Ifthir_ESO wrote: »
This is the type of fighting that should be happening, the Fengrush's vs. the Alacrity's, and then of course, all of you getting murdered by the EP's
So what's the deal with Team Orange? DC too strong for you guys?
Dleatherus wrote: »a week or two ago it was team purple - this week it might be team orange - next week team green
such are the politics of AvAvA, whether they are put together by a council of opposing faction leaders, or simply in game as a response to what is happening on the map
D.
Dleatherus wrote: »a week or two ago it was team purple - this week it might be team orange - next week team green
such are the politics of AvAvA, whether they are put together by a council of opposing faction leaders, or simply in game as a response to what is happening on the map
D.
Aoe_Barbecue wrote: »Dleatherus wrote: »a week or two ago it was team purple - this week it might be team orange - next week team green
such are the politics of AvAvA, whether they are put together by a council of opposing faction leaders, or simply in game as a response to what is happening on the map
D.
I have it all but confirmed that major cooperation occurs between AD and EP guilds ... but that's not an issue because its been done before and it's a legitimate aspect of AvA politics. We've fought through it before and will do it again; one bad day won't ruin anything.
I am interested in the nature of the agreement though. Red and Yellow still want to win, respectively. This means someone has to f*ck over someone at some point. It is furthermore a concession of sorts that Blue Master Race is the single largest threat, since despite the impassioned cries of certain people (;)) all factions pop-lock and all factions have pretty zergish zerging going on. Thus, Blue Ubermensch dominance boils down to the superior coordination of our pugs and the superior play of No Mercy.
I know for certain (since I have EP friends) that a significant Red thinks they will easily crush AD once they have enough of a lead on DC. I have less AD friends but I assume a similar attitude prevails as well. This implies both realize neither can defeat Blue Master Race on their own, and betrayal is the logical course of order within this tentative alliance as well.
Aoe_Barbecue wrote: »Dleatherus wrote: »a week or two ago it was team purple - this week it might be team orange - next week team green
such are the politics of AvAvA, whether they are put together by a council of opposing faction leaders, or simply in game as a response to what is happening on the map
D.
I have it all but confirmed that major cooperation occurs between AD and EP guilds ... but that's not an issue because its been done before and it's a legitimate aspect of AvA politics. We've fought through it before and will do it again; one bad day won't ruin anything.
I am interested in the nature of the agreement though. Red and Yellow still want to win, respectively. This means someone has to f*ck over someone at some point. It is furthermore a concession of sorts that Blue Master Race is the single largest threat, since despite the impassioned cries of certain people (;)) all factions pop-lock and all factions have pretty zergish zerging going on. Thus, Blue Ubermensch dominance boils down to the superior coordination of our pugs and the superior play of No Mercy.
I know for certain (since I have EP friends) that a significant Red thinks they will easily crush AD once they have enough of a lead on DC. I have less AD friends but I assume a similar attitude prevails as well. This implies both realize neither can defeat Blue Master Race on their own, and betrayal is the logical course of order within this tentative alliance as well.
alacrity
IKilled007 wrote: »
who?
IKilled007 wrote: »alacrity
Shouldn't you guys all be lying face down in the dirt?
With love, No Mercy.IKilled007 wrote: »
who?
No Mercy. If you don't know who we are, set your PvP campaign to Thornblade; click "J"; click the trophy tab (farthest icon on the top right); See the first 11 places on the server leaderboard? 9 of those are us. (Tripwyr and Kaghei are the exceptions at 5th and 10th, respectively.) Now click the "Daggerfall Covenant" option on the left; Scroll down to 21st on the leaderboard. No Mercy is 1st through 21st there. Now you know who we are!
Very nice to meet you, @Lowbei!
IKilled007 wrote: »alacrity
Shouldn't you guys all be lying face down in the dirt?
With love, No Mercy.IKilled007 wrote: »
who?
No Mercy. If you don't know who we are, set your PvP campaign to Thornblade; click "J"; click the trophy tab (farthest icon on the top right); See the first 11 places on the server leaderboard? 9 of those are us. (Tripwyr and Kaghei are the exceptions at 5th and 10th, respectively.) Now click the "Daggerfall Covenant" option on the left; Scroll down to 21st on the leaderboard. No Mercy is 1st through 21st there. Now you know who we are!
Very nice to meet you, @Lowbei!
hello, nice to meet you as well.
however, time invested doesnt equal skill, and since you seem to run a zerg, i have to assume the worst, and thus wouldnt group any of you, no offense.
if you aim to impress (you certainly talk the talk) then i look forward to you breaking that zerg down into real groups and "competing".
Dleatherus wrote: »a week or two ago it was team purple - this week it might be team orange - next week team green
such are the politics of AvAvA, whether they are put together by a council of opposing faction leaders, or simply in game as a response to what is happening on the map
D.
Dleatherus wrote: »a week or two ago it was team purple - this week it might be team orange - next week team green
such are the politics of AvAvA, whether they are put together by a council of opposing faction leaders, or simply in game as a response to what is happening on the map
D.
There will never be a team green
IKilled007 wrote: »
We field between 12 and 18 players 90% of the time -- not even 5 full groups. Your definition of zerg is unusual and not one I've encountered before. I wasn't aiming to impress at all. I wanted to introduce you to our guild and now you can see our names and find us (or avoid us, since we're not skilled enough to run with you) in game.
IKilled007 wrote: »
We field between 12 and 18 players 90% of the time -- not even 5 full groups. Your definition of zerg is unusual and not one I've encountered before. I wasn't aiming to impress at all. I wanted to introduce you to our guild and now you can see our names and find us (or avoid us, since we're not skilled enough to run with you) in game.
more like 18-32 players
IKilled007 wrote: »alacrity
Shouldn't you guys all be lying face down in the dirt?
With love, No Mercy.IKilled007 wrote: »
who?
No Mercy. If you don't know who we are, set your PvP campaign to Thornblade; click "J"; click the trophy tab (farthest icon on the top right); See the first 11 places on the server leaderboard? 9 of those are us. (Tripwyr and Kaghei are the exceptions at 5th and 10th, respectively.) Now click the "Daggerfall Covenant" option on the left; Scroll down to 21st on the leaderboard. No Mercy is 1st through 21st there. Now you know who we are!
Very nice to meet you, @Lowbei!
Aoe_Barbecue wrote: »
the average size of the pvp guilds on each faction (in my experience) ranges from:
crystalized's group: ~ 6 -14
alacrity: ~ 6-14
TYSM: ~12-24
no mercy: ~18-32
EG: ~75-125
IKilled007 wrote: »IKilled007 wrote: »alacrity
Shouldn't you guys all be lying face down in the dirt?
With love, No Mercy.IKilled007 wrote: »
who?
No Mercy. If you don't know who we are, set your PvP campaign to Thornblade; click "J"; click the trophy tab (farthest icon on the top right); See the first 11 places on the server leaderboard? 9 of those are us. (Tripwyr and Kaghei are the exceptions at 5th and 10th, respectively.) Now click the "Daggerfall Covenant" option on the left; Scroll down to 21st on the leaderboard. No Mercy is 1st through 21st there. Now you know who we are!
Very nice to meet you, @Lowbei!
hello, nice to meet you as well.
however, time invested doesnt equal skill, and since you seem to run a zerg, i have to assume the worst, and thus wouldnt group any of you, no offense.
if you aim to impress (you certainly talk the talk) then i look forward to you breaking that zerg down into real groups and "competing".
We field between 12 and 18 players 90% of the time -- not even 5 full groups. Your definition of zerg is unusual and not one I've encountered before. I wasn't aiming to impress at all. I wanted to introduce you to our guild and now you can see our names and find us (or avoid us, since we're not skilled enough to run with you) in game.
Aoe_Barbecue wrote: »
i dont really like TYSM, but in their defense they usually have about 1/3rd the number of players that EG runs, srsly