Is this a joke post? You are aware that Haderus is and always will be AD's buff campaign until the Oceanics decide otherwise, and that all it's good for atm is for EP and DC guilds to jump on, cap a keep and farm AP from the hordes of AD PvE'rs that will rush in to get their buffs back?

This comes off as you asking around for DC/EP guilds to help de facto emp farming in Haderus, because those are the only people who are going to come and 'take the ring'.

I can assure you, the lack of EP/DC presence has nothing to do with them being 'cowardly weaklings'. Nice rhetoric though.

if the emperor has been reigning for 27 days, that means AD Sends in 30 player+ zergs every single time EP or DC attacks something. Even if its a resource they will still send in those huge zergs. Don't even try to tell me im wrong. I played in hopesfire for almost 3 months. the AD in it had an emperor that reigned for almost 50 days straight, did not get de-throned until second scoring period. I was there to see it. EVERY SINGLE TIME we would attack something, casuale with his emperor buffs and about 30-40 of his teammates would come along and steamroll us. They even camped our gates until we all left. it was pathetic on ADs part, not fun, and VERY discouraging. Hedarous is the same way. There is no way your emp could be reigning for 27 days If EP and DC were actually trying.

If you want your campaign to stop being a dead wasteland, then get your AD friends to stop hitting every single attack with 30+ player groups. I myself will NEVER deal with that again. Nor do I blame the EP and DC people on that campaign for leaving and doing something else.

Until this happens, hedarous will continue to be a dead buff campaign for AD. nothing more i can say

MAOofDC wrote: »

Not a troll post I want some damn action on Haderus. The same should go for the EP and DC "buff" campaign. Buff campaigns on a 7 day server is ***!!! I like a lot of other players have a life or a job that doesn't give us the time to get enough AP on the 30 campaign to be emperor. The 7 day is our best shot BUT since EP and DC rarely even show up I don't get AP anyway, or better said AP that counts for anything.

the reason I stated above is the reason why any campaign is only for buffs. whether its AD, DC, or EP.

Again, if all your AD friends care about is buffs, then they will ruin it for everyone else.

Cody wrote: »

MAOofDC wrote: »

Not a troll post I want some damn action on Haderus. The same should go for the EP and DC "buff" campaign. Buff campaigns on a 7 day server is ***!!! I like a lot of other players have a life or a job that doesn't give us the time to get enough AP on the 30 campaign to be emperor. The 7 day is our best shot BUT since EP and DC rarely even show up I don't get AP anyway, or better said AP that counts for anything.

the reason I stated above is the reason why any campaign is only for buffs. whether its AD, DC, or EP.

Again, if all your AD friends care about is buffs, then they will ruin it for everyone else.

I agree this campaign has BEEN ruined and needs to be fixed. ZOS won't reset it which I think they should every scoring period for the 7 one.

MAOofDC wrote: »

Cody wrote: »

if the emperor has been reigning for 27 days, that means AD Sends in 30 player+ zergs every single time EP or DC attacks something. Even if its a resource they will still send in those huge zergs. Don't even try to tell me im wrong. I played in hopesfire for almost 3 months. the AD in it had an emperor that reigned for almost 50 days straight, did not get de-throned until second scoring period. I was there to see it. EVERY SINGLE TIME we would attack something, casuale with his emperor buffs and about 30-40 of his teammates would come along and steamroll us. They even camped our gates until we all left. it was pathetic on ADs part, not fun, and VERY discouraging. Hedarous is the same way. There is no way your emp could be reigning for 27 days If EP and DC were actually trying.

If you want your campaign to stop being a dead wasteland, then get your AD friends to stop hitting every single attack with 30+ player groups. I myself will NEVER deal with that again. Nor do I blame the EP and DC people on that campaign for leaving and doing something else.

Until this happens, hedarous will continue to be a dead buff campaign for AD. nothing more i can say

IDK maybe if red and blue tried to go purple OR if red and blue could get 3 or 4 zergs of their own then it would be a decent time. The blues actually took a tower today. Sure AD took it back but all AD has in zone is one zerg AT most. If EP and/or DC really came in with overwhelming force this one zerg couldn't defend.

You don't understand. YOU HAVE AN EMPEROR. An emperor, combined with all those zergs(at this point they are zergs, lets get that clear) is impossible to beat when only a few groups are trying to take their stuff back. Is it ALL ADs fault? of course not. EP and DC, could, as you said get their own zergs together and try it.

But the problem with that, is your factions selfish and inconsiderate playstyle ruined that. Do you really think people want to play in a campaign, where they get steamrolled by the emperor and 30+ other players, every single time they attack something? The answer Is a VERY BIG NO.

Im not trying to sound like an arrogant know it all, But, again, I have seen this firsthand. Here is what happened in hopesfire:

We attack kingscrest/Farragut resources.

we get to the flag, and are ABOUT to cap it; when casuale(the emperor of the time) and about 30 of his guild buddies(if you played in hopesfire you know what guild I mean, I cant name them due to the name and shame policy. im already taking a risk simply naming casuale) charge to the flag and steamroll us.

THEN they get thru our gates, and camp at our gates until we all leave. You could sit at the gate for an hour straight and AD would STILL be there, campign our spawns. We had no choice, but to leave the campaign and come back later. We could have ported to the other gate and tried another keep, but the same exact thing would have happened again.

This is what is happening on hedarous. I dont even need to go to it to know this is what happening, we just had someone confirm it in this very thread right above my post. If you want this campaign to become a good balanced, fun campaign, then get those selfish guilds to stop with their crap, and Give EP and DC a chance to actually take back their stuff. Stop sending in huge zergs at every little attack, stop camping their gates, Just stop with all of that.

Im not mad at you. I actually doubt you are one of these selfish people, seeing as how you want competition and fun. I just take things like this very seriously.

Until the majority of AD on hedarous stop acting like selfish, sore winners, DC and EP will not be back. I quit hopesfire a week after that crap started. I cant even remember if I went back to it or not. I dont think I did. ANYWAY, there are currently better campaigns than hedarous. sad to say. Hopefully it changes at some point.

MAOofDC wrote: »

zac_sooleprb18_ESO wrote: »

MAOofDC wrote: »

zac_sooleprb18_ESO wrote: »

MAOofDC wrote: »

Let me start this off by stating for the record that I'm a member of the AD. I'm most likely going to *** off some of my Alliance members but I don't care. AD has held complete control of the campaign for a VERY long time. This makes it a very boring place to PvP. Also the current reigning Emperor has been doing so( at the time of this posting) for 27 days in a 7 day campaign. So for FOUR scoring periods there has been no change. I am sure Sura is a very nice person but the crown must be past to another. So to the cowardly weaklings that make up the members of the EP and DC, I issue you a challenge. Come take the six towers if you can, so that I or someone else can be crowned.

Sorry... I will tell the total of 11.3 players who play DC and EP to try and take the crown...

Your a troll or a derpa.. The ratio of AD to EP and DC is beyond derpa.

I'm a troll because DC and EP have given up? No I want to light a fire under their asses and get them to do something. If 60 from each faction logged on the 24 AD would lose because even the AD don't play there that's how bad Haderus has become.

lol 24 AD. Maybe 24:1 Ratio of AD to EP DC. MAYBE.

If you were on Sunday night there was ONE AD group running defense it wasn't even full. The blues even took Warden because the reds also attacked around the same time we couldn't be in two places at once. That is what I am BEGGING you guys to do.

;p I was at work Sun.

The scenario you bring up sounds like once in a blue moon. AD keeps nigh constant vigil. We've tried. We've tried getting large groups around 5am or so, it just never works, or we never hold anything for longer than a few minutes.

What I don't get is buffs come from forts, not resources....so why then do all the nanners pounce on resources if they so much as flicker?

serenenightmare wrote: »

MAOofDC wrote: »

zac_sooleprb18_ESO wrote: »

MAOofDC wrote: »

Let me start this off by stating for the record that I'm a member of the AD. I'm most likely going to *** off some of my Alliance members but I don't care. AD has held complete control of the campaign for a VERY long time. This makes it a very boring place to PvP. Also the current reigning Emperor has been doing so( at the time of this posting) for 27 days in a 7 day campaign. So for FOUR scoring periods there has been no change. I am sure Sura is a very nice person but the crown must be past to another. So to the cowardly weaklings that make up the members of the EP and DC, I issue you a challenge. Come take the six towers if you can, so that I or someone else can be crowned.

Sorry... I will tell the total of 11.3 players who play DC and EP to try and take the crown...

Your a troll or a derpa.. The ratio of AD to EP and DC is beyond derpa.

I'm a troll because DC and EP have given up? No I want to light a fire under their asses and get them to do something. If 60 from each faction logged on the 24 AD would lose because even the AD don't play there that's how bad Haderus has become.

No one cares or wants to go to Haderus. You aren't "lighting a fire" under anyone's ass. Why go there when I can be on Thornblade or Chillrend? There is actually competition on those two.

So instead You would rather have the forums filled up with people complaining about early morning raids, that change the color of a map on those two servers? As far why you should go to Haderus because of exactly the reason you stated. Thornblade and Chillrend HAVE competition. What makes Haderus immune to any attempts to make it a competitive server? The rewards for are the same no matter the server, Haderus just gets them more often.

I just would like to point out that I go to Haderus while waiting in my Thornblade queue.

If I'm camping you in your spawn it is because I'm trying to get the AP necessary to get reward tier 3 which is quite a feat considering how little action actually occurs on the server.

This will all be fixed when campaign buffs are changed so that you get the buffs from the campaign you're playing in, not the one you're home'd in.

WarrioroftheWind_ESO wrote: »

ezareth_ESO wrote: »

I just would like to point out that I go to Haderus while waiting in my Thornblade queue.

If I'm camping you in your spawn it is because I'm trying to get the AP necessary to get reward tier 3 which is quite a feat considering how little action actually occurs on the server.

This will all be fixed when campaign buffs are changed so that you get the buffs from the campaign you're playing in, not the one you're home'd in.

I can't imagine you get as much AP camping our gate with 15+ of you versus like 4 of us plus a lowbie or two. And even less so after being incapable of breaching our defenses you decide to call in the emperor to wipe out everyone.

This is the part of Had AD logic I can't wrap my head around. You benefit more from the big crazy balls out bonkers epic battles. So why are they doing everything in their power to squash any opposition, even if we're NOT holding a resource.

You know the saying "the more things change". Even if they axe a camp what's to stop the min/maxers from breaking the format again to suit them? We kept hoping things would change back with the other server format, they didn't. Same thing with the downsizing. They didn't.

If it's so hard getting max contribution then run scout quests. I maxed that back on Vol when Kage's guild hogged that place dry in a reverse of the situation on Had. Course scout sends you to the boonies if the map is mono.

I get plenty of AP solo farming, I don't run with (or need) others to kill the EP I've seen there. The last time I was at your gate there were 3 V12 EP hiding by the mages refusing to come out of their proteciton to fight me 3 on 1 lol.

All that said I never believe minimizing campaigns would change anything, changing the way buffs work is the only way I see any of this changing.

I've spent the vast majority of my time fighting players coming in from buff servers while I fought and achieved rank 2 in every campaign I've played on and was always the buff underdog. If you can't beat them, join them. I'll be happy to see buff servers go away and competition come back to all servers (hopefully).

I'm not so hardup for AP (or Gold) that I'd waste my time doing scouting quests. Getting reward Tier 3 in a 7 day campaign is really not worth the effort.

This thread is hilarious.

Very tempting.