Hm, i intended to add a 5th option for Other, but somehow messed that up. Feel free to add your thoughts on this change!

Nobody plays a campaign because of the scoring rules, they were wrong to introduce that. People want good fights and a sense of accomplishment.

Add more objectives to the map itself.

it was alrdy mentioned, but nobody cares about scoring rules...

The changes would maybe have been interesting if they had not opened up a bazillion now empty IC buff campaigns...

I haven't noticed a difference. There are plenty of guilds that don't play the map. Till that changes I don't see much that would make any difference.

I would vote for the gated option but not enough of the factions played on that server (myself included.)

They do need additional objectives badly.
In conjunction with IC district objectives, I think Cyro can have life for more than one DLc update.

Also updated rewards, ways to spend AP, and exp gain.

Ideally pvp and pve should be in tandem with regards to rewards, exp and enjoyment/difficulty.
Or you allow pvp to have strong rewards instead of pve for one quarter to promote pvp then vice versa for pve. Might encourage use of the game from 2 different standpoints.

The problem as far as I can see it is less, 'the rules are different' and more, 'no one in my faction seems to care about winning the campaign.'

Joy_Division wrote: »

These changes have made zero effect whatsoever.

I don't know why people got all excited back in June when they were announced.

Pretty simple, it was the last and more or less only sign of life we had from the PvP team this year at all... We've got to celebrate the little things!

Three points, 1) people don't really care about winning a campaign, because 2) most of them are dead anyway, and 3) did someone really believe people would run around claim only the stuff that gives points?

Teargrants wrote: »

No one cares about end campaign rewards anymore, especially not 5 *** wall repair kits.

I definitely feel this contributes. The other part is how the fighting usually plays out, NPC's and Siege combat itself are very weak mechanics with the changes the latest update brought.

Any large scale fighting that does occur suffers from debilitating performance which makes what active combat mechanics the players use far less effective.

Combine these and a few other factors and it paints a more clear picture as to why there is diminished interest in who wins the campaign. The 'trophy' of winning is only as rewarding as how much fun it was to get there.