If every alliance had an emperor, why should you take or defend any keeps?

lolo_01b16_ESO wrote: »

If every alliance had an emperor, why should you take or defend any keeps?

for the campaign this would also eliminate cross faction usurpas

davidtxr wrote: »

Sharee wrote: »

That's not a bad idea actually. The top player of each alliance could be that faction's chosen emperor(or just 'leader', for immersion's sake), and then one of the three would be 'reigning emperor' (by current emperorship rules) which would mean his faction gets the usual HP bonus.

This would somewhat lessen the issue of rich becoming richer (strongest faction being even stronger becase they have an emperor player as well)

Top player lol just means the player that's on 24/7 while the rest of us work , all I can say is if it isn't broke don't fix it

it is broke you have the faction with most numbers steam roll through not right not fare especially if they have a emporer what are a faction suppose to do with no bars?

davidtxr wrote: »

spawn_to_kill wrote: »

davidtxr wrote: »

Sharee wrote: »

That's not a bad idea actually. The top player of each alliance could be that faction's chosen emperor(or just 'leader', for immersion's sake), and then one of the three would be 'reigning emperor' (by current emperorship rules) which would mean his faction gets the usual HP bonus.

This would somewhat lessen the issue of rich becoming richer (strongest faction being even stronger becase they have an emperor player as well)

Top player lol just means the player that's on 24/7 while the rest of us work , all I can say is if it isn't broke don't fix it

it is broke you have the faction with most numbers steam roll through not right not fare especially if they have a emporer what are a faction suppose to do with no bars? [/quote

Well on the server I play its not always the same faction that has the emperor its fluid and changes often

on ps4 most factions hae buff campaigns with 3 bars there colour none on any others i always play in chillrend usually full AD, made this thread as wiped 4 5 ppl at castle then had 5 min battle with emp to obviously to be killed, feels pointless i refuse to play on azura as i experience very little lag in chillrend but cant do much anymore as everyone vr15 and everything was all good before imperial city then they should have stuck with that saying of if its not broke dont fix it but now its near impossible to face those numbers which is why if they are not going to change it then in the interest of fareness something has to be done for us to counter this otherwise just shut down two serves on eups and force all the buff zergers meet

Weberda wrote: »

Just eliminate emperor altogether.

thats one way but having experienced it, its so fun would be a shame to take away what i think is the funnest feature on the game

emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer
emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer
emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer
emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer
emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer
emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer
emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer
emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer
emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer emporer

Manoekin wrote: »

Ghostbane wrote: »

Mojican v Meth v Alma Ruma

Cage Arena match, Imperial City.

YES.

So... Mojican vs Meth.

I've thought about this. I think you need to make it the top ranked player online, otherwise it stays somewhat as it is now, where you're obligated to play massive amounts of hours because you know it won't last.

Though, something like this just creates even more of a gap between the top players on a campaign and everyone else imo.

Replace alma or kitty or whatever she goes by now with bbq and that would be a sweet cage match

They shoulda kept former emperor buffs. I liked doing that little bit extra siege damage

Controlled number of keeps could define the emperor strength and bonus given to all factions. While I think the Current emp situation is the least of our worries at the moment, Faction emperors could be beneficial to the state of PvP.

Manoekin wrote: »

Ghostbane wrote: »

Mojican v Meth v Alma Ruma

Cage Arena match, Imperial City.

YES.

So... Mojican vs Meth.

I've thought about this. I think you need to make it the top ranked player online, otherwise it stays somewhat as it is now, where you're obligated to play massive amounts of hours because you know it won't last.

Though, something like this just creates even more of a gap between the top players on a campaign and everyone else imo.

if it whent by online player aswell that would actually be perfect stop people usurping eachother and they could share the buff and not feel the need to constantly be on cause if there higher placed all they would have to do is log on and take there position the title of role could be overseeing warlord if they do not own the ring

I tried to be kind.... but you people.

Bloodthirsty.

AJ_1988 wrote: »

They shoulda kept former emperor buffs. I liked doing that little bit extra siege damage

Miss my cheaper overload. ) =

lolo_01b16_ESO wrote: »

If every alliance had an emperor, why should you take or defend any keeps?

For the queen.