Maintenance for the week of April 6:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 6

Horse Stable

sherry.keaneb16_ESO
The horse stable should be central to all toons just like the bank. It would then be worth spending your money to have all the different horses because you could interchange them.
  • Sneak_Thief
    Sneak_Thief
    ✭✭✭✭
    Yeah fair point, its not so much about the money for me as it is the 50 day wait to max a horse on a new character. But as someone said there is not many gold sinks so they will keep horses per character. So I see both sides, I just wish there was a way to buy lvs with no day waits.
    Edited by Sneak_Thief on November 17, 2014 5:12PM
  • Kalman
    Kalman
    ✭✭✭✭
    Sounds good, but if they do that i want my 85,750 gold back from upgrading 8 horses with bag space on all characters (only need to upgrade 1 all the way so 7*(250*49).
  • AlexDougherty
    AlexDougherty
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Horses are a cash sink, so will always be single character only.
    I personally think they should just add more types of mounts, that way it stays interesting.

    The main issue is not cash, since after you get a few alts high enough you can get most of the horses after a few weeks saving (Imperial and cash shop are exceptions, because one is cheap and other is real cash). It's just the time, and people have suggested faster levelling for them, and I now get why.
    People believe what they either want to be true or what they are afraid is true!
    Wizard's first rule
    Passion rules reason
    Wizard's third rule
    Mind what people Do, not what they say, for actions betray a lie.
    Wizard's fifth rule
    Willfully turning aside from the truth is treason to one's self
    Wizard's tenth rule
  • diabeticDemon18
    diabeticDemon18
    ✭✭✭
    Kalman wrote: »
    Sounds good, but if they do that i want my 85,750 gold back from upgrading 8 horses with bag space on all characters (only need to upgrade 1 all the way so 7*(250*49).

    Just so you know, you don't need the parenthesis... It's the, cumulative? or associative?, property of multiplication. Yay Math!!! ;)
  • Elder_III
    Elder_III
    ✭✭✭✭
    Not a good idea --- this game is shy on gold sinks, taking away a large portion of the gold spent on Horses would be pretty bad... at least as it is now where there's nothing to spend gold on once Horses and Inventory are maxed out.
    Semi retired from the trading aspects of the game.
  • Nestor
    Nestor
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Keep the Gold Aspect of it, just charge us some fee for an immediate upgrade. I Would love to pay say 20,000 plus the horse to go straight to L50 on the horse. Make it a requirement that you have at least one horse that you got to L50 the old slow way if needed.
    Enjoy the game, life is what you really want to be worried about.

    PakKat "Everything was going well, until I died"
    Gary Gravestink "I am glad you died, I needed the help"

  • Wreuntzylla
    Wreuntzylla
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    I would pay 2 beeelion gold to have the bag space on each character act as a bank at the stable. I dislike constant relogs more than just about anything else in this game! It would also make it easier to swap bag horse for fasssssssttt! horse.
  • MornaBaine
    MornaBaine
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't know yet because I haven't tried it but I've heard that if you increase the carrying capacity of your horse, but then switch to a different horse and stable the first one, you actually lose the extra spots you you acquired by upping the carry capacity of that horse. In other words, the hose with the additional carrying capacity has to be "equipped" in order for you to HAVE the space doing so gives you. If true, that makes no sense to me. It makes it pointless to have a mount you've leveled up to carry more stuff AND having one you built for speed. I'm PAYING for both! So what gives? Again, haven't done it yet so I'm not sure if it's true. Anyone know?
    PAWS (Positively Against Wrip-off Stuff) - Say No to Crown Crates!

  • Orchish
    Orchish
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    MornaBaine wrote: »
    I don't know yet because I haven't tried it but I've heard that if you increase the carrying capacity of your horse, but then switch to a different horse and stable the first one, you actually lose the extra spots you you acquired by upping the carry capacity of that horse. In other words, the hose with the additional carrying capacity has to be "equipped" in order for you to HAVE the space doing so gives you. If true, that makes no sense to me. It makes it pointless to have a mount you've leveled up to carry more stuff AND having one you built for speed. I'm PAYING for both! So what gives? Again, haven't done it yet so I'm not sure if it's true. Anyone know?

    Yes it is true. You can only have 1 active mount and if you swap out a draft horse and make a speed horse your active mount you will lose the extra space you had as you are no longer using the draft horse.
  • Nestor
    Nestor
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    MornaBaine wrote: »
    I don't know yet because I haven't tried it but I've heard that if you increase the carrying capacity of your horse, but then switch to a different horse and stable the first one, you actually lose the extra spots you you acquired by upping the carry capacity of that horse.

    Yes, you only have the bag space of the active horse in your stable. In fact, if you try to use a horse that gives you less over all bag space than you need, you can't even swap to the other horse until you reduce your item count in inventory.

    In other words, you have 50 bag spaces on the horse, 130 on your character, and you have 170 items total on your character, you can only swap to a horse with 40 bag slots. Or you have to drop some things at the bank if you have say a horse that is all speed and no bags to get below 130 items/stacks.


    Edited by Nestor on November 17, 2014 5:47PM
    Enjoy the game, life is what you really want to be worried about.

    PakKat "Everything was going well, until I died"
    Gary Gravestink "I am glad you died, I needed the help"

  • diabeticDemon18
    diabeticDemon18
    ✭✭✭
    MornaBaine wrote: »
    I don't know yet because I haven't tried it but I've heard that if you increase the carrying capacity of your horse, but then switch to a different horse and stable the first one, you actually lose the extra spots you you acquired by upping the carry capacity of that horse. In other words, the hose with the additional carrying capacity has to be "equipped" in order for you to HAVE the space doing so gives you. If true, that makes no sense to me. It makes it pointless to have a mount you've leveled up to carry more stuff AND having one you built for speed. I'm PAYING for both! So what gives? Again, haven't done it yet so I'm not sure if it's true. Anyone know?

    It makes sense if you think about it... it IS a different horse. The only thing I'm thinking of for changing this would be maybe making the carrying capacity based off of what kind of saddle you have for your horse so that then when you change horses, you obviously just switch saddle's and good to go :)
  • Merlin13KAGL
    Merlin13KAGL
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    I'd just like to be able to feed the horse without mounting it.

    Why do I have to have X more inventory slots open to give Sir Fluffican's an apple??
    Just because you don't like the way something is doesn't necessarily make it wrong...

    Earn it.

    IRL'ing for a while for assorted reasons, in forum, and in game.
    I am neither warm, nor fuzzy...
    Probably has checkbox on Customer Service profile that say High Aggro, 99% immunity to BS
  • MornaBaine
    MornaBaine
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nestor wrote: »
    MornaBaine wrote: »
    I don't know yet because I haven't tried it but I've heard that if you increase the carrying capacity of your horse, but then switch to a different horse and stable the first one, you actually lose the extra spots you you acquired by upping the carry capacity of that horse.

    Yes, you only have the bag space of the active horse in your stable. In fact, if you try to use a horse that gives you less over all bag space than you need, you can't even swap to the other horse until you reduce your item count in inventory.

    In other words, you have 50 bag spaces on the horse, 130 on your character, and you have 170 items total on your character, you can only swap to a horse with 40 bag slots. Or you have to drop some things at the bank if you have say a horse that is all speed and no bags to get below 130 items/stacks.

    Well fiddlesticks! I guess I'll just stick with making my bank alts have fat slow ponies that can carry a lot of stuff and my main gets the speedy horse with far less carrying capacity. But this also means it's highly unlikely I'll ever buy more than one horse per character. What would be the point?
    PAWS (Positively Against Wrip-off Stuff) - Say No to Crown Crates!

  • diabeticDemon18
    diabeticDemon18
    ✭✭✭
    MornaBaine wrote: »
    Nestor wrote: »
    MornaBaine wrote: »
    I don't know yet because I haven't tried it but I've heard that if you increase the carrying capacity of your horse, but then switch to a different horse and stable the first one, you actually lose the extra spots you you acquired by upping the carry capacity of that horse.

    Yes, you only have the bag space of the active horse in your stable. In fact, if you try to use a horse that gives you less over all bag space than you need, you can't even swap to the other horse until you reduce your item count in inventory.

    In other words, you have 50 bag spaces on the horse, 130 on your character, and you have 170 items total on your character, you can only swap to a horse with 40 bag slots. Or you have to drop some things at the bank if you have say a horse that is all speed and no bags to get below 130 items/stacks.

    Well fiddlesticks! I guess I'll just stick with making my bank alts have fat slow ponies that can carry a lot of stuff and my main gets the speedy horse with far less carrying capacity. But this also means it's highly unlikely I'll ever buy more than one horse per character. What would be the point?

    Right now, I have two horses on my main. One of them is highly focused on stamina so if I plan on traveling a long distance I will use him, the other is focused on speed so if I just want to quickly run across the city then I use him, I'm probably going to buy another horse and make him a pack mule before long :)
  • Nestor
    Nestor
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    One of them is highly focused on stamina so if I plan on traveling a long distance I will use him,

    Just so you know, you can gallop with your horse long after they lose Stamina.

    Having no stamina just means you can get hit a couple of times before you get knocked off. In my experience, I have only been able to stay on the horse one time getting while getting hit, and that was just after I got on, kicked it into high gear but did not notice the mob. Most of the time, it's one hit stay then the second one knocks me off.

    There might be a point on the stamina bar where you don't get knocked off, but in my experience half full stamina bar or less, your getting knocked off.
    MornaBaine wrote: »

    Well fiddlesticks! I guess I'll just stick with making my bank alts have fat slow ponies that can carry a lot of stuff and my main gets the speedy horse with far less carrying capacity. But this also means it's highly unlikely I'll ever buy more than one horse per character. What would be the point?

    I have Horses for my Mules (that just sounds so weird now that I have written it, but lets get past just how weird this sounds) and it is almost unbelievable how slow their unleveled horses are. I don't even get on them anymore. Note, I had the Imp edition so the horse was just one gold for the mules. That still seems weird the second time around.

    Edited by Nestor on November 17, 2014 9:53PM
    Enjoy the game, life is what you really want to be worried about.

    PakKat "Everything was going well, until I died"
    Gary Gravestink "I am glad you died, I needed the help"

Sign In or Register to comment.