Maintenance for the week of April 6:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 6

Would you like to see small scale PvP?

  • Audigy
    Audigy
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is.
    Your pool answers are ... quite few and limited i would say.

    Personally im happy with cyro , at most i could consider playing in BGs that had also lots of player inside at the same time playing with neat objectives , but i wouldnt play in arenas and such with few players.

    Always found PvP with few players in MMOs to be boring.

    Still i dont have something that goes directly against them adding outside balance issues that arenas always bring. IF zen adds them right , maybe even making them like GW2 where all their gear and balance is divided from the rest of the game , i wouldnt mind the devs adding them.

    If they dont , then we will have 10 times the amount of balance issues threads we have today , the current balance is NOT at ALL made for small group fights.

    It's really a yes or no question?

    "Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP."

    No i would not personally , im happy playing the current PvP.

    "No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is."

    I dont mind them adding other kinds of PvP for those that enjoy those , i just want them to add them right so it doesnt break my form of PvP/PvE.

    While I understand where you're coming (and I did pause and consider a third option) from I don't understand why people would vote against adding something that others would enjoy and that wouldn't effect them at all.

    When Blizzard added Arena in TBC it destroyed BG´s.

    Blizzard was forced to add timers for BG`s so that they were in line with the small 5 minute battles that Arena is. Vanilla AV or Warsong could last hours, it was amazing after the timer was put in these great BG´s became zerg 5 minute games.

    They also had to nerf specs that were in the game for full two years as they were too powerful at 2v2 Arena like the heal-tank pally.
    They also removed the Rank system and added resilience to gear, making pve gear worthless in pvp.

    The list could go on but the answer to your question is that a Arena will ultimately destroy the other pvp parts as it will offer better rewards for less skill & work while forcing ZO to massive class overhauls.
    Edited by Audigy on August 20, 2014 8:53PM
  • Ghenra
    Ghenra
    ✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    I'm sick of playing open world PvP were 1 faction is always steam rolling the other 2 just because of numbers. I would love to see some smaller maybe 40v40 or even less objective based PvP so skill actually players a role and you feel like you're actually contributing as an individual not a part of a AoE zerg.

    Yes, I want smaller PvP scale, but not 40vs40, maybe 4v4, 2v2 and 1v1 not more, 40v40 is a zerg vs zerg for noobs.
  • technohic
    technohic
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is.
    Your pool answers are ... quite few and limited i would say.

    Personally im happy with cyro , at most i could consider playing in BGs that had also lots of player inside at the same time playing with neat objectives , but i wouldnt play in arenas and such with few players.

    Always found PvP with few players in MMOs to be boring.

    Still i dont have something that goes directly against them adding outside balance issues that arenas always bring. IF zen adds them right , maybe even making them like GW2 where all their gear and balance is divided from the rest of the game , i wouldnt mind the devs adding them.

    If they dont , then we will have 10 times the amount of balance issues threads we have today , the current balance is NOT at ALL made for small group fights.

    It's really a yes or no question?

    "Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP."

    No i would not personally , im happy playing the current PvP.

    "No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is."

    I dont mind them adding other kinds of PvP for those that enjoy those , i just want them to add them right so it doesnt break my form of PvP/PvE.

    While I understand where you're coming (and I did pause and consider a third option) from I don't understand why people would vote against adding something that others would enjoy and that wouldn't effect them at all.

    Because very few , VERY FEW , MMOs that ever implemented arenas can say they really didnt "mess up" the rest for that.

    The balance for something like cyrodiil and arenas is not the same at all. Current builds in a locked small space like an arena being used against few people would just instantly kill them all and so on. Does this mean the skill requires a nerf for cyro? A nerf for PvE?

    So it is normal for people to believe that by having arenas in the game , they will be affected even if they are 100% PvE players.

    Yeah, it always [snip] things up. Think PvEers don't like balancing for PvP now? Wait until they start balancing it for for small scale where the discrepencies are much more noticed. Even worse when they go an make a ranking system. Such an [snip] fail.

    [Moderator Note: Edited per our rules on Cursing & Profanity]
    Edited by ZOS_SandraF on August 23, 2014 2:25AM
  • Ormtunge
    Ormtunge
    ✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    Yes, please:) Zerging isnt for everyone. Also I would like to get more focus on builds. Nobody cares about your build, or even equipment, if u are in a 80 man/woman zerg:)
  • WebBull
    WebBull
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.

    Yes but only if it doesn't detract from Cyrodill and could somehow be tied in. But please, NO ARENA. This isn't WoW.
  • Helwyr
    Helwyr
    ✭✭
    No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is.
    Voted no, in objection to your idea and rather poorly worded poll that biases people to vote yes. I would like small scale PvP, but not your arena style. Existing open PvP with new mechanics which open up more possibilities for small scale PvP is what I would support.
  • kevlarto_ESO
    kevlarto_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is.
    I was in Cyro tonight had, a few small scale battles, 3 to 4 on 3 to 4, a really good one on one, he could not kill me I could not kill him..LOL I find small scale pvp all the time in cyro, I don't need to sit in a que and face the same pre-mades over and over, thats just my personal view, I have played many small battle pvp games just gets really boring fast for me..

    But if they could come up with some small scale pvp that did not take away from the over all war effort, then I am good with that for an option, maybe when the Imperial city comes in, there might be even more small scale battles inside the city. :)
    Edited by kevlarto_ESO on August 23, 2014 2:35AM
  • smeeprocketnub19_ESO
    smeeprocketnub19_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is.
    Hang out at quest hubs on busy campaigns and you will get tons of small scale pvp.
    Dear Sister, I do not spread rumors, I create them.
  • Probitas
    Probitas
    ✭✭✭
    No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is.
    Fix the problems inherent in the system, then start branching out. What good is it to add even more areas of PvP where skills don't work properly, there are the same balancing issues, and they still haven't fixed all the classes yet?

    Let's focus on fixing things before we starting creating more problems with them.
  • jbreen95_ESO
    jbreen95_ESO
    ✭✭
    technohic wrote: »

    Wait until they start balancing it for for small scale where the discrepencies are much more noticed. Even worse when they go an make a ranking system. Such an [snip] fail.

    [Moderator Note: Edited per our rules on Cursing & Profanity]

    are you joking dude? you are arguing AGAINST balancing a game???? please just get outa here.

    we need small scale stuff(both pvp and pve) as a way to look at things under a microscope otherwise things will never be equal and fair. arena is a fantastic way to do this and it is long overdue.
  • jbreen95_ESO
    jbreen95_ESO
    ✭✭
    Probitas wrote: »
    Fix the problems inherent in the system, then start branching out. What good is it to add even more areas of PvP where skills don't work properly, there are the same balancing issues, and they still haven't fixed all the classes yet?

    Let's focus on fixing things before we starting creating more problems with them.

    arena will hammer out class problems way quicker than just letting cyrodiil do the same crap its already been doing for months.... the only things that are noticed are the very large game changing spells. whereas with arena there are more competitive 1v1 opportunities which will show where individual classes lack and excel. this will in turn make cyrodiil better as well
  • seneferab16_ESO
    seneferab16_ESO
    ✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    A bit fat NO to Arenas, a big massive YES to battlegrounds.
    Aerin Treerunner, pre dinner snack
  • kieso
    kieso
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is.
    you could find it in cyrodiil if you wanted.
  • BBSooner
    BBSooner
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is.
    Id prefer the focus to be on Cyrodiil and the upcoming imperial city.
  • Maverick827
    Maverick827
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    I'd like 10v10 battlegrounds that tie in to Cyrodiil somehow.

    Maybe something like a capture the flag game where each team tries to capture a magic crystal. The faction that wins the most matches in a day gets a faction-wide buff for the next day. The magic crystal puts a bubble around your keeps that reduces siege damage or some other lore-friendly justification (so you're not just capturing literal flags for no reason).
  • Nivzruo_ESO
    Nivzruo_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    Probitas wrote: »
    Fix the problems inherent in the system, then start branching out. What good is it to add even more areas of PvP where skills don't work properly, there are the same balancing issues, and they still haven't fixed all the classes yet?

    Let's focus on fixing things before we starting creating more problems with them.

    arena will hammer out class problems way quicker than just letting cyrodiil do the same crap its already been doing for months.... the only things that are noticed are the very large game changing spells. whereas with arena there are more competitive 1v1 opportunities which will show where individual classes lack and excel. this will in turn make cyrodiil better as well


    This guy nailed it.
    Nelgyntc- V14 NB
  • Kewljag_66_ESO
    Kewljag_66_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is.
    And yet all these 1v1, 2v2, and small skrimishes are in Curodiil, you just have to know the spots and the travel lines
  • smeeprocketnub19_ESO
    smeeprocketnub19_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is.
    Yea I've done plenty of small encounters. The great thing about cyrodiil is very little is preplanned and you have to be proactive to search out those fights. You also might bite off more than you can chew.

    I don't like the idea of limited pvp, tbh, not at all.
    Dear Sister, I do not spread rumors, I create them.
  • Stx
    Stx
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    Cyrodiil is laggy, and zergy. Any other avenue for PvP would make the game better. Yes you can sometimes find small scale battles, but honestly who has the time to go looking for that, without even knowing if you will find one, or that you won't just get overrun anyway?

    Small scale pvp requires more communication, personal skill, and helps balance the game(due to both teams having even numbers).

    Small scale is pure PvP, and more competitive.

    Siege pvp is great, massive battles can be fun(if the lag was fixed), and the war theme is cool. It shouldn't go away. But its time to add more to the game, it will make it better.
  • charley222
    charley222
    ✭✭✭✭
    i like smaller pvp instance spawn 20 vs 20 inside cyrodiil every hour and player will gain something too help the realm in cyrodiil maybe canon or special buff or special race maybe a big minotaur or giant idk something kool and useful to help the realm to push more or def ;)
    Edited by charley222 on August 27, 2014 11:51PM
    the wall of the covenant
  • Koopest
    Koopest
    ✭✭
    No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is.
    Arena , BG stuffs will ruin MMO.

    Zeni should focus on improving Cyorodiil and fix broken things instead of intoducing arena, bg to ESO
    Edited by Koopest on August 29, 2014 12:14AM
  • soulclaw
    soulclaw
    ✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    I don't like running with the zerg in wide open PvP, I prefer small scale PvP with an objective for the teams to compete over.
    Sweetie, can you show us on the doll where the bad man from Blizzard touched you?



  • Daethz
    Daethz
    ✭✭✭
    Hard to say.
    Arenas ruined WoW's pvp.
    if they add arenas i want arena and arena players to be second class citizens compared to Cyrodil.
    I dont want any game balance to be caused by them.

    And MMO's should be balanced on a 1v1 term.
    WoW is balanced for 3v3, which is terrible.
    Waiting, and watching, for the return of Melee Weapons.
    -Subsidiary of The Fighters Guild
  • I55UE5
    I55UE5
    ✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    I would like to see smaller scale PvP without a doubt. I believe there needs to be a contrast to PvE grinding to keep a handful of players interested. Unfortunately, Cyrodill zerg trains are not much a deviation from a grind.

    EDIT: Before anyone comments on it, I am aware you don't have to join zergs when in Cyrodill. The fact remains, however, that it is the easiest way to get alliance points and accomplish objective on the map.

    Small scale arenas will create many balance issues, which I sadly believe Zenimax can not deal with in a timely manner.

    This being said, I would like to see something slightly larger scale than an arena, a 12v12 battleground maybe. They might also make PvP like this objective based rather than deathmatch, in order to ease balance issues as well.
    Edited by I55UE5 on August 28, 2014 8:59AM
  • AtriasNaradan
    AtriasNaradan
    ✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    Yes, i would like Arena/Colloseum like how it is on Oblivion (TESIV) and at Reaper's March (ESO). About the number, 5v5 is the maximum, while 1v1 is a must.

    To avoid it from distracting people too much from Cyrodiil, it could just uses event based championship for prices, while for most of the times it will just give achievements at most. Also maybe make it only available for faction wide, where only some specific events makes it world wide.

    The important thing for me is duel, i would like to test my skill 1v1 without any third party interuption. So, a free + no-prize duel system should be added.
    Edited by AtriasNaradan on August 28, 2014 2:56PM
  • UnholyPerfection
    UnholyPerfection
    ✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    Helwyr wrote: »
    Voted no, in objection to your idea and rather poorly worded poll that biases people to vote yes. I would like small scale PvP, but not your arena style. Existing open PvP with new mechanics which open up more possibilities for small scale PvP is what I would support.

    Then your vote is yes lol.
  • GaldorP
    GaldorP
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is.
    I like the open world PvP in Cyrodiil.

    One side steam-rolling is only possible because...
    • Campaign-hopping is so easy and you can change your home and guest campaign every 3 days.
    • There's still too many campaigns (at least on the EU server).
    • AoE caps prevents small groups from having any chance of defending a keep against a zergball.

    There are three main incentives why it's done:
    • You get full PvP buffs from your home campaign no matter where you play (be it on another campaign or in PvE where these buffs are helpful for trial groups who are aiming for competitive times in the leaderboard; the buffs also make veteran dungeons easier for everyone).
    • You have it easier (in PvP) without missing out on anything (there is no noteworthy underdog bonus at the moment).
    • You have a lot more port options playing in a campaign where your side is dominating which makes the PvE content in Cyrodiil (skyshards, anchors, dungeons, quest nodes) a lot easier to access.

    The first two incentives are being addressed at the moment (campaign buffs should only work when you are in Cyordiil, in the campaign that grants the buffs, in the end, and the underdog bonus hopefilly will be significantly increased).

    Reducing the number of campaigns to 3-4 per server (would be enough, at least on the EU server except for prime-time on week-ends), giving them all the same duration of 14 days or 1 month and making campaign hopping only possible at the end of each cycle (with no guest campaign option anymore but only a home campaign) would help prevent it even further.

    As for AoE caps, we all know what should happen to them...
  • Mondo
    Mondo
    ✭✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    Arena
    Im not the Hero you need, im the Troll you deserve!
    - Survived the WoW Pre LK Rogue Forum "Come at me Bro" -

    L2P = Accept that DK is OP and stop complaining
  • guybrushtb16_ESO
    guybrushtb16_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    The most fun I've ever had in MMO PvP was Huttball in ToR. Although I do understand peoples concerns that balancing small scale PvP could mess up the large scale PvP and honestly that's a really good point and not something I thought of.

    Finally someone who shouts out for huttball! I loved those smaller scale instant queue gamemodes that were more objective based. Somehow my experience with wvw was that it always just degrades into mindless zerging where most people don't even really know how the objective works.
  • PharmaChief
    PharmaChief
    ✭✭✭
    Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP.
    For me even an one on one arena would be great. Yet the main problem i see is that once small scale pvp happens, the large scale pvp will die as many people will leave it. Still my hopes are up for an arena pvp mode or even a simple dueling option (That we don't have the last is unbelievable for me)
Sign In or Register to comment.