This is a tribute to Valnas the great NB Emp
ya not at all, most already control resos very well w/ siphoning att. and a ton of veils is pretty sweet but a ton of banners is better.ezareth_ESO wrote: »I can't think of a Nightblade emperor who was successful.
I don't think a massive increase in resources and ult generation really helps NBs scale as much as it does other classes, especially DKs and negate spamming sorcs.
ezareth_ESO wrote: »I can't think of a Nightblade emperor who was successful.
I don't think a massive increase in resources and ult generation really helps NBs scale as much as it does other classes, especially DKs and negate spamming sorcs.
ezareth_ESO wrote: »I can't think of a Nightblade emperor who was successful.
I don't think a massive increase in resources and ult generation really helps NBs scale as much as it does other classes, especially DKs and negate spamming sorcs.
ezareth_ESO wrote: »I can't think of a Nightblade emperor who was successful.
I don't think a massive increase in resources and ult generation really helps NBs scale as much as it does other classes, especially DKs and negate spamming sorcs.
you mean like streak spamming sorcs too?
Wasn't complaining, simply pointing out a fact.
It's entertaining that you're annoyed because you know it's true.
mike.gaziotisb16_ESO wrote: »Wasn't complaining, simply pointing out a fact.
It's entertaining that you're annoyed because you know it's true.
If you read my post you'll notice I said "I find it amusing people complaining about Streak spamming". I'm nowhere near annoyed by anything posted in these forums.
I'm glad you're entertained nonetheless
AlienDiplomat wrote: »
AlienDiplomat wrote: »
Lotta help Emp is doing on Thornblade lol.
There were very few emps who could alter the fight. The current is not one of them.
But then again Playtime = skill amirite?
AlienDiplomat wrote: »
AlienDiplomat wrote: »
While buff servers play a big role, they don't impact capability as much as you would think.
For example, in Thornblade 1.0, EP only crowned emperor once (in the first few hours the campaign was open -- I don't recall what the relative populations were), and for the entire duration they had control over Bow of Shadows, they did not crown emperor again. DC, however, crowned emperor many times even before we claimed Bow of Shadows (though, ironically, we crowned much less often afterwards).
This isn't a DC epeen stroke or a diss toward EP, it's more of a statement about how the average quality of the playerbase can impact things like that, versus the sole bonuses from a buff server.
Agrippa_Invisus wrote: »seeing TSym go largely inactive and others fielding in lower numbers (but that speaks to the overall state of the game, too.
ya tht looks awful. ehj kind of wrecked them. the leader was claiming we had about 60+people who were all vamps, when we had 20 in group and 4 vamps. we rolled them a few nights and then they decided to go all vamps but we still rolled them. the leader's stream was so much fun to watch. BRAIDAS takes full resposnibility for destroying TSymAgrippa_Invisus wrote: »seeing TSym go largely inactive and others fielding in lower numbers (but that speaks to the overall state of the game, too.
As for TSYM, it's not surprising they aren't fielding groups anymore. Their playstyle, while effective in what they tried to do, couldn't have been much fun for the players. At least not after a while. Only so many times you can tell people to cast the same few abilities over and over and "group on crown."
Agrippa_Invisus wrote: »GG buff servers. GG population imbalance.