Sneaky-Snurr wrote: »Thuy chaged alut of tings. U will nut rejeneret stameena when yew bloke is the bigjest chage for tenkers. You ken red the whole chages in the petch nodes. Is rely long tho.
Sneaky-Snurr wrote: »Thuy chaged alut of tings. U will nut rejeneret stameena when yew bloke is the bigjest chage for tenkers. You ken red the whole chages in the petch nodes. Is rely long tho.
LMAO! That gets an awesome.
Sneaky-Snurr wrote: »Thuy chaged alut of tings. U will nut rejeneret stameena when yew bloke is the bigjest chage for tenkers. You ken red the whole chages in the petch nodes. Is rely long tho.
Sneaky-Snurr wrote: »Thuy chaged alut of tings. U will nut rejeneret stameena when yew bloke is the bigjest chage for tenkers. You ken red the whole chages in the petch nodes. Is rely long tho.
Sneaky-Snurr wrote: »Thuy chaged alut of tings. U will nut rejeneret stameena when yew bloke is the bigjest chage for tenkers. You ken red the whole chages in the petch nodes. Is rely long tho.
Reading this made my brain bleed x___x. OP please go through your post and edit it into something a bit closer to comprehensible.
All I can assume is that you're saying the same meta that applied before 1.7 apply after it? Because if that's what you're trying to say the majority of the forums strongly disagree.
Artfuldodger wrote: »Sneaky-Snurr wrote: »Thuy chaged alut of tings. U will nut rejeneret stameena when yew bloke is the bigjest chage for tenkers. You ken red the whole chages in the petch nodes. Is rely long tho.
sad thing is I could read it as if normal.
It's not sad. It's a feature of the human mind. If the underlying sentence is coherent to begin with, a bunch of misspellings will not make it hard to understand. As opposed to incoherent sentences where every word is spelled correctly. Those are much harder to understand. Which is why nitpicking peoples spelling is really a waste.
Sneaky-Snurr wrote: »It's not sad. It's a feature of the human mind. If the underlying sentence is coherent to begin with, a bunch of misspellings will not make it hard to understand. As opposed to incoherent sentences where every word is spelled correctly. Those are much harder to understand. Which is why nitpicking peoples spelling is really a waste.
A bit salty now are we? A little banter won't be much of a problem now wouldn't it? Lighten up a bit, friend.
Moonshadow66 wrote: »Sneaky-Snurr wrote: »It's not sad. It's a feature of the human mind. If the underlying sentence is coherent to begin with, a bunch of misspellings will not make it hard to understand. As opposed to incoherent sentences where every word is spelled correctly. Those are much harder to understand. Which is why nitpicking peoples spelling is really a waste.
A bit salty now are we? A little banter won't be much of a problem now wouldn't it? Lighten up a bit, friend.
Although it's funny, @Rikal is right, though^^
@timborggrenlarsenb16_ESO I'm just curious, but do you happen to be from Sweden? Because I know someone from Sweden who has the exact same way of spelling English words. I guess every language has its own characteristic "style" of spelling in another language, here in English. I mostly can also tell if an English text is written by a German person (such as I am myself), we're making all the same mistakes because it's how we would say or write it, etc
Sorry I can't reply to your actual question in the OP, though, I don't know.
Moonshadow66 wrote: »Although it's funny, @Rikal is right, though^^
@timborggrenlarsenb16_ESO I'm just curious, but do you happen to be from Sweden? Because I know someone from Sweden who has the exact same way of spelling English words. I guess every language has its own characteristic "style" of spelling in another language, here in English. I mostly can also tell if an English text is written by a German person (such as I am myself), we're making all the same mistakes because it's how we would say or write it, etc
Sorry I can't reply to your actual question in the OP, though, I don't know.
timborggrenlarsenb16_ESO wrote: »Yea, gotter love to inter game used to see that HA / 1/S for a vampire/ magiacka lifedrain build still is a personal nurf and that: staff and LA still are the way to go, pluse that the same skills still are compltly OP.
What did they change again?
Sneaky-Snurr wrote: »Moonshadow66 wrote: »Although it's funny, @Rikal is right, though^^
@timborggrenlarsenb16_ESO I'm just curious, but do you happen to be from Sweden? Because I know someone from Sweden who has the exact same way of spelling English words. I guess every language has its own characteristic "style" of spelling in another language, here in English. I mostly can also tell if an English text is written by a German person (such as I am myself), we're making all the same mistakes because it's how we would say or write it, etc
Sorry I can't reply to your actual question in the OP, though, I don't know.
I did not disagree on what @Rikal said and in fact, I understand where he's coming from. What he said is relatable to a lot of people including myself. I'm just saying that everything doesn't have to be so serious. It's how you perceive things, mate. Everything can be a disaster should you decide to ponder on the downside of things.
You can autcllay cnhage the odrer of lretrts in mnay wdors in a snctenee and the bairn can fgirue it out so lnog as the fsirst and lsat lteter are creorct.