Eriquito3 wrote: »

RizaHawkeye wrote: »

Naslu wrote: »

phairdon wrote: »

Flying mounts? Wonders why we need flying mounts.

wonders why we need reskinned mounts.

dont get me wrong , i do not desire a 2km high flying dragon (not possible due to engine and size of pve areas) but 2 or 3 m above the ground would be nice and why - cause i would pay crowns for a complete different mount!

I think you may have the wrong game.

But yes, why not?! Why not - for the sole purpose of making more money - put a hovercraft in? In fact, why don't we just dump all the ESO lore and kick it to curb 'cause it's really, really starting to hold us back when it comes to creative game design.

I mean wouldn't you want:

Dwemer handguns
Light sabers or light swords
Maybe a huge anime sword of ice ... and then one of fire ... and then one of shock ...
Maybe some more races that were never, ever in the TES series
Maybe some more classes that were never, ever in the TES series
Maybe we could sell some bikinis and stuff in the Crown store so all the guys could ... whistle ... to their toons (see what I did there? See?)

/sarcasm off.

How about instead of an actual mount, we can put a levitaion spell as a mount per say.

It wont be a normal spell like the ones in our loadouts, but in all aspects it is just a mount but when you click your mount button you will levitate a few feet off the ground and could move around like you would with a normal mount.

It is lore friendly, and I think it will be cool to see.

.__. Yeaaaaaa

Artheiron wrote: »

flying mounts? well sorry you have to wait 2 eras for dragons to come. also you're no dragonborn too.

maybe, maybe! physic laws can be altered for fun in oblivion planes.
something teach mortals how weird sheogorath's sense of humour really is. a mini game or a quest that requires you to fly or something similar can be done for fun right?

no.

-pout-

Eriquito3 wrote: »

RizaHawkeye wrote: »

Naslu wrote: »

phairdon wrote: »

Flying mounts? Wonders why we need flying mounts.

wonders why we need reskinned mounts.

dont get me wrong , i do not desire a 2km high flying dragon (not possible due to engine and size of pve areas) but 2 or 3 m above the ground would be nice and why - cause i would pay crowns for a complete different mount!

I think you may have the wrong game.

But yes, why not?! Why not - for the sole purpose of making more money - put a hovercraft in? In fact, why don't we just dump all the ESO lore and kick it to curb 'cause it's really, really starting to hold us back when it comes to creative game design.

I mean wouldn't you want:

Dwemer handguns
Light sabers or light swords
Maybe a huge anime sword of ice ... and then one of fire ... and then one of shock ...
Maybe some more races that were never, ever in the TES series
Maybe some more classes that were never, ever in the TES series
Maybe we could sell some bikinis and stuff in the Crown store so all the guys could ... whistle ... to their toons (see what I did there? See?)

/sarcasm off.

How about instead of an actual mount, we can put a levitaion spell as a mount per say.

It wont be a normal spell like the ones in our loadouts, but in all aspects it is just a mount but when you click your mount button you will levitate a few feet off the ground and could move around like you would with a normal mount.

It is lore friendly, and I think it will be cool to see.

So yeah, levitation.

Years ago, when I was a girl in middle school starting to game and my Dad introduced me to Morrowind, I LOVED levitation. I know, I know it was game breaking and you could levitate up and kill your mobs from the sky and all that. But I would abuse alchemy until I had these massively overpowered levitation potions ... and then I would spend hours just floating over Red Mountain.

Yeah .... levitation.

TheTwistedRune wrote: »

RavenSkylord wrote: »

Problem with adding Necromancer, is the way it would bust the actual playthrough. All alliances have long drawn out quests about fighting Necromancers, who are trying to undermine every alliance. Not to mention how it directly relates to the main story line and its main 2 antagonists, as all Necromancy is directly tied to Mannimarco and Molag Bol.

Having a Necromancer playing through that would be game breaking for many, unless an alternate story line is created for each alliance and main story.

In other words, very impractical to even attempt

I don't see it that way. Apply this reasoning to ESIV Oblivion for example. Its like saying the player should not be able to summon daedra because that's what Mankar Camoran does.

Its true that necromancy did start with Mannimarco, but assumptions that all necromancers owe fealty and are aligned with him are incorrect. Take the book "The Legend of Vastarie" for example. It centres upon a different approach to necromancy. Which, while still could be considered evil, is separate from the Worm Cult and the King of Worms.

To deny those that would like a necromancer skill line in ESO because all necromancers are allied with Mannimarco and Molag Bal is a thin argument, and not reason enough to prohibit one.

Just my opinion of course.

Missing the point by focusing on one aspect of it. Take the Daggerfall storyline into account. In A'likr map the Redguard have a pretty definitive feeling towards Necromancy, and that the storyline takes you into a sect of Redguard culture that willingly outcast themselves to battle necromancy. The Orcs also share a particular hatred for Necromancy in all its shapes and forms.

And lets not forget that Meridia has a long and deep seeded hatred for Necromancy, and the very existence of which is an affront to her existence. Its not just Mannimarco that makes necromancy as a class option impractical. Its the entire tone of the story in many of its facets, expecting people to work with what they hate more then anything else, well its just foolish

Understand, I have nothing against it as a class, just pointing out its infeasible t8 do.

Gyudan wrote: »

ZOS_RichLambert wrote: »

To be clear I said a new Trial is in the works. I didn't say when it would come out.

To be clear, you didn't say when anything would come out.

To be really clear they have said new content every quarter which kind of gives us release dates so come christmas time we have more content to get engrossed in

*FACEPALM*

Housing? Really?!

Thoughts on housing instead of new classes or text chat for consoles...

Bet next news will be on adding little anime-like pets and costumes instead of Orsinium

OLIVI3R wrote: »

*FACEPALM*

Housing? Really?!

Thoughts on housing instead of new classes or text chat for consoles...

Bet next news will be on adding little anime-like pets and costumes instead of Orsinium

If they add text chat on consoles i gaurntee alot of the console guys will be satisfied for a good while.

Necromancer could work in the same way as they allowed players to play as any race in any alliance. Maybe one day a bunch of necromancers said.. " This aint right. I am going to use my abilities to change the world for the better ". I am occasionally roleplaying a Nord that defected to AD for example.

CapnPhoton wrote: »

RavenSkylord wrote: »

Problem with adding Necromancer, is the way it would bust the actual playthrough. All alliances have long drawn out quests about fighting Necromancers, who are trying to undermine every alliance. Not to mention how it directly relates to the main story line and its main 2 antagonists, as all Necromancy is directly tied to Mannimarco and Molag Bol.

Having a Necromancer playing through that would be game breaking for many, unless an alternate story line is created for each alliance and main story.

In other words, very impractical to even attempt

There would be an issue with lore. Plus, 2 MMOs I played in the past were ruined by having a nec class.

Your obvious hatred of necros is affecting your objectivity: how can an MMO be "ruined" by any particular class mechanics?

The idea of adding flying mounts to this game is stupid.

Why would people demand another class when it took them this long to get the class we have halfway balanced? Don't get me wrong, I love what ZOS has done and they've come a long way, but we don't need another class for awhile.

ZOS_RichLambert wrote: »

To be clear I said a new Trial is in the works. I didn't say when it would come out.

Also... #ashhole was about the funniest thing I've heard in awhile! (Weathers is my hero)

Already looking forward to the new trial - Take your time @ZOS_RichLambert Quality is worth the wait

Thanks for joining us here on the forums!