Olen_Mikko wrote: »I use daggers with precise trait, for increased critical.
I need to burst people down fast, and that's why i need my critical change to be over 50%
Olen_Mikko wrote: »I use daggers with precise trait, for increased critical.
I need to burst people down fast, and that's why i need my critical change to be over 50%
Somone with impenetrable traits or heavy armor or blocking or using damage shields will shut you down hard though. This setup only really works on noobs who don't know how to pvp imo.
Olen_Mikko wrote: »I use daggers with precise trait, for increased critical.
I need to burst people down fast, and that's why i need my critical change to be over 50%
Somone with impenetrable traits or heavy armor or blocking or using damage shields will shut you down hard though. This setup only really works on noobs who don't know how to pvp imo.
Meh works well for me on my nb too, very few people seem to run impen nowdays, and my build is a pure glass cannon stealth ganker, sitting on 76% crit rating and shadow mundus with all divines gear, and a khajit for more stealth damage. Most people are a one shot from stealth, even if they aren't a quick fear and another suprise attack always finishes them off.
TheWolfJeW wrote: »For a while in PvE it was dual sharpened maces, but after testing it multiple times I have found that dual sharpened swords is actually more beneficial. This is mainly due to the change they made where swords no longer increase just your weapon damage, but raise all damage you initiate. Before while dual wielding swords it increased your max weapon damage by 5%, but now it just raises all damage you do by 5% making it better than the armor penetration you get from maces. At least this is what I have found on my Stamplar.
Elijah_Crow wrote: »TheWolfJeW wrote: »For a while in PvE it was dual sharpened maces, but after testing it multiple times I have found that dual sharpened swords is actually more beneficial. This is mainly due to the change they made where swords no longer increase just your weapon damage, but raise all damage you initiate. Before while dual wielding swords it increased your max weapon damage by 5%, but now it just raises all damage you do by 5% making it better than the armor penetration you get from maces. At least this is what I have found on my Stamplar.
Knowing that things can change over time I went and tested this. I made two purple sharpened swords and two purple sharpened maces at VR15. All other things being equal, every hit with the maces was 1000 points more damage than the swords. Tested with surprise attack crit from behind the mob as I can repeat the exact number every time. Tested against VR16 troll in Orsinium.
For now, duel wield sharpened maces is still superior.
TheWolfJeW wrote: »Elijah_Crow wrote: »TheWolfJeW wrote: »For a while in PvE it was dual sharpened maces, but after testing it multiple times I have found that dual sharpened swords is actually more beneficial. This is mainly due to the change they made where swords no longer increase just your weapon damage, but raise all damage you initiate. Before while dual wielding swords it increased your max weapon damage by 5%, but now it just raises all damage you do by 5% making it better than the armor penetration you get from maces. At least this is what I have found on my Stamplar.
Knowing that things can change over time I went and tested this. I made two purple sharpened swords and two purple sharpened maces at VR15. All other things being equal, every hit with the maces was 1000 points more damage than the swords. Tested with surprise attack crit from behind the mob as I can repeat the exact number every time. Tested against VR16 troll in Orsinium.
For now, duel wield sharpened maces is still superior.
Alright, so I decided to hop onto my nightblade and test this further as well. My conclusion is that Dual wielding swords is better.
I used a surprise attack from behind on v16 ogres in wrothgar during these tests.
With dual sharpened v16 gold swords my surprise attacks did 42,611 damage on the ogre. As can be seen in this FTC report
imgur.com/fqIxIEI
With dual sharpened v16 gold maces my surprise attacks did 42,273 damage on the ogre. As can be seen in this FTC Report
imgur.com/uH9Fa9a
I then went on to test ambush as well to make sure that swords were consistently higher than maces. These tests were performed on v16 bears in wrothgar.
With the same swords as before my ambush did 35,098 damage from stealth towards the bear as can be seen here
imgur.com/lKtlHDP
With the same maces an ambush on another bear from stealth only did 34,820 damage. As can be seen here
imgur.com/rrUk4PC
The difference is not much, but as can be clearly seen the swords do produce higher numbers than the maces.
Elijah_Crow wrote: »TheWolfJeW wrote: »Elijah_Crow wrote: »TheWolfJeW wrote: »For a while in PvE it was dual sharpened maces, but after testing it multiple times I have found that dual sharpened swords is actually more beneficial. This is mainly due to the change they made where swords no longer increase just your weapon damage, but raise all damage you initiate. Before while dual wielding swords it increased your max weapon damage by 5%, but now it just raises all damage you do by 5% making it better than the armor penetration you get from maces. At least this is what I have found on my Stamplar.
Knowing that things can change over time I went and tested this. I made two purple sharpened swords and two purple sharpened maces at VR15. All other things being equal, every hit with the maces was 1000 points more damage than the swords. Tested with surprise attack crit from behind the mob as I can repeat the exact number every time. Tested against VR16 troll in Orsinium.
For now, duel wield sharpened maces is still superior.
Alright, so I decided to hop onto my nightblade and test this further as well. My conclusion is that Dual wielding swords is better.
I used a surprise attack from behind on v16 ogres in wrothgar during these tests.
With dual sharpened v16 gold swords my surprise attacks did 42,611 damage on the ogre. As can be seen in this FTC report
imgur.com/fqIxIEI
With dual sharpened v16 gold maces my surprise attacks did 42,273 damage on the ogre. As can be seen in this FTC Report
imgur.com/uH9Fa9a
I then went on to test ambush as well to make sure that swords were consistently higher than maces. These tests were performed on v16 bears in wrothgar.
With the same swords as before my ambush did 35,098 damage from stealth towards the bear as can be seen here
imgur.com/lKtlHDP
With the same maces an ambush on another bear from stealth only did 34,820 damage. As can be seen here
imgur.com/rrUk4PC
The difference is not much, but as can be clearly seen the swords do produce higher numbers than the maces.
The difference must be in the champion points and diminishing returns for Penetration. I have 100 in mighty but only 5 in penetration. I'm guessing that you are above 331 champion points?
TheWolfJeW wrote: »Elijah_Crow wrote: »TheWolfJeW wrote: »Elijah_Crow wrote: »TheWolfJeW wrote: »For a while in PvE it was dual sharpened maces, but after testing it multiple times I have found that dual sharpened swords is actually more beneficial. This is mainly due to the change they made where swords no longer increase just your weapon damage, but raise all damage you initiate. Before while dual wielding swords it increased your max weapon damage by 5%, but now it just raises all damage you do by 5% making it better than the armor penetration you get from maces. At least this is what I have found on my Stamplar.
Knowing that things can change over time I went and tested this. I made two purple sharpened swords and two purple sharpened maces at VR15. All other things being equal, every hit with the maces was 1000 points more damage than the swords. Tested with surprise attack crit from behind the mob as I can repeat the exact number every time. Tested against VR16 troll in Orsinium.
For now, duel wield sharpened maces is still superior.
Alright, so I decided to hop onto my nightblade and test this further as well. My conclusion is that Dual wielding swords is better.
I used a surprise attack from behind on v16 ogres in wrothgar during these tests.
With dual sharpened v16 gold swords my surprise attacks did 42,611 damage on the ogre. As can be seen in this FTC report
imgur.com/fqIxIEI
With dual sharpened v16 gold maces my surprise attacks did 42,273 damage on the ogre. As can be seen in this FTC Report
imgur.com/uH9Fa9a
I then went on to test ambush as well to make sure that swords were consistently higher than maces. These tests were performed on v16 bears in wrothgar.
With the same swords as before my ambush did 35,098 damage from stealth towards the bear as can be seen here
imgur.com/lKtlHDP
With the same maces an ambush on another bear from stealth only did 34,820 damage. As can be seen here
imgur.com/rrUk4PC
The difference is not much, but as can be clearly seen the swords do produce higher numbers than the maces.
The difference must be in the champion points and diminishing returns for Penetration. I have 100 in mighty but only 5 in penetration. I'm guessing that you are above 331 champion points?
Yes, I am currently at the max amount of champ points allowed. So I have 100 in mighty and 67 in piercing.
Elijah_Crow wrote: »TheWolfJeW wrote: »Elijah_Crow wrote: »TheWolfJeW wrote: »Elijah_Crow wrote: »TheWolfJeW wrote: »For a while in PvE it was dual sharpened maces, but after testing it multiple times I have found that dual sharpened swords is actually more beneficial. This is mainly due to the change they made where swords no longer increase just your weapon damage, but raise all damage you initiate. Before while dual wielding swords it increased your max weapon damage by 5%, but now it just raises all damage you do by 5% making it better than the armor penetration you get from maces. At least this is what I have found on my Stamplar.
Knowing that things can change over time I went and tested this. I made two purple sharpened swords and two purple sharpened maces at VR15. All other things being equal, every hit with the maces was 1000 points more damage than the swords. Tested with surprise attack crit from behind the mob as I can repeat the exact number every time. Tested against VR16 troll in Orsinium.
For now, duel wield sharpened maces is still superior.
Alright, so I decided to hop onto my nightblade and test this further as well. My conclusion is that Dual wielding swords is better.
I used a surprise attack from behind on v16 ogres in wrothgar during these tests.
With dual sharpened v16 gold swords my surprise attacks did 42,611 damage on the ogre. As can be seen in this FTC report
imgur.com/fqIxIEI
With dual sharpened v16 gold maces my surprise attacks did 42,273 damage on the ogre. As can be seen in this FTC Report
imgur.com/uH9Fa9a
I then went on to test ambush as well to make sure that swords were consistently higher than maces. These tests were performed on v16 bears in wrothgar.
With the same swords as before my ambush did 35,098 damage from stealth towards the bear as can be seen here
imgur.com/lKtlHDP
With the same maces an ambush on another bear from stealth only did 34,820 damage. As can be seen here
imgur.com/rrUk4PC
The difference is not much, but as can be clearly seen the swords do produce higher numbers than the maces.
The difference must be in the champion points and diminishing returns for Penetration. I have 100 in mighty but only 5 in penetration. I'm guessing that you are above 331 champion points?
Yes, I am currently at the max amount of champ points allowed. So I have 100 in mighty and 67 in piercing.
If you're not adverse to testing again and pulling some champion points out and then re-spend I would bet if you have no points in piercing, the maces will produce higher damage. That would confirm the deminishing returns from sharpened and mean at lower champion points maces are better (as we know Mighty is where your first points should go) and swords at higher champion points.
Elijah_Crow wrote: »Appreciate the testing. Now I'm confused why I'm getting the opposite results. I will play around again tomorrow and see if I can figure it out. Thank you.