[Updated] My ESO Cyrodil PVP POV (videos)

sirrmattus · January 2016

Ok so this is updated for today 3/15/16 everything is the same except the changes made in v2.3.6, below is a couple videos i made back in january, the difference is shocking.

this is a full campaign maxed population im going to show 32 and 64 bit diferences

i can honestly say right now 64bit is unplayable for me, i cant deal with the lag like others.

ESO v2.3.6 980ti Nvidia Optimized Test 32bit & 64bit Settings

https://youtu.be/ckIAiLeyM1c

ESO v2.3.6 980ti Nvidia Optimized Test 32bit
its very playable and no huge lag spikes

https://youtu.be/QYcZooRCUDc

ESO v2.3.6 980ti Nvidia Optimized Test 64bit
you can see right away the big differences. im just standing still here. monster lag spike for a few seconds

https://youtu.be/tJmTD3GVFdk

THIS IS JANUARY 29 2016. Same rig, same everything.

Here are some short clips of me pushing my PC to the max. I dont overclock so this is stock. It looks so beautiful.
i7 5820k
msi 980ti
16gb ram

Here is some solo play with hi fps. Inside i also show my video settings and character stats

https://youtu.be/ZDpnVT-1SWo

Here is some more solo but I am surrounded by a zerg of friends and we battle it out with a good amount of AD

https://youtu.be/skOHswEcVt4

Hope you guys enjoy. I am trying to put out a beautiful product without spending $ so I use the free nvidia shadowplay to record.

Xantaria · January 2016

sirrmattus wrote: »

Here are some short clips of me pushing my PC to the max. I dont overclock so this is stock. It looks so beautiful.
i7 5820k
msi 980ti
16gb ram

Here is some solo play with hi fps. Inside i also show my video settings and character stats

https://youtu.be/ZDpnVT-1SWo

Here is some more solo but I am surrounded by a zerg of friends and we battle it out with a good amount of AD

https://youtu.be/skOHswEcVt4

Hope you guys enjoy. I am trying to put out a beautiful product without spending $ so I use the free nvidia shadowplay to record.

It looks exactly the same even with average setups in the 1k $ pricerange.

sirrmattus · January 2016

Xantaria wrote: »

sirrmattus wrote: »

Here are some short clips of me pushing my PC to the max. I dont overclock so this is stock. It looks so beautiful.
i7 5820k
msi 980ti
16gb ram

Here is some solo play with hi fps. Inside i also show my video settings and character stats

https://youtu.be/ZDpnVT-1SWo

Here is some more solo but I am surrounded by a zerg of friends and we battle it out with a good amount of AD

https://youtu.be/skOHswEcVt4

Hope you guys enjoy. I am trying to put out a beautiful product without spending $ so I use the free nvidia shadowplay to record.

It looks exactly the same even with average setups in the 1k $ pricerange.

LOL. idk about that man. maybe cause youtube pushes the fps down. or the nvidia shadowplay. but on my screen it looks like glass

PURPLE245 · January 2016

i have np with fps for me its the ping my ping is always threw the roof

IcyDeadPeople · January 2016

Xantaria wrote: »

It looks exactly the same even with average setups in the 1k $ pricerange.

That frame rate is amazing, though. Even when he's around a lot of enemy players, seems to always stay at least around 40-60.

Makes me wonder if the Cyrodiil performance problems are more related to client hardware. After IC patch, my frame rate drops a lot, below 10 fps around big keep battles.

sirrmattus · January 2016

I tell you what I'll do when I get home. I'll run this on the same settings. On my $1000 rig. And see how similar it looks. If this was the case I wouldn't have built a new computer for nothing.

sirrmattus · January 2016

IcyDeadPeople wrote: »

Xantaria wrote: »

It looks exactly the same even with average setups in the 1k $ pricerange.

That frame rate is amazing, though. Even when he's around a lot of enemy players, seems to always stay at least around 40-60.

Makes me wonder if the Cyrodiil performance problems are more related to client hardware. After IC patch, my frame rate drops a lot, below 10 fps around big keep battles.

What set up are you currently using?

Robbmrp · January 2016

IcyDeadPeople wrote: »

Xantaria wrote: »

It looks exactly the same even with average setups in the 1k $ pricerange.

That frame rate is amazing, though. Even when he's around a lot of enemy players, seems to always stay at least around 40-60.

Makes me wonder if the Cyrodiil performance problems are more related to client hardware. After IC patch, my frame rate drops a lot, below 10 fps around big keep battles.

I disagree as my system can run in Cyrodil with 30-60 FPS in large group fights and up to 100 at other times and that's with an I7 3770K OC'd to 4.5 GHZ, 32GB DDR3 Ram, 250GB SSD and a GTX970. When your ping is solid Red 300+ and everyone else in the game is saying Laaaag at the exact same time your game lags, it's NOT client hardware, that's all on the Server side.

There are people running this game with 2x 970 or 980 GTX's and CPU's higher than i7 5820k with SSD's running this game that get the exact same Server Latency issues.

sirrmattus · January 2016

Robbmrp wrote: »

IcyDeadPeople wrote: »

Xantaria wrote: »

It looks exactly the same even with average setups in the 1k $ pricerange.

That frame rate is amazing, though. Even when he's around a lot of enemy players, seems to always stay at least around 40-60.

Makes me wonder if the Cyrodiil performance problems are more related to client hardware. After IC patch, my frame rate drops a lot, below 10 fps around big keep battles.

I disagree as my system can run in Cyrodil with 30-60 FPS in large group fights and up to 100 at other times and that's with an I7 3770K OC'd to 4.5 GHZ, 32GB DDR3 Ram, 250GB SSD and a GTX970. When your ping is solid Red 300+ and everyone else in the game is saying Laaaag at the exact same time your game lags, it's NOT client hardware, that's all on the Server side.

There are people running this game with 2x 970 or 980 GTX's and CPU's higher than i7 5820k with SSD's running this game that get the exact same Server Latency issues.

You current set up is what I have sitting in the kids room, I upgraded to what I have now from this and it's a world of a difference. Although I don't over clock my hardware.

IcyDeadPeople · January 2016

Robbmrp wrote: »

IcyDeadPeople wrote: »

Xantaria wrote: »

It looks exactly the same even with average setups in the 1k $ pricerange.

That frame rate is amazing, though. Even when he's around a lot of enemy players, seems to always stay at least around 40-60.

Makes me wonder if the Cyrodiil performance problems are more related to client hardware. After IC patch, my frame rate drops a lot, below 10 fps around big keep battles.

I disagree as my system can run in Cyrodil with 30-60 FPS in large group fights and up to 100 at other times and that's with an I7 3770K OC'd to 4.5 GHZ, 32GB DDR3 Ram, 250GB SSD and a GTX970. When your ping is solid Red 300+ and everyone else in the game is saying Laaaag at the exact same time your game lags, it's NOT client hardware, that's all on the Server side.

There are people running this game with 2x 970 or 980 GTX's and CPU's higher than i7 5820k with SSD's running this game that get the exact same Server Latency issues.

At one time, however, frame rate during high latency spikes in keep battles on those high end rigs never dropped below 60, or at least that's what a couple owners of similar PCs with Titans or GTX 980 SLI mentioned.

They would experience rubber banding, etc., but apparently frame rate remained above 60. If this is the case, it suggests ESO may currently be a bit more demanding on client hardware than it used to be.

At least in these videos, the gameplay seems incredibly smooth. Might be different in Azura's Star during weekend primetime, of course.
.

Bfish22090 · January 2016

looks nice man, I wish lag wouldn't matter if you had a good pc or not

sirrmattus · January 2016

IcyDeadPeople wrote: »

Robbmrp wrote: »

IcyDeadPeople wrote: »

Xantaria wrote: »

It looks exactly the same even with average setups in the 1k $ pricerange.

That frame rate is amazing, though. Even when he's around a lot of enemy players, seems to always stay at least around 40-60.

Makes me wonder if the Cyrodiil performance problems are more related to client hardware. After IC patch, my frame rate drops a lot, below 10 fps around big keep battles.

I disagree as my system can run in Cyrodil with 30-60 FPS in large group fights and up to 100 at other times and that's with an I7 3770K OC'd to 4.5 GHZ, 32GB DDR3 Ram, 250GB SSD and a GTX970. When your ping is solid Red 300+ and everyone else in the game is saying Laaaag at the exact same time your game lags, it's NOT client hardware, that's all on the Server side.

There are people running this game with 2x 970 or 980 GTX's and CPU's higher than i7 5820k with SSD's running this game that get the exact same Server Latency issues.

At one time, however, frame rate during high latency spikes in keep battles on those high end rigs never dropped below 60, or at least that's what a couple owners of similar PCs with Titans or GTX 980 SLI mentioned.

They would experience rubber banding, etc., but apparently frame rate remained above 60. If this is the case, it suggests ESO may currently be a bit more demanding on client hardware than it used to be.

At least in these videos, the gameplay seems incredibly smooth. Might be different in Azura's Star during weekend primetime, of course.
.

I can drop my settings to high and medium and never go below 60-70 fps. This was max settings and with vsync that's why you never see it go above 60fps

sirrmattus · January 2016

Bfish22090 wrote: »

looks nice man, I wish lag wouldn't matter if you had a good pc or not

sirrmattus · January 2016

I recently switched from ftc to lui and I am enjoying it very much. So much more sleek

Lexxypwns · January 2016

sirrmattus wrote: »

Here are some short clips of me pushing my PC to the max. I dont overclock so this is stock. It looks so beautiful.
i7 5820k
msi 980ti
16gb ram

Here is some solo play with hi fps. Inside i also show my video settings and character stats

https://youtu.be/ZDpnVT-1SWo

Here is some more solo but I am surrounded by a zerg of friends and we battle it out with a good amount of AD

https://youtu.be/skOHswEcVt4

Hope you guys enjoy. I am trying to put out a beautiful product without spending $ so I use the free nvidia shadowplay to record.

Nah, bruh, use those zerg goggles

everyone knows if they're not in your group they don't exist, you SOLO wiped those AD

amidoingitrite streamers?

Sallington · January 2016

sirrmattus wrote: »

I tell you what I'll do when I get home. I'll run this on the same settings. On my $1000 rig. And see how similar it looks. If this was the case I wouldn't have built a new computer for nothing.

Settings are settings regardless of hardware. They only difference would be the framerate.

Sallington · January 2016

This is going to slowly turn into a thread of people confusing FPS drops and CPU bottlenecks with server latency and lag.

sirrmattus · January 2016

Lexxypwns wrote: »

sirrmattus wrote: »

Here are some short clips of me pushing my PC to the max. I dont overclock so this is stock. It looks so beautiful.
i7 5820k
msi 980ti
16gb ram

Here is some solo play with hi fps. Inside i also show my video settings and character stats

https://youtu.be/ZDpnVT-1SWo

Here is some more solo but I am surrounded by a zerg of friends and we battle it out with a good amount of AD

https://youtu.be/skOHswEcVt4

Hope you guys enjoy. I am trying to put out a beautiful product without spending $ so I use the free nvidia shadowplay to record.

Nah, bruh, use those zerg goggles

everyone knows if they're not in your group they don't exist, you SOLO wiped those AD

amidoingitrite streamers?

Lol I'm so confused. Can you elaborate

sirrmattus · January 2016

Sallington wrote: »

sirrmattus wrote: »

I tell you what I'll do when I get home. I'll run this on the same settings. On my $1000 rig. And see how similar it looks. If this was the case I wouldn't have built a new computer for nothing.

Settings are settings regardless of hardware. They only difference would be the framerate.

That's what I'm getting at. If I put max settings on my old rig my *** would prob crash

sirrmattus · March 2016

This is shocking.

IcyDeadPeople · March 2016

sirrmattus wrote: »

Ok so this is updated for today 3/15/16 everything is the same except the changes made in v2.3.6, below is a couple videos i made back in january, the difference is shocking.

this is a full campaign maxed population im going to show 32 and 64 bit diferences

i can honestly say right now 64bit is unplayable for me, i cant deal with the lag like others.

ESO v2.3.6 980ti Nvidia Optimized Test 32bit & 64bit Settings

https://youtu.be/ckIAiLeyM1c

ESO v2.3.6 980ti Nvidia Optimized Test 32bit
its very playable and no huge lag spikes

https://youtu.be/QYcZooRCUDc

ESO v2.3.6 980ti Nvidia Optimized Test 64bit
you can see right away the big differences. im just standing still here. monster lag spike for a few seconds

https://youtu.be/tJmTD3GVFdk

[/b]

I wonder why your frame rate drops so much when using 64-bit exe - somehow it's not fully utilizing your six core processor compared to 32-bit? For me 64-bit runs a little bit better than 32-bit on my Clarksfield laptop CPU (i7-820QM)
.

sirrmattus · March 2016

@IcyDeadPeople

id imagine server side?