Maintenance for the week of December 15:
· [COMPLETE] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)

4 Players vs. 4 Players Arena

Dragonnord
Dragonnord
✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭
Hello,

I'd like your opinion about a 4 Players vs. 4 Players arena. Maybe more variants also, 1vs1, 2vs2, etc., but mostly a 4vs4.

Personally, I'd really like to see this kind of championship be implemented in the game, with leaderboards, rankings, rewards and so.

It would be a system of a 4-player squad playing agaist onother 4-player squad of your same rank, or at least, let's say, in a range of +/- 4 ranks, so the arena is balanced and a team with, for example, a VR1, two VR2 and one VR5 cannot play against two VR8, two VR10 and one VR14. The ranks would need to be close.

Of course, the squad killing all the members of the other squad would win the combat, but also, maybe, there could be a timer in case the battle takes too long, and so the squad killing more players of the other squad would win (no resurrections). If no killings when time runs out, maybe the team doing more damage wins.

The squads could have names, symbols and/or representing the team.

Don't know, just expressing something I'd like to see in the game in the future, very cool in my opinion, or giving an idea at least. :)

Thanks for reading.
  • Dragonnord
    Dragonnord
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    I'd like some opinions please.

    Thank you.
  • AnoVando
    AnoVando
    ✭✭
    They actually already have something similar to this that they've used as a demo at conventions like PAX. It's 4v4v4 and its similar to king of the hill gameplay. It's a lot of fun (got to try it out at PAX Prime), but they haven't said if it's coming to live or not (as far as I know). Here is an article featured on Tamrielfoundry that talks more about it:

    http://tamrielfoundry.com/2014/09/hands-on-4v4-arena/
    Edited by AnoVando on July 31, 2015 6:33PM
  • NewBlacksmurf
    NewBlacksmurf
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    First.....yes!

    Here are some of my other thoughts but....overall Yes



    PvP ideas:

    I've not experienced PvP in games where Level variance of 10 or more wasn't an issue.

    I think a lot of the community pondered why we never saw an arena PvP or some sort of small versions of Cyrodil as battle fields by level ranges

    Battlefields 10-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, VR1 - VR14
    Arenas: 4X4X4 based on the level ranges above for battle fields

    Cyrodil as a whole is a great experience for some but for others it brings on a lot of rage and rage quitting or the attitude of "I'm going to grind CP's and then come to XYZ campaign and zerg!!!!!!"


    Ultimately, the Cyrodil concept is waaaay too long for some.
    Battlefields with a shorter 1 hour max timeframe would be a lot more ideal for some. Not to take away from those who enjoy the current Cyrodil experience.

    Then this just adds to the Imperial City where you can access IC via traditional Cyrodil or via Battlefields until you reach VR1
    -PC (PTS)/Xbox One: NewBlacksmurf
    ~<{[50]}>~ looks better than *501
  • Kloud
    Kloud
    ✭✭✭
    Yes everyone has really been begging zos for this hopefully they will listen soon!
  • Forestd16b14_ESO
    Forestd16b14_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    A arena has been asked for since beta. Every one wants one ZoS had a chance to add one but didn't and turned the once great Imperial Arena into another stupid PvE gauntlet.
  • SG_Celerrimus
    SG_Celerrimus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I believe they said a long time ago they might implement the 4v4v4 thing they use at conventions, but they haven't said anything on it in a looong time. I think the last time it was mentioned by them as being a "maybe" was last year after Quakecon when it was used in the PvP tournament.
  • markt84
    markt84
    ✭✭✭
    Let's wait for IC, it sounds like a bunch of small battles are to be had there
  • NewBlacksmurf
    NewBlacksmurf
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I believe they said a long time ago they might implement the 4v4v4 thing they use at conventions, but they haven't said anything on it in a looong time. I think the last time it was mentioned by them as being a "maybe" was last year after Quakecon when it was used in the PvP tournament.

    Maybe if it were just a tournament...like (I hate when PPL do this but its the best example I can think of)
    .....like WoW's PvP tournament

    ....aaahhhh.....don't blast me, I know this isn't Wow
    -PC (PTS)/Xbox One: NewBlacksmurf
    ~<{[50]}>~ looks better than *501
  • ouijacom
    ouijacom
    Seriously, we need an Arena and some smaller pvp action. I hate zerg mode 50 vs 50 of back and forth ***. No real teamwork or always a troll doing dumb stuff.
    Veteran Rank 14 (Stamina Templar) (XBOX 1)
  • Mitchblue
    Mitchblue
    ✭✭✭✭
    I want 10 vs 10 or/and 20 vs 20. I don't like small arena.
    Anyone else rooting for Molag Bal?
Sign In or Register to comment.