I hate 60 day months, they take for ever to get paid in!DaniAngione wrote: »So, it means that people who needs a lot of time can ALWAYS get a 180-day (3 month ESO plus) right before the change...
*hint hint hint*
PS: SENCHE TIGER MOUNT!!!!!!!!!!! yes, YES, I KNEW IT WAS ALL WORTH IT, I KNEW IT WAS, THANK YOU, UNIVERSE
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Rook_Master wrote: »This will set the bar significantly lower than what I believed was necessary to get the mount.
With this new calculation, it's possible for someone's paid time to have started on 8/16/2014, and they would still get the mount.
8/16/2014 until 3/16/2015 is 212 days. At that point, someone could set up a 3-month sub for an extra 92 days, putting them at 304 days, and get the mount.
I believe this should reward people that have been here since Day One, not people that joined four months after launch.
I dont mind they paid the same as us. Hell after March we can cancel our subs they will have paid 5 months.
Rook_Master wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Rook_Master wrote: »This will set the bar significantly lower than what I believed was necessary to get the mount.
With this new calculation, it's possible for someone's paid time to have started on 8/16/2014, and they would still get the mount.
8/16/2014 until 3/16/2015 is 212 days. At that point, someone could set up a 3-month sub for an extra 92 days, putting them at 304 days, and get the mount.
I believe this should reward people that have been here since Day One, not people that joined four months after launch.
I dont mind they paid the same as us. Hell after March we can cancel our subs they will have paid 5 months.
It's the principle of the matter. I've been here since the Beta in September 2013. That means I've been playing this game almost a year longer than some people who will also be receiving the "Loyalty" mount.
It's clearly designed as a way to hook people into new subs, I just personally wish it was a bit more exclusive.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Rook_Master wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Rook_Master wrote: »This will set the bar significantly lower than what I believed was necessary to get the mount.
With this new calculation, it's possible for someone's paid time to have started on 8/16/2014, and they would still get the mount.
8/16/2014 until 3/16/2015 is 212 days. At that point, someone could set up a 3-month sub for an extra 92 days, putting them at 304 days, and get the mount.
I believe this should reward people that have been here since Day One, not people that joined four months after launch.
I dont mind they paid the same as us. Hell after March we can cancel our subs they will have paid 5 months.
It's the principle of the matter. I've been here since the Beta in September 2013. That means I've been playing this game almost a year longer than some people who will also be receiving the "Loyalty" mount.
It's clearly designed as a way to hook people into new subs, I just personally wish it was a bit more exclusive.
In the end its a video game. I was hoping it to be a bit more exclusive as well. I'll get over it tho
Rook_Master wrote: »This will set the bar significantly lower than what I believed was necessary to get the mount.
With this new calculation, it's possible for someone's paid time to have started on 8/16/2014, and they would still get the mount.
8/16/2014 until 3/16/2015 is 212 days. At that point, someone could set up a 3-month sub for an extra 92 days, putting them at 304 days, and get the mount.
I believe this should reward people that have been here since Day One, not people that joined four months after launch.
Rook_Master wrote: »This will set the bar significantly lower than what I believed was necessary to get the mount.
With this new calculation, it's possible for someone's paid time to have started on 8/16/2014, and they would still get the mount.
8/16/2014 until 3/16/2015 is 212 days. At that point, someone could set up a 3-month sub for an extra 92 days, putting them at 304 days, and get the mount.
I believe this should reward people that have been here since Day One, not people that joined four months after launch.
gclifton58ub17_ESO wrote: »Rook_Master wrote: »This will set the bar significantly lower than what I believed was necessary to get the mount.
With this new calculation, it's possible for someone's paid time to have started on 8/16/2014, and they would still get the mount.
8/16/2014 until 3/16/2015 is 212 days. At that point, someone could set up a 3-month sub for an extra 92 days, putting them at 304 days, and get the mount.
I believe this should reward people that have been here since Day One, not people that joined four months after launch.
Fortunately, there are only 90 days in a 90 day subscription, so they will not be able to game the system like that. There is also no way they could have 212 days since all subs are in 30 day increments. They would either have 210 days or 240; there is no option in between. The least amount of time you would need on March 15 is 210 days elapsed. Then you could pay for another 90 days, which is the longest subscription at the moment, and you could qualify for the tiger.
You could also go out and buy time cards but that requires a whole new level of math that I am not qualified to try.
Ya if people wanna shovel dollar bills into the ZOS Mail slot to ride the tiger let them . I got the time needed already . Now it's time to make that Charlie Sheen toon I've been waiting for ...