MercyKilling wrote: »wow, the point flew that high over your head huh?
Apparently it flew right over yours too.
Because comparing a video game to a cancer causing, highly addictive, life threatening substance is just like comparing Charles Manson to Bozo the Clown.
It's overdoing things more than a wee bit for no good reason.
We get it, you're not happy with the game. Please, do us all AND yourself a favor and just move on?
MercyKilling wrote: »wow, the point flew that high over your head huh?
Apparently it flew right over yours too.
Because comparing a video game to a cancer causing, highly addictive, life threatening substance is just like comparing Charles Manson to Bozo the Clown.
It's overdoing things more than a wee bit for no good reason.
We get it, you're not happy with the game. Please, do us all AND yourself a favor and just move on?
good god.......another one.........sigh....here we go......its about ignoring information passed down by people just because someone who disagrees with them tells you to do the opposite. The product is defective. period. and all your hate for people who post awareness isn't going to change that fact.
So he tells someone to try it out for themselves. lets say they do and turns out they hate it too. do they get their money back? nope. but then does he care or have any responsibility? nope.
Is the light starting to brighten? or do you require additional assistance?
Spottswoode wrote: »Having played MMO's since Ragnarok Online, I'm not surprised to see yet another "this game sucks because I'm at the level cap and I have nothing to do now"-ish thread complete with the customary pvp whining. I've made a number of these threads over the years, so I'm not dogging the OP or those who share his sentiments that much. I've been there.
I'll be the first to admit, I get bored after I reach the level cap. I don't like running infinite end game quests and only occasionally pvp, so when I reach the cap I make a new toon. I pick a new class and try something different. This kept me playing several mmos for a very long time. I did eventually quit playing all of those games but I never once experienced perfection, a total lack of frustration, no lag, total ownage in pvp. I have dealt with many, many bugs and issues over the years with both my machines and the games themselves.
The staff is working on the problems and must work on them in a schedule. This means that the development staff must work on a prioritization schedule that addresses what they need to keep going financially, keep the game functioning, keep players interested, and new ways to draw in new players as they can with their work schedule. The process is actually pretty long and is in constant motion as development for pretty much every MMO is ongoing by necessity. New content must be developed and generated for the long term prospects of the game. ZOS has to develop new content if they are going to attract new players or keep current subscribers. While bugs and complaints must be addressed for both of those, development of new content can take precedence over either.
Finance, however, takes the highest priority because the game would not stay online if they did not make it the foremost priority. So yes, if the staff had a bug that caused them to directly lose money, that would move to the top of the priority list. The game exists to make money. The company exists to make money. Claiming that ZOS is more interested in money than keeping every player is a declaration of the obvious. You're not making any point stating it.
ViciousWayz wrote: »<Puts original post into Google Translate> Results....: WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Yes rage more. What happened, got owned in PVP 100x over and blame it on lag? How can so many of us play and you can not? What MMO is perfect ---- without even considering that this game has only been out since April (or very very end of March with early access)? What MMO is perfect after 10 years? NONE. There will always be problems, and ZOS team work on each issue and sometimes (if you knew anything about programming) other issues that would seem unrelated can sprout up from fixing different ones.
No game is perfect, but this is right now my favorite MMO to play. List an MMO I most likely played it, including Archeage, Wildstar, etc..
Apparently this game is not for you OP. So with that, take care!
ViciousWayz wrote: »<Puts original post into Google Translate> Results....: WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Yes rage more. What happened, got owned in PVP 100x over and blame it on lag? How can so many of us play and you can not? What MMO is perfect ---- without even considering that this game has only been out since April (or very very end of March with early access)? What MMO is perfect after 10 years? NONE. There will always be problems, and ZOS team work on each issue and sometimes (if you knew anything about programming) other issues that would seem unrelated can sprout up from fixing different ones.
No game is perfect, but this is right now my favorite MMO to play. List an MMO I most likely played it, including Archeage, Wildstar, etc..
Apparently this game is not for you OP. So with that, take care!
I was gonna respond to you.....but i think there are laws against abusing a minor.

ViciousWayz wrote: »ViciousWayz wrote: »<Puts original post into Google Translate> Results....: WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Yes rage more. What happened, got owned in PVP 100x over and blame it on lag? How can so many of us play and you can not? What MMO is perfect ---- without even considering that this game has only been out since April (or very very end of March with early access)? What MMO is perfect after 10 years? NONE. There will always be problems, and ZOS team work on each issue and sometimes (if you knew anything about programming) other issues that would seem unrelated can sprout up from fixing different ones.
No game is perfect, but this is right now my favorite MMO to play. List an MMO I most likely played it, including Archeage, Wildstar, etc..
Apparently this game is not for you OP. So with that, take care!
I was gonna respond to you.....but i think there are laws against abusing a minor.
Says the guy who doesn't know what Rated M implies about the minimum age of community members.
Again, WAHHHHHHH here, have some Kleenex:
I don't see it as acceptable, but I do tolerate it because it is a limitation of the system itself. Prioritization causes most of those problems to occur, because the staff can't, frankly, fix everything at once. Gradual bug fixes are a reality and a necessity. Complaining about the slow process will not necessarily make it go faster.
hahaha and yet you continually tolerate and even see this as acceptable. the end game in this is cyrodiil. and its broken. its completely broken. ZoS continually pushes out patches with known bugs. that's a fact. Why is it ok for a company to completely ignore the group of people who have already paid them in order to sign up new people to ignore when they complain about their broken product? Why do people tolerate this?
They care because they lose money when people unsubscribe. By necessity, they will have to address the issues with the game. They make an attempt to keep subscribers but they have to work on a pretty long schedule and don't have time to address every single complaint. They will fix the issues, but they need time to fix them. If you can't wait, it's not their fault.I wonder how many thousands of subs ZoS lost because of all these issues? they could care less. why? because they don't have to refund anyones money. By not addressing these game breaking issues ZoS is saying, "who cares if you quit. bye. thanks for the cash." while they power on to rob new people.
By all means please vote with your money. It is the strongest way to make the staff pay attention. They do have to address the issues. But they will most definitely need more time to do it.Why doesn't anyone else see the benefit in standing in front of the ZOS theft train and telling people not to sign up? By choking their profits on the front end it forces them to push the brakes and address the profit bleeding on the back end by fixing the game. current player base preventing new player base from paying + current player base unsubbing and expressing the issues = ZOS having to take responsibility and fix things or quit.
anyone else see this?
Spottswoode wrote: »I don't see it as acceptable, but I do tolerate it because it is a limitation of the system itself. Prioritization causes most of those problems to occur, because the staff can't, frankly, fix everything at once. Gradual bug fixes are a reality and a necessity. Complaining about the slow process will not necessarily make it go faster.
hahaha and yet you continually tolerate and even see this as acceptable. the end game in this is cyrodiil. and its broken. its completely broken. ZoS continually pushes out patches with known bugs. that's a fact. Why is it ok for a company to completely ignore the group of people who have already paid them in order to sign up new people to ignore when they complain about their broken product? Why do people tolerate this?They care because they lose money when people unsubscribe. By necessity, they will have to address the issues with the game. They make an attempt to keep subscribers but they have to work on a pretty long schedule and don't have time to address every single complaint. They will fix the issues, but they need time to fix them. If you can't wait, it's not their fault.I wonder how many thousands of subs ZoS lost because of all these issues? they could care less. why? because they don't have to refund anyones money. By not addressing these game breaking issues ZoS is saying, "who cares if you quit. bye. thanks for the cash." while they power on to rob new people.By all means please vote with your money. It is the strongest way to make the staff pay attention. They do have to address the issues. But they will most definitely need more time to do it.Why doesn't anyone else see the benefit in standing in front of the ZOS theft train and telling people not to sign up? By choking their profits on the front end it forces them to push the brakes and address the profit bleeding on the back end by fixing the game. current player base preventing new player base from paying + current player base unsubbing and expressing the issues = ZOS having to take responsibility and fix things or quit.
anyone else see this?