Maintenance for the week of September 29:
• PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 29, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – October 1, 8:00 UTC (4:00AM EDT) - 16:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – October 1, 8:00 UTC (4:00AM EDT) - 16:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)
• PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 29, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – October 1, 8:00 UTC (4:00AM EDT) - 16:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – October 1, 8:00 UTC (4:00AM EDT) - 16:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)
Size of DLC
Would you rather have relatively small quarterly DLCs like Imp City or big yearly expansion like WoW?
Edited by itaybrodskyb16_ESO on August 6, 2015 10:55AM Size of DLC 30 votes
Quarterly
76%
23 votes
Yearly
23%
7 votes
0
-
Sausage✭✭✭✭✭
✭Quarterly4 DLCs quartely sounds great as console launch was just recently. Eventually they need to start thinking expansions though and make it best possible and try to get lots of new and people back. Also what I'd like to happen is F2P before expansions, then release expansion and throw all F2P players out, why, just because they can, or maybe not B2P-switch seems to be working quite well even now, ESO still sells as full priced so maybe just forget whole F2P.Edited by Sausage on August 6, 2015 12:22PM0 -
Azurephoenix999✭✭✭✭✭YearlyMy choice was more of a coin toss than anything else.
Quarterly - If ZOS is capable of releasing content that fast.
Yearly - If the content we get is worth the wait.Guildmaster of Spectral Liberty - Xbox One - European Megaserver0 -
QuarterlyYearly for me would be too long, I tend to get bored pretty quickly and would probably move on.Yeah I used to live in Skyrim. Then I took an arrow to the knee.0 -
Elsonso✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭QuarterlyUpdates and Expansions are not mutually exclusive. I expect that frequency (or complexity) of updates will be revised to make room for a full on expansion. For all we know, they are already working on a full expansion that could be released in a couple of years.XBox EU/NA:@ElsonsoJannus
PC NA/EU: @Elsonso
PSN NA/EU: @ElsonsoJannus
Total in-game hours: 11321
X/Twitter: ElsonsoJannus0 -
I would personally say quarterly and yearly combined. However with the structure of the game being "free" but the DLC not being a lot of people would moan. I know something that could give me a constant year of entertainment and cost me a $100 - 200 isn't bad at all. I know I haven't wanted to play any other games since I get addicted to MMO's so it's actually saving money in the long run.
0 -
ZigoSid✭✭✭✭YearlyPack of zones for the 3 factions yearly and some Daedric/100% neutral smaller zones quaterly.
Pack of zones for example : Orsinium, Murkmire and one AD zone at the same time, you finish your zone and then you can access to other factions zones, like in the game now with veteran zones. So like that we can have stories related to the alliance war and the factions, more in the context of the game, for everyone instead of a bad and annoying neutral story like in Craglorn (in fact it's not that bad but it's too much out of the contexts (war and daedric invasions) to be really good for me)
Edited by ZigoSid on August 6, 2015 1:24PM0 -
Audigy✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭QuarterlyBecause,
not every DLC might be my type of thing, for instance I wouldn't buy something like Craglorn as I can never experience it due RL and playing mostly solo. At the same time, IC and housing / solo based DLC´s would work for me.
If they release an expansion once a year then it would not only cost more money (unwise, as surely quite a few players run on low budgets), but it would also consist of content that you might never use.
My only concern is, that ZOS still lacks a social DLC (after Craglorn being group, IC AVA and Obsidium solo PVE).0