Okay, why do you disagree. With what specifically do you disagree, or are you simply incapable of articulating it? If you are, then perhaps you don't really disagree at all. Or does it perhaps just give you bad feelings to read what was written?
Think of it this way: If a professor in class or a boss at work makes a statement, and you reply simply with, "I disagree!" what do you think would result?
LOLHmmm, folks are disagreeing with others and explaining why?
... and here I was, practicing for the inevitable return of the "disagree" button.
I'd be doing both personally. I fall udner the "If I feel storng enough I'm going to post anyway." category when it comes to this particular discussion. Others? Not so much. I'd just drop my opinion in a click of a button and go back to the rest of the forums.
My multiple "Disagree" posts demonstrated the absurdity of simply disagreeing with someone, without bothering to state why.
Disagree
Agree.
Yup OP. They had LOL and disagree, but too many QQ whiners got their feelings hurt when they voiced stupid hairbrained ideas. Or it just ruined their sensibilities that someone could disagree without giving a fully tapped out explanation. You know because ofcourse you owe them one you know. :-/
Yup OP. They had LOL and disagree, but too many QQ whiners got their feelings hurt when they voiced stupid hairbrained ideas. Or it just ruined their sensibilities that someone could disagree without giving a fully tapped out explanation. You know because ofcourse you owe them one you know. :-/
Disagree.
Psychobunni wrote: »+1 For a disagree button
I didn't read the whole thread so forgive me if I repeat another, but we need a disagree without having to say why. I get the whole point that forcing people to say why (or not comment) "might" encourage discussion, but that isnt always best.
Some threads don't inspire a constructive post, they make you want to slap the OP or at minimum tell the OP what an idiot they are....but you can't because the MODs taze your arse. Couple of tazes and you're dead (banned). RIP forum goers :'(
Or maybe the people that enjoy the forums are tired of explaining for the 500th time that there are no dragons in ESO. Let me just click that I "disagree" that what's lacking from Skyrim ESO is dragons.
As it stands Joe Blow can do a "why can't we have flying pink unicorns?" post, and unless we want to argue explain why, there is no option for people to simply disagree with it. So it doesn't provide accurate feedback either.
Psychobunni wrote: »+1 For a disagree button
I didn't read the whole thread so forgive me if I repeat another, but we need a disagree without having to say why. I get the whole point that forcing people to say why (or not comment) "might" encourage discussion, but that isnt always best.
Some threads don't inspire a constructive post, they make you want to slap the OP or at minimum tell the OP what an idiot they are....but you can't because the MODs taze your arse. Couple of tazes and you're dead (banned). RIP forum goers :'(
Or maybe the people that enjoy the forums are tired of explaining for the 500th time that there are no dragons in ESO. Let me just click that I "disagree" that what's lacking from Skyrim ESO is dragons.
As it stands Joe Blow can do a "why can't we have flying pink unicorns?" post, and unless we want to argue explain why, there is no option for people to simply disagree with it. So it doesn't provide accurate feedback either.
*disagree*
All I do is hit agree and then when the person get's excited that someone agrees with them I take it away. It's a very powerful statement.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BRl2tHxbDfo