Maintenance for the week of May 18:
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – May 18, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – May 18, 8:00 UTC (4:00AM EDT) - 13:00 UTC (9:00AM EDT)
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – May 18, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – May 18, 8:00 UTC (4:00AM EDT) - 13:00 UTC (9:00AM EDT)
The issues on the North American Xbox megaserver have been resolved at this time. If you continue to experience difficulties at login, please restart your client. Thank you for your patience!
ENDGAME CHANGE
SIN-X
✭✭✭
Do you think this would be viable?
ENDGAME CHANGE: I see a lot of people unhappy with trials and such using the no reason to run them stance. I was thinking what if we took MASTER WEAPONS and made them researchable. EXAMPLE: I loot a master inferno staff w/prcise trait. I can then learn it at a min of 30 day research time ,this helps to prevent using alts to exploit the function. I can then craft myself a master inferno staff with just the precise trait but adding a set bonus. So I could make a v14 master inferno staff w/prcise that is tourags pact. This will help open up builds,make crafting feel very important and thru the next step trails very viable. so master drops in dsa/vdsa. Now to help AA/HRC we allow random drop master trait stones so even if I have learned the master inferno w/precise I need to run aa/hrc to aquire a master prcise trait stone to craft it. Lastly Vds and SO can drop the master chants ie increase damage of crushing shock/force pulse by 400 or increase max magicka by 900 etc. So more people are running trails ,end game is worth it and crafters feel rewarded. SO I could in theory craft myself a v14 masters inferno staff with prcise /tourags pact/that increases my force pulse dam by 400. That's pretty solid. By making players learn each staff indiv by type and trait you add a nice bit of content to the game.
Edited by SIN-X on May 2, 2015 8:28PM ENDGAME CHANGE: I see a lot of people unhappy with trials and such using the no reason to run them stance. I was thinking what if we took MASTER WEAPONS and made them researchable. EXAMPLE: I loot a master inferno staff w/prcise trait. I can then learn it at a min of 30 day research time ,this helps to prevent using alts to exploit the function. I can then craft myself a master inferno staff with just the precise trait but adding a set bonus. So I could make a v14 master inferno staff w/prcise that is tourags pact. This will help open up builds,make crafting feel very important and thru the next step trails very viable. so master drops in dsa/vdsa. Now to help AA/HRC we allow random drop master trait stones so even if I have learned the master inferno w/precise I need to run aa/hrc to aquire a master prcise trait stone to craft it. Lastly Vds and SO can drop the master chants ie increase damage of crushing shock/force pulse by 400 or increase max magicka by 900 etc. So more people are running trails ,end game is worth it and crafters feel rewarded. SO I could in theory craft myself a v14 masters inferno staff with prcise /tourags pact/that increases my force pulse dam by 400. That's pretty solid. By making players learn each staff indiv by type and trait you add a nice bit of content to the game.
X-SINISTER-X v14 NB
"DEATH WAITS IN THE DARK"
"DEATH WAITS IN THE DARK"
ENDGAME CHANGE 14 votes
yes
21%
3 votes
no
78%
11 votes
other
0%
0
-
Zazaaji✭✭✭✭OP - You really should have specified if voting for "yes" or "no" means if they think it will be changed, or if they want it to be changed in the poll itself. Some people on this site won't understand without that clarification because they didn't read the thread, they only read the poll.Edited by Zazaaji on May 2, 2015 9:19PMEnglish is not my first language, Finnish is.
Please don't heap on me for grammar problems.0 -
PKMN12✭✭✭✭✭noOP - As PKMN12 demonstrated, you really should have specified if voting for "yes" or "no" means if they think it will be changed, or if they want it to be changed in the poll itself. Some people on this site won't understand without that clarification because they didn't read the thread, they only read the poll.
oh, no, i read the thread, i was just pointing you that whether you agree with it or not, it is simply not going to happen, though i happen to disagree with making the grind even longer and more boring then before.0 -
Zazaaji✭✭✭✭OP - As PKMN12 demonstrated, you really should have specified if voting for "yes" or "no" means if they think it will be changed, or if they want it to be changed in the poll itself. Some people on this site won't understand without that clarification because they didn't read the thread, they only read the poll.
oh, no, i read the thread, i was just pointing you that whether you agree with it or not, it is simply not going to happen, though i happen to disagree with making the grind even longer and more boring then before.
Sorry, I misunderstood your post. Thanks for not taking it badly.
English is not my first language, Finnish is.
Please don't heap on me for grammar problems.0 -
Heromofo✭✭✭✭✭yesOP - As PKMN12 demonstrated, you really should have specified if voting for "yes" or "no" means if they think it will be changed, or if they want it to be changed in the poll itself. Some people on this site won't understand without that clarification because they didn't read the thread, they only read the poll.
oh, no, i read the thread, i was just pointing you that whether you agree with it or not, it is simply not going to happen, though i happen to disagree with making the grind even longer and more boring then before.
Sorry, I misunderstood your post. Thanks for not taking it badly.
You dont see that often also your message still applies because after rereading looks like i did click the wrong one.0 -
Zazaaji✭✭✭✭OP - As PKMN12 demonstrated, you really should have specified if voting for "yes" or "no" means if they think it will be changed, or if they want it to be changed in the poll itself. Some people on this site won't understand without that clarification because they didn't read the thread, they only read the poll.
oh, no, i read the thread, i was just pointing you that whether you agree with it or not, it is simply not going to happen, though i happen to disagree with making the grind even longer and more boring then before.
Sorry, I misunderstood your post. Thanks for not taking it badly.
You dont see that often also your message still applies because after rereading looks like i did click the wrong one.
Oh. I just edited out PKMN12's name and removed the strikeout line then.
Edited by Zazaaji on May 2, 2015 9:26PMEnglish is not my first language, Finnish is.
Please don't heap on me for grammar problems.0