This is said every time anything happens but I'll repeat: It's AvAvA. At any time, one alliance will be "getting ganged up on".

Earlier today I saw blue break down the walls at Drakelowe (when yellow owned roebeck/nikel/brindle/alessia/sejanus) only for them to disappear and red take it over ~30 seconds later. Does that mean red/blue are working together? Absolutely not. Maybe it was a small group of blues working with red, or, more likely, it was a small group of blues having fun and red seeing it and taking advantage of an open castle.

Blue has been attacking yellow all day as well at Nikel/Roebeck, it's just a lot slower going typically.

As for blue "Helping" at roebeck, maybe yellow wiped them? Is it so hard to consider that it happened?

Lastly: Red is in first. While it is more tactical for blue to attack yellow (scrolls), it's hard to argue against beating the person in 1st place.

it would be one thing if DC came in to take advantage of us sieging down the inner wall so they could flip the keep themselves but every single one of the DC who came in to wipe us literally walked back out of the keep and allowed AD to bring up both the inner and outer walls.

Earlier today in fact I distinctly saw a good group of blue attack yellow at BRK when the nearest blue keep was Aleswell.

It's all perspective. I even have videos of blues/reds dancing together on yellow bodies.

I still don't believe in any way that blue is helping red or vice-versa.