




Paulington wrote: »I'm a Dunmer and I agree with this post.


KhajiitiLizard wrote: »Really nice costume but there is one issue and that's only when you look up the skirt... heh
Loving it, but...
...what is this crap?
Mettaricana wrote: »KhajiitiLizard wrote: »Really nice costume but there is one issue and that's only when you look up the skirt... heh
Loving it, but...
...what is this crap?
Why are you looking up the skirt to begin with?

CirithValaria wrote: »Even if I like the fact that they are doing these for fair ladies (and different men) especially since most armor models dont have proper female version anymore... I still wonder how easy it could have been to do "male version" of these.
Simply make the kilt a bit longer and remove torso part, but keep the hand/arm stuff.
So instead of 1 costume you would get 2, but you could only wear the another depending on your sex.
Yes. In my opinion, the costume looks nice and is fitting to the character models. While not too much detail is given, it still is enough to be of "solid quality". Would I personally buy it? No. But, would I if I was into quality costumes? Yes. Absolutely.
Yes. In my opinion, the costume looks nice and is fitting to the character models. While not too much detail is given, it still is enough to be of "solid quality". Would I personally buy it? No. But, would I if I was into quality costumes? Yes. Absolutely.
sometimes less is more, I bought both due to that - I like that one with the beads, but the simpler, less decorated one, is nice as well in it's own right.