is the only no go and that's because there are several conflicts with skills between swaps.

    The only greater freedom that I'd be for that is not already slated to be here at some point is regarding respecs. I personally think that respecs of Attributes, Skills/Morphs, and CP should be free and available in the character menu. The middle ground to this could be a high priced in game item, that once bought would allows a character access to this.
  • NateAssassin
    NateAssassin
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I demand transgender bathrooms in Cyrodiil
    AD | Malaya the Mystic ─ VR16 Khajiit Sorc | Shal'ina the Swift ─ VR16 Khajiit NB | Jòhn Cena ─ VR1 Khajiit NB | Priestess Shaari ─ VR1 Temp
  • Mojmir
    Mojmir
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    lore is a weak argument, we can already choose any race any faction with a crown purchase. changing races/sex/appearance should have been added awhile ago. are those against just looking for something to go against?
  • Saoirse_Siobhan
    Saoirse_Siobhan
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Runs wrote: »
    I really wish we had an alliance change option, at least a one time change per character. I'm not looking to switch back and forth, I just didn't have the insight to make all my characters the same faction when I first started playing.

    I think this is a good idea, having a one time change. It would avoid people swapping to join the winning alliance!
    Edited by Saoirse_Siobhan on May 15, 2016 12:57AM
    PC/EU DC
  • Artis
    Artis
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I demand transgender bathrooms in Cyrodiil

    Right? Why can't I identify as a male orc one day and as a female redguard another day?
  • DocFrost72
    DocFrost72
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    Race change, no. Racial PASSIVES change, definately. Not every bosmer is good with a bow, not every orc is a warrior, not every altmer wears a dress (just the males =P).

    Class change- Eh, I see both sides, not really sure what is safer here.

    Appearence change- Are there people that even oppose this? Legitimately.

    Faction change- Would much prefer an all faction zone (Should have been coldharbour, ZoS -_-) or two for frolicking. The concern of people bumping over alliances for whoever is on top at a given moment is silly. People ALREADY do this. Maybe some I know personally >.>

    Solid post, and agree aboot the huge investment needed to regain what one toons has, but a little more honey and a little less vinegar goes a long way =)
  • Artis
    Artis
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    DocFrost72 wrote: »
    Race change, no. Racial PASSIVES change, definately. Not every bosmer is good with a bow, not every orc is a warrior, not every altmer wears a dress (just the males =P).

    Appearence change- Are there people that even oppose this? Legitimately.

    Looks like you are one of them. If you can change racial passives, race becomes just one more slider in the appearance choice. And you say no to changing it.
  • DannyLV702
    DannyLV702
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    I only agree with the hair change
  • radiostar
    radiostar
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's not like Z hasn't changed numerous things over the life of the game :smile:

    As someone who created a char during the early access zoom bug and still waiting to correct it, I say I should be able to correct my char for free. But hey, what do I know?

    And Z certainly is nerfing chars with the new DB release. I'm sure they will consider that when thinking about players being able to change things up. HA HA

    "Billions upon Billions of Stars"
  • Bossdonut
    Bossdonut
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Only thing that should be modified is the hairstyles. Everything else?

    Reroll
  • Sogreth
    Sogreth
    ✭✭✭
    Serenityx wrote: »
    Class/race change will not and should not ever be implemented* in any MMO.

    Class? Obviously not. But there is NO REASON that we can't do a race change. And you say "will not--in any MMO" but what I guess you fail to realize is you can race change in WoW. So....
  • Junkogen
    Junkogen
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with OP. Some people think this game is real life or something. It's a game. No life lessons are being learned here. Games are just that, games.

    I think it's funny when people treat the game like it should punish players for their choices like they committed a crime or something. "He chose an Argonian, he should get the death penalty, dang it! Life sucks. Deal with it!" Get a grip.
    Edited by Junkogen on May 15, 2016 3:56AM
  • bloodenragedb14_ESO
    bloodenragedb14_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The one thing I absolutely hate in this game is how once you've made your character, there are a few crucial choices that you're not allowed to return to.
    • You come to regret the race you've chosen later down the line? "reroll [Snip]".
    • Your character has a goofy hairstyle? "Lol, just roll an alt".
    • Your class gets screwed over in the most recent update and you want to play as a different one? "start a new character."
    • Your character's name no longer appeals to you? "Just make a new one!"
    • Your friends are all in a different alliance and you want to play with them outside of a group delve or trial? "REROLL!"

    Every time someone suggests an alliance change, a class change, or even a race change or the ability to re-customise your character, they're pounced on by a ton of people telling them to reroll and move on.

    "It's an MMO, people are supposed to have more than one character."

    Who cares if it's an MMO? That doesn't automatically mean that it needs to be like every other MMO. Even if we're "supposed" to have more than one character, under no circumstances should it be mandatory to start an entirely new one in order to change just one thing about it.

    So here, I've provided reasons why we should be allowed to change each aspect of our characters without being forced to reroll.

    Appearance

    If we want to change our character's name, hairstyle, or gender (things that don't affect gameplay in the slightest I might add) we should not be forced to start the whole game again purely so we can create the exact same character as our current one with one minor alteration.

    Alliance

    Being able to change a character's alliance cold turkey might be a little much, but there is no reason to be against cross-alliance play outside of dungeons.

    With regards to Alliance, it might be difficult to implement cross-alliance play in all areas, but there have been literally tons of suggestions on the matter in these forums, and quite a few that I've seen would be preferable to what we have now ("Roll an alt or you'll only be able to play with your friends in a series of repetitive linear dungeons").

    Oh, and to those idiots that keep whining "lorebreaking", don't forget that the Light of Meridia we currently have breaks the lore in exactly the same way. If your first reaction after reading that was to jump to the light's defense in anyway ("BUT IT'S MAGIC!!1!"), then I'd like to point out that all ZOS has to do to make cross-alliance play lore-friendly is to slap a similar explanation onto it. You don't like that, you can shut your hypocritical pie hole.

    Race

    Race shouldn't be too much of a stretch either. Regrettably, the people yelling "lorebreaking" are still present for this one, so I'll just quickly remind them that we live in a fantasy world where magic exists and move on. To those who think this would make the game unbalanced, it wouldn't. Race has relatively little impact on a character's playstyle, and people should be able to make their character any race they want it to be.

    [bClass[/b]

    This is the one people seem to find the most controversial as it has the biggest impact on gameplay. I've taken the time to summarise the biggest complaints here:
    • It's lorebreaking
    • It would unbalance the game, everyone would flock to the class that was deemed the best in that current update.
    • I DON'T LIKE CHANGE!

    For the group that use the first argument, no. We know next to nothing about these classes and how they get their abilities or where their magic comes from. Prior to this game, they did not exist in TES canon. Regarding these classes, there is no lore to break.

    For the group that use the second argument, it's a valid concern, but we already have systems in place to allow players to rechoose their skill and attribute points. You can even cure Vampirism and Lycanthropy! These are both things things that NPCs in the TES universe fret over constantly, but the player is allowed to go back on a huge decision like this for the sake of convenience.
    If I wanted I could switch from a dual wielding DPS to a staff wielding mage. It'd cost me a pretty penny in gold, but I'd certainly be able to do it. Considering we can already do this, why not go the extra mile and allow people to change classes?
    In the event that everybody does flock to one class, it'd be because of a severe inbalance that would need addressing. If ZOS monitored the feature, they could use it to collect data and improve the game. Do you hear me? This could actually be a good thing!

    For the group that use the third argument, you're in the wrong game. ESO is supposed to evolve, not stay in the same state forever. If it did, it'd get old and boring real fast.

    "If people could change everything about their character, they'd only ever need one!"

    Not true. I mean, it would be if changing these things was super easy, but it doesn't need to be. Putting any kind of difficulty and inconvenience in front of things like this will be enough to deter most players (i.e. the people who just want to abuse it) unless the thing they're looking to change is really important to them.

    Conclusion

    No choice regarding one's character should be 100% permanent. I don't believe that the game would be made inherently worse by at least making changes like this possible.
    Instead of insisting that people reroll when they make a mistake during character creation, support them in their quest to attract ZOS' attention. In the end, it's up to them whether or not changes are made to the game.

    [Edit for censor bypass]

    PREACH ON BROTHER, PREACH ON
  • Polysemy
    Polysemy
    ✭✭✭
    going to take 4 hours to reroll in DB

    git guud bruuh
    git guuuud
    Grade A ***
  • Artis
    Artis
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Polysemy wrote: »
    going to take 4 hours to reroll in DB

    git guud bruuh
    git guuuud

    Really? Don't think I'll get all my achievements that fast though.
  • WhoThenNow7
    WhoThenNow7
    ✭✭✭
    I agree with changing anything about your appearance; but changing class and race just sounds absolutely ridiculous to me. Those two things SHOULD stay permanent.


    Edit: Alliance needs to stay permanent as well! I suggest you learn to do some research before ranting about wanting to change something you chose. Also, if all of your friends are in another alliance, why did you choose a different one in the first place?
    Edited by WhoThenNow7 on May 15, 2016 6:38AM
  • Lylith
    Lylith
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    a one time alliance change would have no effect on balance.

    no reason it shouldn't be available.
  • Junkogen
    Junkogen
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Also, in Skyrim you could change anything at any time on PC. You could even bring back dead NPCs. I don't understand the difference here. So what if people want to switch to FOTM. Maybe the devs shouldn't keep making seismic changes to classes, races, and abilities. This game bears little resemblance to the originally released game. Heck, they didn't have any stamina morphs for class abilities. Even racial passives were much different in some cases.

    I just really don't understand people who are adamantly opposed to these options. It has nothing to do with you. Your characters stay exactly the same. Your lore is intact. Why do you feel the need to foist your gameplay on someone else?
  • WhoThenNow7
    WhoThenNow7
    ✭✭✭
    Junkogen wrote: »
    Also, in Skyrim you could change anything at any time on PC. You could even bring back dead NPCs. I don't understand the difference here. So what if people want to switch to FOTM. Maybe the devs shouldn't keep making seismic changes to classes, races, and abilities. This game bears little resemblance to the originally released game. Heck, they didn't have any stamina morphs for class abilities. Even racial passives were much different in some cases.

    I just really don't understand people who are adamantly opposed to these options. It has nothing to do with you. Your characters stay exactly the same. Your lore is intact. Why do you feel the need to foist your gameplay on someone else?

    I'd say there's a huge difference. Lets see.. In skyrim there's only one player. In ESO there are tens or hundreds of thousands...
  • dsalter
    dsalter
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Name and appearance should be coming eventually.
    Alliance tbh should be a one off, or make it an EXTREAMLY expensive feature so it can only be milked hard by rich kids, the kind with more money than sense as switching alliance is open to picking the "fotm".
    hell to the no on class switches. ever.
    PLEASE REPLY TO ME WITH @dsalter otherwise i'm likely to miss the reply if its not my own thread

    EU - [Arch Mage Dave] Altmer Sorcerer
    Fight back at the crates and boxes, together we can change things.

  • Mr.Hmm
    Mr.Hmm
    ✭✭✭✭
    They should just add Barbershop and let us change hairstyles/beards there.

    While they add a total character appearance change token in the Crown Shop.
    If I die tomorrow I do not want to think of the game I could of played today, therefor I will play whatever I want today while securing a future to play in as well.

    A true gamer will think of all the possible outcomes and execute the one that is the hardest to accomplish.
  • khele23eb17_ESO
    khele23eb17_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Serenityx wrote: »
    Class/race change will not and should not ever be inplemented in any MMO. Also, with DB you literally will be able to play every stupid little race and class ZOS has *** out for us much easier. Your entire argument about race/class seems moot saying as "re-rolling" will be incredibly ez.

    ESO requires quite a time investment to max out a character (even after VR removal) so IMO everything but classes should be up for change. You should be able to give your character a full makeover with just in-game gold. Name change, sex change - crown store items. Faction change tho... not sure about that. Maybe with a hefty price tag. 5k crowns perhaps.
    P2P offered you 'hell yeah!' moments. F2P offers you 'thank god its over' moments.
  • Eshenya
    Eshenya
    ✭✭

    I think 'gamers' these days are far too spoiled. I'm an old school gamer and back in the day you didn't even have the option to alter the appearance or race of your character or pick a side to fight on and just had to go with whatever you'd been given.
    I'd rather see bug fixes implemented than people's vanity crave satisfied.

    And besides, being able to play different races and alliances is part of what makes the game replayable. =]
    This one does not appreciate txt tlk, elitism and foul language.
  • Junkogen
    Junkogen
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Junkogen wrote: »
    Also, in Skyrim you could change anything at any time on PC. You could even bring back dead NPCs. I don't understand the difference here. So what if people want to switch to FOTM. Maybe the devs shouldn't keep making seismic changes to classes, races, and abilities. This game bears little resemblance to the originally released game. Heck, they didn't have any stamina morphs for class abilities. Even racial passives were much different in some cases.

    I just really don't understand people who are adamantly opposed to these options. It has nothing to do with you. Your characters stay exactly the same. Your lore is intact. Why do you feel the need to foist your gameplay on someone else?

    I'd say there's a huge difference. Lets see.. In skyrim there's only one player. In ESO there are tens or hundreds of thousands...

    Yeah, so? Why does that matter? Me changing my race doesn't affect your gameplay at all. You're still exactly the same. I understand the games are different, but there's no difference in terms of how it affects your game if I change my character. That's what I meant by no difference.

    For instance, why is it okay for me to reroll another race, but not simply change race? From another player's perspective there is no difference. How do you know if I rerolled or simply changed the race? That's what I don't get. People just want to deny others a simple convenience for no valid reason.
    Edited by Junkogen on May 15, 2016 8:12AM
  • Docmandu
    Docmandu
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    While I like choice, I fear it will kill some of the diversity in the game... if it's easy everybody will race and class change to the current FoTM.. or that "perfect" race for a specific build.

    So name, looks, hairstyle.. no problems at all.. and think most of that is coming with the barber shop.
    Race change.. not a fan of it.. if it's added, make it require some effort imho.
    Class change... nah.. one of the things that adds replayability to MMO's is the fact that people roll alts to try the other classes.

  • Elsterchen
    Elsterchen
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well, honestly... since the game does not promote RPG playstyle in any way anymore, even the need to do the main quest was canceled, it really doesn't matter anymore to pretend there is any value in decisions at all.

    Well, done... bend over backwards ...

    Btw ...this makes me sad.
    Edited by Elsterchen on May 15, 2016 8:23AM
  • khele23eb17_ESO
    khele23eb17_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Docmandu wrote: »
    While I like choice, I fear it will kill some of the diversity in the game... if it's easy everybody will race and class change to the current FoTM.. or that "perfect" race for a specific build.

    So name, looks, hairstyle.. no problems at all.. and think most of that is coming with the barber shop.
    Race change.. not a fan of it.. if it's added, make it require some effort imho.

    I suspect race and name changes will be crown store services.
    Edited by khele23eb17_ESO on May 15, 2016 8:22AM
    P2P offered you 'hell yeah!' moments. F2P offers you 'thank god its over' moments.
Sign In or Register to comment.