Ourorboros wrote: »Agree 100% with your post. I'll continue using CraftStore at least until all my traits are researched. Just a suggestion...maybe repeat this thread in the Add-on category. That might improve odds of finding someone to pick up the torch on this. That's happened for a couple other add-ons I use.
ZOS_ShannonM wrote: »Hey Folks.
We moved this thread from the General Discussion Section to the Add-Ons & UI Mod Section of the forums, as we feel this is a better fit. Thank you for understanding.
That is a pretty crappy thing to do assuming it's true. There are many people who used the addons myself included and we would have gladly supported the author had we know there were issues.Thechemicals wrote: »alpha tools was alright....wykkids is better support and update. As far as making an addon for everyone and then saying its only for a select few....yeah your a ***.
Thechemicals wrote: »As far as making an addon for everyone and then saying its only for a select few....yeah your a ***.
Thechemicals wrote: »As far as making an addon for everyone and then saying its only for a select few....yeah your a ***.
And this sort of treatment is one reason why addon authors burn out.
The more important issue is that there needs to be more incentive for programmers to create and maintain mods. Especially here, where the UI was designed to be bare in anticipation of a large amount of addons.
Ourorboros wrote: »The more important issue is that there needs to be more incentive for programmers to create and maintain mods. Especially here, where the UI was designed to be bare in anticipation of a large amount of addons.
Players do have the option to donate to the authors. I don't how much support they get, and I wonder if having to already pay a sub for ESO stops players from supporting authors. I do think it's past time for ZOS to re-evaluate their position on add-ons and their UI. The player base is currently at the mercy of add-on authors, and the situation with ALPHA TOOLS and CRAFTSTORE is a perfect example. We are powerless if authors pull their add-on or otherwise stop support for patches. And from the frequent forum posts, it seems pretty clear most players would welcome UI options from ZOS incorporating some of the most popular add-ons. It's one thing to allow the use of add-ons, but it feels like a Catch-22 that ZOS offers no support when every patch they issue seems to break a good many add-ons.
Ourorboros wrote: »The more important issue is that there needs to be more incentive for programmers to create and maintain mods. Especially here, where the UI was designed to be bare in anticipation of a large amount of addons.
Players do have the option to donate to the authors. I don't how much support they get, and I wonder if having to already pay a sub for ESO stops players from supporting authors. I do think it's past time for ZOS to re-evaluate their position on add-ons and their UI. The player base is currently at the mercy of add-on authors, and the situation with ALPHA TOOLS and CRAFTSTORE is a perfect example. We are powerless if authors pull their add-on or otherwise stop support for patches. And from the frequent forum posts, it seems pretty clear most players would welcome UI options from ZOS incorporating some of the most popular add-ons. It's one thing to allow the use of add-ons, but it feels like a Catch-22 that ZOS offers no support when every patch they issue seems to break a good many add-ons.
I can pretty much guarantee you if people were donating that authors wouldn't pull them.
But how many people actually donate?
Thechemicals wrote: »As far as making an addon for everyone and then saying its only for a select few....yeah your a ***.
And this sort of treatment is one reason why addon authors burn out.
eventide03b14a_ESO wrote: »That is a pretty crappy thing to do assuming it's true. There are many people who used the addons myself included and we would have gladly supported the author had we know there were issues.Thechemicals wrote: »alpha tools was alright....wykkids is better support and update. As far as making an addon for everyone and then saying its only for a select few....yeah your a ***.
Ourorboros wrote: »The more important issue is that there needs to be more incentive for programmers to create and maintain mods. Especially here, where the UI was designed to be bare in anticipation of a large amount of addons.
Players do have the option to donate to the authors. I don't how much support they get, and I wonder if having to already pay a sub for ESO stops players from supporting authors. I do think it's past time for ZOS to re-evaluate their position on add-ons and their UI. The player base is currently at the mercy of add-on authors, and the situation with ALPHA TOOLS and CRAFTSTORE is a perfect example. We are powerless if authors pull their add-on or otherwise stop support for patches. And from the frequent forum posts, it seems pretty clear most players would welcome UI options from ZOS incorporating some of the most popular add-ons. It's one thing to allow the use of add-ons, but it feels like a Catch-22 that ZOS offers no support when every patch they issue seems to break a good many add-ons.
I can pretty much guarantee you if people were donating that authors wouldn't pull them.
But how many people actually donate?
Thechemicals wrote: »Thechemicals wrote: »As far as making an addon for everyone and then saying its only for a select few....yeah your a ***.
And this sort of treatment is one reason why addon authors burn out.
What other treatment should one give of a person who makes an addon for everyone and then stops and makes it for a select few only?Im not sure what you would like the community to think on what was done.
Eh, I already pay ZOS for the game. I am not willing to pay a dime more for extra features. IMO, it should be on ZOS to provide some kind of incentive program for addon authors. They could take an amount equal to %20 of the monthly salary of the lowest paid intern and send out some gift cards or give out small amounts of free game time.

Thechemicals wrote: »Thechemicals wrote: »As far as making an addon for everyone and then saying its only for a select few....yeah your a ***.
And this sort of treatment is one reason why addon authors burn out.
What other treatment should one give of a person who makes an addon for everyone and then stops and makes it for a select few only?Im not sure what you would like the community to think on what was done.
Perhaps, thank them for ever having made their work available publicly, for free, at all.
You're a better man than I, Gunga Dhin, if it's that easy for you to check needed traits. I found it a lot trickier to figure out what traits I needed without spending considerable time and sometimes deconning traits I needed. Couple add-ons did make the process faster and more reliable. Point is, not everyone shares your POV and/or experience, and that doesn't make us wrong for using add-ons.I just use the game UI for seeing what research items I need. I think people get too much hand holding with these addons. Thats why they are so upset when an author removes one they like. You do not need an addon to see what you need for research. Go to any crafting station take 2 seconds and look.
I can pretty much guarantee you if people were donating that authors wouldn't pull them.
But how many people actually donate?
I can pretty much guarantee you if people were donating that authors wouldn't pull them.
But how many people actually donate?
In case of SkyShards addon it is about 1 person out of 500 users:
SkyShards has about 1.4 millons of downloads from ESOUI and Curse. There was 45 versions, so 1,400,000 / 45 ~= 31,111. Some people downloads addon more then once and on the other hand not all users have downloaded all verson, so lets say every third user downloads addon twice: 31,111 / 1.33 ~= 23,392 users. I got 48 donations for SkyShards, so it is 1 person out of 487 users.