
lolo_01b16_ESO wrote: »I agree that it's easier to get a good stamblade than a good stam sorc, but I think your comparison is a bit off balance. You should try to make it as unbiased as possible, and don't worry, sorcs will still look weaker even when you include everything.
For the nb you included defensive skills that cost magicka and can be hardcountered easiely. (btw. cloak won't purge dots anymore). So why not include bolt escape?
You mentioned consuming darkness as ultimate which I feel is funny. That is actually the only nb ultimate where I would say it is not stronger than what stam sorcs have in their class trees.
What about crit surge? It's an ok heal (better than killers blade) and can be a good reliable heal if combined with crit rush.
Every melee attack stuns when performed from stealth, and sa doesn't stun when you use it while you're visable.
For both, killers blade and power extraction much stronger weapon skills exist, so nbs rarely use them.
What about the stamina buff you get from your bound armour? Not worth mentioning?
Oh, yes, I forgot that you can't crit on shields.lolo_01b16_ESO wrote: »I agree that it's easier to get a good stamblade than a good stam sorc, but I think your comparison is a bit off balance. You should try to make it as unbiased as possible, and don't worry, sorcs will still look weaker even when you include everything.
For the nb you included defensive skills that cost magicka and can be hardcountered easiely. (btw. cloak won't purge dots anymore). So why not include bolt escape?
You mentioned consuming darkness as ultimate which I feel is funny. That is actually the only nb ultimate where I would say it is not stronger than what stam sorcs have in their class trees.
What about crit surge? It's an ok heal (better than killers blade) and can be a good reliable heal if combined with crit rush.
Every melee attack stuns when performed from stealth, and sa doesn't stun when you use it while you're visable.
For both, killers blade and power extraction much stronger weapon skills exist, so nbs rarely use them.
What about the stamina buff you get from your bound armour? Not worth mentioning?
You're right, I could have made it a little more unbiased, but it was a quick summary as I didn't want to spend too long on it. I was thinking about including bolt escape, but with its high cost, 50% increase for each additional use and the fact it sets up your target for a free gap close I didn't even bother.
Crit surge is a very unreliable heal. With everyone running impen and shields, it's impossible to get decent heals from it. I literally crit rush mobs around IC while fighting players just to heal myself.
I didn't mention the stamina in bound armour because it was under the defence category. I was just listing the things that will help keep you alive, like armour buffs.
It's almost as if NB is an extremely well made and well rounded class, more so than any other class and class spec in the game, not just stam sorc, haha.oh wait..
mistermutiny89 wrote: »Mag sorcs will use nothing but crystal frag no matter how much they buff the other morph, so let's use the other morph for stam sorcs... Make it only have the range of an uppercut with the Stam cost of an uppercut but perhaps lower damage and an instant cast.
Reduce stamina cost of thundering presence and have it remove snares.
Then give us a Stam morph for curse that causes poison damage with major defile.
Boom... Stam sorc fixed.
stamina sorc is far, far behind everyone else.
mistermutiny89 wrote: »Mag sorcs will use nothing but crystal frag no matter how much they buff the other morph, so let's use the other morph for stam sorcs... Make it only have the range of an uppercut with the Stam cost of an uppercut but perhaps lower damage and an instant cast.
Reduce stamina cost of thundering presence and have it remove snares.
Then give us a Stam morph for curse that causes poison damage with major defile.
Boom... Stam sorc fixed.
rofl would make it so *** OP. even more then WB rofl
mistermutiny89 wrote: »mistermutiny89 wrote: »Mag sorcs will use nothing but crystal frag no matter how much they buff the other morph, so let's use the other morph for stam sorcs... Make it only have the range of an uppercut with the Stam cost of an uppercut but perhaps lower damage and an instant cast.
Reduce stamina cost of thundering presence and have it remove snares.
Then give us a Stam morph for curse that causes poison damage with major defile.
Boom... Stam sorc fixed.
rofl would make it so *** OP. even more then WB rofl
I freaking hate having to put wb on my bar for my dk and stam sorc.... Surprise attack and jabs are spammable class dps abilities.. Every class and build should have them. I wouldn't care if it didn't even cc... Just give us spammable stam dps skills... Ploise! Haha
Stam sorcs should be just as bursty as mag sorcs.
mistermutiny89 wrote: »mistermutiny89 wrote: »Mag sorcs will use nothing but crystal frag no matter how much they buff the other morph, so let's use the other morph for stam sorcs... Make it only have the range of an uppercut with the Stam cost of an uppercut but perhaps lower damage and an instant cast.
Reduce stamina cost of thundering presence and have it remove snares.
Then give us a Stam morph for curse that causes poison damage with major defile.
Boom... Stam sorc fixed.
rofl would make it so *** OP. even more then WB rofl
I freaking hate having to put wb on my bar for my dk and stam sorc.... Surprise attack and jabs are spammable class dps abilities.. Every class and build should have them. I wouldn't care if it didn't even cc... Just give us spammable stam dps skills... Ploise! Haha
Stam sorcs should be just as bursty as mag sorcs.
yes but an istant CC as strong as frags has even when it's melee is OP to be sure. you would see things like frags WB WB executener. Just maybe with some light attacks weaved in between frags and first WB
Yep, this is YASSP (Yet another stam sorc post), but I just wanted to show the the team at ZOS what stam sorcs have to deal with in terms of balance. I've chosen Nightblade to put them up against because people say they need high damaging abilities to make up for their lack of defence (similar to stam sorc).
Note: This is not a nerf NB thread. I am just using them as a comparison as mentioned above. I think Nightblades are fine.
I've whipped up a quick sheet of some useful abilities and passives both classes have to get a good look. I didn't even bother with an Ultimate comparison because we all know stam sorcs ultimates are terrible compared to Nightblades anyway.
To ensure this post isn't too biased, I'm going to say I prefer the Sorc passives for my stamina builds. However, the main thing behind this thread is to point out passives don't necessarily keep you alive. You can tell from the comparison Nightblades obviously have more damage related specs, but also pretty good "oh crap" utilities. Stamina sorcerers just have to sit there and take whatever's coming. You could say streak is an option, but with gap closers and the streak nerf hurting us more than magicka, well, you know the story.
Defence wise, we suck. One puncture and that lightning around us is useless. We have absolutely nothing else to fall back on. That, and a severe lack of decent utilities makes you a sitting duck. We can't CC multiple targets that induces a snare and reduces their damage, we can't cloak to become invisible and heal, we can't use a shadow image to teleport away. This is why Stamina Sorcerer is terrible. We have the same defence as a Nightblade, yet lack the burst damage and escape utilities.
This is why what's left of the stam sorc population are rerolling stam DKs or Nightblades.
Mojomonkeyman wrote: »Yep, this is YASSP (Yet another stam sorc post), but I just wanted to show the the team at ZOS what stam sorcs have to deal with in terms of balance. I've chosen Nightblade to put them up against because people say they need high damaging abilities to make up for their lack of defence (similar to stam sorc).
Note: This is not a nerf NB thread. I am just using them as a comparison as mentioned above. I think Nightblades are fine.
I've whipped up a quick sheet of some useful abilities and passives both classes have to get a good look. I didn't even bother with an Ultimate comparison because we all know stam sorcs ultimates are terrible compared to Nightblades anyway.
To ensure this post isn't too biased, I'm going to say I prefer the Sorc passives for my stamina builds. However, the main thing behind this thread is to point out passives don't necessarily keep you alive. You can tell from the comparison Nightblades obviously have more damage related specs, but also pretty good "oh crap" utilities. Stamina sorcerers just have to sit there and take whatever's coming. You could say streak is an option, but with gap closers and the streak nerf hurting us more than magicka, well, you know the story.
Defence wise, we suck. One puncture and that lightning around us is useless. We have absolutely nothing else to fall back on. That, and a severe lack of decent utilities makes you a sitting duck. We can't CC multiple targets that induces a snare and reduces their damage, we can't cloak to become invisible and heal, we can't use a shadow image to teleport away. This is why Stamina Sorcerer is terrible. We have the same defence as a Nightblade, yet lack the burst damage and escape utilities.
This is why what's left of the stam sorc population are rerolling stam DKs or Nightblades.
What`s your ingame character`s name? I see you post a lot about stam sorcs, but I think I´ve never seen you play on eu. We have some unique strentghs imo, that are really strong.
I.e.: I cant cc multiple targets with a single button press (maybe streak?), but I can stack caltrops, mines and multiple buffs on me due to overload 3rd bar. Lots of ground control which allows in combo with streak for really nasty positioning moves that no other class is able to pull off. I could go on about def rune, which is really, really strong as a cc and theres a lot more.
Its not as one-sided is what I`m trying to say.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Dragonknight Class Skills and Passives that Support Stamina
1. Direct Damage:Burning Breath, Unstable Flame, Dragon Leap (Ultimate)
khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »This will not get stam sorcs buffed... this will get stam nbs nerfed.
khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »This will not get stam sorcs buffed... this will get stam nbs nerfed.
Hopefully not. I even bolded the part saying this isn't a nerf nb post!
The fact that the class is called SORCERER...
It boggles my mind why you would want anything other than Magicka.
[snip][snip]Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Dragonknight Class Skills and Passives that Support Stamina
1. Direct Damage:Burning Breath, Unstable Flame, Dragon Leap (Ultimate)
Enjoy your stamsorc as it is if you think that UF and BB can be considered as spammable direct damage abilities.
[snip]
[snip][snip][snip][snip][snip]
[snip]
[snip][snip]Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Dragonknight Class Skills and Passives that Support Stamina
1. Direct Damage:Burning Breath, Unstable Flame, Dragon Leap (Ultimate)
Enjoy your stamsorc as it is if you think that UF and BB can be considered as spammable direct damage abilities.
[snip]
[snip][snip][snip][snip][snip]
[snip]
Probably. I'm not a patient nor tolerant. And pretty much straightforward.
I want all classes to be balanced and good in both pve and pvp.
So when people start to compare classes they should remember that classes may have different mechanics, otherwise why have classes?
Also when people compare skills they should know how they work. Having weak base direct damage component on a strong dot isn't the same as having strong direct damage ability. I too think that stamsorcs deserve a buff, but if you want to compare stuff, then do it correctly.
Only NBs have instacast hardhitting stamina based ability actually. Surprise Attack.
Beta-class' Biting Jabs is a channelled dot that lasts several seconds.
DK has only stamina damage over time effects with small initial damage on hit.
Sorc has Thundering Presence which is a damage over time effect. At least it can't be purged, but NOBODY uses. So it's safe to say that they have nothing.
In short only NBs have that nice ability and that's perfectly fine, but other classes need adjustments. Since NB is pretty balanced as of now.
But that's a little bit off topic.
Mojomonkeyman wrote: »Yep, this is YASSP (Yet another stam sorc post), but I just wanted to show the the team at ZOS what stam sorcs have to deal with in terms of balance. I've chosen Nightblade to put them up against because people say they need high damaging abilities to make up for their lack of defence (similar to stam sorc).
Note: This is not a nerf NB thread. I am just using them as a comparison as mentioned above. I think Nightblades are fine.
I've whipped up a quick sheet of some useful abilities and passives both classes have to get a good look. I didn't even bother with an Ultimate comparison because we all know stam sorcs ultimates are terrible compared to Nightblades anyway.
To ensure this post isn't too biased, I'm going to say I prefer the Sorc passives for my stamina builds. However, the main thing behind this thread is to point out passives don't necessarily keep you alive. You can tell from the comparison Nightblades obviously have more damage related specs, but also pretty good "oh crap" utilities. Stamina sorcerers just have to sit there and take whatever's coming. You could say streak is an option, but with gap closers and the streak nerf hurting us more than magicka, well, you know the story.
Defence wise, we suck. One puncture and that lightning around us is useless. We have absolutely nothing else to fall back on. That, and a severe lack of decent utilities makes you a sitting duck. We can't CC multiple targets that induces a snare and reduces their damage, we can't cloak to become invisible and heal, we can't use a shadow image to teleport away. This is why Stamina Sorcerer is terrible. We have the same defence as a Nightblade, yet lack the burst damage and escape utilities.
This is why what's left of the stam sorc population are rerolling stam DKs or Nightblades.
What`s your ingame character`s name? I see you post a lot about stam sorcs, but I think I´ve never seen you play on eu. We have some unique strentghs imo, that are really strong.
I.e.: I cant cc multiple targets with a single button press (maybe streak?), but I can stack caltrops, mines and multiple buffs on me due to overload 3rd bar. Lots of ground control which allows in combo with streak for really nasty positioning moves that no other class is able to pull off. I could go on about def rune, which is really, really strong as a cc and theres a lot more.
Its not as one-sided is what I`m trying to say.
You use mines on a stam sorc? Their damage is laughable without the stacked magicka and spell power while also being insanely pricey to place. Overload's 3rd bar can easily be seen as compensation for the class with the most toggles in game, gap closers make the 1-2 uses of streak not quite as 'nasty' as say, a nb teleporting back to a well placed shade. Also for ground control what else, encase? Same as mines, way to expensive. And defensive rune, while nice, is broken by any damage and mostly just wards of gankers. We've had a year of silence and Wrobel brushed us off during the last show, we're an after thought and aside from templars, stam sorcs are not in as peachy of a place in my opinion as you suggest.