UnholyPerfection wrote: »Nox_Aeterna wrote: »UnholyPerfection wrote: »Nox_Aeterna wrote: »Your pool answers are ... quite few and limited i would say.
Personally im happy with cyro , at most i could consider playing in BGs that had also lots of player inside at the same time playing with neat objectives , but i wouldnt play in arenas and such with few players.
Always found PvP with few players in MMOs to be boring.
Still i dont have something that goes directly against them adding outside balance issues that arenas always bring. IF zen adds them right , maybe even making them like GW2 where all their gear and balance is divided from the rest of the game , i wouldnt mind the devs adding them.
If they dont , then we will have 10 times the amount of balance issues threads we have today , the current balance is NOT at ALL made for small group fights.
It's really a yes or no question?
"Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP."
No i would not personally , im happy playing the current PvP.
"No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is."
I dont mind them adding other kinds of PvP for those that enjoy those , i just want them to add them right so it doesnt break my form of PvP/PvE.
While I understand where you're coming (and I did pause and consider a third option) from I don't understand why people would vote against adding something that others would enjoy and that wouldn't effect them at all.
UnholyPerfection wrote: »I'm sick of playing open world PvP were 1 faction is always steam rolling the other 2 just because of numbers. I would love to see some smaller maybe 40v40 or even less objective based PvP so skill actually players a role and you feel like you're actually contributing as an individual not a part of a AoE zerg.
Nox_Aeterna wrote: »UnholyPerfection wrote: »Nox_Aeterna wrote: »UnholyPerfection wrote: »Nox_Aeterna wrote: »Your pool answers are ... quite few and limited i would say.
Personally im happy with cyro , at most i could consider playing in BGs that had also lots of player inside at the same time playing with neat objectives , but i wouldnt play in arenas and such with few players.
Always found PvP with few players in MMOs to be boring.
Still i dont have something that goes directly against them adding outside balance issues that arenas always bring. IF zen adds them right , maybe even making them like GW2 where all their gear and balance is divided from the rest of the game , i wouldnt mind the devs adding them.
If they dont , then we will have 10 times the amount of balance issues threads we have today , the current balance is NOT at ALL made for small group fights.
It's really a yes or no question?
"Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP."
No i would not personally , im happy playing the current PvP.
"No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is."
I dont mind them adding other kinds of PvP for those that enjoy those , i just want them to add them right so it doesnt break my form of PvP/PvE.
While I understand where you're coming (and I did pause and consider a third option) from I don't understand why people would vote against adding something that others would enjoy and that wouldn't effect them at all.
Because very few , VERY FEW , MMOs that ever implemented arenas can say they really didnt "mess up" the rest for that.
The balance for something like cyrodiil and arenas is not the same at all. Current builds in a locked small space like an arena being used against few people would just instantly kill them all and so on. Does this mean the skill requires a nerf for cyro? A nerf for PvE?
So it is normal for people to believe that by having arenas in the game , they will be affected even if they are 100% PvE players.
Nox_Aeterna wrote: »UnholyPerfection wrote: »Nox_Aeterna wrote: »UnholyPerfection wrote: »Nox_Aeterna wrote: »
Wait until they start balancing it for for small scale where the discrepencies are much more noticed. Even worse when they go an make a ranking system. Such an [snip] fail.
[Moderator Note: Edited per our rules on Cursing & Profanity]
are you joking dude? you are arguing AGAINST balancing a game???? please just get outa here.
we need small scale stuff(both pvp and pve) as a way to look at things under a microscope otherwise things will never be equal and fair. arena is a fantastic way to do this and it is long overdue.
Fix the problems inherent in the system, then start branching out. What good is it to add even more areas of PvP where skills don't work properly, there are the same balancing issues, and they still haven't fixed all the classes yet?
Let's focus on fixing things before we starting creating more problems with them.
jbreen95_ESO wrote: »Fix the problems inherent in the system, then start branching out. What good is it to add even more areas of PvP where skills don't work properly, there are the same balancing issues, and they still haven't fixed all the classes yet?
Let's focus on fixing things before we starting creating more problems with them.
arena will hammer out class problems way quicker than just letting cyrodiil do the same crap its already been doing for months.... the only things that are noticed are the very large game changing spells. whereas with arena there are more competitive 1v1 opportunities which will show where individual classes lack and excel. this will in turn make cyrodiil better as well
Voted no, in objection to your idea and rather poorly worded poll that biases people to vote yes. I would like small scale PvP, but not your arena style. Existing open PvP with new mechanics which open up more possibilities for small scale PvP is what I would support.
UnholyPerfection wrote: »The most fun I've ever had in MMO PvP was Huttball in ToR. Although I do understand peoples concerns that balancing small scale PvP could mess up the large scale PvP and honestly that's a really good point and not something I thought of.