Tintinabula wrote: »I don't know which AOE to take seriously..the one who sounds as if he has a college education or the one who cant piece together a coherent sentence.
Either way..stick a monocle on a pig..you got a pig that looks smart.
So by your logic, you suck at group play because you don't do it? And since group play is the actual PvP in this game, you suck at PvP? Duly noted.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Do they happen often in largely populated campaigns? No.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »No img there bud, prob for the best b/c ur gifs are by far the worst BRAIDAS has seen.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »To those of you that said yes, you are obviously of higher intelligence.
To those that said "eh, why not, he's good", BRAIDAS acknowledges your mild intellect.
To all who said no, thank you for the delicious tears; BRAIDAS must have rolfstomped you a few times .
For all those who said idgaf, thank you for your opinionless, apathetic contribution (you must be very exciting people irl).
To those wondering who this weirdo is talking in third person: BRAIDAS.
And lastly, to the majority wondering why BRAIDAS made a poll for this, twas to see all his haters and laugh at them.
Mission accomplished.
All of BRAIDAS's haters.
[img][/img]You mean one of the players that said yes? or one of the players mentioned in the OP?Thechemicals wrote: »I fell off the side of a mountain along with one of these player mentioned and they were forced to 1v1 me. I wrecked him. I guess im the best player now.
Either way, your opinion that 1v1's prove anything in this game speaks for itself, especially when they were most likely running a group/aoe build.
Btw, care to at least give your ign if you're going to passive aggressively call someone out?
1v1 does prove things in this game. You just choose to ignore that aspect if the game (which is fine).
No, it does not. But as GM of a dueling guild, BRAIDAS wouldn't expect you to say otherwise.
Btw: Responding to my thread? multiple times?!?!? by your def you must be stalking me....eeeewwwww....(BRAIDAS hopes you understand he is mocking you, yes?)
Let's try to be civil here for once.
1v1 happens across cyrodiil as does group vs group and Zerg vs Zerg. To some it matters more than others.
That doesn't mean it is irrelevant or not measurable. I'm not talking about dueling, I'm referring to the spontaneous 1v1 runs that people have.
Do they have a contribution towards the over all war efforts? Not even close.
Are they measurable encounters that require a degree of focus/skill in order to win them? Yes.
Is it a measure of skill when one or both of you are geared for fighting large groups? No.
Are they worth investing time into b/c of how little they matter? No.
BRAIDAS doesn't know what you're doing to be so stupid, but it's working.
Duels in this game come down to counters. Say you fight someone who beats you, you make an adjustment to counter them and win. They, in turn, counter your counter, and so on. Perhaps at some point you have your builds worked out against each other and are both of equal skill, now the fight probably takes 10 mins and comes down to whoever makes a mistake. No skill, and boring as faaawwwwkkkkkk.
Game wasn't designed for duels, doesn't support duels in any way, and gives no value to them. As far as BRAIDAS is concerned, they are no more relevant in PvP than an RP event. If you can get everyone in Cyrodiil to line up in a single-file line and duel your way to taking keeps, then we'll talk.
You keep talking about Duels. You're on the wrong page here.
I'm not talking about duels. I'm talking about 1v1 run ins in a open pvp zone. You say that in a populated campaign they rarely happen, that isn't true.
They don't happen if you are with a group the entire time. If you run around solo you can pick off reinforcements and find plenty of 1v1 encounters. If two players who are specced for group run into each other, it still is going to take skill/management of resources for one player to beat the other consistently.
Sure, if a 1v1 specced player runs into a group spec, he should be able to beat the group spec. But even then, if the group specced player is experienced in 1v1 he can manage to out play the 1v1 player.
To say that 1v1 is as irrelevant as a RP event is just plain ignorant to both solo pvpers and RPers.
Just because people don't have the same pvp playstyle as you doesn't make it immeasurable or irrelevant.
Lol this post proves you have no idea what goes on in alliance war.
9/10 times I run into someone 1v1, I will jump up and down on purpose so I can die and rez at a forward camp where I am actually needed.
1v1 has almost no value in alliance war in this game.
You are wrong sypher. Accept it.
1v1 doesn't contribute to the war efforts, we already got that part down.
It's still a measurable skill and requires some level of PvP knowledge to come out on top consistently.
You guys choose to pretend 1v1 happens in some imaginary land that you will never visit. I don't blame you, I wouldn't play a sport I sucked at either.
Whether BRAIDAS thinks it takes skill or not (it doesn't) wasn't the point, he was saying they're equally irrrelevant.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Most 1v1s I'd be up for the fight.
But if I'm running with my group and I have a place to be / idiot faction emergency with no suicide port, I would stand still to the melee.
Exactly. Any smart player does this to help his faction or team.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Do they happen often in largely populated campaigns? No.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »No img there bud, prob for the best b/c ur gifs are by far the worst BRAIDAS has seen.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »To those of you that said yes, you are obviously of higher intelligence.
To those that said "eh, why not, he's good", BRAIDAS acknowledges your mild intellect.
To all who said no, thank you for the delicious tears; BRAIDAS must have rolfstomped you a few times .
For all those who said idgaf, thank you for your opinionless, apathetic contribution (you must be very exciting people irl).
To those wondering who this weirdo is talking in third person: BRAIDAS.
And lastly, to the majority wondering why BRAIDAS made a poll for this, twas to see all his haters and laugh at them.
Mission accomplished.
All of BRAIDAS's haters.
[img][/img]You mean one of the players that said yes? or one of the players mentioned in the OP?Thechemicals wrote: »I fell off the side of a mountain along with one of these player mentioned and they were forced to 1v1 me. I wrecked him. I guess im the best player now.
Either way, your opinion that 1v1's prove anything in this game speaks for itself, especially when they were most likely running a group/aoe build.
Btw, care to at least give your ign if you're going to passive aggressively call someone out?
1v1 does prove things in this game. You just choose to ignore that aspect if the game (which is fine).
No, it does not. But as GM of a dueling guild, BRAIDAS wouldn't expect you to say otherwise.
Btw: Responding to my thread? multiple times?!?!? by your def you must be stalking me....eeeewwwww....(BRAIDAS hopes you understand he is mocking you, yes?)
Let's try to be civil here for once.
1v1 happens across cyrodiil as does group vs group and Zerg vs Zerg. To some it matters more than others.
That doesn't mean it is irrelevant or not measurable. I'm not talking about dueling, I'm referring to the spontaneous 1v1 runs that people have.
Do they have a contribution towards the over all war efforts? Not even close.
Are they measurable encounters that require a degree of focus/skill in order to win them? Yes.
Is it a measure of skill when one or both of you are geared for fighting large groups? No.
Are they worth investing time into b/c of how little they matter? No.
BRAIDAS doesn't know what you're doing to be so stupid, but it's working.
Duels in this game come down to counters. Say you fight someone who beats you, you make an adjustment to counter them and win. They, in turn, counter your counter, and so on. Perhaps at some point you have your builds worked out against each other and are both of equal skill, now the fight probably takes 10 mins and comes down to whoever makes a mistake. No skill, and boring as faaawwwwkkkkkk.
Game wasn't designed for duels, doesn't support duels in any way, and gives no value to them. As far as BRAIDAS is concerned, they are no more relevant in PvP than an RP event. If you can get everyone in Cyrodiil to line up in a single-file line and duel your way to taking keeps, then we'll talk.
You keep talking about Duels. You're on the wrong page here.
I'm not talking about duels. I'm talking about 1v1 run ins in a open pvp zone. You say that in a populated campaign they rarely happen, that isn't true.
They don't happen if you are with a group the entire time. If you run around solo you can pick off reinforcements and find plenty of 1v1 encounters. If two players who are specced for group run into each other, it still is going to take skill/management of resources for one player to beat the other consistently.
Sure, if a 1v1 specced player runs into a group spec, he should be able to beat the group spec. But even then, if the group specced player is experienced in 1v1 he can manage to out play the 1v1 player.
To say that 1v1 is as irrelevant as a RP event is just plain ignorant to both solo pvpers and RPers.
Just because people don't have the same pvp playstyle as you doesn't make it immeasurable or irrelevant.
Lol this post proves you have no idea what goes on in alliance war.
9/10 times I run into someone 1v1, I will jump up and down on purpose so I can die and rez at a forward camp where I am actually needed.
1v1 has almost no value in alliance war in this game.
You are wrong sypher. Accept it.
1v1 doesn't contribute to the war efforts, we already got that part down.
It's still a measurable skill and requires some level of PvP knowledge to come out on top consistently.
You guys choose to pretend 1v1 happens in some imaginary land that you will never visit. I don't blame you, I wouldn't play a sport I sucked at either.
You are truly delusional. It seems any cognitive dissonance alters your memory and you forget what you literally just said. Let me remind you.
You literally said, 1v1 in Cyrodiil has meaning because it tests skill regardless of build or whatever.
I'm telling you no. It really doesn't. Because any relevant player welcomes the 1v1 as a bloodgate.
Honestly, most of us pray for gankers to help us bloodgate to the real fight.
So, if you ran into me, while I'm running from Fort Ash to Nikel to bloodgate. I will stand still, and let you kill me, so I can go to my forward camp where my team needs me.
And in case your little mind got lost in the logic, lemme lay it out again.
1v1 happens in Cyrodiil.
It proves skill and has meaning.
But any decent player wants to die.
So if they're smart they won't fight back.
The faster you kill them, the faster they can take a forward camp to a relevant fight.
Therefore, 1v1 has zero meaning.
You. Are. Wrong. Accept it.
I rarely EVER attack a player who just lets me kill them. 99.9% of my run ins fight back.
Tell me what you plan to do IF they make blood porting obsolete?
You better start taking the long routes at that point. Don't want to end up being AP fodder...
LMAO.
And no, I'll just put some 1v1 skills into my bar.
The only time I load up 1v1 skills is when I'm running somewhere to drop a camp and I can't afford to die.
I didn't say all 1v1 is obsolete. Only most of it. So your argument that 1v1 has meaning in Cyrodiil is wrong. It has very little meaning.
And again, you might be hopeless. I can't tell if it's an issue with your reading ability, or your comprehension.
But I clearly state that I wish they would fix bloodgating and get rid of it so that small skirmishes, and 1v1's could gain meaning.
Atm, it's worthless.Most 1v1s I'd be up for the fight.
But if I'm running with my group and I have a place to be / idiot faction emergency with no suicide port, I would stand still to the melee.
Exactly. Any smart player does this to help his faction or team.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Do they happen often in largely populated campaigns? No.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »No img there bud, prob for the best b/c ur gifs are by far the worst BRAIDAS has seen.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »To those of you that said yes, you are obviously of higher intelligence.
To those that said "eh, why not, he's good", BRAIDAS acknowledges your mild intellect.
To all who said no, thank you for the delicious tears; BRAIDAS must have rolfstomped you a few times .
For all those who said idgaf, thank you for your opinionless, apathetic contribution (you must be very exciting people irl).
To those wondering who this weirdo is talking in third person: BRAIDAS.
And lastly, to the majority wondering why BRAIDAS made a poll for this, twas to see all his haters and laugh at them.
Mission accomplished.
All of BRAIDAS's haters.
[img][/img]You mean one of the players that said yes? or one of the players mentioned in the OP?Thechemicals wrote: »I fell off the side of a mountain along with one of these player mentioned and they were forced to 1v1 me. I wrecked him. I guess im the best player now.
Either way, your opinion that 1v1's prove anything in this game speaks for itself, especially when they were most likely running a group/aoe build.
Btw, care to at least give your ign if you're going to passive aggressively call someone out?
1v1 does prove things in this game. You just choose to ignore that aspect if the game (which is fine).
No, it does not. But as GM of a dueling guild, BRAIDAS wouldn't expect you to say otherwise.
Btw: Responding to my thread? multiple times?!?!? by your def you must be stalking me....eeeewwwww....(BRAIDAS hopes you understand he is mocking you, yes?)
Let's try to be civil here for once.
1v1 happens across cyrodiil as does group vs group and Zerg vs Zerg. To some it matters more than others.
That doesn't mean it is irrelevant or not measurable. I'm not talking about dueling, I'm referring to the spontaneous 1v1 runs that people have.
Do they have a contribution towards the over all war efforts? Not even close.
Are they measurable encounters that require a degree of focus/skill in order to win them? Yes.
Is it a measure of skill when one or both of you are geared for fighting large groups? No.
Are they worth investing time into b/c of how little they matter? No.
BRAIDAS doesn't know what you're doing to be so stupid, but it's working.
Duels in this game come down to counters. Say you fight someone who beats you, you make an adjustment to counter them and win. They, in turn, counter your counter, and so on. Perhaps at some point you have your builds worked out against each other and are both of equal skill, now the fight probably takes 10 mins and comes down to whoever makes a mistake. No skill, and boring as faaawwwwkkkkkk.
Game wasn't designed for duels, doesn't support duels in any way, and gives no value to them. As far as BRAIDAS is concerned, they are no more relevant in PvP than an RP event. If you can get everyone in Cyrodiil to line up in a single-file line and duel your way to taking keeps, then we'll talk.
You keep talking about Duels. You're on the wrong page here.
I'm not talking about duels. I'm talking about 1v1 run ins in a open pvp zone. You say that in a populated campaign they rarely happen, that isn't true.
They don't happen if you are with a group the entire time. If you run around solo you can pick off reinforcements and find plenty of 1v1 encounters. If two players who are specced for group run into each other, it still is going to take skill/management of resources for one player to beat the other consistently.
Sure, if a 1v1 specced player runs into a group spec, he should be able to beat the group spec. But even then, if the group specced player is experienced in 1v1 he can manage to out play the 1v1 player.
To say that 1v1 is as irrelevant as a RP event is just plain ignorant to both solo pvpers and RPers.
Just because people don't have the same pvp playstyle as you doesn't make it immeasurable or irrelevant.
Lol this post proves you have no idea what goes on in alliance war.
9/10 times I run into someone 1v1, I will jump up and down on purpose so I can die and rez at a forward camp where I am actually needed.
1v1 has almost no value in alliance war in this game.
You are wrong sypher. Accept it.
1v1 doesn't contribute to the war efforts, we already got that part down.
It's still a measurable skill and requires some level of PvP knowledge to come out on top consistently.
You guys choose to pretend 1v1 happens in some imaginary land that you will never visit. I don't blame you, I wouldn't play a sport I sucked at either.
You are truly delusional. It seems any cognitive dissonance alters your memory and you forget what you literally just said. Let me remind you.
You literally said, 1v1 in Cyrodiil has meaning because it tests skill regardless of build or whatever.
I'm telling you no. It really doesn't. Because any relevant player welcomes the 1v1 as a bloodgate.
Honestly, most of us pray for gankers to help us bloodgate to the real fight.
So, if you ran into me, while I'm running from Fort Ash to Nikel to bloodgate. I will stand still, and let you kill me, so I can go to my forward camp where my team needs me.
And in case your little mind got lost in the logic, lemme lay it out again.
1v1 happens in Cyrodiil.
It proves skill and has meaning.
But any decent player wants to die.
So if they're smart they won't fight back.
The faster you kill them, the faster they can take a forward camp to a relevant fight.
Therefore, 1v1 has zero meaning.
You. Are. Wrong. Accept it.
I rarely EVER attack a player who just lets me kill them. 99.9% of my run ins fight back.
Tell me what you plan to do IF they make blood porting obsolete?
You better start taking the long routes at that point. Don't want to end up being AP fodder...
LMAO.
And no, I'll just put some 1v1 skills into my bar.
The only time I load up 1v1 skills is when I'm running somewhere to drop a camp and I can't afford to die.
I didn't say all 1v1 is obsolete. Only most of it. So your argument that 1v1 has meaning in Cyrodiil is wrong. It has very little meaning.
And again, you might be hopeless. I can't tell if it's an issue with your reading ability, or your comprehension.
But I clearly state that I wish they would fix bloodgating and get rid of it so that small skirmishes, and 1v1's could gain meaning.
Atm, it's worthless.
You added that bit about blood parting after I made my comment.
I never argued that 1v1 meant anything towards the overall war effort. (Maybe you need to asses your comprehension skills)
All I'm saying is that 1v1 is a skill that is measurable and there is a degree of pvp skill in order to win these encounters (which do happen).
Braidas has compared 1v1 to whoever can AFK the longest, or whoever can stand in oil the longest. That's just a pitiful bandaid he is attempting to place on his lack of skill or interest in 1v1s.
Attempt to discredit your work, huh? In the last 2 *** videos you posted, BRAIDAS commented on the viewers' reactions, and your fragile ego. Neither of which have to do with the actual video itself, though they do suck. Proving my point, your fragile ego has apparently taken them as insults to your oh so great "work".Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Agrippa_Invisus wrote: »Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Most 1v1s I'd be up for the fight.
But if I'm running with my group and I have a place to be / idiot faction emergency with no suicide port, I would stand still to the melee.
Exactly. Any smart player does this to help his faction or team.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Do they happen often in largely populated campaigns? No.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »No img there bud, prob for the best b/c ur gifs are by far the worst BRAIDAS has seen.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »To those of you that said yes, you are obviously of higher intelligence.
To those that said "eh, why not, he's good", BRAIDAS acknowledges your mild intellect.
To all who said no, thank you for the delicious tears; BRAIDAS must have rolfstomped you a few times .
For all those who said idgaf, thank you for your opinionless, apathetic contribution (you must be very exciting people irl).
To those wondering who this weirdo is talking in third person: BRAIDAS.
And lastly, to the majority wondering why BRAIDAS made a poll for this, twas to see all his haters and laugh at them.
Mission accomplished.
All of BRAIDAS's haters.
[img][/img]You mean one of the players that said yes? or one of the players mentioned in the OP?Thechemicals wrote: »I fell off the side of a mountain along with one of these player mentioned and they were forced to 1v1 me. I wrecked him. I guess im the best player now.
Either way, your opinion that 1v1's prove anything in this game speaks for itself, especially when they were most likely running a group/aoe build.
Btw, care to at least give your ign if you're going to passive aggressively call someone out?
1v1 does prove things in this game. You just choose to ignore that aspect if the game (which is fine).
No, it does not. But as GM of a dueling guild, BRAIDAS wouldn't expect you to say otherwise.
Btw: Responding to my thread? multiple times?!?!? by your def you must be stalking me....eeeewwwww....(BRAIDAS hopes you understand he is mocking you, yes?)
Let's try to be civil here for once.
1v1 happens across cyrodiil as does group vs group and Zerg vs Zerg. To some it matters more than others.
That doesn't mean it is irrelevant or not measurable. I'm not talking about dueling, I'm referring to the spontaneous 1v1 runs that people have.
Do they have a contribution towards the over all war efforts? Not even close.
Are they measurable encounters that require a degree of focus/skill in order to win them? Yes.
Is it a measure of skill when one or both of you are geared for fighting large groups? No.
Are they worth investing time into b/c of how little they matter? No.
BRAIDAS doesn't know what you're doing to be so stupid, but it's working.
Duels in this game come down to counters. Say you fight someone who beats you, you make an adjustment to counter them and win. They, in turn, counter your counter, and so on. Perhaps at some point you have your builds worked out against each other and are both of equal skill, now the fight probably takes 10 mins and comes down to whoever makes a mistake. No skill, and boring as faaawwwwkkkkkk.
Game wasn't designed for duels, doesn't support duels in any way, and gives no value to them. As far as BRAIDAS is concerned, they are no more relevant in PvP than an RP event. If you can get everyone in Cyrodiil to line up in a single-file line and duel your way to taking keeps, then we'll talk.
You keep talking about Duels. You're on the wrong page here.
I'm not talking about duels. I'm talking about 1v1 run ins in a open pvp zone. You say that in a populated campaign they rarely happen, that isn't true.
They don't happen if you are with a group the entire time. If you run around solo you can pick off reinforcements and find plenty of 1v1 encounters. If two players who are specced for group run into each other, it still is going to take skill/management of resources for one player to beat the other consistently.
Sure, if a 1v1 specced player runs into a group spec, he should be able to beat the group spec. But even then, if the group specced player is experienced in 1v1 he can manage to out play the 1v1 player.
To say that 1v1 is as irrelevant as a RP event is just plain ignorant to both solo pvpers and RPers.
Just because people don't have the same pvp playstyle as you doesn't make it immeasurable or irrelevant.
Lol this post proves you have no idea what goes on in alliance war.
9/10 times I run into someone 1v1, I will jump up and down on purpose so I can die and rez at a forward camp where I am actually needed.
1v1 has almost no value in alliance war in this game.
You are wrong sypher. Accept it.
1v1 doesn't contribute to the war efforts, we already got that part down.
It's still a measurable skill and requires some level of PvP knowledge to come out on top consistently.
You guys choose to pretend 1v1 happens in some imaginary land that you will never visit. I don't blame you, I wouldn't play a sport I sucked at either.
You are truly delusional. It seems any cognitive dissonance alters your memory and you forget what you literally just said. Let me remind you.
You literally said, 1v1 in Cyrodiil has meaning because it tests skill regardless of build or whatever.
I'm telling you no. It really doesn't. Because any relevant player welcomes the 1v1 as a bloodgate.
Honestly, most of us pray for gankers to help us bloodgate to the real fight.
So, if you ran into me, while I'm running from Fort Ash to Nikel to bloodgate. I will stand still, and let you kill me, so I can go to my forward camp where my team needs me.
And in case your little mind got lost in the logic, lemme lay it out again.
1v1 happens in Cyrodiil.
It proves skill and has meaning.
But any decent player wants to die.
So if they're smart they won't fight back.
The faster you kill them, the faster they can take a forward camp to a relevant fight.
Therefore, 1v1 has zero meaning.
You. Are. Wrong. Accept it.
I rarely EVER attack a player who just lets me kill them. 99.9% of my run ins fight back.
Tell me what you plan to do IF they make blood porting obsolete?
You better start taking the long routes at that point. Don't want to end up being AP fodder...
LMAO.
And no, I'll just put some 1v1 skills into my bar.
The only time I load up 1v1 skills is when I'm running somewhere to drop a camp and I can't afford to die.
I didn't say all 1v1 is obsolete. Only most of it. So your argument that 1v1 has meaning in Cyrodiil is wrong. It has very little meaning.
And again, you might be hopeless. I can't tell if it's an issue with your reading ability, or your comprehension.
But I clearly state that I wish they would fix bloodgating and get rid of it so that small skirmishes, and 1v1's could gain meaning.
Atm, it's worthless.Most 1v1s I'd be up for the fight.
But if I'm running with my group and I have a place to be / idiot faction emergency with no suicide port, I would stand still to the melee.
Exactly. Any smart player does this to help his faction or team.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Do they happen often in largely populated campaigns? No.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »No img there bud, prob for the best b/c ur gifs are by far the worst BRAIDAS has seen.Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »To those of you that said yes, you are obviously of higher intelligence.
To those that said "eh, why not, he's good", BRAIDAS acknowledges your mild intellect.
To all who said no, thank you for the delicious tears; BRAIDAS must have rolfstomped you a few times .
For all those who said idgaf, thank you for your opinionless, apathetic contribution (you must be very exciting people irl).
To those wondering who this weirdo is talking in third person: BRAIDAS.
And lastly, to the majority wondering why BRAIDAS made a poll for this, twas to see all his haters and laugh at them.
Mission accomplished.
All of BRAIDAS's haters.
[img][/img]You mean one of the players that said yes? or one of the players mentioned in the OP?Thechemicals wrote: »I fell off the side of a mountain along with one of these player mentioned and they were forced to 1v1 me. I wrecked him. I guess im the best player now.
Either way, your opinion that 1v1's prove anything in this game speaks for itself, especially when they were most likely running a group/aoe build.
Btw, care to at least give your ign if you're going to passive aggressively call someone out?
1v1 does prove things in this game. You just choose to ignore that aspect if the game (which is fine).
No, it does not. But as GM of a dueling guild, BRAIDAS wouldn't expect you to say otherwise.
Btw: Responding to my thread? multiple times?!?!? by your def you must be stalking me....eeeewwwww....(BRAIDAS hopes you understand he is mocking you, yes?)
Let's try to be civil here for once.
1v1 happens across cyrodiil as does group vs group and Zerg vs Zerg. To some it matters more than others.
That doesn't mean it is irrelevant or not measurable. I'm not talking about dueling, I'm referring to the spontaneous 1v1 runs that people have.
Do they have a contribution towards the over all war efforts? Not even close.
Are they measurable encounters that require a degree of focus/skill in order to win them? Yes.
Is it a measure of skill when one or both of you are geared for fighting large groups? No.
Are they worth investing time into b/c of how little they matter? No.
BRAIDAS doesn't know what you're doing to be so stupid, but it's working.
Duels in this game come down to counters. Say you fight someone who beats you, you make an adjustment to counter them and win. They, in turn, counter your counter, and so on. Perhaps at some point you have your builds worked out against each other and are both of equal skill, now the fight probably takes 10 mins and comes down to whoever makes a mistake. No skill, and boring as faaawwwwkkkkkk.
Game wasn't designed for duels, doesn't support duels in any way, and gives no value to them. As far as BRAIDAS is concerned, they are no more relevant in PvP than an RP event. If you can get everyone in Cyrodiil to line up in a single-file line and duel your way to taking keeps, then we'll talk.
You keep talking about Duels. You're on the wrong page here.
I'm not talking about duels. I'm talking about 1v1 run ins in a open pvp zone. You say that in a populated campaign they rarely happen, that isn't true.
They don't happen if you are with a group the entire time. If you run around solo you can pick off reinforcements and find plenty of 1v1 encounters. If two players who are specced for group run into each other, it still is going to take skill/management of resources for one player to beat the other consistently.
Sure, if a 1v1 specced player runs into a group spec, he should be able to beat the group spec. But even then, if the group specced player is experienced in 1v1 he can manage to out play the 1v1 player.
To say that 1v1 is as irrelevant as a RP event is just plain ignorant to both solo pvpers and RPers.
Just because people don't have the same pvp playstyle as you doesn't make it immeasurable or irrelevant.
Lol this post proves you have no idea what goes on in alliance war.
9/10 times I run into someone 1v1, I will jump up and down on purpose so I can die and rez at a forward camp where I am actually needed.
1v1 has almost no value in alliance war in this game.
You are wrong sypher. Accept it.
1v1 doesn't contribute to the war efforts, we already got that part down.
It's still a measurable skill and requires some level of PvP knowledge to come out on top consistently.
You guys choose to pretend 1v1 happens in some imaginary land that you will never visit. I don't blame you, I wouldn't play a sport I sucked at either.
You are truly delusional. It seems any cognitive dissonance alters your memory and you forget what you literally just said. Let me remind you.
You literally said, 1v1 in Cyrodiil has meaning because it tests skill regardless of build or whatever.
I'm telling you no. It really doesn't. Because any relevant player welcomes the 1v1 as a bloodgate.
Honestly, most of us pray for gankers to help us bloodgate to the real fight.
So, if you ran into me, while I'm running from Fort Ash to Nikel to bloodgate. I will stand still, and let you kill me, so I can go to my forward camp where my team needs me.
And in case your little mind got lost in the logic, lemme lay it out again.
1v1 happens in Cyrodiil.
It proves skill and has meaning.
But any decent player wants to die.
So if they're smart they won't fight back.
The faster you kill them, the faster they can take a forward camp to a relevant fight.
Therefore, 1v1 has zero meaning.
You. Are. Wrong. Accept it.
I rarely EVER attack a player who just lets me kill them. 99.9% of my run ins fight back.
Tell me what you plan to do IF they make blood porting obsolete?
You better start taking the long routes at that point. Don't want to end up being AP fodder...
LMAO.
And no, I'll just put some 1v1 skills into my bar.
The only time I load up 1v1 skills is when I'm running somewhere to drop a camp and I can't afford to die.
I didn't say all 1v1 is obsolete. Only most of it. So your argument that 1v1 has meaning in Cyrodiil is wrong. It has very little meaning.
And again, you might be hopeless. I can't tell if it's an issue with your reading ability, or your comprehension.
But I clearly state that I wish they would fix bloodgating and get rid of it so that small skirmishes, and 1v1's could gain meaning.
Atm, it's worthless.
You added that bit about blood parting after I made my comment.
I never argued that 1v1 meant anything towards the overall war effort. (Maybe you need to asses your comprehension skills)
All I'm saying is that 1v1 is a skill that is measurable and there is a degree of pvp skill in order to win these encounters (which do happen).
Braidas has compared 1v1 to whoever can AFK the longest, or whoever can stand in oil the longest. That's just a pitiful bandaid he is attempting to place on his lack of skill or interest in 1v1s.
Question:
Who cares what Braidas said about it? Why bother interjecting?
Believe me, I wouldn't care if he didn't constantly attempt at discrediting my work on every thread I've created relating to solo pvp.
When presented with the opportunity, I'll prove his reasoning wrong for the sake of debate and just because he makes it too easy.
Are you always this much of an ****** (not intelligent person)?? or is this some kind of special show for us?Sypherpkub17_ESO wrote: »Once again AOE you are attempting at justifying my behavior by pretending you know my true intentions.
As far as you've showed me, you're completely off track when it comes to analyzing me.
If only you knew.
If I was some random guy that didn't bother you, you wouldn't go this far to justify my actions or your actions. You'd brush it off as you do with other criticism. Clearly though, there's more to it.
I'm about done with this conversation. I'm sure it'll spark up again sometime soon, and it'll end the same way it always does.
Not my fault Dr. Butthurt over here has to turn every thread into the "Sypher looks like a jack***" show.ez2k.stoobzzub17_ESO wrote: »For god sakes Braidas...make your video already so this post can die.
Cause tht's what this thread said....what other threads has BRAIDAS made??? pls tell him.you should get banned for making threads on forums everywhere about how you are the best and so on. It's crazy.
wait....are you saying BRAIDAS is not being BRAIDAS enough?....or you were here before "I" was BRAIDAS?Who is this stranger who has taken Braidas and forum account, return him or the taste of my slippers will be all over your tastebuds.
Because you are talking in 3RD person I made a joke.wait....are you saying BRAIDAS is not being BRAIDAS enough?....or you were here before "I" was BRAIDAS?
Dude, who are you? Some american server star?
No no no no no....we are the BEST players in ESO, bar none, no competition. U jelly?Famemonster wrote: »Dude, who are you? Some american server star?
No. He is some dude from NA DC guild. Him and his guildies think they are the best at the game. They recently have been coming onto the forum everyday to talk about how good they are, to defend their friends and to offer their opinions. Also, they come on the forums to talk crap about Sypher, the DK. The original poster likes to talk funny.
BRAIDAS has never once flattered himself in this thread, for the record.
No no no no no....we are the BEST players in ESO, bar none, no competition. U jelly?
ahh ok, sad
No no no no no....we are the BEST players in ESO, bar none, no competition. U jelly?Famemonster wrote: »Dude, who are you? Some american server star?
No. He is some dude from NA DC guild. Him and his guildies think they are the best at the game. They recently have been coming onto the forum everyday to talk about how good they are, to defend their friends and to offer their opinions. Also, they come on the forums to talk crap about Sypher, the DK. The original poster likes to talk funny.
When BRAIDAS said it, it was true. He can not be held accountable for his words at all points in time.....logic....it eludes you.Famemonster wrote: »
Indeed. Lo MEJOR!No no no no no....we are the BEST players in ESO, bar none, no competition. U jelly?Famemonster wrote: »Dude, who are you? Some american server star?
No. He is some dude from NA DC guild. Him and his guildies think they are the best at the game. They recently have been coming onto the forum everyday to talk about how good they are, to defend their friends and to offer their opinions. Also, they come on the forums to talk crap about Sypher, the DK. The original poster likes to talk funny.
Clearly talking about Estoy Aqui
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dsp_8Lm1eSkClaroIndeed. Lo MEJOR!No no no no no....we are the BEST players in ESO, bar none, no competition. U jelly?Famemonster wrote: »Dude, who are you? Some american server star?
No. He is some dude from NA DC guild. Him and his guildies think they are the best at the game. They recently have been coming onto the forum everyday to talk about how good they are, to defend their friends and to offer their opinions. Also, they come on the forums to talk crap about Sypher, the DK. The original poster likes to talk funny.
Clearly talking about Estoy Aquihttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dsp_8Lm1eSk