KiraTsukasa wrote: »It's a spin-off. The canon Elder Scrolls games are numbered.
Did they make an official statement, or opinion?
Did they make an official statement, or opinion?
GuyNamedSean wrote: »And for anyone tha finds inconsistencies, they have an in story excuse that can be used. Dragon Breaks. Some points in time are so tumultuous that the regular flow of time itself becomes less uniform. An easy example is when the ancient Nords sent Alduin forward in time. Another is the usage of Numidium by Tiber Septim at the beginning of the Third Era. There's another confirmed break in the First Era, where for a few hundred years there is absolutely no recorded history. If ESO takes place in a Dragon Break, it would explain events such as the Planemeld and Three Banners War not being mentioned in other lore.
KiraTsukasa wrote: »It's a spin-off. The canon Elder Scrolls games are numbered.
KiraTsukasa wrote: »
The main series Elder Scrolls games are numbered (with the exception of Arena, considering it was the first) and each one in sequence makes allusions to the events of previous games. The events of ESO are never mentioned in any of the main series, and ESO doesn't mention the events of the main series. This, coupled with the fact that ESO is listed as a spin-off on every Elder Scrolls database, means that it is highly likely that ESO is a non-canon spinoff game.
If this IS just my opinion, then 99.9% of the Internet agrees with me.
So by that logic:KiraTsukasa wrote: »
Dragon Breaks. In other words, alternate dimensions. Meaning that ESO takes place in an alternate reality than the main series games, which is more proof of ESO being non-canon than canon.
Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »
Let's not be too hasty in naming what is/is not canon until Bethesda makes a statement about it. Oh, wait... they did.
theroyalestpythonnub18_ESO wrote: »
Nobody's ever released a statement refuting or revoking it's canon status. It's not like it needs re-certification.Akavir_Sentinel wrote: »
That quote was from 2013 before ESO was even released. Of course they are going to say it's canon so Elder Scrolls fans will buy it.
Akavir_Sentinel wrote: »
That quote was from 2013 before ESO was even released. Of course they are going to say it's canon so Elder Scrolls fans will buy it.
It doesn't need a poll, canonity isn't our decision. ESO is both canon (confirmed by ZOS) and a spin-off. Spin-off doesn't equate to non-canonity, it merely indicates that the game isn't a part of the main series. Elder Scrolls had a lot of spin-off series over the years: Legend (Battlespire), Adventures (Redguard), Travels, now ESO and soon the card game Legends.
Just because you don't like the fact that it has been stated as canon, doesn't revoke its authenticity.Akavir_Sentinel wrote: »
That quote was from 2013 before ESO was even released. Of course they are going to say it's canon so Elder Scrolls fans will buy it.