What? I don't use insightful like that!!! Is it the new LOL?
I immediately apologise to anyone I have given an insightful to.
RAGUNAnoOne wrote: »
RAGUNAnoOne wrote: »
Mate, don't change my s to a z when quoting me, I'm English, so apologise is correct.
RAGUNAnoOne wrote: »RAGUNAnoOne wrote: »
Mate, don't change my s to a z when quoting me, I'm English, so apologise is correct.
I didn't know that at all, I apologise and I won't do it again now that I know it is spelled differently.
edit fixed
What? I don't use insightful like that!!! Is it the new LOL?
I immediately apologise to anyone I have given an insightful to.
Yeah, that's because it's not. There needs to be consensus that that's what it means for it to have any impact. But it never caught on, and the majority of the forum still uses insightful to mark intelligent posts.What? I don't use insightful like that!!! Is it the new LOL?
Elektrakosh wrote: »I don't have many insightful anyway. This place needs a Lol button so folk can distinguish lols from genuine compliments.
There are people who use insightful for the same purpose as a lol. I don't take it as compliments anymore because of it.Elektrakosh wrote: »I don't have many insightful anyway. This place needs a Lol button so folk can distinguish lols from genuine compliments.
I disagree. LOLs were just used to troll in many cases. ZOS has taken the "if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all" approach with those buttons and I think that's fine.
Elektrakosh wrote: »There are people who use insightful for the same purpose as a lol. I don't take it as compliments anymore because of it.Elektrakosh wrote: »I don't have many insightful anyway. This place needs a Lol button so folk can distinguish lols from genuine compliments.
I disagree. LOLs were just used to troll in many cases. ZOS has taken the "if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all" approach with those buttons and I think that's fine.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »I use insightful as.. insightful, agree as ... agree and awesome as... awesome.
Unbelievable !!
Elektrakosh wrote: »There are people who use insightful for the same purpose as a lol. I don't take it as compliments anymore because of it.Elektrakosh wrote: »I don't have many insightful anyway. This place needs a Lol button so folk can distinguish lols from genuine compliments.
I disagree. LOLs were just used to troll in many cases. ZOS has taken the "if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all" approach with those buttons and I think that's fine.
I think there is a very small percentage of people who do this.anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »I use insightful as.. insightful, agree as ... agree and awesome as... awesome.
Unbelievable !!
I think most people do this... then there are those who use "awesome" sarcastically.
LegendaryChef wrote: »Elektrakosh wrote: »There are people who use insightful for the same purpose as a lol. I don't take it as compliments anymore because of it.Elektrakosh wrote: »I don't have many insightful anyway. This place needs a Lol button so folk can distinguish lols from genuine compliments.
I disagree. LOLs were just used to troll in many cases. ZOS has taken the "if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all" approach with those buttons and I think that's fine.
I think there is a very small percentage of people who do this.anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »I use insightful as.. insightful, agree as ... agree and awesome as... awesome.
Unbelievable !!
I think most people do this... then there are those who use "awesome" sarcastically.
Who peed in your coffee?
Riko_Futatabi wrote: »Maybe we shouldn't have any options for reactions because it can lead to the thread getting more "Clicks" over actual "Posts". Many times I've just hit "Agree" and not posted and some good threads fade away into the back end of the forums in a few days.
Now maybe if selecting "Agree, Awesome or Insightful" actually bumped the thread then it'd be a different case. But for now it's sort of a lazy way to voice your opinion without posting.
Very insightful.gen_reynard2050 wrote: »...hahaha!