When it comes to a reasonable price, I would suggest 1500-2000 crowns. Players, who would buy this bag would still buy the DLC content, so this should not be unreasonably overpriced. And it would avoid the bad feeling, those would have who bought all DLC content so far, would have to subcribe to get the bag and see their investment into the DLCs as basically lost.
Doncellius wrote: »Point 1.... your poll is badly written and exceptionally biased... you want a genuine response to support your argument make it more neutral.
Point 2..... It's nothing to do with being able to give ZoS money via a one off microtransaction in the crown store. It's HOW ZoS gets the money thats important here...
Microtrasactions are neither consistent nor forecast-able. ZoS neds a forecast-able & reliable revenue stream (Via Subs) to be able to talk to shareholders etc about future development etc.
Many people will have dropped subs when the game went B2P.... they need to get more people back on a regular pay plan so they can demonstrate the project has future sustainability to the money men and keep the development going.
That's why this is sub only, and why it will likely stay that way.
Poll isn't biased. Perhaps you dislike how I separated (in a 100% impartial way) Subs and Non-Subs for supporting the current plan? You don't have to like my own (popular in-game rather than forums) opinion.
A Crafting Bag doesn't get people thinking "Wow, ZOS really did it! I'm sooooo paying $15 a month now despite that I already paid for multiple DLCs full price! Love these guys!"
People get frustrated that such a long-time, highly requested feature is being placed behind a Sub fee. Not happy. Only the minority of Subs are happy, and even many of them can see the unfairness despite it benefitting them.
Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Doncellius wrote: »Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Lol, I just saw this in someone else's reply...
"The results of this poll will determine just how out of touch/elitist "sub vs non-sub" these forums are compared to the actual in-game playerbase. Judging from the vMA completion poll, my guess is the first option will be the most popular. We shall see"
Guess it was part of the OP and you edited it out @Doncellius. So, having a grown-up understanding of business and a real world expectation that a company must earn profits makes gamers elitist? Can't help but sit in awe at the forums and the ignorance and entitlement of some posters.
But, just for arguments sake, lets say players agree with you that crafting bags should be put up for sale in the crown store, and ZOS lists them for 5k tel var stones, or more. I can only imagine you would then whine they are too expensive and call ZOS greedy and call out anyone who pays for it as an elitist pay-to-win expletive.
Edited what out? I usually only edit for spelling mistakes since it is more difficult to see typos when typing from an iPhone.
Sorry to ruin your entire point, but you should go to the first page. It's one of the first comments
EDIT: You're awefully eager to shoot me down for some reason. Smh. You named yourself after advice you need to take for yourself. You could have easily answered the unbiased poll and stated your opinion. Instead, you attack me as much as you can, without even reading through previous comments.
Fair enough, I see it is a reply in a lower post. Forgive me for not reading thru all of your BS. It is an ignorant post. Guess I am programmed to overlook non-sense.
As for your claim that your poll is unbiased... If it were unbiased, you would not have the caveat in the first couple options that "I am an ESO+ Member". This implies that only a subscriber would agree with this. In reality, I am sure most mature adults agree with it, even if not subscribers; if not agree with it or like it, then certainly understand it. ZOS is a company and they must make money. There is nothing wrong with offering subs a quality perk, and in MMOs it is hard to offer perks that do not fringe upon P2W; crafting bags are a reasonable offer to subs.
Look, I agree that inventory management in this game is a nightmare. The tendency for ZOS to make sets BoP in recent DLCs has certainly compounded the problem since we are now forced to horde as we never know when sets will get buffed or nerfed and, because the RNG rates in this game are atrocious, we cannot be assured we can replace said sets in a reasonable time-frame. The devs really need to do something about the BoP system and inventory management as a whole. As is, most players are forced to create mules, but those of use that actively play all our characters cannot rely on mules. I am forced to create a guild just to use as a personal bank for an extra 500 slots. Who knows, maybe keeping inventory space small and the prevalence of mules is part of their stragety to sell new character slots. I agree that inventory management needs to be addressed, and even that it would be nice for crafting bags to be available to all.
However, your polled is biased, and as such, I completely disregarded any relevance it may have. There are more tactful ways to discuss issues. Furthermore, you claims that anyone who sides one way is an elitist that is out of touch with the gaming community is absurd and completely skews you as someone incapable of a rational thought or grown-up discussion.
Doncellius wrote: »Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Doncellius wrote: »Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Lol, I just saw this in someone else's reply...
"The results of this poll will determine just how out of touch/elitist "sub vs non-sub" these forums are compared to the actual in-game playerbase. Judging from the vMA completion poll, my guess is the first option will be the most popular. We shall see"
Guess it was part of the OP and you edited it out @Doncellius. So, having a grown-up understanding of business and a real world expectation that a company must earn profits makes gamers elitist? Can't help but sit in awe at the forums and the ignorance and entitlement of some posters.
But, just for arguments sake, lets say players agree with you that crafting bags should be put up for sale in the crown store, and ZOS lists them for 5k tel var stones, or more. I can only imagine you would then whine they are too expensive and call ZOS greedy and call out anyone who pays for it as an elitist pay-to-win expletive.
Edited what out? I usually only edit for spelling mistakes since it is more difficult to see typos when typing from an iPhone.
Sorry to ruin your entire point, but you should go to the first page. It's one of the first comments
EDIT: You're awefully eager to shoot me down for some reason. Smh. You named yourself after advice you need to take for yourself. You could have easily answered the unbiased poll and stated your opinion. Instead, you attack me as much as you can, without even reading through previous comments.
Fair enough, I see it is a reply in a lower post. Forgive me for not reading thru all of your BS. It is an ignorant post. Guess I am programmed to overlook non-sense.
As for your claim that your poll is unbiased... If it were unbiased, you would not have the caveat in the first couple options that "I am an ESO+ Member". This implies that only a subscriber would agree with this. In reality, I am sure most mature adults agree with it, even if not subscribers; if not agree with it or like it, then certainly understand it. ZOS is a company and they must make money. There is nothing wrong with offering subs a quality perk, and in MMOs it is hard to offer perks that do not fringe upon P2W; crafting bags are a reasonable offer to subs.
Look, I agree that inventory management in this game is a nightmare. The tendency for ZOS to make sets BoP in recent DLCs has certainly compounded the problem since we are now forced to horde as we never know when sets will get buffed or nerfed and, because the RNG rates in this game are atrocious, we cannot be assured we can replace said sets in a reasonable time-frame. The devs really need to do something about the BoP system and inventory management as a whole. As is, most players are forced to create mules, but those of use that actively play all our characters cannot rely on mules. I am forced to create a guild just to use as a personal bank for an extra 500 slots. Who knows, maybe keeping inventory space small and the prevalence of mules is part of their stragety to sell new character slots. I agree that inventory management needs to be addressed, and even that it would be nice for crafting bags to be available to all.
However, your polled is biased, and as such, I completely disregarded any relevance it may have. There are more tactful ways to discuss issues. Furthermore, you claims that anyone who sides one way is an elitist that is out of touch with the gaming community is absurd and completely skews you as someone incapable of a rational thought or grown-up discussion.
Your jumbling everything together. Relax a bit! Lol.
When you see ESO+ member or not an ESO+ member for two separate options, it means the same thing.
It serves solely to distinguish those who are Subbed to those who aren't. I did this because I took an educated guess that most Subs were going to say yes. The second option allows Non-Subs to be recognized as well for picking Yes. Because of this, you can tell how many Subs compared to non-Subs chose Yes, an interesting thing to look at.
When it comes to a reasonable price, I would suggest 1500-2000 crowns. Players, who would buy this bag would still buy the DLC content, so this should not be unreasonably overpriced. And it would avoid the bad feeling, those would have who bought all DLC content so far, would have to subcribe to get the bag and see their investment into the DLCs as basically lost.
That's not enough, it's only ~ 1 month of subscription. i think they want it as an long-term-tool to generate money. So maybe make it cost around 1 year of subscription. Remember...the championsystem in it's current state is a progression system for the next 15 years and they need money the whole time. Related to this 18k Crowns (equals 1 year subscription) is pretty cheap.
When it comes to a reasonable price, I would suggest 1500-2000 crowns. Players, who would buy this bag would still buy the DLC content, so this should not be unreasonably overpriced. And it would avoid the bad feeling, those would have who bought all DLC content so far, would have to subcribe to get the bag and see their investment into the DLCs as basically lost.
That's not enough, it's only ~ 1 month of subscription. i think they want it as an long-term-tool to generate money. So maybe make it cost around 1 year of subscription. Remember...the championsystem in it's current state is a progression system for the next 15 years and they need money the whole time. Related to this 18k Crowns (equals 1 year subscription) is pretty cheap.
Players, who would buy this bag would still buy the DLC content, so this should not be unreasonably overpriced. And it would avoid the bad feeling, those would have who bought all DLC content so far, to basically have to subscribe to get the bag and with it their investment into DLCs is basically lost. I myself have bought Orsinium and IC - so I have basically wasted crowns on this content, because I am a subscriber now.
Doncellius wrote: »Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Doncellius wrote: »Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Lol, I just saw this in someone else's reply...
"The results of this poll will determine just how out of touch/elitist "sub vs non-sub" these forums are compared to the actual in-game playerbase. Judging from the vMA completion poll, my guess is the first option will be the most popular. We shall see"
Guess it was part of the OP and you edited it out @Doncellius. So, having a grown-up understanding of business and a real world expectation that a company must earn profits makes gamers elitist? Can't help but sit in awe at the forums and the ignorance and entitlement of some posters.
But, just for arguments sake, lets say players agree with you that crafting bags should be put up for sale in the crown store, and ZOS lists them for 5k tel var stones, or more. I can only imagine you would then whine they are too expensive and call ZOS greedy and call out anyone who pays for it as an elitist pay-to-win expletive.
Edited what out? I usually only edit for spelling mistakes since it is more difficult to see typos when typing from an iPhone.
Sorry to ruin your entire point, but you should go to the first page. It's one of the first comments
EDIT: You're awefully eager to shoot me down for some reason. Smh. You named yourself after advice you need to take for yourself. You could have easily answered the unbiased poll and stated your opinion. Instead, you attack me as much as you can, without even reading through previous comments.
Fair enough, I see it is a reply in a lower post. Forgive me for not reading thru all of your BS. It is an ignorant post. Guess I am programmed to overlook non-sense.
As for your claim that your poll is unbiased... If it were unbiased, you would not have the caveat in the first couple options that "I am an ESO+ Member". This implies that only a subscriber would agree with this. In reality, I am sure most mature adults agree with it, even if not subscribers; if not agree with it or like it, then certainly understand it. ZOS is a company and they must make money. There is nothing wrong with offering subs a quality perk, and in MMOs it is hard to offer perks that do not fringe upon P2W; crafting bags are a reasonable offer to subs.
Look, I agree that inventory management in this game is a nightmare. The tendency for ZOS to make sets BoP in recent DLCs has certainly compounded the problem since we are now forced to horde as we never know when sets will get buffed or nerfed and, because the RNG rates in this game are atrocious, we cannot be assured we can replace said sets in a reasonable time-frame. The devs really need to do something about the BoP system and inventory management as a whole. As is, most players are forced to create mules, but those of use that actively play all our characters cannot rely on mules. I am forced to create a guild just to use as a personal bank for an extra 500 slots. Who knows, maybe keeping inventory space small and the prevalence of mules is part of their stragety to sell new character slots. I agree that inventory management needs to be addressed, and even that it would be nice for crafting bags to be available to all.
However, your polled is biased, and as such, I completely disregarded any relevance it may have. There are more tactful ways to discuss issues. Furthermore, you claims that anyone who sides one way is an elitist that is out of touch with the gaming community is absurd and completely skews you as someone incapable of a rational thought or grown-up discussion.
Your jumbling everything together. Relax a bit! Lol.
When you see ESO+ member or not an ESO+ member for two separate options, it means the same thing.
It serves solely to distinguish those who are Subbed to those who aren't. I did this because I took an educated guess that most Subs were going to say yes. The second option allows Non-Subs to be recognized as well for picking Yes. Because of this, you can tell how many Subs compared to non-Subs chose Yes, an interesting thing to look at.
Please, if you're going to continue to be as harsh and childish as possible, just send me PMs instead. Would rather not we cause this entire thread to be us arguing.
Doncellius wrote: »Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Doncellius wrote: »Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Lol, I just saw this in someone else's reply...
"The results of this poll will determine just how out of touch/elitist "sub vs non-sub" these forums are compared to the actual in-game playerbase. Judging from the vMA completion poll, my guess is the first option will be the most popular. We shall see"
Guess it was part of the OP and you edited it out @Doncellius. So, having a grown-up understanding of business and a real world expectation that a company must earn profits makes gamers elitist? Can't help but sit in awe at the forums and the ignorance and entitlement of some posters.
But, just for arguments sake, lets say players agree with you that crafting bags should be put up for sale in the crown store, and ZOS lists them for 5k tel var stones, or more. I can only imagine you would then whine they are too expensive and call ZOS greedy and call out anyone who pays for it as an elitist pay-to-win expletive.
Edited what out? I usually only edit for spelling mistakes since it is more difficult to see typos when typing from an iPhone.
Sorry to ruin your entire point, but you should go to the first page. It's one of the first comments
EDIT: You're awefully eager to shoot me down for some reason. Smh. You named yourself after advice you need to take for yourself. You could have easily answered the unbiased poll and stated your opinion. Instead, you attack me as much as you can, without even reading through previous comments.
Fair enough, I see it is a reply in a lower post. Forgive me for not reading thru all of your BS. It is an ignorant post. Guess I am programmed to overlook non-sense.
As for your claim that your poll is unbiased... If it were unbiased, you would not have the caveat in the first couple options that "I am an ESO+ Member". This implies that only a subscriber would agree with this. In reality, I am sure most mature adults agree with it, even if not subscribers; if not agree with it or like it, then certainly understand it. ZOS is a company and they must make money. There is nothing wrong with offering subs a quality perk, and in MMOs it is hard to offer perks that do not fringe upon P2W; crafting bags are a reasonable offer to subs.
Look, I agree that inventory management in this game is a nightmare. The tendency for ZOS to make sets BoP in recent DLCs has certainly compounded the problem since we are now forced to horde as we never know when sets will get buffed or nerfed and, because the RNG rates in this game are atrocious, we cannot be assured we can replace said sets in a reasonable time-frame. The devs really need to do something about the BoP system and inventory management as a whole. As is, most players are forced to create mules, but those of use that actively play all our characters cannot rely on mules. I am forced to create a guild just to use as a personal bank for an extra 500 slots. Who knows, maybe keeping inventory space small and the prevalence of mules is part of their stragety to sell new character slots. I agree that inventory management needs to be addressed, and even that it would be nice for crafting bags to be available to all.
However, your polled is biased, and as such, I completely disregarded any relevance it may have. There are more tactful ways to discuss issues. Furthermore, you claims that anyone who sides one way is an elitist that is out of touch with the gaming community is absurd and completely skews you as someone incapable of a rational thought or grown-up discussion.
Your jumbling everything together. Relax a bit! Lol.
When you see ESO+ member or not an ESO+ member for two separate options, it means the same thing.
It serves solely to distinguish those who are Subbed to those who aren't. I did this because I took an educated guess that most Subs were going to say yes. The second option allows Non-Subs to be recognized as well for picking Yes. Because of this, you can tell how many Subs compared to non-Subs chose Yes, an interesting thing to look at.
This all doesn't matter. poll answers should have been:
1. Yes
2. No
3. i don't mind
Maybe it's interesting whether the guys are subbed or not, but i can choose everything i want. Even if it#s the false option. So it's just a useless and maybe even false information.
Doncellius wrote: »Point 1.... your poll is badly written and exceptionally biased... you want a genuine response to support your argument make it more neutral.
Point 2..... It's nothing to do with being able to give ZoS money via a one off microtransaction in the crown store. It's HOW ZoS gets the money thats important here...
Microtrasactions are neither consistent nor forecast-able. ZoS neds a forecast-able & reliable revenue stream (Via Subs) to be able to talk to shareholders etc about future development etc.
Many people will have dropped subs when the game went B2P.... they need to get more people back on a regular pay plan so they can demonstrate the project has future sustainability to the money men and keep the development going.
That's why this is sub only, and why it will likely stay that way.
Poll isn't biased. Perhaps you dislike how I separated (in a 100% impartial way) Subs and Non-Subs for supporting the current plan? You don't have to like my own (popular in-game rather than forums) opinion.
A Crafting Bag doesn't get people thinking "Wow, ZOS really did it! I'm sooooo paying $15 a month now despite that I already paid for multiple DLCs full price! Love these guys!"
People get frustrated that such a long-time, highly requested feature is being placed behind a Sub fee. Not happy. Only the minority of Subs are happy, and even many of them can see the unfairness despite it benefitting them.
I'll make this very simple for you, as it's already been mentioned many time sin this thread.
If the poll was unbiased then the language used should be neutral & in no way convey the opinion of the person creating the poll.
When you read your poll, you know exactly what your opinion is....language used and the structure is designed entirely to support and skew in favour of your own opinion.
That's the very definition of biased.
I don't blame you for it.... you have an opinion that you're totally entitled to.... just don't try and defend it as if you have created a totally neutral poll, and then also portray a tiny snapshot of a couple of hundred people as any kind of fact.
Back to the subject in hand though.... I have an experience which is the opposite to yours..... most people I speak to understand the WHY of this, rather than just feeling aggrieved because of their own situation & claiming unfairness. I know a LOT of people who are either now staying subbed, or starting up.
Neither you nor I have any way of seeing the data ZoS has on their sub rates.... how this impacts the future development of the game (Predictable & forecastable revenue streams - see my earlier post), nor any way to accurately predict & forecast the likely uptake of subs after this. So TBH it's all a bit moot... we should just wait & see the patch notes on monday
Doncellius wrote: »Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Doncellius wrote: »Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Lol, I just saw this in someone else's reply...
"The results of this poll will determine just how out of touch/elitist "sub vs non-sub" these forums are compared to the actual in-game playerbase. Judging from the vMA completion poll, my guess is the first option will be the most popular. We shall see"
Guess it was part of the OP and you edited it out @Doncellius. So, having a grown-up understanding of business and a real world expectation that a company must earn profits makes gamers elitist? Can't help but sit in awe at the forums and the ignorance and entitlement of some posters.
But, just for arguments sake, lets say players agree with you that crafting bags should be put up for sale in the crown store, and ZOS lists them for 5k tel var stones, or more. I can only imagine you would then whine they are too expensive and call ZOS greedy and call out anyone who pays for it as an elitist pay-to-win expletive.
Edited what out? I usually only edit for spelling mistakes since it is more difficult to see typos when typing from an iPhone.
Sorry to ruin your entire point, but you should go to the first page. It's one of the first comments
EDIT: You're awefully eager to shoot me down for some reason. Smh. You named yourself after advice you need to take for yourself. You could have easily answered the unbiased poll and stated your opinion. Instead, you attack me as much as you can, without even reading through previous comments.
Fair enough, I see it is a reply in a lower post. Forgive me for not reading thru all of your BS. It is an ignorant post. Guess I am programmed to overlook non-sense.
As for your claim that your poll is unbiased... If it were unbiased, you would not have the caveat in the first couple options that "I am an ESO+ Member". This implies that only a subscriber would agree with this. In reality, I am sure most mature adults agree with it, even if not subscribers; if not agree with it or like it, then certainly understand it. ZOS is a company and they must make money. There is nothing wrong with offering subs a quality perk, and in MMOs it is hard to offer perks that do not fringe upon P2W; crafting bags are a reasonable offer to subs.
Look, I agree that inventory management in this game is a nightmare. The tendency for ZOS to make sets BoP in recent DLCs has certainly compounded the problem since we are now forced to horde as we never know when sets will get buffed or nerfed and, because the RNG rates in this game are atrocious, we cannot be assured we can replace said sets in a reasonable time-frame. The devs really need to do something about the BoP system and inventory management as a whole. As is, most players are forced to create mules, but those of use that actively play all our characters cannot rely on mules. I am forced to create a guild just to use as a personal bank for an extra 500 slots. Who knows, maybe keeping inventory space small and the prevalence of mules is part of their stragety to sell new character slots. I agree that inventory management needs to be addressed, and even that it would be nice for crafting bags to be available to all.
However, your polled is biased, and as such, I completely disregarded any relevance it may have. There are more tactful ways to discuss issues. Furthermore, you claims that anyone who sides one way is an elitist that is out of touch with the gaming community is absurd and completely skews you as someone incapable of a rational thought or grown-up discussion.
Your jumbling everything together. Relax a bit! Lol.
When you see ESO+ member or not an ESO+ member for two separate options, it means the same thing.
It serves solely to distinguish those who are Subbed to those who aren't. I did this because I took an educated guess that most Subs were going to say yes. The second option allows Non-Subs to be recognized as well for picking Yes. Because of this, you can tell how many Subs compared to non-Subs chose Yes, an interesting thing to look at.
Please, if you're going to continue to be as harsh and childish as possible, just send me PMs instead. Would rather not we cause this entire thread to be us arguing.
so now your the victim? lol
you had no issue arguing with me when i told you it was biased.
When it comes to a reasonable price, I would suggest 1500-2000 crowns. Players, who would buy this bag would still buy the DLC content, so this should not be unreasonably overpriced. And it would avoid the bad feeling, those would have who bought all DLC content so far, would have to subcribe to get the bag and see their investment into the DLCs as basically lost.
That's not enough, it's only ~ 1 month of subscription. i think they want it as an long-term-tool to generate money. So maybe make it cost around 1 year of subscription. Remember...the championsystem in it's current state is a progression system for the next 15 years and they need money the whole time. Related to this 18k Crowns (equals 1 year subscription) is pretty cheap.
See, that my suggestion would be a limited time offer - for those, who want to stick with the "I am buying DLC content" concept and have invested into this already. Don't forget that the effective payment for a subscription minus the crowns you get is just about 1.50€ per month - so my suggested price is the equivalent to about a year of subscription - and this group will continue to buy DLCs as well - out of their own wallets, not from crown allotments like a subscriber does ít. So 1500-2000 crowns is reasonable. And it would be just available on summer sale and after that time exclusive to subscribers.
LOL. Look at how many ESO+ members are "NO! IT"S MINE!"
It makes me think back to how many discussions there have been about how ESO+ isn't worth it and how many people defended it, saying it's a good value.
Doncellius wrote: »Doncellius wrote: »Point 1.... your poll is badly written and exceptionally biased... you want a genuine response to support your argument make it more neutral.
Point 2..... It's nothing to do with being able to give ZoS money via a one off microtransaction in the crown store. It's HOW ZoS gets the money thats important here...
Microtrasactions are neither consistent nor forecast-able. ZoS neds a forecast-able & reliable revenue stream (Via Subs) to be able to talk to shareholders etc about future development etc.
Many people will have dropped subs when the game went B2P.... they need to get more people back on a regular pay plan so they can demonstrate the project has future sustainability to the money men and keep the development going.
That's why this is sub only, and why it will likely stay that way.
Poll isn't biased. Perhaps you dislike how I separated (in a 100% impartial way) Subs and Non-Subs for supporting the current plan? You don't have to like my own (popular in-game rather than forums) opinion.
A Crafting Bag doesn't get people thinking "Wow, ZOS really did it! I'm sooooo paying $15 a month now despite that I already paid for multiple DLCs full price! Love these guys!"
People get frustrated that such a long-time, highly requested feature is being placed behind a Sub fee. Not happy. Only the minority of Subs are happy, and even many of them can see the unfairness despite it benefitting them.
I'll make this very simple for you, as it's already been mentioned many time sin this thread.
If the poll was unbiased then the language used should be neutral & in no way convey the opinion of the person creating the poll.
When you read your poll, you know exactly what your opinion is....language used and the structure is designed entirely to support and skew in favour of your own opinion.
That's the very definition of biased.
I don't blame you for it.... you have an opinion that you're totally entitled to.... just don't try and defend it as if you have created a totally neutral poll, and then also portray a tiny snapshot of a couple of hundred people as any kind of fact.
Back to the subject in hand though.... I have an experience which is the opposite to yours..... most people I speak to understand the WHY of this, rather than just feeling aggrieved because of their own situation & claiming unfairness. I know a LOT of people who are either now staying subbed, or starting up.
Neither you nor I have any way of seeing the data ZoS has on their sub rates.... how this impacts the future development of the game (Predictable & forecastable revenue streams - see my earlier post), nor any way to accurately predict & forecast the likely uptake of subs after this. So TBH it's all a bit moot... we should just wait & see the patch notes on monday
I hope for ZOS's sake you aren't kidding. Console is not taking it as gracefully as those you have spoken to on PC seem to. The best way I can sum up reaction on PS4 (and I quote numerous times) is "Wtf. But I already bought DLC I'm not subbing for that! [cussing]"
Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Players, who would buy this bag would still buy the DLC content, so this should not be unreasonably overpriced. And it would avoid the bad feeling, those would have who bought all DLC content so far, to basically have to subscribe to get the bag and with it their investment into DLCs is basically lost. I myself have bought Orsinium and IC - so I have basically wasted crowns on this content, because I am a subscriber now.
From a corporate financials perspective:
1. There is no guarantee that those who will buy the crafting bags, if offered as a crown store purchase, will also buy the DLCs.
2. Past transactions have no bearing on future transactions. Whether you subbed to get access to the DLCs and used your crowns to buy vanity stuff, subbed for months and used accumulated crowns to buy the DLCs, or never subbed and bought the DLCs outright is irrelevant as you likely broke even if you subbed to buy or bought outright. This has no bearing on future transactions. If one of the perks of subbing is continued access to DLCs without buying them, then you have incentive to start subbing now as you will get access to DB and all other future DLCs as well as get the shiny new crafting bag. We cannot cry over spilled mill. No one can predict the future and therefore no one can anticipate who best to spend our hard earned money. However, we have known since well before TG DLC that crafting bags were coming and that they would be a ESO+ perk only, so you certainly could have saved money on the TG purchase.
Look, I agree that inventory management is a nightmare, and that everyone will want crafting bags. I want them, and am willing to sub to get them. Regardless, it is not unfair for a profit based company to offer a tangible and desirable perk as an incentive for subscriptions. These are a convenience item and do not qualify as P2W, as it would be a serious foul if subs got a PvE and/or PvP advantage. Simply, either you want the bags enough to sub, or you don't (or cannot afford them). Either way, ZOS has the right to make such an item sub only. No forum crusade will change it.
Doncellius wrote: »Doncellius wrote: »Point 1.... your poll is badly written and exceptionally biased... you want a genuine response to support your argument make it more neutral.
Point 2..... It's nothing to do with being able to give ZoS money via a one off microtransaction in the crown store. It's HOW ZoS gets the money thats important here...
Microtrasactions are neither consistent nor forecast-able. ZoS neds a forecast-able & reliable revenue stream (Via Subs) to be able to talk to shareholders etc about future development etc.
Many people will have dropped subs when the game went B2P.... they need to get more people back on a regular pay plan so they can demonstrate the project has future sustainability to the money men and keep the development going.
That's why this is sub only, and why it will likely stay that way.
Poll isn't biased. Perhaps you dislike how I separated (in a 100% impartial way) Subs and Non-Subs for supporting the current plan? You don't have to like my own (popular in-game rather than forums) opinion.
A Crafting Bag doesn't get people thinking "Wow, ZOS really did it! I'm sooooo paying $15 a month now despite that I already paid for multiple DLCs full price! Love these guys!"
People get frustrated that such a long-time, highly requested feature is being placed behind a Sub fee. Not happy. Only the minority of Subs are happy, and even many of them can see the unfairness despite it benefitting them.
I'll make this very simple for you, as it's already been mentioned many time sin this thread.
If the poll was unbiased then the language used should be neutral & in no way convey the opinion of the person creating the poll.
When you read your poll, you know exactly what your opinion is....language used and the structure is designed entirely to support and skew in favour of your own opinion.
That's the very definition of biased.
I don't blame you for it.... you have an opinion that you're totally entitled to.... just don't try and defend it as if you have created a totally neutral poll, and then also portray a tiny snapshot of a couple of hundred people as any kind of fact.
Back to the subject in hand though.... I have an experience which is the opposite to yours..... most people I speak to understand the WHY of this, rather than just feeling aggrieved because of their own situation & claiming unfairness. I know a LOT of people who are either now staying subbed, or starting up.
Neither you nor I have any way of seeing the data ZoS has on their sub rates.... how this impacts the future development of the game (Predictable & forecastable revenue streams - see my earlier post), nor any way to accurately predict & forecast the likely uptake of subs after this. So TBH it's all a bit moot... we should just wait & see the patch notes on monday
I hope for ZOS's sake you aren't kidding. Console is not taking it as gracefully as those you have spoken to on PC seem to. The best way I can sum up reaction on PS4 (and I quote numerous times) is "Wtf. But I already bought DLC I'm not subbing for that! [cussing]"
Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Players, who would buy this bag would still buy the DLC content, so this should not be unreasonably overpriced. And it would avoid the bad feeling, those would have who bought all DLC content so far, to basically have to subscribe to get the bag and with it their investment into DLCs is basically lost. I myself have bought Orsinium and IC - so I have basically wasted crowns on this content, because I am a subscriber now.
From a corporate financials perspective:
1. There is no guarantee that those who will buy the crafting bags, if offered as a crown store purchase, will also buy the DLCs.
2. Past transactions have no bearing on future transactions. Whether you subbed to get access to the DLCs and used your crowns to buy vanity stuff, subbed for months and used accumulated crowns to buy the DLCs, or never subbed and bought the DLCs outright is irrelevant as you likely broke even if you subbed to buy or bought outright. This has no bearing on future transactions. If one of the perks of subbing is continued access to DLCs without buying them, then you have incentive to start subbing now as you will get access to DB and all other future DLCs as well as get the shiny new crafting bag. We cannot cry over spilled mill. No one can predict the future and therefore no one can anticipate who best to spend our hard earned money. However, we have known since well before TG DLC that crafting bags were coming and that they would be a ESO+ perk only, so you certainly could have saved money on the TG purchase.
Look, I agree that inventory management is a nightmare, and that everyone will want crafting bags. I want them, and am willing to sub to get them. Regardless, it is not unfair for a profit based company to offer a tangible and desirable perk as an incentive for subscriptions. These are a convenience item and do not qualify as P2W, as it would be a serious foul if subs got a PvE and/or PvP advantage. Simply, either you want the bags enough to sub, or you don't (or cannot afford them). Either way, ZOS has the right to make such an item sub only. No forum crusade will change it.
My bad - that I think in terms of honor and fairness as a business owner in real life. I am not going to sign up for capitalism, but I think that a business should be honorable, while still being profitable. Customer relations are largely underestimated in your point of view. In a world of social media, a company has to care more than in the past for it's reputation and having a good reputation brings in new costumers, because players are actually liking the company running the game and suggest it to their friends. This is a huge difference between ESO and EVE for example. While the relation of players to ZOS is broken, EVE has a real bond with their player-base. That game will never go down the drain, because players would even help out of their own wallets, if required - but they are a healthy company, where employees have fun working for the company and players are happy subscribers, they do charity and they support science with projects - project discovery is an ingame activity, which actually helps science in the field of Bioinformatics - it is a win-win situation for many areas, this company will prosper and I as a player do not have to fear, that EVE would not be there in 10 or 20 years - it will be,. whereas ESO will be gone.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Why split up the "yes" answers into two groups and not the "no" answers ?
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Do you guys seriously think they will give up $15 a month to sell a crafting bag for a measly 1000 crowns? Give me a break. You can panhandle $15 a month.
And it would be just available on summer sale and after that time exclusive to subscribers.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Do you guys seriously think they will give up $15 a month to sell a crafting bag for a measly 1000 crowns? Give me a break. You can panhandle $15 a month.
Well it's not giving up getting anything if portions of the community dislike the bags being locked behind ESO+.
It's either selling a crafting bag or making no more money....I think that's the rest of the conversation as ppl who don't sub....don't want to sub.
Ppl who do, will keep subbing
But ppl who want the bag want to buy it cause even if it's 1500 crowns or 3000 crowns per bag type, it's similar to a sub in price to add items. 1500 to have it and add, in-sub and all ur stuff is still in the bag but I can't add more to it.
Makes sense to just sale access based on this