ThatHappyCat wrote: »Yes but 40v40 isn't exactly what I have in mind with "smaller scale".
ThatHappyCat wrote: »Yes but 40v40 isn't exactly what I have in mind with "smaller scale".
Nox_Aeterna wrote: »Your pool answers are ... quite few and limited i would say.
Personally im happy with cyro , at most i could consider playing in BGs that had also lots of player inside at the same time playing with neat objectives , but i wouldnt play in arenas and such with few players.
Always found PvP with few players in MMOs to be boring.
Still i dont have something that goes directly against them adding outside balance issues that arenas always bring. IF zen adds them right , maybe even making them like GW2 where all their gear and balance is divided from the rest of the game , i wouldnt mind the devs adding them.
If they dont , then we will have 10 times the amount of balance issues threads we have today , the current balance is NOT at ALL made for small group fights.
UnholyPerfection wrote: »Nox_Aeterna wrote: »Your pool answers are ... quite few and limited i would say.
Personally im happy with cyro , at most i could consider playing in BGs that had also lots of player inside at the same time playing with neat objectives , but i wouldnt play in arenas and such with few players.
Always found PvP with few players in MMOs to be boring.
Still i dont have something that goes directly against them adding outside balance issues that arenas always bring. IF zen adds them right , maybe even making them like GW2 where all their gear and balance is divided from the rest of the game , i wouldnt mind the devs adding them.
If they dont , then we will have 10 times the amount of balance issues threads we have today , the current balance is NOT at ALL made for small group fights.
It's really a yes or no question?
Nox_Aeterna wrote: »UnholyPerfection wrote: »Nox_Aeterna wrote: »Your pool answers are ... quite few and limited i would say.
Personally im happy with cyro , at most i could consider playing in BGs that had also lots of player inside at the same time playing with neat objectives , but i wouldnt play in arenas and such with few players.
Always found PvP with few players in MMOs to be boring.
Still i dont have something that goes directly against them adding outside balance issues that arenas always bring. IF zen adds them right , maybe even making them like GW2 where all their gear and balance is divided from the rest of the game , i wouldnt mind the devs adding them.
If they dont , then we will have 10 times the amount of balance issues threads we have today , the current balance is NOT at ALL made for small group fights.
It's really a yes or no question?
"Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP."
No i would not personally , im happy playing the current PvP.
"No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is."
I dont mind them adding other kinds of PvP for those that enjoy those , i just want them to add them right so it doesnt break my form of PvP/PvE.
UnholyPerfection wrote: »Nox_Aeterna wrote: »UnholyPerfection wrote: »Nox_Aeterna wrote: »Your pool answers are ... quite few and limited i would say.
Personally im happy with cyro , at most i could consider playing in BGs that had also lots of player inside at the same time playing with neat objectives , but i wouldnt play in arenas and such with few players.
Always found PvP with few players in MMOs to be boring.
Still i dont have something that goes directly against them adding outside balance issues that arenas always bring. IF zen adds them right , maybe even making them like GW2 where all their gear and balance is divided from the rest of the game , i wouldnt mind the devs adding them.
If they dont , then we will have 10 times the amount of balance issues threads we have today , the current balance is NOT at ALL made for small group fights.
It's really a yes or no question?
"Yes I would love to play some smaller scale PvP."
No i would not personally , im happy playing the current PvP.
"No, I want the only PvP available to stay as is."
I dont mind them adding other kinds of PvP for those that enjoy those , i just want them to add them right so it doesnt break my form of PvP/PvE.
While I understand where you're coming (and I did pause and consider a third option) from I don't understand why people would vote against adding something that others would enjoy and that wouldn't effect them at all.
Nivzruo_ESO wrote: »10v10 /15v15 CTF & KoTH matches, also 2v2 arena or 2v2v2 ... But most importantly we need a death match type game, no pve non sense.
Nivzruo_ESO wrote: »10v10 /15v15 CTF & KoTH matches, also 2v2 arena or 2v2v2 ... But most importantly we need a death match type game, no pve non sense.
Go to WoW, their you have your FPS Style PvP.
No need for it in ESO. If you want 4v4 PvP go to Cyrodiil. Use the Board to make up a spot where no Zergs are running and roam up there for Grp PvP.
Worked in DAOC as well, but today every one seems to need an instance that ports you to the action instead of organize it for yourself...
4 on 4, 2 on 2 and dueling.. yes sir